offered in Part 1. The restructuredPart I, by unanimous Faculty decision, remains a common program of eight x 15-pointcourses for all first-year students, one of which was required by University mandate to be aGeneral Education course. Each of the new 15 point courses would involve 10 hours ofstudent time per week with four hours formal contact time via lectures and tutorials,laboratory time where relevant, while the remaining time was self learning time for studentsto complete problem exercises, assignments and independent study.Four courses remained essentially unchanged, albeit with content reduction. These were thetwo-point courses Mathematical Modelling, Engineering Mechanics, Materials Science andElectrical and Digital Systems. The Design
University. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics, predominantly di-electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned aNSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within herMedical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development ofDesktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi-ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committeeand PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributedto 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles
Laboratory on campus where she works with lithium ion coin cells. She has completed two co-ops, where she has worked on grid-scale energy storage technologies and electrochemically medi- ated CO2 capture devices. She is an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship recipient and will begin pursuing a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at Brown University this Fall.Ms. Hannah Boyce, Northeastern University Hannah Boyce is a fourth year undergraduate student pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering at North- eastern University. She has been involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program for a three years, is a peer mentor, President of AIChE and Conference Chair for the 2021 AIChE Northeast Regional Con- ference. She
materials recycling for pavement construction and numerical analysis in engineering appli- cations. He teaches Statics, Soil Mechanics and Foundation (Lectures and Labs), and Transportation Engineering Laboratories at CSU Chico.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, California State University, Chico Kathleen Meehan earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Manhattan College and her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Illinois. After graduation, she worked at Lytel, Inc., Polaroid Corporation, and Biocontrol Technology. She moved into academia full-time in 1997 and worked at the University of Denver, West Virginia University, and Virginia Tech. From 2013 to 2017, she was the director of the Electronics and Electrical Engineering
peers.As we enter an age when diversity is highly valued, inclusion and equity are becoming commonterms associated with learning and work environments. ABET EAC Student Outcome 5 specifiescreating “a collaborative and inclusive environment” as part of teamwork, and, as such, it isessential we educate our incoming students on these topics and provide support for their socialand emotional development as part of their professional development.The authors present a new model for an engineering orientation for first-year students thatintroduces them to professional codes of conduct and educates students on the importance ofacting professionally and ethically in classrooms, laboratories, makerspaces, and even in thehallways. The orientation also
civil engineering, economics, pharmacy, andchemical engineering. The showed a higher GPA at the end of the term compared with a generalgroup and a control group. This effect lasted for several semesters.A successful experiment was run at Baylor University which improved the GPA and retention ofstudents taking the introductory freshmen engineering class.14 All students (90) were required to Page 14.1294.8attend a “Success4Students” seminar in place of the laboratory the first week of class. Thestudents were then encouraged to complete 12 weeks of Internet follow-up to get three points ofextra credit on their semester average. A control group of 90
projects could be replaced with two lectures and two homeworkassignments, with a lower teaching load but different learning outcomes.In addition to the time requirements, there is a significant increase in stress and apparentworkload from the expectations from the client and the larger community that the SL projects Page 11.879.13will be a success. For all these reasons, the instructor reports feeling “burnt out” after thecompletion of the projects. Possible reductions in workload may be achieved through theaddition of the engineering workshop and technical laboratory instructor, additional training andearlier recruitment of teaching assistants to
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for
Engineering from Wright State University, in Day- ton, Ohio. Her experience with teaching first-year engineering students has led to research interests in curriculum development, student empowerment and the development of holistic engineers through the collaboration with engineering stakeholders.Prof. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is an Assistant Professor and the director of the Multiphase Microfluidics Laboratory at Kansas State University. She received her PhD from Columbia University and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the George Washington University. Her research aims to acquire new fundamental understanding of phase-change processes. She is passionate about research
providing “hands-on” laboratory experience is one of the major challenges of online courses11-12, which causesmajority engineering faculty members and administrators to “shy” away from online education2-5 . University of Wisconsin Colleges offers an online project based introductory engineeringcourse, the first and only one of this kind offered in the nation13, however, one of the two teamprojects involved in this course did not have any “hands-on” aspect involved while for the otherone team members each build the same design and a final design was required to be built by onlyone member of the team and sent to the instructor for evaluation13. Our introduction toengineering course, on the other hand, has been designed such that students work in
into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it.Ms. Katherine Christine Tetrick, Washington State University Katherine directs the Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) program at Washington State Uni- versity. She holds a Master
. Previously, he conducted research as a Student Summer Fellow in the Hypersonic Sciences Branch at the Air Force Research Laboratory under the direction of Dr. Roger Kimmel. Carson is a Graduate Associate for the Kaneb Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Notre Dame, where he designs, prepares, and delivers workshops on effective teaching strategies and pedagogy for faculty, postdoctoral students, and graduate students. He is also a Graduate Fellow with the Research and Assessment for Learning (ReAL) Design Lab at the University of Notre Dame, where he conducts research to create predictive learning analytics and dynamic driven admissions criteria to better serve underprepared and underserved engineering
,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, paper 2006-911, Chicago, IL, June 2006.2. J.-D. Yoder, B. K. Jaeger, and J. K. Estell, “One-Minute Engineer, Nth Generation: Expansion to a Small Private University,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, paper 2007-599, Honolulu, HI, June 2007.3. J. Renaud, C. Squier, and S. C. Larsen, “Integration of a Communicating Science Module into an Advanced Chemistry Laboratory Course,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7 (July 2006), pp. 1029-1031.4. J. Renaud, personal communication, 11 September 2006.5. J. K. Estell and J. K. Hurtig, “Using Rubrics for the Assessment of Senior Design
College’s Engineering StudentSuccess Center during the academic year and had rigorous training in advising and mentoring.The peer mentors formally interacted with the EXCEED students through active participation inthe projects and activities and leading nightly small discussion groups and informally duringmeals and break times.Campus Resource Hunt: Teams of students went on a photo “scavenger” hunt to discover theresources across campus, including the library, counseling, registrar, bursar’s office, writingcenter, and tutoring and advising centers.College of Engineering Tour: Students went on a comprehensive tour of the buildinghighlighting classrooms, student club space, laboratories, and department offices.Student Panels: Groups of current
Paper ID #7189Engaging Early Engineering Students (EEES): A Fourth Year Report froman NSF STEP ProjectDr. Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University Jon Sticklen is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State Univer- sity. Dr. Sticklen is also Director of Applied Engineering Sciences, an undergraduate bachelor of science degree program in the MSU College of Engineering that focuses both on engineering and business. He also is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen formerly led a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task
an Assistant Professor of civil and environmental engineering with a specialty in geotechnical engineering. Her civil engineering research projects typically involve testing geosynthetic materials, as well as instrumenting and monitoring large-scale civil engineering structures constructed with geosynthetic inclusions to determine their performance behaviors in the field. Warren has more re- cently become involved in the educational research arena and is currently implementing classroom inno- vations in a core civil engineering undergraduate course to determine and assess the impact of interactive learning as part of a course, curriculum, and laboratory improvement grant
is required by someengineering programs but not by others within the school, thus providing a reasonable controlgroup with which to analyze retention differences. Retention was considered over eight cohortyears revealing a first-year retention rate of 86% for those taking the FYEP course, compared to78% for those not taking the course. Retention to the senior year was 64% for FYEP students,compared to 54% for the rest. Although the graduation rate seems higher than the average, theydo have selective admittance into their engineering program. Baylor University has implementeda freshman engineering course focused on laboratory experiences and two design-build-testprojects.24 The first offerings of this course have shown first-year retention
AC 2011-2517: CONSIDERATION OF HAPPENSTANCE THEORY IN MA-JOR SELECTION AND MIGRATION IN A LARGE ENGINEERING PRO-GRAMOdis Hayden Griffin, Jr., East Carolina University O. Hayden Griffin, Jr. is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He has over 35 years experience in industrial and government laboratories and academia.Sandie J. Griffin, Sandie J. Griffin is an academic advisor with over 15 years of university experience. She holds a BA in elementary education from Virginia Tech and an MS in academic advising from Kansas State University. Page 22.376.1
range of new technologies and systems.Dr. Mar´ıa Helguera, Rochester Institute of Technology Mar´ıa Helguera was born in Mexico city where she got a BS in Physics from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). She also holds an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Rochester and a PhD in Imaging Science from the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) . Dr. Helguera is the principal investigator in the Biomedical and Materials Multimodal Imaging Laboratory in the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (CIS), RIT. Dr. Helguera is also very interested in implementing novel pedagogies in science and technology and has been involved with the freshman imaging project since its inception
-Engineering, Shawnee Mission High SchoolMs. Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkMr. Christopher Stephen Smith, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mr. Smith is an instructor at the Pennsylvania State University in the School of Engineering Design, Tech- nology, and Professional Programs. He is also a research engineer at the Applied Research Laboratory at the Pennsylvania State University. His education consits of a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and an M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University