Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Cribbs, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Hariharan Naganathan, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Christopher O'Neil, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Michael J D'Agostino, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

the modern construction industry's increasing demand fortechnology-related expertise to manage construction projects. Construction companies aremoving towards managing projects through immersive technologies, Artificial Intelligence, anddigital twin technologies. Specifically, after COVID, these technologies helped the industry tohandle projects from different locations. Hence, the new concentration aims to provide a trackfor the students of CM to learn and utilize these technologies in the classroom and environmentand implement their skills during their co-ops and full-time opportunities. The VDCconcentration will include 15 credits of courses, including 2 CM required courses, 2 CMelectives, and 1 Capstone project course.The new

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Marie Coppola, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

twoinstances (A2 and E2), there were other educators involved. In both cases, the educator reportedhaving to explain ungrading and negotiate the use of ungrading in order to arrive at the ultimatedecision. Further, in the case of E2 (the capstone course), there was a department expectationthat a significant portion of the grade would be based on student performance.Dimension: Emphasis. Across the instances of ungrading, there were three instances in whichungrading mediated the entire grade (A1, A2, and E1). In the remaining instance (E2), studentswere told that the ungrading effort would account for 30% of the grade (and the rest of the gradewould be based on the capstone project effort).The notion of tradeoffs may not be relevant to motivations, but

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Engineering School, then as a Jefferson Science Fellow at the U.S. Department of State in 2019. Her research focuses on sensors, combining organic materials, including polymers and biological cells, with conventional devices.Dr. Vincent Nguyen, University of Maryland, College Park Vincent P. Nguyen is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is a founding member of the Environmental and Socially Responsible Engineering (ESRE) group who work to integrate and track conscientious engineering aspects throughout the undergraduate educational experience across the college. His efforts include formally integrating sustainability design requirements into the mechanical engineering capstone projects

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy L Brooks, Oregon State University; Jeff Knowles; Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shane A. Brown, P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

University Elliott Clement is a doctoral student at Oregon State University. His current research is using grounded theory to understand identity and motivation within the context of capstone design courses. He is also part of a research team investigating context-specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education division at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in prac- tice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tiantian Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kristin Bartlett; Wanju Huang, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

-Based Enterprise”, and “6: MBSE Capstone Project”. These aredesigned to provide students with enough knowledge and practice to enable them to startapplying MBSE in their professional environments.The interview protocol was constructed to understand instructor experiences using the modules,the scaffoldings they provided to learners, and the effectiveness of the modules as perceived bythem. All the participants in this WIP were involved in the module design process as contentselectors or as content producers. Content selectors were responsible for content selection andestablishing main course goals in the modules while collaborating with instructional designers onthe pedagogical approach. Content producers were in charge of transferring the

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Liu; Greg Evans P.Eng.; Milad Moghaddas; Tamara Kecman

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

sources were part of a larger research project with the researchethics protocol approved by the Canadian university.In the survey, instructors were asked about the changes in their teaching practices and theirprofessional development activities from 2020 to 2022; their perceptions of certain teachingpractices in terms of teaching effectiveness; and their views on how to move forward. Theresponse rate of the instructor survey was 20%, based on the completed 81 responses. Of the 81instructors who completed the survey, 64% were tenure-stream faculty members, and 36% wereteaching-stream faculty members or sessional instructors. The respondents had varying lengthsof teaching experience, with 43% having taught more than 20 years, 29% having 11 to 20