semester long and early in the engineeringcurriculum. The study collects pre- and post-survey data at the beginning and end of thesemester, which may not be sufficient time for students to absorb lessons regarding thesociotechnical nature of engineering from the course. Anecdotally, we have observed students’appreciation of this course increasing as they approach graduation, more so than when they arein or have just completed the course. Future studies may recollect the post survey data later instudents’ college career after the lessons learned in this course have had more time to sink in.ConclusionThe work described in this paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge related to socialjustice education in engineering. The results show that
, “Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended,” ADA.gov. [Online]. Available: https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2023].[18] G. Mamboleo, S. Dong, and C. Fais, “Factors associated with disability self-disclosure to their professors among college students with disabilities,” Career Dev. Transit. Except. Individ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 78–88, May 2020.[19] M. A. Sukhai, “Minding the Gap: Perspectives on Graduate Education for Students with Disabilities,” in Preparing Students for Life and Work, Brill, 2019, pp. 64–77.[20] L. Barnard-Brak, T. Sulak, A. Tate, and D. Lechtenberger, “Measuring College Students’ Attitudes Toward Requesting Accommodations: A National Multi-Institutional Study,” Assess
engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 583–610, Oct. 2018.[20] A. Lee, “A comparison of postsecondary Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) enrollment for students with and without disabilities,” Career Dev. Except. Individ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 72–82, Aug. 2011.[21] C. J. Groen-McCall, L. D. McNair, M. C. Paretti, A. Shew, and D. R. Simmons, “Exploring professional identity formation in undergraduate civil engineering students who experience disabilities: Establishing definitions of self,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education [ASEE] Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[22] A. Crabtree, K. Neikirk, A. Marshall, T. Barongan, H. K. Beasley, E. G. Lopez, D
" artifacts crafted from unconventional resources, can be integrated into asset-based pedagogies like Connected Learning to reimagine engineering education. Participants include Mexican American middle and high school-aged youth in Southern California, USA, alongside Mexican American adult mentors and researchers. Study participants collaboratively designed a prototype workshop targeting future youth who may not consider engineering as a career, utilizing speculative fiction (e.g., Latinofuturism) to ignite interest while tapping into existing creativity, collaboration, and resourcefulness inherent in everyday engineering problem-solving. This holistic approach aims to render engineering more relevant
social justice. She is the Director of Engineering+, the College of Engineering’s first year program at Oregon State University. Engineering+ [link webpage] combines three foundational engineering courses, co-curricular opportunities, career and industry development skills to enhance the success of our first year and transfer students. In addition to her 10 years in higher education, she has over 6 years of work experience as a design, process and research engineer in nuclear energy, renewable technologies, and various manufacturing facilities. In 2020, she received the OSU Breaking Barriers in Education Award, which recognizes high impact in teaching, mentoring, and advancing gender equity in higher education. She is
engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is a professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa
in shifting student bias towards inclusion in the three interventions. The mostpromising approach is student-led, where senior students worked to change the student culturedirectly.Introduction and BackgroundImproving diversity in STEM fields is an important goal and has been widely studied. It is well-known that students and professionals in STEM careers in the USA do not reflect the generalpopulation of the country [1]. For example, white men make up 31.6% of the general populationwhile they make up 51% of scientists and engineers. Black men make up 6% of the populationand 3% of the STEM workforce. The percentage of non-white and non-Asian people in the USAis 31.3% while the percentage of this sub-population working in STEM is just 12%. In
qualitativecomments about each other at 4 points during the term. We tracked patterns of coded languageuse [27] amongst selected teams, and did a deep analysis of how coded language increased inintensity across the term. We also assessed how minoritized teammates indicated warnings oftheir marginalization. We have reported some analysis from these data elsewhere [27], [28], [31].Finally, we conducted a diary study during spring 2022, much delayed from our originaltimeline. We conducted in-person initial interviews with diary participants who were recruitedbased on their self-indicated identities as someone from a historically excluded group inengineering, using the device of a career journey map to structure the conversation. We thenasked them to reflect on