-books: the views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory”, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 61(1):33-47.7. Appleton, L. (2005) “Using electronic textbooks: promoting, placing and embedding”, The Electronic Library, 23(1):54-63.8. Dong, S., S. Xu and X. Lu (2009) “Development of online instructional resources for Earth system science education: An example of current practice from China”, Computers & Geosciences, 35:1271–1279.9. Ravid, G., Y. Kalman, and S. Rafaeli (2008) “Wikibooks in higher education: Empowerment through online distributed collaboration”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24:1913–1928.10. Crestania, F. and M. Melucci (2003) “Automatic construction of hypertexts for
a county government team that was N DIC N T S HT KERSO 38 collaborative, interested in working N ST 38 TH ST N with a university class and
serve as a basis for the development, execution, and refinement of the model(s).Lastly, we will produce a final report to summarize our findings as well as create an internet sitefor interested parties to contribute to, view, or edit.Bibliography 1. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2. Pappas, E. & R. Kander. (2008). “Sustainable Societies: The Sustainable Engineering Design Curriculum at James Madison University,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Splitt, Frank G. (2002). Engineering Education Reform: A Trilogy. Published by the International
TOTAL xx STUDENTS # A B C . . . X Y Z THE CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION : (1 : Strongly Disagree; 5 : Strongly Agree) 1 Environment: Fundamental Knowledge and Concepts 4 5 3 . . . 4 4 4 4 2 Ability to Address the Consequences Pertaining to Environment 3 4 4 . . . 4 3 3 2 3 Integration with Relevant, Contemporary Environmental Issues 5 4 3 . . . 3 4 5 2 4 Depth of Understanding of the Importance of Environment 4 3 4 . . . 3 3 4 4
Programs. Effective for Evaluations During the 2009-2010Accreditation Cycle. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. www.abet.org2. Davidson, C.I., H.S. Matthews, C.T. Hendrickson, M.W. Bridges, B.R. Allenby, J.C. Crittenden, Y. Chen, E.Williams, D.T. Allen, C.F. Murphy, and S. Austin. 2007. Adding sustainability to the engineer’s toolbox: achallenge for engineering educators. Environmental Science & Technology. July 15. 4847-4850.3. American Academy of Environmental Engineers (AAEE). 2009. Environmental Engineering Body ofKnowledge. AAEE, Annapolis, MD.http://www.cece.ucf.edu/bok/pdf/EnvE_Body_of_Knowledge_Final.pdf4. Reed, Brian E. 2008. Database ABET Environmental Engineering Degrees. University of Maryland– Baltimore County. Dept. of
Lundeberg, M. A., B. B. Levin and H. L. Harrington, eds., Who Learns What From Cases and How? The Research Base for Teaching and Learning with Cases, 1999, pp. 3-23.6. Chinowsky, P. S. and J. Robinson, “Enhancing Civil Engineering Education Through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 1, 1997, 45-49.7. Russell, J. S. and B. G. McCullouch, “Civil Engineering Education: Case Study Approach”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 116, 2, 1990, pp. 164-174.8. Raju, P. K. and C. S. Sankar, “Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies”, Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 4, 1999, pp. 501-508.9. Richards, L. G., M. Gorman, W. T. Scherer and R. D. Landel, “Promoting Active Learning with
and Environmental Engineering, and the Engineering Studies Program. Her research focuses on decision-making for environmental and infrastructure systems. Dr. Jones received a BS Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a PhD Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. She is a licensed professional engineer in several states.Christopher Ruebeck, Lafayette College CHRISTOPHER S. RUEBECK is an Associate Professor in the Economics Department at Lafayette College, teaching in the areas of industrial organization, marketing research, introductory Principles and Microeconomics courses, as well as simulation and evolutionary game theory. Dr. Ruebeck holds the
engineers’ performance when solving design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (4), 281-287.11. Cardella, M.E., Atman, C.J., Turns, J. and Adams, R.S. (2008). Students with differing design processes as freshmen: Case studies on change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24 (2), 246-259.12. Caicedo, J.M., Pierce, C.E., Flora, J.R.V., Timmerman, B., Nichols, A.P., Graf, W. and Ray, T. (2010) Instructional environments to stimulate critical thought of freshmen civil engineering students. Submitted to: Advances in Engineering Education.13. Palmer, S. (2004). Evaluation of an on-line reflective journal in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 12 (4), 209-214
engine conditions such as engines atstart up compared to engines that have been running. Page 15.223.8Future ResearchThis activity has been used in an initial mechanical engineering class as an introduction toenvironmental science. To assess the effectiveness of the activity, students will be given surveysto assess engagement and pre and post assessments of conceptual understanding. After analysisof surveys and assessments, we intend to make assessment results, additional data sets, andsample calculations available for other engineering educators.Bibliography1. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
disseminated onthe project’s website soon after its implementation. This template consists of the followingblocks: 1) Summary – goal to be achieved by students; 2) Objectives – skills to be acquired bystudents; 3) Standards to be addressed; and 4) Lesson Information – Grade Level, Subject Area,Duration, Setting, Materials Needed, Background Knowledge, Lesson Plan(s) details, andAdditional Resources (learning objects, timelines, assessment rubrics, surveys, etc.). Item 4includes detailed information provided via hotlinks. The Fellow submits the final lesson to theGrant Coordinator for checking and approval before implementation. On the average it takesabout six weeks to develop a lesson before implementation.Most of the lessons that have been created