engineering (in the field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics) from Cornell University.Dr. Michael Machas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Incorporating an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Online Introduction to Engineering Courses: A Study of Value CreationShort AbstractThis study examines the impact of integrating entrepreneurially minded learning (EML)principles into an online Introduction to Engineering course at Arizona State University. Theintervention focused on value creation, encouraging students to consider the political, economic,social, technological, legal, and environmental impacts of their designs. Quantitative data frompre- and post-surveys were analyzed using independent t
location.Many of these venues are open to all faculty, although we specifically recruited participants fromengineering and computer science disciplines to participate in the workshops.Workshop Development and MaterialsThe overall goals of the faculty development workshops are to 1) improve faculty engagement inundergraduate research experiences, and 2) integrate an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) intoresearch mentoring. To achieve these goals, we developed two main workshops addressing howto empower students with an entrepreneurial mindset in research [10]: How to InvolveUndergraduates in Research and Why Involve Undergrads in Research. Both workshops buildon the three principles of the entrepreneurial mindset - “curiosity”, “connections”, and
Paper ID #47272Exploring Creative Productivity: Development of an Engineering CreativityAssessment Tool (ECAT)Dr. Zeynep Gonca Akdemir-Beveridge, University of Connecticut Zeynep G. Akdemir-Beveridge is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Connecticut. Her current research focuses on exploring the creative productivity of engineering students and promoting strength-based approaches in engineering education to better support neurodiverse learning profiles in STEM/engineering learning environments. Her doctoral research centered on K–12 curriculum development specifically tailored to quantum information
contemporary digital era, small business owners encounter mounting pressure to adapt toevolving market demands, frequently with constrained access to data analytics resources. Thisstudy investigates how Knime, a complementary data analytics platform, enables entrepreneurs tomake informed, evidence-based decisions by analyzing customer behavior, market trends, andoperational efficiency. By employing Knime, businesses can optimize processes, personalizeservices, and identify growth opportunities. This study examines the integration of Knime traininginto the Be an Entrepreneur program, highlighting its role in fostering innovation, improvingdecision-making, and enhancing the competitiveness of new ventures in Colombia's dynamicbusiness environment. The
, “Design Essential #2: Professional Skill Development,” in Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the University: An Integrative Approach, L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 55–63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-79050-9_6.[4] “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer.” Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/epdf/10.1061/9780784415221[5] A. L. Welker, K. M. Sample-Lord, and J. R. Yost, “Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineering Curriculum,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
cultivate an EM in engineeringeducation by promoting the three Cs. These approaches engage students in active learning byproviding partial information and foster independent problem-solving, require teamwork tointegrate knowledge, and provide deeper connections to real-world applications. Studies haveshown that jigsaw methods, whether applied in digital communication systems,[7] biomedicalengineering,[8] or online game-based learning,[9] enhance engagement, critical thinking, andcreative problem-solving. Santiago and Guo[7] applied the KEEN EM framework to a digitalcommunication systems course using jigsaw activities that were integrated into learningmodules, requiring students to research emerging topics such as the Internet of Things
identifyTpatterns and assess changes in themes between pre- and post-surveys. Some students received a post-survey with wording intended for pre-experience use, which influenced their open-ended responses. Misaligned responses were omitted to preserve the accuracy and integrity of the findings. Thematic coding, the qualitative analysis method used in this study of first-year engineering students who studied abroad, involved identifying recurring patterns, organizing them into themes, and refining those themes to gain deeper insights into students' experiences [13]. Specifically, questions 38 and 39 of the pre- and post-surveys were analyzed to evaluate the study abroad programs' impact and outcomes. oncept Maps as an
with multiple deadlines can help students.IncubatorOverview: An intensive on campus workshop (called the WEU Incubator) was delivered to providein-depth education to faculty on the 6 Cs of EM with year-long coaching to implement EM incourses. As a KEEN partner school, we had five golden tickets (i.e., all travel expenses covered) toaward for faculty to travel to Engineering Unleashed Faculty Development opportunities, but NCState is large with almost 500 full-time faculty in the College of Engineering. With natural turnover,five trained faculty each year would not spread these concepts much at all. Our workshop wasinspired by the hugely-successful Integrating the Curriculum workshop from KEEN’s EngineeringUnleashed Faculty Development [6
Paper ID #46967Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies in Engineering Students: AComparative Analysis between In-Person and Online EducationProf. Barbara Munoz-Vallejos, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile B´arbara Estefan´ıa Mu˜noz Vallejos, M.Sc., is an Assistant Professor and faculty member at the School of Engineering, Universidad Andr´es Bello (UNAB), Chile. She holds a degree in Psychology and a Bachelor’s in Psychology from Universidad del Desarrollo (2008). Additionally, she earned a Master’s degree in Curriculum Development and Educational Projects from Universidad Andr´es Bello (2019–2021). She has also
, simulationof entrepreneurial activity may also occur earlier in the ME curriculum [2]. Pre and post studentsurveys show no statistically significant change in entrepreneurial affects resulting from thisinteraction, though. Unsurprisingly, the literature holds examples of pedagogy meant toencourage potential enterprises based on engineering innovation. Wang and Kleepe describe acapstone course for ME and EE seniors that incorporates legal, financial and venture capitalconsiderations alongside engineering prototyping as part of an effort to develop a new product[3]. Their qualitative and quantitative assessments of the educational intervention found that itmet their learning objectives using a format desired by their students. Moreover, the
with the real-world demands of entrepreneurship.Potential solutions may be investigated to tackle the identified gaps in the development ofcompetencies within current academic programs, considering the viewpoints of different scholarsand research [42]. Consequently, finding common ground in how entrepreneurial competenciesshould be integrated into the curriculum is a critical challenge for higher education institutions.Another point of discussion in the literature is the integration of terminal objectives and proceduralelements in entrepreneurship education [43]. An effective mediator, using creativity, collaboration,and motivation, guides conflicts towards calm, harmony, and self-reflection. This approach, whichfosters the development of
curriculum writer, but quickly evolved to reflect her passion for supporting the tactical details of large-scale programs and product development and dissemination. Ashley is currently engaged in research on behalf of NIHF as a member of the Strategic Data Project Fellowship, a program of the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University.Roxanne A. Moore Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Roxanne Moore is currently a Principal Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC) and Mechanical Engineering. She has spent her 12+ year research faculty career focusing on broadening participation in STEM and creating novel
, Columbus, Ohio, p. 27460. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27460.[17]Patrick, A., Borrego, M., and Prybutok, A., 2018, “Predicting Persistence in Engineering through an Engineering Identity Scale.” https://doi.org/10.15781/T2ZC7SB9J.[18]Hughes, B., Schell, W., Tallman, B., Beigel, R., Annand, E., and Kwapisz, M., 2019, “Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, Tampa, Florida, p. 32674. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32674.[19]Blake Hylton, J., Mikesell, D., Yoder, J.-D., and LeBlanc, H., 2020, “Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrep. Educ. Pedagogy, 3(1), pp. 86
and educational data mining toanalyze the impact of learning coaches and project mentors more effectively.IntroductionInnovation-Based Learning (IBL) is an educational approach designed to equip students withcritical skills for addressing real-world challenges [1]. Unlike traditional project-based learning(PBL), which often emphasizes theoretical applications, IBL fosters creativity, collaboration, andcritical thinking through open-ended projects that address complex, real-world problems [2]. IBLencourages students to identify gaps in knowledge, propose innovative solutions, and iterativelyrefine their ideas to create meaningful value beyond the classroom. Integrating core engineeringconcepts with experiential learning, IBL aims to cultivate
fromexisting programs.Academic programs at other institutions typically emphasize physical design or digitalexperience. Our aim was to create a curriculum that integrates both. To address this, wedeveloped two options for tracks: (i) Physical Design + Manufacturing, and (ii) Digital UserExperience + AI.We reached this point by the start of summer term and then stalled due to the FAB consisting of9-month faculty. University leadership and the Deans wanted the program to launch in Fall 2025and so it needed to be approved by our Board of Regents in their November 2024 meeting. Thisrequired an accelerated timeline to develop the curricular details of the program and to seekfeedback so that it would be ready for approval by the curriculum committees in
designing an enterprise network; (2)the Question Formulation Technique (QFT), which focuses on enhancing student curiosity and theability to formulate questions, and (3) the Need-Approach-Benefits/Costs-Competition (NABC)framework, which provides a formulaic approach to crafting compelling value propositions. In theNetworks and Data Communications course, these frameworks are used in lab activities, a casestudy assignment, an exploratory research paper, and a design project.Network professionals may fail to consider potential threats until a severe intrusion occurs. Toaddress this gap, the course integrates the outcome of “Considering risk as a factor when designingand configuring an enterprise network” to encourage students to understand the
strongcharacter, inspired by quality education, driven by an entrepreneurial mindset, and guided by thedesire to create value for others [2]. One such effort launched in 2005 is the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN), which aims “to reach all undergraduate engineering students withan entrepreneurial mindset (EM) so they can create personal, economic, and societal valuethrough a lifetime of meaningful work [3].” Faculty at nearly 70 institutions across the UnitedStates emphasize the “3Cs” of an entrepreneurial mindset as defined by KEEN: empoweringstudents with an insatiable curiosity to investigate a rapidly changing world, fosteringconnections to integrate the pursuit of knowledge as a means for revealing innovative solutions,and championing
educational programming. Her research and evaluation has focused on educational programs, outreach and collective impact activities that foster inclusion and equity in computing and engineering. College student development and faculty career development are central themes across her body of work, which focuses on focus on capacity building in research and evaluation, organizational change in STEM education, and integration of computing into pedagogy.Dr. Praveen Ramaprabhu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University. Involvement includes working as an Undergraduate Research Associate and Lead Undergraduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Program within the Department of Engineering Education. Research interests focus on sense of belonging, concept mapping, instrument content validation, and metacognition.Sydney Cooper, The Ohio State University Sydney Cooper is pursuing her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include inclusion in engineering.Dr. Krista M
locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 57, no. 5, 1989.[31] F. Guay, G. A. Mageau and R. J. Vallerand, "On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: a test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effects," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 8, 2003.[32] A. Ünlü, "Adjusting Potentially Confounded Scoring Protocols for Motivation Aggregation in Organismic Integration Theory: An Exemplification with the Relative Autonomy or Self-Determination Index," Frontiers in Psychology, 2016.[33] J. D. Stolk, M. D. Gross and Y. V. Zastavker, "Motivation, pedagogy, and gender: examining the
Campus and played a key role in launching the bioengineering PhD program and undergraduate minor, brewing innovation undergraduate minor, and UO’s undergraduate major in data science. Prior to joining the Knight Campus, Nathan earned his PhD in mechanical engineering and applied mechanics at the University of Pennsylvania, where he investigated the effects of ageing and degeneration on intervertebral disc biomechanics. Nathan earned his BS in bioengineering at the University of Utah. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP More than its parts: Integrating a science communicator into an engineering program with an innovation and entrepreneurship focusThis work in progress
University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include sense of belonging in engineering and curriculum development in the first year programs.Shukufe Rahman, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education.Dr. Adam R Carberry, The Ohio State University Dr. Adam R. Carberry is Professor and Chair in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts
are a component of the full mindset and represent a desired learningoutcome for the entrepreneurial thinking curriculum that was created to assist engineering faculty inawakening and engendering an entrepreneurial mindset as part of engineering education. The overallgoal is for students to: “DEMONSTRATE constant curiosity about our changing world; EXPLORE acontrarian view of solutions; INTEGRATE information from many sources to gain insight; ASSESS andMANAGE risk; IDENTIFY unexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value; and PERSIST throughand learn from failure [1 at page 5].”The second part of the KEEN Framework contains three parts: DESIGN, OPPORTUNITY, and IMPACT.Design is where we see the application of the mindset in the form of
isincorporated. Backward course design [18] provides an effective structure to accomplish this.The quantity, variety, and accessibility of generative AI platforms continues to evolve. As thesetools become more integrated and embedded into existing digital applications, it is imperative toteach engineering students how to use them effectively and efficiently in their professionalendeavors that require both critical and creative thinking skills. Engineers develop impactful,novel solutions to both large- and small-scale problems, and equipping students with the skillsand practice necessary for utilizing cutting-edge technology to do so is essential.References[1] D. H. Cropley, Creativity in Engineering: Novel Solutions to Complex Problems. London
progress: How a Cornerstone Course Impacts Self-efficacy and EntrepreneurshipIntroductionEngineers have emerged as pivotal players in technological innovation in the past decadeby founding or actively participating in entrepreneurial ventures [1]. Consequently, policyinitiatives have increasingly supported integrating entrepreneurship programs withinengineering education [2]. Economic shifts and an evolving job market for graduates haveheightened the demand for engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset, which is defined asthe cognitive adaptability that preceeds entrepreneurial behaviors for acting onopportunities, learning from failures, and creating economic and social value throughproblem-solving [6]. Such a mindset