Conference Session

Faculty Development: Grading and Artificial Intelligence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azadeh Hassani, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Guy Trainin, University of Nebraska Lincoln; Jordan M Wheeler, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. The Chronicle of Higher Education has observed, One year after its release, ChatGPT has pushed higher education into a liminal place. Colleges are still hammering out large-scale plans and policies governing how generative AI will be dealt with in operations, research, and academic programming. But professors have been forced more immediately to adapt their classrooms to its presence. Those adaptations vary significantly, depending on whether they see the technology as a tool that can aid learning or as a threat that inhibits it [11]. Faculty perspectives and responses are particularly critical in professional programs suchas engineering, medicine, and teacher preparation, where the rapid integration

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

bepresented as a lightning talk.Keywords—Faculty Professional Development, Mentor, Mentee, Faculty, EngineeringIntroductionThere is a growing discourse on faculty professional development within the field of engineeringto improve pedagogical practices within engineering and to enhance students’ learning [1], [2],[3], [4]. With a major shift in technological advancements within education due to large languagemodels (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), the focus of teaching should not only be on lecture content butalso on effective didactic approaches [5], [6]. It has been found that the classroom environmenthas a profound impact on student success and learning [7]. Additionally, there is limited literatureon transparent communication of engineering faculty with