presented their LCA work at conferences like FYEE and EWRI. Active in service, Dr. Logan is a district director for Tau Beta Pi, and advises student groups on campus including the LGBTQ+ group Open Doors. Dr. Logan was recently recognized as a 2024 Engineering Unleashed Fellow for her work developing an engineering museum exhibit classroom project. In her free time, Dr. Logan enjoys visiting theme parks and watching horror movies with her spouse, and cuddling their four furbabies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Autonomy, Motivation, and Inclusive Teaching: Engineering Museum Exhibit Class Project Lauren H
Native American Engineering StudentsABSTRACTEngineering students have limited opportunities for experiential learning, especially at TribalColleges and Universities, where engineering programs tend to be small, and resources areextremely limited. Typically, the first and senior years of a student's engineering educationjourney are infused with hands-on projects and capstone courses. However, the sophomore andjunior years generally need more opportunities for active learning, gaining professional skills,and developing a sense of professional practice. Also, scholars have increasingly realized thatarts subjects help students understand connections between different disciplines from acomprehensive perspective.This study highlights findings from
Paper ID #37637Bringing Entrepreneurial Mindset to the Design of Machinery through aBio-Inspired Design Project with Aesthetic ObjectivesProf. Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Colorado State University Soheil Fatehiboroujeni received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Merced in 2018 focused on the nonlinear dynamics of biological filaments. As an engineering educator and postdoctoral researcher at Cornell University, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineer- ing, Soheil worked in the Active Learning Initiative (ALI) to promote student-centered learning and the use of computational tools
Hands-On Learning: A Case Study on Project-Based Learning in Advanced Manufacturing and Additive Manufacturing Courses1. IntroductionAdvanced manufacturing integrates cutting-edge technologies such as robotics, artificialintelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and Additive Manufacturing. Advanced manufacturingtechnologies are fundamental to Industry 4.0. Educating students in these areas is crucial todeveloping a workforce capable of innovating and managing highly automated manufacturingsystems. Modern manufacturing systems require interdisciplinary knowledge spanningmechanical, electrical, software, and systems engineering. Therefore, teaching methods formodern manufacturing should emphasize creative thinking
stakeholders, including clients, end users, suppliers, designers, contractors, andother project team members. The civil engineering body of knowledge identifies four categories(foundational, engineering fundamentals, technical, and professional), including 21 outcomes forcivil engineers to acquire [4]. Many of these outcomes are addressed through the KEENframework. Integrating an entrepreneurial mindset into civil engineering education fosters aculture of critical thinking and collaboration, enabling civil engineers to approach challengesholistically by considering diverse stakeholders and environmental contexts [5]. This broadenedawareness enhances problem-solving capabilities while empowering professionals to createinnovative, sustainable, and value
Ocean Engineering at ESPOL. Prof. Andrade has been working with these two communi�es for manyyears and has developed a strong rela�onship with the community members. The trip was made in lateMay 2023 with the course scheduled to be taught during the month of July 2023. In addi�on to Drs.Singh and Andrade, Dr. Jorge Duque and Prof. Eduardo Cas�llo, two professors in the mechanicalengineering department (where Dr. Singh was based during his Fulbright appointment at ESPOL). Prof.Duque had previously worked on a mechanical engineering project with the Barcelona community andProf. Cas�llo had experience with entrepreneurship, having started his own company.During the visit to the communi�es, Dr. Singh was introduced to community leaders as well
developing skills in leadership, collaboration, creativity, and innovativethinking (Paray and Kumar, 2020; Isabelle, 2020; and Rodriguez and Lieber, 2020). Rodriguezand Liber (2020), in particular, call out the goals, and potential benefits, of entrepreneurshipeducation. They highlight the ways that entrepreneurship education in high schools can, andshould, be linked to the development of skills linked to design-thinking, to thinking towardinnovative practices and processes, and the ways that entrepreneurship programs can be a‘gateway’ to actual entrepreneurship projects. As we examined curricula from several differenthigh school programs, we saw the connection of the assignments, readings, and projects to theskills-development listed above
innovation in engineering education, design thinking, prototyping, program development, crafting inter- active curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 8 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabri- cation technologies. He has taught lectures and workshops on advanced subjects to more than 1000 undergraduate engineering students and 150 graduate students, while advising on over 500 student and faculty research projects. His academic credentials include an M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and a B.E in Mechanical Engineering from
students to embrace uncertainty and view failure as a learning opportunity.Research also highlights the critical role of instructors in modeling risk-taking behavior,fostering an entrepreneurial mindset essential for innovation [18, 19]. Studies on risk assessmentand management [20, 21] and the impact of instructional frameworks on developing anentrepreneurial mindset [22, 23] emphasize the importance of active learning and project-basedapproaches in cultivating the skills needed for navigating the complexities of the engineeringprofession.Existing literature emphasizes the complexity of failure and its critical role in learning andinnovation. However, there remains a gap in empirical studies exploring the integration of failurejournaling in
Technology from the Technical University of Munich, with specializations in Mechanical Engineering, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Finance. She is also an alumna scholar of the entrepreneurial qualification program at Munich’s Center for Innovation and Business Creation (UnternehmerTUM). Professionally, Nada currently works as a Senior Corporate Strategy Manager at a SaaS company. Her student practical experiences include roles as venture capital investment analyst, startup strategy consultant and entrepreneurial coach, alongside being team lead for innovation projects in the automotive industry.Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical
needs to be complemented with skills that includecreativity, critical thinking, and collaboration[3, 6], along with an improved self-efficacy toconduct different entrepreneurial tasks, that is, the person's belief of being capable [4].Prior studies have shown that students who received entrepreneurial training reportedhigher levels of entrepreneurial self-efficacy [2], and were much more likely to engage withhands-on experiences were they are expected to learn how to navigate complextechnological landscapes and spearhead the development of solutions to significanttechnological challenges on both local and global scales [5]. To achieve this later objective,engineering programs have implemented practical experiences based on project- andteam
for translational research development, strategic planning, and implementation of major projects. Ms DeChant is a dynamic leader with 20+ years of experience in higher education, and earned her MBA at Case Western Reserve University, her MS in Cell Biology at Cleveland State University, and her BS at Ohio State University.Prof. Erika Swift, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Erika Swift is a Professor of Practice and Center for Medical Innovation Director at The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. Before joining Penn State University in 2015, she worked in various industry sectors, including medical devices, dental equipment, and consumer goods. She has over 25 years of experience
, students who had an interest in graduate programs were alsoencouraged to take an M-CURE that focused on writing peer reviewed papers and transition to graduateprograms [3,5].The last element of the CURE experiences was tied to development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM).EM for this project is defined as a set of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a uniqueapproach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation. In the context of research, we are focused onhelping students connect research with value creation. We have defined a research mindset as a broaderidea that includes many facets of an entrepreneurial mindset. These factors in turn are connected to theidea of student-centered research [6].All of the CUREs in the
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Sophie Wang, University of Illinois at Urbana
training in active learning methodologies at the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Vi˜na del Mar and Concepci´on, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Relationship Among Entrepreneurial Intention and Entrepreneurial Competency Development: A Study on Perceptions Through Engineering Students.AbstractEntrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial competencies are two
Paper ID #43559Developing Engineering Identity Through StoryDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is leading a project to use story to help
systems, dynamic obstacle avoidance algorithms for unmanned aerial vehi- cles, improving software engineering pedagogy, and et ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Undergraduate Research as a Tool for Building Entrepreneurial Mindset inEngineering StudentsAbstractEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) has become a widespread classroom practice in many universities in recentyears. Our research project is focused on how EM may be infused into undergraduate researchexperiences for engineering students. For several years, we have offered a workshop to help facultydevelop methods to build EM into research practice. This includes research in traditional lab groups andalso building course-based undergraduate research
bootcamp. Some studieshave suggested the I-Corps model has several potential benefits within undergraduate education,but more research is needed to elucidate the features of I-Corps that are most valuable at theundergraduate level.In this study, we developed a new Entrepreneurial Bioengineering elective course for junior andsenior undergraduate engineering students that models various aspects of the I-Corps program.The course introduces entrepreneurship, business model canvas, and lean start-up principles tothe students with a focus on medical device customer discovery and technologycommercialization. Students work in teams to form project ideas, interview customers, testbusiness model hypotheses, and present their discoveries. The goal of this
ofinterdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement. We will close with both a section on “lessonslearned” throughout this process, as well as a section on the “deliverables” that have emergedfrom this process thus far. These ‘deliverables’ tie to benefits that, we believe, will enhancecareer preparation for students.theories of interdisciplinaritySeveral theories could have supported our work on developing a program in SocialEntrepreneurship. We are aware of the literature suggesting that theories of community-engagement (Tekic et al., 2022; Wallerstein et al. 2020), and even collaborative building () couldhave been used to guide this project. However, the development of this project was madepossible by a grant from funders who have a particular interest in
project examining how math and science motivational beliefs influence STEM students’ major choice in college. Her recent work focuses on exploring STEM students’ metacognition, entrepreneurial mindset, self-regulated learning strategies, and learning achievement.Dr. David K Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte David Pugalee is a full Professor and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. Dr. Pugalee has published works on STEM teaching and learning and on the NSF project Developing a Systemic, Scalable Model to Broaden Participation in Middle School Computer Science that focuses on computational thinking in science and mathematics. He
fields [4], [5], [6].In recent years, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been gainingpopularity as a way to engage undergraduate students in authentic scientific inquiry on a largescale [7]. While CUREs have many similarities to traditional laboratory courses or courseresearch projects, the work students do as part of a CURE is framed in a fundamentally differentway. Research projects within CUREs ideally have direct and indirect impact on the broaderscientific community and offer students the opportunity to share study findings with externalstakeholders [8]. Consequently, CUREs represent an overlap between the triumvirate of studentlearning, stakeholder impact, and promotion of a faculty’s research program.In this work
effectiveness of COIL, as previous studies have shown it to promoteintercultural competency but noted its dependence upon adequate pre-training to contextualizethe cross-cultural experience [2], [9], [10].Herein, we describe the initiation and initial stages of our cross-institutional project to answer: 1)How do international experiences influence undergraduate science and engineering students’EM, and 2) How does the international experience modality (i.e., study abroad or COIL) impactdevelopment of EM?Team formation:Team members initially met during the Networking, Ideation, and Collaboration (NIC) workshop[11] offered by APA-ENG (March 29-31, 2023). The NIC workshop is an intensive, nine hourworkshop that provides participants with foundational
seetheir mission in response to economic pressures, funding constraints, and the evolvingexpectations of higher education.The Bayh Dole Act passed in 1980, is the legislation that allowed US universities to own patentsemerging from federally-funded research (Mowery et al., 2001). Before the Act, the federalgovernment owned inventions emerging from government-funded projects. Granting universitiesownership and management of their patent portfolios was viewed as a way to promotetechnology transfer, research commercialization, and collaboration between academia andindustry. Universities could demonstrate research's societal and economic impact by developingnew technologies, products, and services. They could also benefit from licensing agreementswith
Paper ID #44131WIP: Developing Collaborative Entrepreneurship Competencies for TechnicalMajorsBlanca Esthela MoscosoDr. Miguel Andres Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Miguel Andres is an Assistant Professor in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. He holds a BS in Civil Engineering from USFQ, a M.Sc. in Civil Engineering in Construction Engineering and Project Management from Iowa State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Sustainable Construction from Virginia Tech, and two Graduate Certificates from Virginia Tech in Engineering
Paper ID #46809BOARD #151: WIP: Fostering Collaborative Entrepreneurship Skills in TechnicalDisciplinesBlanca Esthela MoscosoDr. MiguelAndres Andres Guerra P.E., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ MiguelAndres is an Associate Professor in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering and the Director of the Masters in Management of Construction and Real Estate Companies MDI at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. He holds a BS in Civil Engineering from USFQ, a M.Sc. in Civil Engineering in Construction Engineering and Project Management from Iowa State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with emphasis in
curriculum writer, but quickly evolved to reflect her passion for supporting the tactical details of large-scale programs and product development and dissemination. Ashley is currently engaged in research on behalf of NIHF as a member of the Strategic Data Project Fellowship, a program of the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University.Roxanne A. Moore Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Roxanne Moore is currently a Principal Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC) and Mechanical Engineering. She has spent her 12+ year research faculty career focusing on broadening participation in STEM and creating novel
faculty member using a rubric to scorepitch performance, communication skills, and value creation. Three faculty teaching differentsections of seminar worked collaboratively across disciplines to measure n=19 engineeringstudents, n=14 computer science students, and n=8 communication students. An additional 68students in a different seminar class served as a control group. Additionally, after the completionof the project, the three faculty evaluated the student pitches using a pitch rubric that wasdesigned to assess technical content, communication skills, and articulation of theentrepreneurial mindset, focused on “Creating Value. To identify the interrater reliability of thefaculty feedback, each of the faculty-evaluations were compared to one
(VentureWell, 2019) where the Technical Lead (TL), usually a faculty member,provides the technical expertise necessary for the project; the Entrepreneurial Lead (EL), usuallya graduate student or postdoctoral researcher, is the full-time leader of the project; and an I-Corps Mentor (IM), a volunteer business advisor, consults on the project (Blank & Engel, 2016;National Science Foundation, 2019; VentureWell, 2019).During the time period we studied, the I-Corps Teams program involved seven weeks of onlineinstruction, and in-person classes at the beginning and end, when cohorts of teams assembled indifferent regions of the country (current and future classes are expected to be exclusivelyremote). Teams accepted into the program received $50,000
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
based on the depth of cultural immersion and the diversity of travelexperiences.Future WorkIn our study, the artistic creativity of the research participants was demonstrated through adrawing while their innovation was evaluated by a self-rated measure. In our future work, weenvision assessing research participants’ term projects for innovation demonstrated through theirwork. This would provide us with more comparable measures for artistic creativity andinnovation self-efficacy attributes. Our future focus group with the research participants willexplore the portion of states that they reported having visited that they also lived in. This canhelp us better understand the relationship between the lived experiences of the participants withtheir