22.768.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Helping Freshmen Develop a Personal Identity as an EngineerAbstractFreshman retention is a top priority in nearly all engineering schools. Increased retentionoptimizes new-student recruitment dollars, decreases students‟ time to graduation, impactsschool rankings, and helps to meet industry‟s increasing demand for engineers. Most researchersand experts in the field agree on a number of basic tenants of retention. Topmost are the tenantsof creating community amongst freshmen, bonding freshmen with returning students, creatingopportunities for meaningful interaction between freshmen and faculty both in and outside of theclassroom, helping freshmen
] hasbeen used as the basis to develop a construct for engineering identity development within theengineering education community. The science identity model advances that science identitydevelops intersectional and over time. Research on engineering identity emerged from variousacademic strands, including psychology and sociology. The definition of identity in this study isviewed through the social lens. Identity is defined as "being recognized as a certain 'kind ofperson' in a given context" [16, p.99]. The given context focuses on individual socialperformances rather than their uniqueness as a person. Our context is this study is specific toengineering and how students self-described and are seen within the context of engineering
Education, 2012 “OMG! That’s What an Engineer Does?”: Freshmen Developing a Personal Identity as an EngineerAbstractFreshman retention is a top priority in nearly all engineering schools. Increased retentionoptimizes new-student recruitment dollars, decreases students’ time to graduation, impactsschool rankings, and helps to meet industry’s increasing demand for engineers. Most researchersand experts in the field agree on a number of basic tenants in retaining engineering freshmen.Topmost are the tenants of creating community amongst freshmen, bonding freshmen withreturning students, creating opportunities for meaningful interaction between freshmen andfaculty both in and outside of the classroom, helping freshmen
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
University in the Department of Chemical and Biolog- ical Engineering since 2007. She is particularly interested in retention of underrepresented groups in engineering and first-year engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WIP: Building the Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Community by Involving Capstone Design Students in Undergraduate CoursesAbstract:Motivated by efforts to retain, prepare, and create a sense of community among engineeringstudents, aspects of a Senior Design Capstone course in the Department of Chemical andBiological Engineering at Montana State University were integrated into freshman- throughjunior-level courses over the course of two years. In the
Paper ID #29475Developing Technical Self-efficacy through a Maker-inspired DesignProjectDr. Jennifer S Mullin, UC Davis Jennifer S. Mullin is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at UC Davis. Her work concerns the intersection between design, communication and prob- lem solving skills in engineering by enhancing all three through informed instructional choices using a ”learn-by-doing,” hands-on approach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Developing Technical Self-efficacy through a Maker-inspired Design ProjectAbstract:This
identify theircultural capital from which to develop their future possible selves as engineers. Throughout thefirst two years, students will be mentored to foster their engineering identity while focusing onsupport for transition to college. Support for transition to college includes encouragement andhelp to form peer learning study groups, study habit workshops, note-taking methods, timemanagement, and financial aid-education. Support for engineering identity development in year1, include opportunities to meet industry professionals, visits to industry sites to learn first-handwhat engineering workplaces look like, engage with engineering leaders through a speakerseries, and attend recurring choice-based 2-hour technical and soft skills building
within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American Society of Engineering Educa- tion. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Tracking Skills Development and Self-Efficacy in a New First-Year Engineering Design CourseAbstract This evidence-based practice paper describes the development and implementation ofsurveys and a focus group to understand the impact of a new first-year engineering design course.With the intent of adding a practical design experience for first-year students, the EngineeringDesign and Communication course was introduced as a pilot program in the fall of 2017 at
Paper ID #16483Student Success through College of Engineering Freshman Year ExperienceProgramProf. John Ross Tapia, New Mexico State University John Ross Tapia has a focus on student engagement and success for all students in their coursework. John Ross is an assistant professor with the Engineering Technology Department at New Mexico State University. He teaches Civil Engineering Technology courses and is the faculty lead for the Freshman Year Experience/ENGR100 course. His research focus is engineering education. Prior to working at NMSU, John worked at New Mexico’s first Early College High school and helped develop the
, and perform at thehighest levels in an increasingly global and demanding world. Educating graduates that meetthese standards is critical to retaining America’s worldwide technical leadership. The MichiganState University College of Engineering has responded to this need through a large-scaleinitiative, the CoRe Experience, that integrates the first-year engineering academic program andan engineering living-learning community to support the academic, personal, and professionalgrowth of early engineering students during this important transition year. Instructors, peers,advisors, staff, and faculty all play a role in “building the whole engineer.” The CoRe Experiencename captures the two primary program components, the Cornerstone Engineering
close relationships with peers and faculty.Students pointed to living near each other as an important factor in developing peer relationships.They were neighbors, friends, and peers all connected through the engineering major.ELC student took two ELC-linked courses each semester. They attended class, worked onlaboratories and homework, and studied together. These in and out of class peer collaborationshelped to foster, build, and maintain close friendships amongst the ELC community members.The social programming that was implemented for the ELC community throughout the year alsohelped to spark and sustain friendships within the community. Students in the focus groupindicated this helped build their peer-to-peer relationships, perseverance to
Paper ID #33743WIP: Halting Attrition in Civil Engineering Programs ThroughLower-Division Engagement Course ImplementationMs. Briceland McLaughlin, Boise State University Briceland McLaughlin is an academic advisor at Boise State University. She graduated with an M.Ed. from the University of Kansas in 2011 and has worked at higher education institutions across the country over the last decade in both student affairs and academic support roles. Briceland is interested in the intersectionality of student development theory and curriculum design.Dr. Nick Hudyma, Boise State University Nick is a professor and chair of Civil
looked at knowledge building in coursework and found that students’ abilities toconnect this to imagined futures was an important factor in their motivation to succeed [3]. Moregenerally, the specific information that instructors emphasize with respect to the future in theclassroom has been shown to be important to students [4].The role of first-year engineering programs also may play a role in students’ continuation andcompletion of an engineering degree and may contribute to a higher graduation rate thanprograms with a direct matriculation [5]. However, these programs are not without challenges.Notable concerns include a potential for a higher student workload, in a time whenadministrations are seeking to reduce this [6]. It has also been
curriculum. Thecommon program, taught entirely in-house, provides the opportunity for the earlydevelopment of a sense of belonging and identity as an engineer. Data presented in the formof student feedback, assessment results and evaluations suggest that this program may wellprovide examples of best practice.IntroductionIn the mid 1990s a series of international reviews of engineering education1,2,3, called forengineering graduates to be: “more outward looking, more attuned to the real concerns of communities. Courses should promote environmental, economic and global awareness, problem-solving ability, engagement with information technology… communication, management and teamwork skills, but on a sound base of mathematics and
. 12[5] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the Development of aProfessional Identity: Engineering Persisters Vs. Engineering Switchers.” ASEE/IEEE Frontiersin Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.[6] M.W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Charchra, and R.A. Layton,“Persistence Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259-278, 2008.[7] C. B. Zoltowski, P. M. Buzzanell, A. O. Brightman, D. Torres, and S. M. Eddington,“Understanding the Professional Formation of Engineers through the Lens of Design Thinking:Unpacking the Wicked Problem of Diversity and Inclusion,” ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Columbus, OH, June
Paper ID #22582Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year CoursesJordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. learning sciences student and lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering De- partments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design Based Research
AC 2012-5144: ENHANCING THE EXPERIENCE IN A FIRST-YEAR EN-GINEERING COURSE THROUGH THE INCORPORATION OF GRAPH-ICAL PROGRAMMING AND DATA ACQUISITION TECHNOLOGYDr. Gregory Warren Bucks, Ohio Northern University Gregory Bucks graduated with his Ph.D. in 2010 from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his B.S.E.E. from the Pennsylvania State University and his M.S.E.C.E. from Purdue University. While at Purdue, he has been heavily involved with the EPICS program, as well as working with the First-year Engineering program. He is currently a visiting Assistant Professor in the electrical and computer engineering and computer science department at Ohio Northern University.Dr. William C. Oakes
2017, the course was instructed by twodoctoral graduate student instructors, and supported by undergraduate teaching assistants and asenior teaching fellow. Students have daily homework assignments, computer lab work, exams,and an engineering-related group project and final presentation. Upper-level engineeringstudents, hired as tutors, assist students each week night to provide guidance and support onhomework assignments and projects. In addition to the academic components of the FYSE program, the program seeks tocultivate community and a network of support among each FYSE cohort (see Appendix B forsample schedule). Team building is strengthened through various team-building activities, suchas a group outdoor challenge-by-choice course
Learning (PAL) programs and provides support to the General Engi- neering Learning Community. She is also co-developer of Entangled Learning, a model of rigorously- documented, self-directed learning in communities of practice. She has an M.A. in Music from The Pennsylvania State University and an M.L.S. from Indiana University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Supporting Student Learning Through Peer-Led Course Support InitiativesAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper outlines the three course support initiatives in place atClemson University to support student learning. In recognizing variation in student needs andlearning preferences, our
student in the School of Engineering at The Univer- sity of Oklahoma. Her passion for engineering education stems from her basic curiosity to develop more effective engineering curriculum to help students to meet their professional demands. This motivated her to take part in engineering education research.Mr. Dan Thomas Carlton, University of Oklahoma, College of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Dan Carlton is pursuing his Bachelor’s in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Oklahoma, where he is expected to graduate in 2016. He is a Midshipman in the Naval ROTC unit at the University of Oklahoma, and is involved in undergraduate fellowship program sponsored by NASA and the Oklahoma Geospatial and Space Grant
development of engineering community relate to the educational process.21 Others,such as race, gender, and interest in other fields depend on a particular student.22,23,24Engineering identity and self-efficacy are the factors that are influenced both by an individualstudent and the educational process.24,13 The first year curriculum is where many universitiesstart tackling all of these retention-related factors.4,25,26,27 Developing experiences in the first yearthat actively engage the student in learning, such as an integrated curriculum, updated teachingmethods, or a cornerstone course, can be used to counteract attrition by improving theeducational process and addressing issues related to student specific variables.28,29,30,31,32Educational
AC 2011-467: ASSESSMENT OF FIRST YEAR EXPERIENCES AT SJSUPatricia R Backer, San Jose State University PATRICIA BACKER is a professor of Technology and the Director of General Engineering at SJSU. In 1997, she received a Fulbright Scholar award in Peru where she taught on the topics of computer-based multimedia. At SJSU, she is involved in developing and assessing outreach programs to increase the number of underrepresented students in engineering.Emily L. Allen, College of Engineering, San Jose State UniversityJanet Sundrud, San Jose State University JANET SUNDRUD is a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies. She specializes in performance theory, queer identities, gender equality, and critical
, teen pregnancy prevention/positive youth development programming, and public health eval- uation.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American Society of
from the freshmen year forward.More work needs to be done, but early results appear to have been successful because wecarefully managed the timing, content, and structure of the coursework, project work, andcommunity work. This combination appears to have made the difference between a traditionallearning community that would largely have helped students form relationships with their peersand faculty, and the iCommunity, in which socialization and connectedness appeared to occurtogether with an additional burst of initiative, confidence, and engineering identity—the Olineffect—witnessed in students at XX. We can hardly wait to track this energized group of youngpeople as they continue through their education. We are working now to provide new
, designed in response to the changing demands placed onengineering graduates in the future, as illustrated by The Engineer of 2020[3] and Educating theEngineer of 2020[4] reports. Both reports illustrate the need for engineers who can effectivelycontribute to the changing landscape of the field through creativity, strong communication skills,an understanding of the principles of leadership and by becoming lifelong learners. [3-4] TheUniversity of Michigan’s program includes elements intended to specifically address theseneeds. We have also explored new models for scalability through a pilot program, includingstudent-led larger group discussions of 50-100 participants.In the following sections, we will offer strategies for the development of a
attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr
and struggle to achieve parity over their educational career (MacPhee, Farro, andCanetto 2013).The qualitative interviews were structured to reflect the hypothesized theory (see Eisenhardt1989) of social belonging as presented in Error! Reference source not found.. The researchersconducting the interviews were all graduates of the engineering class in this study and had servedas a teaching assistant for this course at some time in the previous years. An interviewquestionnaire was developed to reflect the social belonging framework and to align with thequalitative research principles outlined by Corbin and Strauss (2008). A pre-interview reviewwas conducted among all interviewers to answer questions and align expectation and post-interview
Paper ID #18049Work in progress: First-Year Students’ Definitions of Engineering PracticeMrs. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a Curriculum and Instruction PhD student and Graduate Research Assistant for the Speed School of Engineering and College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville. She received a Bachelors in Mathematics and Physics and Masters in Teaching STEM education from the University of Louisville. She is a prior Project Lead the Way Master Teacher and Secondary Educa- tion Engineering Instructor, leading the creation of two engineering programs for
-Birkhimer’s research has focused on broadening participation of women and underrepresented group in STEM fields. Recently, she has been investigating the intersec- tion of education and career path with cultural identity and is developing strategies to inform programming and policies that facilitate recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in academia. In 2012 Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer was presented with an Outstanding Alumni Award from the Department of Earth, At- mospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University. She also serves on their Alumni Advisory Board. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer earned her B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Minnesota, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science from Purdue
Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include self-directed learning and motivation, learning within communities of prac- tice, the cultural influence on informal and formal learning, and intergenerational learning. Abby currently works as a graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community, which supports freshmen engineering students in building effective learning strategies that are transferable to the workforce, includ- ing collaboration, self-regulation, and reflection. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to Promote Engineering SuccessAbstractThis Work in