engineers use in professional practice15. Professional Development – Student development in ethics, etiquette, interviewing, presentations, “dress for success”, and interpersonal skills is an integral part of the EPD sequence. Graduates of the program frequently refer to the positive impact the professional development activities had on their experiences as interns and ultimately in the careers. Citizen Development – Students learn that engineers are servants to society through presentations, reading activities, and a minimum of 70 of hours of community service that they complete while at Itasca. Examples of the activities include road-side clean- ups, recreational trail maintenance, local
, increasing ESL student achievement, and meeting the needs of secondary ESL students in the content areas. Current interests include, developing programs which ensure university success for ESL students, integrated curriculum at an aviation focused university, and accreditation processes.Hemdeep Dulthummon, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise University Hemdeep Dulthummon is an undergraduate student at Dubai Aerospace Enterprise University. He is currently doing a B.Sc. in Flight and Aviation Management but plans to switch to Aerospace Engineering. Page 13.629.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008
AC 2008-654: TINKERING INTERACTIONS ON FRESHMAN ENGINEERINGDESIGN TEAMSArlisa Labrie Richardson, Arizona State University Arlisa Labrie Richardson graduated from Grambling State University with a BS in Physics. After ten years of engineering experience in the semiconductor industry, she returned to graduate school to earn a MS in Engineering of Materials from Arizona State University. In May 2008 she completed her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Science Education at Arizona State University. Her research interest includes freshman engineering and retention efforts for female engineering students. In her current position as the Coordinator of Instructional
AC 2010-384: PEER MENTORING: IMPACT ON MENTEES AND COMPARISONWITH NON-PARTICIPANTSRose Marra, University of Missouri ROSE M. MARRA is an Associate Professor in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is Co-Director of the NSF-funded Assessing Women andMen in Engineering (AWE) and Assessing Women In Student Environments (AWISE) projects and Co-PI of the National Girls Collaborative Project. Her research interests include gender equity issues, the epistemological development of college students, and promoting meaningful learning in web-based environments.Whitney Edmister, Virginia Tech WHITNEY A. EDMISTER is the Assistant Director of the
undergraduate engineering students. This requires for integration of students fromvarying engineering disciplines and from different educational levels of their undergraduatetenure. Our program is focused to serve as an introduction to engineering design for first yearstudents with limited technical backgrounds in any specific realm of engineering. Furthermore,EPICS is not a mandatory component for students at Purdue. However, since our CSLP programis integrated into our mandatory first-year curriculum, we can ensure that each student is giventhe opportunity to participate.Our program is part of the National EPICS program. While we share the same vision as ourpartner institutions, our approaches vary significantly. We believe in the importance of
related to self-understanding (personal strengths [8], values, ethics and social identity).Students completed eight reflection assignments, based on the lecture and discussion topics.Prior to Fall 2018, course evaluations for ENGR 110 consistently indicated that some studentsdesired more exposure to careers within the engineering field, while other students needed moresupport leveraging academic resources and integrating into the engineering communitysuccessfully. Many students indicated that their primary motivation for enrolling in the coursewas to determine which major to pursue and had limited interest in other topics provided by thecourse. In an effort to improve student engagement and motivation across a range of needs, weintroduced student
-levelengineering courses. A shocking percentage of these students do not make it to their second yearwithin their chosen engineering discipline, either switching majors or leaving the universityentirely. Dr. Nathan Klingbeil of Wright State University first observed that, traditionally, only42% of engineering or computer science majors at Wright State advance beyond first-yearcalculus classes to seek their degrees 1. Thus, in an effort to improve student retention, in 2004WSU under the care of Dr. Klingbeil developed a mathematics education model which is Page 22.585.2designed to incorporate a new introductory math course into the engineering curriculum
assessment shows students find this course dramatically improves their ability to work inteams. For instance, data from Section 04 for fall 2008 shows that 75% of students found thatthis course is “very useful” in learning attributes of an effective team member. 94% respondedthat is was “very useful” or “useful.” These results are based upon a sample of 16 responses froma class of 18 students.Implementation and ResultsThis research has led to curriculum changes that instructors are currently implementing.Instructors implemented new curriculum related to the bridge project during the fall 2008semester and instructors will begin implementing the other proposed curriculum changes in thespring and fall semesters of 2009. Instructors expect some
ABET criteria. One of the main ABEToutcomes is to have engineering students communicate effectively. Being a brilliant andcreative engineer is just not enough, in today’s global world engineers need be able towork and communicate in diverse teams and should be able to influence and engagecoworkers in discussions and negotiations. Writing technical information appropriately tocommunicate with others is essential and needs to be developed in technical subjects withstudents who study engineering. In this paper authors will describe and consider thecourse work plan for a successful capstone project taught at the Petroleum Institute, AbuDhabi.IntroductionCapstone design has become an integral component of the undergraduate engineeringprogram
Paper ID #14145Bringing technology to the First Year Design Experience through the use ofElectronic Design NotebooksDr. Tracy Jane Puccinelli, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison In 2011, I joined the Biomedical Engineering (BME) Department as a Lecturer and Outreach Coordinator. As part of the BME design faculty, I work on curriculum development, as well as innovative approaches for teaching design. I coordinate BME outreach, advising BME seniors as they develop interactive hands- on activities for K-12 students that teach biomedical engineering concepts. Additionally, in 2012, I began teaching an
they would with traditional techniques.” Bowen 13 describes an introductory class incomputing that is focused on MATLAB as a replacement for FORTRAN. As Bowen observes,“Inclusion of computer programming early in the curricula has been seen by the CivilEngineering faculty as a way of improving the students' skills in logical reasoning, application oftechnical knowledge, and quantitative problem solving.” The students “write MATLABprograms as an integral part of a structural design project where groups of students competeagainst one another to produce a truss-style balsa wood bridge having the highest profit.Throughout the semester a series of homework assignments require students to write MATLABprograms that calculate separate bridge
retained betterinto the following year. In consequence, peer marking is to be retained as a standardcomponent in ELECTENG 101 and is now becoming a standard feature of other first-yearengineering courses at the University of Auckland.Bibliography1. Godfrey, E., Archer, R., Denny, P., Hyland, M., Smaill, C., & Stol, K. (2009). Innovation and Integration in an In-house First-Year Engineering Program: A fast track to Enculturation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX.2. Smaill, C. (2005). The implementation and evaluation of OASIS: a Web-based learning and assessment tool for large classes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 658-663.3. Smaill, C., Godfrey, E., & Rowe, G. (2008
education. At Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech),we had three different groups (faculty, graduate students and upper level undergraduate students)develop design activities. These activities were developed for the ENG1001/1100 coursesequence for first-year students who were enrolled in pre-calculus as their first math course atMichigan Tech as part of an NSF CCLI Phase 1 grant (DUE: 0836861). All groups developedengineering activities that included a: Design/Model/Build sequence, Matlab mathematicalmodel, spreadsheet analyses, and technical communication of their activities. For thecomponents listed previously, lectures and class activities, project description and deliverablesand example Matlab codes were developed for the
AC 2009-62: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERINGSTUDENT PERCEPTIONS ON STUDENT EFFICACYLesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University Lesley Strawderman is an assistant professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering. She conducts research in the area of human factors and ergonomics, specifically looking at the impact of large scale service systems on human use. She has received her IE degrees from Penn State and Kansas State Universities.Bill Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill Elmore is an Associate Professor and Associate Director in the Swalm School of Chemical Engineering. His research interests include K-12 and undergraduate education reform and
” is Susan Engel’s (5) call to turn collegeclassrooms into transformative experiences. Engel focuses on three elements to encouragestudents to think and participate in transformative class discussions that include the following:1.The chance to think like an expert, 2. The chance to come up with new ideas, and 3. Thechance to be part of an intellectual group. In many ways these goals overlap with other findingsto improve STEM education and student retention. For example, Daempfle (6a,b) calls forincreased faculty involvement with students along with actively engaging students in anintegrative curriculum that helps students see relationships between the disciplines and theirprofessions. Volkwein &Cabrera (7) stress the importance of
Engineering Education, 2006 Learning through Service: Analysis of a First Semester, College-Wide, Service-Learning Course1. AbstractService-learning is a pedagogy which strives to integrate student learning with communityservice. In an engineering context, service-learning provides a project-based experience in whichstudents are confronted with real clients and problems, often of immediate need. In the context ofcourse development, however, many engineering faculty seem to feel that service learning isinfeasible in technical and/or large engineering courses, and that the overhead and opportunitycosts associated with service learning exceed the benefits received by students.This paper contemplates two years of service
material before submitting a final answer for eachquestion.Format #3: After watching the entire video, students were required to submit a single completionentry to receive completion marks. Figure 1. An example screenshot of a Category #1 video lecture module.Category #2: Video TutorialsIn video tutorials, an instructor would break down examples, further explaining the applicationof concepts while also demonstrating necessary problem-solving skills. While there was noassessment integrated in this video type, the step-by-step example solutions were a valuablestudy resource for exam preparation.Category #3: Just-In-Time HelpJust-in-time help videos require additional instructor time and effort, but are an important part ofsupported
vibration testing of full scale composite air vehicles.Dr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor and Interim Director of the Swalm School of Chem- ical Engineering. In his role as the Hunter Henry Chair, he serves as Undergraduate Coordinator for the chemical engineering program and Faculty Advisor for the student chapter of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. His research interests include biotechnology for renewable energy and innovation Page 26.867.1 in engineering education through integration of problem-based learning across engineering
Dr. Yacob Astatke completed both his Doctor of Engineering and B.S.E.E. degrees from Morgan State University (MSU) and his M.S.E.E. from Johns Hopkins University. He has been a full time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department at MSU since August 1994 and currently serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation. Dr. Astatke has more than 15 years experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based course supplements for electrical engineering courses.Jumoke ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University DR. JUMOKE LADEJI-OSIAS is an Associate
. Page 12.1433.2This paper provides an overview of the UTC Design curriculum and the faculty supportedfreshmen projects and results. In addition, it discusses the additional learning the studentsexperience outside the expected course learning outcomes and the role this learning andexperience may have on student motivation. Also discussed is the benefit these projects have onthose participating in the upper level courses.Design at UTCThe elements of design are emphasized throughout UTC’s engineering curriculum, beginningwith the freshman year. At least ten credit hours are devoted to teaching (to all engineeringmajors) design concepts in an applied, interdisciplinary setting. At the freshmen level thestudents are introduced to the foundations of
Paper ID #6064A Taxonomy of Engineering Matriculation PracticesMs. Xingyu Chen, Purdue University, West Lafayette Xingyu Chen is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She ob- tained her master’s degree in operational research and bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Zhejiang University, China. She started to pursue her Ph.D. degree in engineering education at Purdue in 2010. She is working with Dr. Ohland on the Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Lon- gitudinal Development (MIDFIELD), and also on the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS
Excellence. Dr. Colgate's principal research interests are cobots - collaborative robots - and haptic interface. He has served as U.S. Editor of Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, and as an associate editor of the Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control and the IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. In addition to his academic pursuits, Dr. Colgate is a founder of Cobotics, Inc. (now part of Stanley Assembly Technologies*) a leading supplier of human interface technologies for the industrial marketplace. From June 1999 until September 2000, Dr. Colgate took a sabbatical leave from Northwestern University to work at Cobotics as the Company’s President. More recently, he
research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate
of general education. In particular, we argue for the positive value of ageneral education program centered on common foundation courses taken by all studentsat an institution. Even more particularly, we argue for the positive value of a foundationcourse, taken by all first- or second-year students, which introduces them to, and providesopportunities for them to practice, their critical, analytical, quantitative, and scientificreasoning skills. Most particularly, we argue for the positive value of such a course forundergraduate Engineering majors. In part one of our paper, we will correlate the goals,objectives, and curriculum of UNST 130 Analytical Reasoning, a general educationfoundation course at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical
integrating opportunities to develop non-disciplinary workplace related skills into college classes.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville where she also received her B.S., MEng, and Ph.D. degrees in chemical engineering. Her educational research interests include the use of technology in engineering education, incorporation of critical thinking in engineering education, and ways to improve retention. Her other interests include process modeling, simulation, and process control
control using Lego Robots. They also used LabVIEW toinvestigate material properties and behavior for metals, polymers, and composites. A series ofshort lectures introduced the topics and were followed by hands-on interactive laboratorysessions, culminating in an open ended design project.A companion thread for the program was critical thinking which is fundamental to excelling inan engineering curriculum. Following a brief exposure to basic concepts, the students took anon-line test to evaluate their critical thinking skills before beginning the workshop activities.The same test was administered as a post test, with more than a 10 % increase in their skills. Themaximum increase was over 30%; interestingly, this was an underrepresented minority
-Sacre, M, Atman, C, J, Shuman, L,J, " Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models fordetermining student attrition in engineering ", Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 2, 1997, 139-149.[2] Grose, T, K, "The 10,000 challenge", ASEE Prism, 2012, 32-35.[3] Johnson, M, J, Sheppard, S, D, "Students entering and exiting the engineering pipeline-identifying key decisionpoints and trends", Frontiers in Education, 2002.[4] Olds, B, M, Miller, R, L, "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates andstudent satisfaction: A longitudinal study", Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 1, 2004, 23-36.[5] Froyd, J. Ohland, M, W, "Integrated engineering curricula", Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 2005
teaches a wide array of courses that includes statics, reinforced concrete design, structural analysis, and materials engineering. Dr. Brake actively integrates project based and peer assisted learning pedagogies into his courses.Dr. James C. Curry Dr. James Curry is an Associate Professor in the Lamar Industrial Engineering department. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The impact of one-credit introductory engineering courses on engineering self-efficacy: seminar v. project-basedAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper presents the results of two different one-credit introductoryengineering courses: i) a project based and peer assisted learning introductory
AC 2009-864: CONNECTOR FACULTY: A FRIENDLY FACE FOR EARLYENGINEERING STUDENTSDaina Briedis, Michigan State University Dr. DAINA BRIEDIS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of
. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of