between what they learn infoundational math and science courses and other multidisciplinary coursework (e.g., core coursesin writing, humanities, social sciences, etc.), and how to transfer and apply that knowledge toengineering courses, projects, and professional experiences [3].Despite accreditation criteria elevating contextual competence and other professional practiceoutcomes (e.g., effective communication, teamwork, ethics and leadership), as well as a plethoraof national studies calling for a different approach to engineering education, institutional andstructural issues continue to complicate curricular change [10], [2], [5]. One issue stems from alack of incentive for faculty collaboration across departments to develop consensus around
faculty members in Environmental Engineering as well as facultyfrom Civil Engineering, Chemical and Biological Engineering, History and Philosophy, BusinessManagement, Political Science, and English. From the outset, the team adopted an outcomes-based approach to curricular redesign. In the first phase of the project, the multidisciplinary teamdeveloped a comprehensive list of knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes desired in successfulenvironmental engineering graduates. Targeted competencies encompass discipline-specifictechnical knowledge, as well as cross-disciplinary skillsets related to ethics, communication,teamwork, social justice, economics, sustainability, and public policy. The list of desired studentlearning outcomes was produced
environment, green law, green design, etc. Professional technical courses: new technologies, new processes, new products, new equipment, the social value and social evaluation of each production process and production technology, and the impact of the technology on the ecological environment, etc. Skill Systematic thinking, life cycle thinking, international perspective Engineering ethical quality, safety awareness, green awareness, social Attitude responsibility awarenessII. Specific Actions1. Integrate Green Engineering Concept into the Curriculum As a kind of "green development" concept gradually formed based on
) following the passing of the Clean Air and the Clean Water Acts[3]. However, environmental engineering students often graduate with limited knowledge andinsights about the pathways that lead from scientific knowledge to policy, and the role of otheractors (constituents, industry, media, administrators), who can help or derail an effort to createpolicy consistent with the best scientific knowledge [4], [5], [6]. Gaps have also been identifiedregarding care-ethical responsibility of engineers toward the protection of human subjects,societal values and the environment [7].Regarding interaction with other actors, a gap exists in the area of communication with non-engineers and non-scientists. In a National Academy of Sciences study [8], researchers
preparingstudents for the complexities of modern engineering roles is an imperative shift recognized acrossacademic and industrial spheres (Queiruga-Dios et al., 2021). This transformation is driven by thegrowing demand for engineers who are not only technically adept but also possess a broadunderstanding of the environmental, societal, and ethical implications of engineering projects (deVere et al., 2009; McGinn, 2018). A key aspect of this educational reform is the emphasis oninterdisciplinary learning and the application of knowledge to real-world problems, fostering ageneration of engineers equipped to tackle global challenges with innovative and sustainablesolutions (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2009; Froyd, Wankat, & Smith, 2012). Pedagogical
highlight the importance of each ofthese contexts from practical and ethical perspectives, they are then introduced to the Biblicalconcept of Christian stewardship. The SaS framework defines Christian stewardship as theresponsibility Christians have to actively manage and make use of the resources God hasentrusted to them in a manner consistent with God’s commands and character. This idea can bemost succinctly captured by 1 Corinthians 4:2, which states “Now it is required that those whohave been given a trust must prove faithful” [13]. In order to tie the concept of sustainability tostewardship, students are then presented with a theological progression, with items 1-9thoroughly supported with Biblical references (included in Appendix B). This
Paper ID #41859Evaluating the Efficacy of Project-Based Approach for Teaching HumanitiesCourses to Engineering StudentsDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He was formerly a Research
the efficiency of transportation could allow good to be processed in less environmentally impactul places while still lowering the overall impacts.A. D. (2022) sees resource scarcity and social justice as two challenges related to his futurecareer. “Robots aren’t just metals. In fact, they contain a wide variety of materials in their construction. These materials come from many different sources and will vary in cost, environmental impact, and social values. When designing a robot, I will need to find a balance in the materials I am using between the three pillars of sustainability. I will need to ensure the robot is made from sustainable and ethically produced materials, while maintaining a certain
findings demonstrate that our approach shows promise forachieving these objectives through the implemented coursework.IntroductionThe engineering profession has always aimed to serve society’s needs. However, in some cases,engineering designs and products benefit some at the detriment of other groups [1], [2]. Withjustice issues affecting millions around the world, many engineering programs have startedintroducing modules and themes in their curriculum to educate students on such injustices andoffer approaches to help them address these issues. The environmental engineering discipline isuniquely positioned to recognize environmental injustice, understand its adverse health andeconomic outcomes, and advance ethical approaches and solutions to
: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 34, pp. 51-61, 2017. 5. A.R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, N. Canney, C. Swan, and D. McKnight, “Ethics education of undergraduate and graduate students in environmental engineering and related disciplines,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 35, pp. 684-695, 2018. 6. D.B. Oerther, L.E. Voth-Gaeddert, and D.D. Divelbiss, “Improving environmental health practice and policy through convergence research: A case study of linked food-water systems enhancing child health,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 36, pp. 820-832, 2019. 7. L.D. Montoya, L.M. Mendoza, C. Prouty, M. Trotz, and M.E. Verbyla
professional ethics; 8. and explain the importance of professional licensure.In this paper, we discuss several connections, not just with these SDG connections and CivilEngineering. Still, we especially believe that the case studies of edge computing and machinelearning give direct connections to applying probability, analyzing and solving problems,conducting experiments, and designing a process in civil engineering contexts, all discussedabove.Environmental Engineering CurriculumFor emerging environmental engineers to meet the SDGs, students will need to: 1. Have hands-on laboratory experiments; 2. Analyze and interpret data from their experiments in more than one central environmental engineering focus area, e.g., air, water, land, and
projects in community service. International Journal of Engineering Education 21(1): 139-150. 20. Coyle, E.J., Jamieson, L.H., and Oakes, W.C. (2006). 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Prize lecture*: Integrating Engineering Education and community service: Themes for the future of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 95(1): 7-11. 21. Passino, K.M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineer. Science and Engineering Ethics 15: 577-600. 22. Schneider, J., Lucena, J., and Leydens, J.A. (2009). Engineering to help. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28(4): 42-48. 23. Astin, A.W. and Sax, L. (1998). How Undergraduates Are Affected by Service Participation. Journal of College Student Development 39(3
+ 10 pts for Module 7, above + 10 pts for Module 8, here).As important aspect of engineering judgement includes the ethical dilemma of less experiencedengineers being “overruled” by supervisors or regulators – perhaps even by those with lessor orno Professional Engineering license (or professional credential). As part of Module 8, studentswere specifically confronted with the need to become familiar with, incorporate, and respond tothe document, “Final Report of the NSPE Task Force on Overruling Engineering Judgement,”[14]. The successful training of students of engineering must include an awareness of, anappreciation for, and a thoughtful argument in support of licensure and credentialing as a criticalelement of protecting the health, safety
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42765 Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering
-approved pre- and post-surveys were used to assess the impact of the modules on students’ perceptionof knowledge related to sustainable manufacturing practices in engineering. Their overall improvement inEOP learning objectives was seen across the curriculum, each bar showing a percentage of increasedperception of knowledge in different topic areas (Fig.5). EOP topics such as design thinking related tominimizing environmental and social impact, recognizing local and indigenous practices and use of locallysourced materials was improved by 75% and 38% for first-years and sophomores, respectively. Likewise,recognizing the ethical implications and describing the negative and positive impact of design work onsociety, a skill in social responsibility
Regulations • Safety, Health, and Loss Prevention • Principles of Design • Power and Energy Systems • Supply Chain Management • Systems Engineering • Creative Design • Disasters and Modern Society • Cities and Technology in the Industrial Age • Bioethics • Business & Engineering Ethics • Nature & ReligionC-Tier Courses: • Introduction to Design • Senior Capstone Design • Material Science and Engineering • Design for Manufacturing • Technical Communication • Software Project Management • Six Sigma • Computing in a Global Society • Computational Modeling • Product DesignD-Tier Courses: • Engineering Statistics • Biomaterials • Entrepreneurship and Leadership • Polymer
pH meter and theADALM 1000. At the end of the experiment students had a more informed understanding ofdifferent solutions’ acidity and basicity.Figure 3: ADAM 1000 Figure 4: Analog pH kitData collection and analysisThe study adopted a pre-post-test design approach and data collection was done prior to theimplementation of each module. Noteworthy is that each module was implemented in separateterms and hence the uniqueness of participants was ensured in each term. Ethical considerationin terms of privacy and consent was established and ensured during the study. Survey was sentdigitally to the students prior to the implementation and after the implementation of the moduleusing Motivated Strategies for Learning