history of engineers. At present, 30 textbooks reflecting the concept of greenengineering education have been revised and newly edited, covering variousdisciplines such as engineering, science, management and law.2. Construction of Green Engineering Courses ECUST has offered a series of courses related to green engineering. First,"Fundamentals of Enterprise EHS Risk Management" has been offered to allengineering undergraduates as a compulsory course. This course built by over fortycorporate alumni and university faculty was listed as a national-level MOOC in 2017.Taken by about 2,300 people each year, it has been listed as a required or electivecourse by 106 universities nationwide. Second, eight "Green Engineering" electivecourses have been
timeline that reflects theresearcher’s tenure at the university. At this level, faculty members can tailor meaningful projectsfor researchers over a set period. The last and broadest level of participation is short-termengagement through undergraduate and graduate courses. For short-term engagement, studentsparticipate in community-based class projects for one semester or can take elective courses thatoffer community-based research. With short-term engagement, students apply concepts ofcommunity-based research. This participatory approach serves as an opportunity for students toconduct research and advance into mid-term engagement opportunities (Figure 1). These levels ofengagement provide a more diverse audience that is engaged in community-based
processes. Students worked in groups tocreate 3D parts with cultural or historical perspective. Students searched for art forms, traditions, socialhabits, and rituals from the chosen cultural background or a significant time in history and used it asinspiration to create unique CAD designs and then 3D printed models. Students were required to incorporatethe best DfAM practices required to successfully design a part using additive manufacturing. Each studentgroup prepared a poster that was shared in a gallery walk [17]. Everyone explored the variety of culturallyand historically inspired projects during the gallery walk and self-reflected on the information in an essay.Students were encouraged to include thoughts on unconscious bias, norms, habits
. That systems thinking perspective can be applied to anything, really, including social problems.”The first offering of introduction to sustainability challenges course was in the Fall 2015semester. Metrics for the engineering sustainability designation as a whole, such as participationand placement, indicated some positive results (for example, see above) but assessments of thelearning outcomes for the introductory seminar class (see Table 2 below for learning outcomesand current assessment plan) also indicated some areas where we fell short of learning targets inthe initial years of the designation. For instance, students’ ability to describe sustainability wasrather anemic.For example, D.T. (2018) wrote in a final reflection paper (see
, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. The cognitive dimensionpertains to an individual's increasing ability to effectively process and comprehend information.Simultaneously, the intrapersonal dimension focuses on self-awareness, self-reflection, and theregulation of emotions and thoughts. Lastly, the interpersonal dimension involves an individual'scapacity to engage in and comprehend relationships with others, though the process ofdeveloping empathy and co-creating shared meaning. These dimensions represent distinct modesof development and influence how individuals perceive and interact with the world, themselves,and others. Following this framework, our study uses Kegan's theory to position developmentalideas associated with innovation and inform
human and non- human, through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. 8. As followers of Jesus Christ, we are not our own, but are instead members of His body and servants of God. 9. Our work matters to God, should reflect God’s values, and should align with God’s purposes. 10. Designing for sustainability, with its conscientious use of resources and consideration of environmental, economic, societal, and global contexts, is a helpful framework for approaching design work in a manner consistent with faithful stewardship and obedience, reflecting God’s love for humans and the rest of His creation, upholding His values of justice and mercy, and aligning with his plan for future
diversityof member views regarding the proposed ABET changes, summarize them, and present them forfurther discussion at that year’s Interdivisional Town Hall [3].By 2018 a set of “Town Hall Guiding Principles” had been created by the Ad Hoc Committee:Atsushi Akera (LEES), Chair, Alan Cheville (ERM), John Estell (First-Year Programs), SusannahHowe (DEED), Mark Killgore (Civil), and Joe Tranquillo (Biomedical), Chair-Elect, with theunderstanding that not every town hall meeting would be able to focus on all of the followingcriteria: A great Town Hall meeting will: ● Address a Big Question ● Build community by allowing ASEE members to mix across divisions ● Foster self-reflection among the members of the ASEE community
the lockdown. Figure 2. Correlation Coefficient Matrix of the pollutants for Kolkata6.0 Experiential Learning Outcomes, Assessing Data Analytical and Problem-SolvingSkills, and Grand Challenges of EngineeringThe interns and the high school senior through their reflective essays on their learning experiencesduring the beginning and the end of the course demonstrated their perspective of acknowledgingthe big picture; ability to apply knowledge gained to real-world situations; and displaying empathyby perceiving the challenges of the pandemic, and the extent the underrepresented populations aredisproportionately affected.Experiential Learning OutcomesSome of the experiential learning outcomes included the following: a
score of zero. The lowervariability in scores also may reflect the quick decision-making required during real-time gradingof the exams, as opposed to more contemplative grading possible for a written exam. Differencesin grading between oral exams and transcripts of oral exams also was noted by Thomas andcoworkers [16].Role of Oral Exams in Environmental Engineering EducationWhen asked for their exam preference in engineering courses, respondents expressed apreference for written exams, although nearly one-third of respondents indicated they preferredan equal number of oral and written exams (All Written: 4.9%, Mostly Written/Some Oral:58.9%, Equal: 31.6%, Mostly Oral/Some Written: 4.3%, All Oral: 0.3%). These responsesindicate a desire on the
students to explore and innovate, as reflected in theirheightened level of collaboration. The findings emphasize the significance of integratingexperiential learning methods into environmental engineering education to enhance activeengagement and skill development among students. Importantly, these results hold broaderimplications for educational practices, highlighting the crucial role of hands-on, experientiallearning methodologies in nurturing collaborative skills vital for the future success ofengineering professionals. The limitation identified was the use of a single group for thisexperimental study as well as the small sample size.AcknowledgementThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
initiative to transform engineering education to reflect the growingimportance of sustainability in all engineering functions.16 EOP was developed and is evolving 2023 ASEE National Conferencethrough collaborations among hundreds of sustainability advocates across sectors, geographies,and lived experiences. EOP seeks to ensure all future engineers, across all disciplines, learn thefundamental skills and principles of social and environmental sustainability.The EOP Framework was first launched in 2020 and is a cornerstone of the EOP initiative. Theframework is the first of its kind in that it incorporates to guide to coursework, teaching tools,and student experiences that define what it means to be an engineer who is