TOTAL xx STUDENTS # A B C . . . X Y Z THE CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION : (1 : Strongly Disagree; 5 : Strongly Agree) 1 Environment: Fundamental Knowledge and Concepts 4 5 3 . . . 4 4 4 4 2 Ability to Address the Consequences Pertaining to Environment 3 4 4 . . . 4 3 3 2 3 Integration with Relevant, Contemporary Environmental Issues 5 4 3 . . . 3 4 5 2 4 Depth of Understanding of the Importance of Environment 4 3 4 . . . 3 3 4 4
Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).LiteratureAllen, Deborah E.; Donham, Richard S.; Bernhardt, Stephen A. (2011): Problem-BasedLearning. In: New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128), S. 21–29.Belu, R.; Chiou, R.; Ciocal L.; Tseng, B. (2016): Incorporating Sustainability Concepts andGreen Design into Engineering and Technology Curricula. In: Journal of Education andLearning 10 (2), S. 93–102.Boyle, C. (2004): Considerations on educating engineers in sustainability. In: InternationalJournal of Sustainability in Higher Education 5 (2), S. 147–155.Buys, Laurie; Miller, Evonne; Buckley, Mathew; Jolly, Lesley (2013): The “Engineerswithout Borders” Challenge: Does it engage Australian and New Zealand students
approach usingquality principles. The curriculum seeks to offer a minor in sustainability to students. Given themultidisciplinary aspect of sustainability, it was demonstrated that quality principles can beeffectively used to design said curriculum.References1. Y. Akao, Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Prodduct Design, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press, 1990.2. S. Mizuno, Company wide Quality Control, Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 1988.3. S. Shingo, Zero Quality Control: Source Control and the Pokayoke system, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press, 1986.4. M. J. Harry and R. Schroeder, Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations, Doubleday
Environmental Engineering Curriculum: American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.[2] A. Mitchell and C. Savill-Smith, “The Use of Computer and Video Games for Learning, AReview of the Literature,” Learning and Skills Development Agency, 2004.[3] B. K. Sato, U. Alam, S. J. Dacanay, A. K. Lee, and J. F. Shaffer, “Brewing for Students: AnInquiry-Based Microbiology Lab,” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 16-2, pp.223-229, Dec. 2015.[4] D. J. Wood, “Beer Brewing as a Model for Improving Scientific Literacy in HigherEducation,” Journal of the Human Anatomy and Physiology Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19-27,Apr. 2016.[5] M. W. Pelter and J. McQuade, “Brewing Science
to switching sources. 2. AN EXAMPLE OF A LEAD COMPLEX: PLATTERNITE. Lead pipes are made of Pb0. This form of solid lead is readily oxidized to many lead compounds, including plattnerite (PbO2(s)). When lead pipe is stored above ground, a layer of PbO 2(s) can form before the pipe is installed. When exposed to water, PbO 2(s) can be reduced to Pb2+ which is soluble in water. (a) Write the redox half reaction for the reduction of PbO 2(s) to Pb2+. (b) Write the redox half reaction for the oxidation of H 2O to O2. (c) Write the overall chemical reaction for the conversion of PbO 2(s) to Pb2+ in the presence of H2O. 3. PREVENTING LEAD LEACHING WITH ORTHOPHOSPHATE. Orthophosphate can (and should
both the lack of aclear set of instructions relevant to the audience as well as the publication of high qualityreviews using these instructions that may serve as a template for future efforts.AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the additional workshop organizers, including: ProfessorHeather Ross, Professor Pascal Saikaly, Dr. Muhammad Ali, and Tobias Heselton.References 1. Henry and L. Stieglitz, “An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature,” in Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34121. [Accessed May 20, 2021]. 2. S. Oerther, and D. B. Oerther, “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice offers nurses a
these initial efforts are also described. Finally, an assessment of thestudents’ advising is presented including current observations by this cohort on if and howstudents’ academic direction were effected by the research experience. Page 12.964.2Window on Research and Scholarship (WORS) Advising ProgramWindows on Research and Scholarship is only one of six advising option that incoming first-yearstudents may chose to participate in at Tufts. The semester-long program assigns a small groupof students (10 or less) to an advisor who meets at least once a week with them during thesemester to work on a research topic(s) of interest to that advisor
many tours need tobe scheduled for the class. Determine whether safety equipment needs to be provided by theinstructor or is available at the site. Typically it must be provided, and alumni and companiesassociated with the department are often willing to make donations toward these student learningopportunities. Also confirm whether there are any weather restrictions on the site tour. In generalthe author has found that they can occur in almost any weather so long as some decking is inplace to shelter the tour.After this meeting, plan a short follow up meeting to schedule the tour(s) and talk through whatyour expectations are. Find out any restrictions and talk through what will be shown on the tour.Determine whether the tour will be co-led or
. 13References1. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Part I, Cognitive Domain; McKay: New York, 1956.2. Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21-32.3. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Auzenne, M., Burnham, C., Hanson, A. T., & Garland, J. (2006). 2006-2175: integrating writing to provide context for teaching the engineering design process. 113rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago.4. Jacquez, R., Gude, V. G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M., & Williamson, S. (2007, June). Enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental
molecule, or a feedstock formany useful products. Molecular Synthesis of Plant-based Chemicals is a significantly moresustainable means to produce pharmaceuticals, industrial molecules, but there is a need to educateand train young minds in the methods, practices, and processes of MSPC. Clary sage, Salviasclarea, is an MSPC success story and a cautionary tale of the need to be aware of scientific trends.Clary sage oil contains the diterpene sclareol that is used to produce ambroxide that is areplacement for ambergris, an expensive and rare perfume ingredient. Around 120 family farms inNorth Carolina depend on Clary sage production, a success story that can be traced back toattempts to commercialize its production in the 1950’s in Washington state
the lake. Assume the lake can be adequately described as a cylinder and that the following data describes the system: Lake Area = 40,000 m2 Lake Depth = 42 m Mass of Chemical Spilled = 320 kg Stream flow into lake = 0.7 m3/s Toxicity to deep water fish = 12 µg/l Toxicity to surface water fish = 35 µg/l Assume that during the summer, the lake is stratified with a 2.5 m epilimnion and a 1m thermocline. What would be the difference between a spill during summer stratification and fall turnover. Make quantitative comparisons of
ce a y nt ] ter d p lE nk an n] s / d me rf
learningthrough SWPPP exercise needs to be reinforced with additional relevant assignments that wouldenhance student critical thinking skills related to the subject matter.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the BagleyCollege of Engineering (BCoE), and the Office of Research and Economic Development(ORED) of Mississippi State University (MSU).References1. Jacquez RB, VG Gude, A Hanson, M Auzenne, S Williamson, “AC 2007-907: enhancing critical thinking skills of civil engineering students through supplemental instruction.” Proceedings of ASEE National Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2007.2. Facione PA, Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and
for this work was provided by the Kern Engineering Education Network (KEEN) aspart of a grant to the University of Portland.References1. Hyde, R.A., and Karney, B.W. (2001). Environmental Education Research: Implications for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education 90(2): 267-275.2. Rugarcia, A., Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., and Stice, J.E. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education I. Vision for a New Century. Chemical Engineering Education 34(1): 16-25.3. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., and Rugarcia, A. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods That Work. Chemical Engineering Education 34(1): 26-39.4. Grasso, D., Callahan, K.M., and Doucett, S. (2004). Defining
andunderstanding of the broader context of various environmental engineering work, this study willcontinue in subsequent semesters and will include comment sections for students to provideexamples when responding to various survey statements. Additionally, in future semesters,direct measurement assessment methods (i.e., problem-solving challenges and open-endedassessment questions) will be added to this study.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 1623053. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of NSF.References[1] C. S. Pedersen, “The U.N. Sustainable
group must research and collect relevant information regarding their mass transfer unit process. The choice of dimensions, materials and mode of construction and operation is entirely up to each group however, smaller apparatus is preferred as it is easier to modify and operate. In addition, each group must choose an appropriate compound(s) that would be involved in mass transfer and used for testing the mass transfer unit. The selected compounds must have low toxicity and must be readily available. In addition, it should be possible to adequately monitor the specific contaminant in the School of Engineering laboratories or other laboratories on the Campus.”The first attempt at inclusion of these laboratories
, particularly women andunder-represented minorities, to the engineering profession.References1 Friedman, T. The World is Flat, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005. Page 11.1327.62 Friedman, T. “Keeping Us In The Race”, New York Times, October 14, 2005.3 Kimberley, W., “European Vehicle Manufacturers Face Recycling Requirements”Automotive Design & Production. Vol.116: 8; 2004, pg. 20-22.4 Rowh, M. “Inside the Sustainable Office”, Office Solutions, Vol.22:3 May/June 2005, pg. 22-25.5 National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century”. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.2004.6 Powers, S. E
; Swackhamer G, 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30: 141–158. 3 Hestenes D & Wells M, 1992. A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30: 159–166. 4 Krause S, Birk J, Bauer R, Jenkins B, & Pavelich MJ, 2004. Development, testing, and application of a chemistry concept inventory. ASEE/IEEE 34th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2004.1408473 5 Klymkowsky MW, Underwood SM, Garvin-Doxas RK, 2010. Biological Concepts Instrument (BCI): A diagnostic tool for revealing student thinking. Available at: http://bioliteracy.colorado.edu (accessed 10 January 2012). 6 Stone A, Allen K, Reed-Rhoads T, Murphy TJ, Shehab RL, & Saha C, 2003. The Statistics Concept Inventory: A
, Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge Task Force, Annapolis, MD.2. ASCE (2004), Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century, Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice, Reston, VA.3. NSPE (2007), Code of Ethics for Engineers, Alexandria, VA, Publication 1112, http://www.nspe.org/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-2007-July.pdf (accessed Jan. 3, 2012).4. Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., and Shallcross, D. (2005), How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum, European Journal of Engineering Education 30(1), 1-19.5. Kagawa, F
. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 19(5): p. 657-662.9. Gijbels, D., et al., Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 2005. 75(1): p. 27-61.10. Kolari, S., E.L. Viskari, and C. Savander-Ranne, Improving student learning in an environmental engineering program with a research study project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 21(4): p. 702-711.11. Schmidt, H.G., J.I. Rotgans, and E.H.J. Yew, The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 2011. 45(8): p. 792-806.12. Hmelo, C.E., G.S. Gotterer, and J.D. Bransford, A theory-driven approach to assessing the cognitive effects
://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET/pu blications.html, May.4. Crittenden, J.C. J. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2002, 4(1)6-7. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conference5. De Gelder, C., Oele, M., Cleij, V., Moore, M., Durksz, S., Haringsma, A., Wannee, T. 2012. SimaPro installation manual 1.12. PRé Consultants. the Netherlands.6. Dunn, J.B. 2014. Biofuel Life Cycle Analysis with the GREETTM Model. U.S. Department of Energy Biomass 2014: Growing the future bioeconomy. July 29 – 30, 2014. Washington Convention Center. Washington D.C.7. Fontes, J. 2016. Product Social Impact Assessment: Roundtable for product social metrics. PRé Consultants
also want to workwith faculty in other engineering disciplines to ensure that environmental protection issues areaddressed. This could include giving guest lectures in courses, particularly design-focusedcourses where environmental considerations should be part of the constraints and criteria for allengineering projects.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] StartClass by Graphiq. Compare Colleges & Universities. http://colleges.startclass.com/ Accessed March 10, 2017
, J. & Powers, S. (2008). Energy literacy among Middle and High School youth. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference proceedingsDeWaters, J. & Powers, S. (2011). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior. Energy Policy, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049DeWaters, J., Powers, S., Graham, M. (2007). Developing an energy literacy scale. 2007 ASEE Annual Conference proceedingsDias, R.A., Mattos, C.R., Balestieri, J.A.P (2004). Energy education: breaking up the rational energy use barriers. Energy Policy, 32: 1339-1347Hobson,A. (2003). Physics literacy, energy and the environment. Physics Education, 38, 109-114Hobson,A. (2003). Designing science literacy courses. In
changing in the future would be to focus more on directexamples of technologies useful in the green design field. However, this is a model that we willcontinue to implement and would recommend to others.References:[1] M. Rickinson, C. Lundholm, and N. Hopwood, Environmental Learning: Insights from research into the s tudent experience, 2010 edition. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer, 2009.[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Definition of Green Building. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/about.htm; Accessed Jan 02/2015.[3] Smith, G. Sustainability and Schools: Educating for Interconnection, Adaptability, and Resilience. The Journal of Sustainability Education; Vol. 8, 2010[4] “Stockholm 1972
asking students to vote for a favorite among the fivepresentations that they have reviewed. We suggest that it could be even more valuable to askstudents to grade those five presentations based on the assessment criteria that they receivedbefore recording their own videos. This grading exercise could be included in the peer feedbackexercise.Take-home essay exam with open-ended question(s). Group II argued that it is not necessary toassess student learning of individual ILOs since the ILOs are inseparable from each other – if astudent achieves one of them, he/she will achieve others as well. One of the group memberssuggested that the teacher should “simply ask students to address such a big, complex problem”.The group suggested that examination
their surroundings, or we will never be able to resolve our pressing societal needs.”16References1. Allenby, B. R.; Allen, D. T.; Davidso, C. I. (2007) Teaching Sustainable Engineering, J. Ind. Ecol., 11 (1).2. Huntzinger, D. N.; Hutchins, M. J.; Gierke, J. S.; Sutherlan, J. W. (2007) Enabling Sustainable Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education, Int. J. Engng Ed., 23 (2), 218-230. Page 25.1467.143. Perdan, S.; Azapagic, A.; Clift, R. (2000) Teaching Sustainable Development to Engineering Students, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 1 (3), 267-279.4. Rowan University’s Official Website (2011) College of Engineering
local areashaving groundwater levels below Elev. 5, and he proposed these were caused by leaky sewerswith relatively localized influence. Further concerns were expressed in a 1914 discussion to apaper by Worcester11.It was the finding of rotted wood piles beneath the Boston Public Library in 1929, and concernsfor the wood piles across the street at Trinity Church that set in motion the major 1930’s studyand the early public awareness of the tenuous relationship between groundwater and wood pilepreservation12. But the issue lost advocates and public awareness with the onset of World WarII, and the urban decline of the 1950s and 1960s. It was not until 1984 when rotted wood pileswere discovered beneath the 19 contiguous rowhouses on the waterside
disciplines through hands onprojects.24 Among the students who participated in the pre-survey, 32% were female. Students atInstitution B do not declare majors within engineering until the sophomore year. However whenasked to identify their intended engineering majors on the pre and post survey the majority wereconsidering chemical (37/33%), mechanical (16/18%), and bioengineering (11/17%), with someinterest in civil, computer, electrical, and industrial engineering.Table 2. Course Characteristics Class Rank Major(s) Enrollment+ Description A1 1st Year Civ/Arch E 87 / 78 Required 2-cr intro; 2-week sust. module A2 1st Year Environ E 64 / 63 Required 1-cr intro; 1 week sust
review, discussion and labs. readings, discussions and labs class presentation, and labs. discussions and labs.University of Cincinnati, Daniel B. OertherUC is a comprehensive, research-extensive institution offering doctoral degrees from thirteencolleges. The program of Environmental Engineering and Science (EE&S) within theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering is one of the strongest programs at UC witha compliment of twelve faculty and research expenditures above $4M per year. Because of thetremendous strength of the EE&S program, the PI was afforded the opportunity to develop a newand highly experimental