theories weredeveloped independently, they have been integrated to get better understanding of the “self”(Stets and Burke, 2000).Self-determination theory (SDT) derives from social psychology, and it relates to the motivationbehind people’s choices in the absence of external influences. Its roots are in comparing intrinsicand extrinsic motives and the understanding of the dominant role that intrinsic motivation playsin individual behavior. Intrinsic motivation refers to doing an activity for the inherent satisfactionor enjoyment it brings to an individual, and not because of external pressures or rewards such assatisfaction, self-esteem, competence, and pro-social behavior (Ryan & Deci, 2000). In contrast,extrinsic motivation refers to doing
swath of students. We do not develop an argument for the benefits of entrepreneurship education becausethat has been done so well by previous scholars. For more information about the benefits andvarious definitions of entrepreneurship education, we refer you to studies by Putro et al., (2022);Boldureanu et al. (2020); Gianiodis and Meek (2020); Ahmed et al. (2020); and Brune and Lutz(2020). The paper now turns to the main goals and curriculum practices of entrepreneurshipeducation at the high school level.entrepreneurship education in high school Many scholars have argued for the benefits of entrepreneurship education for highschools students, particularly when the entrepreneurship program is connected to STEMeducation as well as
innovative culture, and York University focused onentrepreneurial mindset in the core curriculum for undergraduate engineering and computerscience students. The program culture aspect does not fit well in the current constructive alignmentmodel; however, it is an important element that can potentially influence the learning outcomesand program design as identified by the educators.4. DiscussionEntrepreneurship education is expanding in Canada, with over 245 programs identified from 65universities. On average, each university offers four different programs, demonstrating thediversity and complexity of entrepreneurship program offerings. While these offerings are notlimited to the college of engineering, they provide multiple pathways for students
engineers. The main research question this poses is how doesconcept mapping affect STEM students' understanding of entrepreneurial mindset?ABET Computing Criteria lists these three student outcomes: 1. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. 2. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles. 3. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline. [2] 1In order to implement these principles effectively, the research team integrated an activity that
beyond. Four essential learning areas for ENI-SE emerged: Mastery by Doing,Real-world Connectivity, Interdisciplinary Exposure, and Supportive Learning Environment.We discuss how these areas were realized in ME310 and provide examples from otherengineering courses. Furthermore, we hypothesize how features of these four areas might beadapted or adopted more broadly in the engineering curriculum. These findings not onlyhighlight the overlap between entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education butalso offer a blueprint for integrating these key pedagogical practices into existing curriculardesigns, equipping students to become creators, drivers, and forerunners of novel ideas andchange.Keywords: Embracing New Ideas, Self-Efficacy
research productivity (e.g., papers published). However, weacknowledge that excellent undergraduate research experiences often lead to peer-reviewed publicationsand help faculty career progression.In partnership with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), a workshop has been held forfour summers to help faculty integrate the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into their work with researchstudents. We are interested in exploring the impact of this work on participation and sharing our findingswith the broader engineering community.Research questions: 1. How can faculty use an EM to adjust their approach to research activities and student mentoring? 2. What structures/practices from the workshop help faculty adjust their approach to
Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations across K-12 and higher education, including programs and research spanning STEM, engineering, and computer science. Currently, she is focusing on inventiveness– how to define it, how to measure it, and how to cultivate it. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Impact of Invention Education Participation on Students' Confidence and Anxiety in STEMAbstractInvention education plays a crucial role in the K-12 setting as it creates a culture of innovationand critical thinking from an early age. It
aims to address this challenge through theintroduction of an innovative multi-disciplinary project-based pilot course called "InnovationThrough Making".The "Innovation Through Making" course blends Entrepreneurial Mindset skills with coreEngineering Sciences (ES) curriculum providing aspiring engineers with a fundamentalunderstanding of knowledge and skills necessary for success in specialized areas of engineering,including mechanical, electrical, civil, chemical, and computer engineering. By mastering thecore engineering sciences, students develop a strong analytical and problem-solving ability thatis essential for success in the field of engineering [7-8].In this work-in-progress paper, we explore the development of the pilot course and aim
Paper ID #38811Re-Evaluating the Examination of Minoritized Social Identities amongI-Corps Hub Program ParticipantsDr. Alanna Epstein, University of Michigan Alanna D. Epstein is an Assistant Research Scientist studying motivation, instruction, and entrepreneurial outcomes in the context of the NSF Innovation Corps (”I-Corps”) training program. She received her Ph.D. from the Combined Program in Education and Psychology at the University of Michigan, and her Bachelor’s degree in psychology was completed at Oberlin College. Her dissertation work focused on the longitudinal development high school students’ motivational
, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)An integral component of the study was the examination of DEI efforts within the course toensure a diverse and inclusive educational environment. Efforts to create an inclusive classroomenvironment were complemented by curriculum development initiatives designed to reflect awide range of perspectives, ensuring that content was relevant and accessible to all students.Active recruitment strategies targeted students from underrepresented groups in engineering,fostering a richer, more diverse learning community. Furthermore, the deliberate formation ofdiverse student teams was pivotal in promoting multidisciplinary collaboration and knowledgeexchange, enhancing the learning experience. The involvement of a diverse array of
emphasize the connectedness of people and theenvironment [10]; however, particularly in engineering degree programs, early coursework doesnot emphasize the connectedness of people and the environment [8, 9]. Therefore, NativeAmerican students who may not see/engage in this aspect may be particularly at risk of losingmotivation for - and possibly leaving - their engineering majors [1]. These issues contribute tolow Native American representation and deprive the U.S. of an opportunity to increase diversityto solve better engineering problems and design innovative solutions that benefit more people[11].A 2012 study from Lesley University indicates Arts integration in STEM stimulates deeplearning and increases student engagement among minority students
Methods section. To conclude thissegment, we provide the research question pursued in this paper which has an exploratory nature:Research question: How does bringing Entrepreneurial Mindset to the design of machinerythrough a bio-inspired design project with aesthetic objectives impact students’ self-reportedexperiences?2. Literature Review2.1 Lack of Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning Integrated Across EngineeringCoursesMost engineering education today does not adequately equip students to address complexand ill-structured technical problems that involve different stakeholders, uncertainty in the successcriteria, and interdisciplinary application of knowledge. Such problems are called wicked problems[3] and constitute some of the most
Paper ID #41330Co-Developing a Social Entrepreneurship Program with a Focus on EngineeringDr. Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Texas Tech University Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Texas Tech University, as well as the Associate Dean of the Graduate School. Her research emerges at the intersection of Educational Technology, Pedagogical Innovation, Personalized Learning, Diversity and Equity Issues, and Global Studies. Greenhalgh-Spencer explores practices of using technology and pedagogical innovation to create engaged learning in both formal and
meaning and purpose.McAdams writes, “the I becomes an autobiographical author; the Me becomes the story it tells”[17].As such, in modern society, storytelling can be leveraged in a variety of ways to support socialcohesion, identity discovery, and sensemaking to positively impact even the engineeringclassroom. For example, the Academic Pathways Study found that for some engineeringstudents, an engineering career was not necessarily the expected end goal (14% definitely not,12% probably not, and 8% unsure) [18]. This data highlights that learning, even in anengineering curriculum, should be broad enough to support students headed to a variety ofcareers that may be related or adjacent to STEM fields.In fact, students’ expectations for the value of
students.Additionally, there is a growing consensus that entrepreneurial competencies should be an integralpart of the industrial engineering curriculum. This integration helps to balance the demandsbetween traditional employment and entrepreneurial activities, promoting entrepreneurship as aviable career option beyond the confines of business schools [16]. The influence of collaborativelearning on entrepreneurship in higher education has also been documented. A study shows apositive and significant impact of collaborative learning on students' engagement inentrepreneurial activities, with indirect effects mediated by entrepreneurial culture quantified at28.29% and 6.6% [17]. This underscores the importance of collaborative learning as a tool toenhance