Engineering Effective solution Desire to solve engineering problems approach algorithms technical problems k. Use techniques, skills & Engineering tools Efficient, effective Need to assess tools of engineering use of tools limitations of tools b. Design & conduct Experimental Laboratory Empirical stance experiments, interpret data method techniquesII c. Design a system, Design methodology Design process, Open to risk and component or process creativity uncertainty d
Program for the New Millenium,” ASEE Southeastern Regional Conf, April 6-8, 1998, Orlando, FL.[5] Goff, R.M. and Gregg, M.H. "Why Hands-on Design? A First Year Hands-on Design & Dissection Laboratory", 1998 Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA) National Design Education Conference. Long Beach, CA September 21-23, 1998. Proceedings are on CD. Page 11.657.14[6] York, S. C., “Providing early design/build opportunities to Freshman Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the ASEE 2002 Annual Conference and Exposition, June 16-19, 2002, Montréal, Quebec Canada.[7] Lo, Jenny, Richard M. Goff
engineering design is to build a course out ofactivities that are woven around a well-established process in order to allow students toexperience design rather than just listen to how it is supposed to work. It is well known throughresearch and practice that incorporating learning activities into a course better facilitates thestudent learning process as compared with more passive approaches2,6,13,14,15. First-yearengineering design courses typically include standard design-and-build projects, designcompetitions, laboratory projects, and other projects that span many weeks. These projects areactive and hands-on, but are often relatively self-contained and separate from the exercises ofpresenting a design process and becoming familiar with other
innovative educational materials as part of the Laboratory for InnovativeTechnology and Engineering Education (LITEE). This paper describes the project goals,summary of some of the case studies that have been developed, methods to integratethese case studies with theoretical materials, and evaluation of implementing thesematerials in freshman engineering classrooms. Page 11.842.4Establishing Project Goals Information technology is essential for solving critical national problems in areassuch as science and engineering, the environment, health care, and governmentoperations; but new fundamental understanding is required to make optimal
Technology, and was formally a Jr. Researcher in the Laboratory for Interactive Learning Technologies at the University of Hawaii. She is co-author of several publications on collaborative learning.Jennifer Beller, Washington State University Jennifer M. Beller, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Educational Psychology in the Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology at Washington State University. She is co-author of six ASEE proceeding papers, including one that won the ASEE Best Conference Paper.Greg Crouch, Washington State University Greg Crouch is associate professor of chemistry at Washington State University. In addition to organic chemistry research, Greg’s
Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp, 319-345 2. Lichtenstein, G. , McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D. and Puma, J, “Comparing the Undergraduate Experience of Engineers to All Other Majors: Significant Differences are Programmatic.” Journal of Engineering Education, 99: 305-317, October 2010. 3. Felder and R. Brent, “Why Students Fail Tests: 1. Ineffective Studying.” Chem. Engr. Education, 50(2), 151-152 (Spring 2016). 4. Newcomb and Bagwell, “Collaborative Learning in an Introduction to Psychological Science Laboratory: Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Teach to Learn.” Teaching of Psychology, April 1997, Vol. 24(2), pp. 88-95. 5. V. Tinto, “Taking Retention Seriously: Rethinking the
to offer training and/or teaching in new skillsand/or knowledge [51]. For quite some time now, many colleges have provided makerspace-analogous functionalities, including assembly/testing areas, machine shops, Computer AidedDesign laboratories, and/or classrooms. What universities often disregard is the inclusion all ofthese elements in one location [52]. For campuses that do implement such centralizedaccommodations, the majority of these makerspaces are utilized predominantly for informalsettings. Utilizing a makerspace for housing an introductory course in engineering, such as ENGR111, fosters a formal setting that includes a variety of disciplines that draws in diverse backgroundsand varying levels of expertise.If structured properly
provided withthe help of hands-on laboratory experiments. The course is divided into lecture and hand-on labs.The topics included covered in lecture are engineering design process, problem solving, technicalcommunication, engineering ethics and teamwork. Utilizing engineering tools to analyze dataand solve real world problems is an important aspect of the course. Analyzing data in MicrosoftExcel, Programming in MATLAB and Design Project are three major areas of the lecturecomponents of the course. Data analysis concepts involve creation of arrays, use of arithmeticoperators, use of built-in functions, graphing techniques for single or multiple datasets inMicrosoft Excel. An Alternative approach to data analysis is presented using MATLABprogramming
tear of thestudents’ laptops while in use, and these investments need to be constantly renewed. Finally thelarge number of students who enter today’s engineering programs at many institutions providesits own logistical barrier to retention efforts. Developing laboratory experiences that promotepersonal discovery are made more difficult the larger the number of students that must haveaccess.III. Creating a First-Year Computer Programming CourseStudents entering a large engineering program bring a wide variety of background skills. Whilethe ability to understand how computers and computer programming works, and what these toolscan enable is considered to be a basic skill of the modern engineer there is a wide range of howcomputer-ready students
students. The course istaught by an assistant professor in the civil engineering department specializing in structural andmaterials engineering. The students met in a small classroom (20 student capacity) located in thecivil engineering teaching laboratory once per week for one hour and twenty minutes. Theclassroom was equipped with four large tables capable of seating up to five students, fourcomputers, a projector, and a 3D printer. Each computer was equipped with Microsoft Office®AutoCad®, STAADPro® and PASCO®. The students were provided with weekly lecturematerial via PowerPoint presentations and embedded video tutorials. All lecture material andproject descriptions were made available to the students four to five days prior to the lecture.The
learning engineeringsurvey (APPLES) (TR-10-01)”. Technical Report CAEE-TR-10-01. Seattle, WA: Center for the Advancement forEngineering Education, September, 2010.[3] Brown, P. R., “Unlocking student motivation: development of an engineering motivation survey”, in AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings of, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[4] Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A.,Harackiewicz, J. M., “Measuring situational interest in academic domains”, in Education and PsychologicalMeasurement, DOI: 10.1177/0013164409355699[5] Huettel, L., “Connecting theory and practice: laboratory-based explorations of the NAE Grand Challenges,” inAmerican Society for Engineering
. degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from University of Strathclyde, UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University on various projects in the area of CFD and heat and mass transfer. Dr. Yan has taught a variety of courses including fluid mechanics, fluid machines, mechanics of materials, calculus, and kinematics and dynamic. She has also developed undergraduate fluids laboratories and supervised many capstone projects. Her interest in SoTL is evidence-based teaching strategies, student engagement, faculty development, and teaching and learning communities. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with APEGBC and has served as reviewer for various
Paper ID #15772Summer Bridge Program Structured to Cover Most Demanding STEM Top-icsMs. Megan McSpedon, Rice University Megan McSpedon is the Associate Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program. She has been with the program since it was founded in 2012. Megan received a B.A. in English from Rice University.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Professor in the Practice in the Bioengineering Department and Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Education in the School of Engineering at Rice University. Saterbak was responsible for developing the laboratory program in Bioengineering. Saterbak introduced problem
engineers for 2020 and beyond. Available from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7126/7639.aspx4 Merriam, S., & Bierema, L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.5 Arkes, J. (1999). What do educational credentials signal and why do employers value credentials? Economics of Education Review, 18, 133-1416 Morell, L. (2012). Engineering education in the 21st century: Roles, opportunities, and challenges. Hewlett Packard Laboratories. Available from http://luenymorell.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/morell- eng-edu-in-21st-cent-roles-opport-and-challenges.pdf7 Young, J. (2012). Badges earned online
Paper ID #12397A First-Year Project-Based Design Course with Management Simulation andGame-Based Learning ElementsMr. Daniel D. Anastasio, University of Connecticut Daniel Anastasio received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut while acting as a co- instructor for the chemical engineering capstone laboratory and the first-year foundations of engineering course. His research interests include osmotically driven membrane separations and engineering peda- gogy.Ms. Malgorzata Chwatko, University of
students in allsections of the course. As the instructors at UM note, not all faculty have access to an on-campuseducational theater group. Even so, we were inspired enough to make our own presentation. Ourintroduction to engineering course is divided into a portion that is team-based, a weekly lecture,and a portion that is conducted in a more traditional laboratory-and-recitation format. Thecourse’s instructional team itself is team-based, which means we value the power of teams at thesame time that we incorporate ideas from a wide range of sources. It seemed to us that even aneffort that was not supported by an educational theater group would be beneficial to initiating aconversation about teamwork.A. Literature ReviewAlthough much of the
most majors in theschool of engineering, and the course is designed to provide a foundation in the soft skillsstudents will need in future engineering courses (such as giving presentations, following labinstructions, using software, as well as working on teams). All students in the class meet once aweek for lecture, which is where this course’s version of the educational theater took place. Thecourse also requires weekly interdisciplinary laboratory experiments and recitations forpresentations in sections of up to 18 students. In addition, an independent design project that isdeveloped by teams is required. Students rank their top choices of various design projects andthen are placed into teams during the third week of class. Although the
of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ. Res. Rev. 2, 130–144 (2007).27. Popham, W. J. Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. (Pearson, 2014).28. Reddy, Y. M. & Andrade, H. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 35, 435–448 (2010).29. Andrade, H. G. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educ. Leadersh. 57, 13– 18 (2000).30. Kellogg, R. S., Mann, J. A. & Dieterich, A. Developing and using rubrics to evaluate subjective engineering laboratory and design reports. in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 1–10 (2001).31. Lovorn, M. G. & Rezaei, A. R. Assessing the assessment: Rubrics training for pre-service
, “Predicting performance in a first engineering calculus course: Implications for interventions,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2015.[33] D. B. Bellinger, M. S. DeCaro, and P. A. S. Ralston, “Mindfulness, anxiety, and high- stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom,” Conscious. Cogn., vol. 37, pp. 123–132, 2015.[34] J. P. Weaver, M. S. DeCaro, J. L. Hieb, and P. A. Ralston, “Social Belonging and First- Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention.” ASEE Conferences, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[35] P. Weaver, J., DeCaro, M., Hieb, J., Ralston, “Social Belonging and First-Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention,” in ASEE
a way of approaching the design process and asks howwe design to 1) preserve and rejuvenate this existing infrastructure, and 2) create newinfrastructure that will help to make our cities more sustainable. Students will use [the local city]as a laboratory to apply principles of reverse engineering to understand existing infrastructureand apply the design process to develop creative solutions to urban infrastructure problems.Engineering Failures: Lessons for the Future (Civil and Environmental Engineering –Instructor 5)Unless they are constructed and used entirely at sea, in the air, or in space, all structures aresupported by soil and/or rock for at least part of their design life. Geotechnical engineering is thearea of engineering that
housing for the duration of the three-weekprogram. The main goal of the FYSE program is to strengthen engineering-related mathematicsskills, with particular focus on pre-calculus and the application of engineering problem solving.Each day during the week, the students participate in several classroom and laboratory hours ofmath-intensive curriculum aligned with practicing and strengthening engineering problem-solving skills (see Appendix A for sample syllabus from 2017). From 2012, the coursework has 5been taught by three university faculty members and instructors and assisted by a graduateassistant and undergraduate teaching assistants. In
Education. ASEE Board of Directors. June 2016,www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/our-mission.[4] Big Beacon. 2012. Big Beacon Manifesto [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved fromhttp://bigbeacon.org/big-beacon-manifesto.pdf[5] Crittenden, K., Hall, D., Brackin, P. Living with the Lab: Sustainable Lab Experiences for FreshmanEngineering Students American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition,June 2010. 2010 Best Paper Award, Division of Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies[6] Hall, D.E., Cronk, S.R., Brackin, P.D., Barker, J.M., Crittenden, K.B. Living with the Lab: ACurriculum to Prepare Freshman Students to Meet the Attributes of "The Engineer of 2020," AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual
, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechani- cal and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineer- ing Students. Her research interests include energy and thermodynamic related topics. Since 2007 she has been actively involved in recruiting and outreach for the Statler College, as part of this involvement Dr. Morris frequently makes
(Any 2) Completed (Any 2) Completed (Any 2) Completed (Any 2) (Mechanical) (Materials Science) (Civil) (Electrical) Heat Transfer MSE Laboratory Engr. Properties of Signals & Systems Construction Materials Applied Mechanics Mech. Behavior of Transportation Engr. System Modeling of Materials Materials Fundamentals and Control Kinematics and Thermodynamics of Reinforced Concrete Microelectronic Machine Dynamics Materials Design Circuits
can serve alarger number of students.Each team was given a budget of $50 that was also covered by funds for laboratory expenses.The students identified sensors, motors, and other materials that were ordered for the class. Thisallowed the greatest flexibility for the students but it created a number of logistical challengeswith purchasing such a wide array of items. On the next iteration, we would offer a list ofavailable materials that they could select from rather than having each team select their ownitems. This would simplify the ordering process. The list of items would include sensors (suchas pressure, proximity, motion, light, infrared, force, and flex), small lasers, motors, LED’s,holiday light strings, magnetic card readers
proper format for an engineering laboratory report.Carbon FootprintIn lecture, we discussed a chemistry-based as well as an energy-based approach to calculatingthe amount of CO2 we produce on an annual basis; i.e., our carbon footprint. To obtain“ballpark values,” we pointed the students to several online carbon footprint calculators thathandle various pollution sources. A specific source of CO2 generation is a dorm room, and that’swhat we wanted the students to investigate.The carbon footprint assignment proceeded as follows: • In your dorm, note all the electrical appliances (e.g. refrigerator, computer, lighting, cell phone charger, iPod, etc.). Enter each appliance name into Excel, along with its operating current, voltage, and
from 33 students to 72 students during that time period.The lab and seminar class sizes have remained the same due to constraints in the physical sizelimitations of the laboratories. Though the curriculum itself has remained the same, the deliveryof the curriculum has changed as well. In many instances faculty are making use of newtechnologies such as MasterEngineering©3 and MasteringPhysics©4 to supplement the deliveryof course material.Program ObjectivesSetting the objectives for MacEwan’s engineering program is strongly driven by the processesthat have been summarized in this article thus far. One of the main objectives of the program isto ensure that students from our engineering program are successful in Year Two at the U of A
who are admitted to theScholarship program usually visit several times over a two year period, often with financialsupport from the University. They participate in overnight "Student for a Day" programs, andideally, a one week experiential workshop, the College Introduction Program (CIP). The CIP is a college student-led, faculty-supported, reality-based journey into life as a Four-Year College student, designed for rising high school seniors. This special week, offered threetimes each July, is built around a robotics project which serves not only as an introduction toengineering, but also as a laboratory to explore leadership and team building. The schedule ishigh-intensity, deliberately designed to challenge students in several
has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education research focused on early engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory
assignment asked each student to keep a log for four days of how they spenttheir time, including their use of social media, and display the results in a pie chart that could beshared with the class. To prepare for playing and evaluating educational games, they read,“Digital Game-Based Learning: It’s Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless (13), whichclaimed game based learning is effective and engaging because games involve analyticalthinking, risk taking, and progressive challenges involving choice. Students were then asked togo to the Tiltfactor, (15) a collaborative laboratory that makes screen based computer games, andplay their game Layoff. The game Layoff attempts to comment on the current state of the USfinancial crisis by asking