minority in the field of engineering.Prof. Joshua M. Hamel, Seattle UniversityDr. Claire Strebinger, Seattle UniversityDr. Gregory Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. de- gree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in 1992. He worked in a robotics lab for the Department of Defense for five years after receiving his M.S.M.E. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University, Seattle, WA. His research interests are controls system and the use
characterized simultaneously by multiplesocial identity categories, these categories are intertwined and linked to each other, there is anelement of power or inequality embedded within each category, and these categories characterizenot only a person’s social identity[s] but also the person’s ever-changing social context. Ourstudy is informed by the concept of intersectionality in two ways: first, as a theory to guide theidentification of constructs and the creation of scale items to probe those constructs and, second,as a methodological approach to analyze data based on the survey respondents’ multipledemographic identities.Diversity in the Engineering Professoriate. A literature review indicated that most studies offaculty diversity aggregate
quantitative follow-up to this work-in-progress paper.AcknowledgementsThanks to the faculty that participated in the intercollegiate coaching experience. We enjoyed the rich sharing ofideas.References[1] KEEN. KEEN - The Framework, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset- matters/framework.aspx (accessed 16 January 2020).[2] Scott V, Miner C. Peer coaching: Implication for teaching and program improvement. Transform Dialogues Teach Learn J 2008; 1: 1–11.[3] Rogers EM. A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. J Health Commun 2004; 9: 13–19.[4] Weiman C, Gilbert S. The Teaching Practices Inventory: A New Tool for Characterizing College and University Teaching in Mathematics and Science. CBE Life
Point)’s unique faculty composition consists of professionalmilitary faculty, permanent military faculty, and civilian faculty is known as the “blend ofexcellence”. The majority of West Point faculty (~55%) are military officers serving for a two-to-three-year period. These military faculty are professional faculty members serving in acapacity similar to adjunct faculty or non-tenured teaching faculty at other universities. Eachtype of faculty member brings unique skills and talents to the faculty team that contribute to theoverall development of West Point’s undergraduates who serve as military officers upongraduation. In spring 2019, West Point faculty members were asked to share their thoughts andperspectives on the faculty development of
pedagogy in Fall 2020. We have conducted afollow-up study at the end of Fall 2020 and the results of this additional study, as well as thecomparison with the analysis in this paper, will be presented in future publications.References[1] S. Eaton, B. Brown, M. Schroeder, J. Lock, and M. Jacobsen, “Signature pedagogies for e-learning in higher education and beyond.”[2] Z. Akyol and D. R. Garrison, “The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence.,” J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks, vol. 12, no. 2–3, pp. 3–23, 2008.[3] A. Gillis, and L.M. Krull, “COVID-19 remote learning transition in Spring 2020: Class
, and to your best ability.1. What was your letter grade in each foundational subject? Write the most recent semester (SMR=summer, F=fall, S=spring) and year when you took the course. Mark courses taken at FGCU with an asterisk (*). Algebra: _____ Geometry/Trig: _____ Calculus I: _____ Physics I: _____ Sem. & Yr. taken? _____ Sem. & Yr. taken? _____ Sem. & Yr. taken? _____ Sem. & Yr. taken? _____• Rate your current level of confidence in utilizing each foundational subject on a scale from 1 to 10. Not Confident → → → → → → → → → →→ → → → Very Confident Algebra 1 2 3 4 5 6
the 1990’s, there was anational effort to develop programs to involve faculty to train them to use more varied teachingmethods [9]. Previous faculty development programs include SUCCEED and ECSEL Coalitions[10], FOUNDATION Coalition [11], and GATEWAY Coalition [9]. These entities work todevelop and execute professional development programs for faculty to train them in diverse andmodern teaching approaches.One type of program that has shown positive progress is based upon summer workshops orinstitutes for faculty devoted to teaching practices. One example is the National AcademiesSummer Institutes (SIs) [12, 13]. Beginning as a biology summer institute, this program has beenoperating since 2004. The SIs are intensive multi-day workshops were