toillustrate the concepts of programming techniques. This intervention is based on the hypothesisthat students will more quickly learn the fundamentals of programming using CCS0’spedagogical model and programming environment than with a conventional course in C, and thatthey will effectively transfer these understandings to the study of C during the second half of thesame course. Furthermore, SDIm’s inclusion of projects that examine the dynamic behavior ofsimple RLC circuits will reinforce key concepts taught in foundational ECE courses.Introduction and motivationThe University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) offers bachelor programs in several engineeringdisciplines and in Computer Science. One problem reported by many faculty members is thelimited
engineering arestarting to be explored,2 studies on the effect of K-12 engineering programs on university successremain limited.Numerous venues exist for exposure to engineering prior to matriculation in a collegeengineering program. Elementary engineering programs such as Engineering is Elementary aimto reinforce students understanding of mathematics and science via simple engineering designprojects.3 Students can further explore engineering concepts in middle school classes, and studydiscipline-specific content or complete a capstone design project as part of a high school class orcurriculum like those developed by Project Lead The Way4 or the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association.5 Outside of a formal class setting
interpretations of experiences and project forward on possible changestowards a growth mindset. Students understood that growth mindset was not an all or nothingswitch to be flipped.These findings are useful for educators interested in promoting productive beliefs about thenature of intelligence. Future work in this area will include an exploration of how these beliefschange over the undergraduate experience and the development of concrete strategies forstudents to begin to implement growth mindset within an engineering education context.BackgroundThe National Academy of Engineering provides us with a particular vision for the Engineer of2020, and these students will be graduating in just a few short years. As engineering educators,we are called to
Survey of Student ExperienceAbstractThis paper is a report on evidence-based practice in a first year engineering program forMechanical Engineering Students. We adapted a year-long curriculum called Living with the Lab(LWTL) that uses a project-based, hands-on instruction to introduce students to engineeringfundamentals, programming, sensors, controls and engineering design. While adhering to thespirit and much of the content of the original curriculum, we added material, created newhands-on projects, introduced a flipped instructional model for the first course in the sequence,and experimented with an alternative final project model. We briefly describe our key innovationsto the LWTL curriculum.Introduction of this curriculum has coincided with
information sessions, and departmental websites. Less valued sources includetextbook readings, hands-on course projects, and instructors. There were also gender differencesin value of sources, with women valuing departmental information sessions more than men, andmen valuing departmental websites more than women. Overall the process of major selectioncorrelates well with the happenstance theory of Krumboltz1.IntroductionA large engineering program is structured so that all entering freshmen are admitted as GeneralEngineering (GE) majors. Approximately 1300-1600 students enter the program each year andare required to take courses in English, chemistry, mathematics, engineering, and physics beforetransferring to a degree-granting program. As a part of
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
aids to enhanced student learning.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Reeping, University of Michigan
project management 4.07 6. Understand how technical decisions affect business decisions 4.04 7. Work in cross-functional teams with other engineering majors 3.85 8. Work in cross-functional teams with business majors 3.73 9. Understand the engineer’s role in corporate competitiveness 3.72 10. Internship with a company 3.64 11. Read and understand financial statements 3.46 12. Working knowledge of costing methods and cost accounting 3.41 13. Participate in preparing a
leadership, the Women in Engineering Pro- gram received the 2008 National Engineers Week Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day Award. She is the principal investigator for a National Science Foundation’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) grant called the Successful Engineering Education and Development Support (SEEDS) Program. SEEDS extends successful women in engineering retention programs to all first-year and new external transfer students in the Clark School. Paige is the co-lead for the Mid-Atlantic Girls Collaborative (MAGiC), a regional collaborative within the NSF-funded National Girls Collaborative Project which brings together girl-serving organizations across
China’s Universities Universities Project Titles Tsinghua University Hsuch-Sen Tsien Mechanics Program, Andrew Chi-Chih Yao Software Engineering Program Tianjin University Engineering High-level Program Shanghai Jiaotong University Elite Engineering Education Program Tongji University Innovative Competence System for Engineering Students Huazhong University of Science & Experimental Zone for Engineering Education Reform Technology Zhejiang University Chu KoChen Honor College East China University of Science Total Engineering Education Program & TechnologyThe earliest recorded first-year engineering honors program
and organization of an activity. A good example of this may be the DesignDeconstruction project. This requires a great deal of coordination and preplanning, and it is very easy forthe instructors to be zeroing in on the details, instead of the significant benefits the activity yields.In assessing this particular course, we can also note that extensive revision to the curriculum and learningmodes used in the course and classroom has already been accomplished, resulting in a much improvedcourse5,6,12. This was seen in increases in retention and significantly better course evaluation ratings in thecategories of Overall Course, Instructor Effectiveness and Amount Learned in the course. In both of oursurveys, most modes cluster in the high/high
physics behind such structures being implicitly involved in mostcases and explicitly examined in a couple. Recommended group sizes ranged anywhere from twoto five students, with ages ranging from elementary through high school.Many of our students have had prior experience with a tower construction project and withconstruction projects in general during their K-12 experiences. A survey of the freshmanengineering students at Ohio Northern University indicated that 24% had had some experiencewith a tower building assignment, and 50% indicated that they had had prior experience withconstruction-type assignments, primarily building either towers or bridges.One item that the authors were unable to find during their background research was
thislarge, midwestern institution, as well as best practices learned from introduction to engineeringcourses at other institutions. In particular, the final project was based on Ray Landis’ work(Landis 2013). The weekly assignments were 1-page essay assignments. We asked students toreflect on the course’s assigned in-person activities, reading, and videos and to create a personalplan that would set themselves up to becoming a successful engineering student. To the best ofour understanding, this is the largest implementation of “Design Your Successful EngineeringPath” that has been able to grade final reports at this scale.Weekly assignments were assessed with Divide-and-Conquer style grading. Student assignmentswere divided by last name into three
strategies have been proposed and implemented to increaseretention in engineering programs [7] – [12]. Some of the most commonly used techniquesconsist of addressing attrition related to calculus courses [9] – [10]. Some institutions haveoffered calculus courses with significant engineering content highlighting the applicability ofcalculus topics to solving engineering problems [8] – [9]. The inability of incoming students tosuccessfully advance past the traditional freshman calculus sequence remains a primary cause ofattrition in engineering programs across the country [13] – [14].The Citadel is embarking on a project to improve the calculus experience of engineering studentsin order to enhance learning and promote retention. Before designing and
PreCalculus course as Problem-Solving with Brooks and was also afforded the opportunity to lead an impactul Project Lead the Way (PLTW) Principles of Engineering (PoE) course, a project-based learning survey of the engineering discipline. Since the Summer of 2015 I have been privileged to work with the Texas A and M Sketch Recognition Lab (TAMU SRL) to evaluate a couple of online tutorial tools (Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)) cur- rently under development, Mechanix and Sketchtivity, that provide immediate constructive feedback to the students and student-level metrics to the instructors. I presented on this work at the state and national PLTW Conventions and at CPTTE in 2016. I also spent 5 semesters beginning the
Paper ID #31280Work in Progress: Professional Development Module in First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Olukemi Akintewe, University of South Florida Dr. Olukemi Akintewe is an instructional faculty in the Medical Engineering Department at the Univer- sity of South Florida. She received a B.E. degree in chemical engineering from City College of New York, CUNY, a M.Sc in materials science and engineering from the Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of South Florida. Dr. Akintewe’s research focuses on project- based learning in engineering education; engineering predictive assessment
coached about the level of the audience, most of them could not relate tofreshmen. Their talks were often jargon filled and over the students’ heads, and as a result thestudents were confused and bored. The students filled out an evaluation card for each speaker tohelp us understand who reached them and who didn’t. They were also encouraged to addcomments about the presentation. Using this technique we were able to bring back speakers thatcould communicate well with the students.Minds-On and Hands-On Experiences Both theory and experimentation are important in an introduction to engineeringtextbook, but how to do both effectively? By integrating simple design projects into the lectureprocess one can expose students to both theory and
, SJSU was notwhat they expected, family or personal problems, and not feeling connected to campus. Thispaper reports on one project at SJSU, Project Succeed, which was funded under theStrengthening Institutions program from the U.S. Department of Education in 2014. ProjectSucceed is focused on increasing the sense of belonging for freshmen at SJSU.The Project Succeed plan is designed to strengthen SJSU’s campus climate and providefreshmen and sophomores with a culture that promotes academic and social success. This kind ofcampus climate will also promote undergraduate success with the goal of increasing retentionand graduation rates, as well as closing the achievement gap for Under-Represented Minority(URM) students at SJSU. SJSU’s Title III
Maine.introductionEngineers have a vital role in modern society. They are the developers and innovators of theproducts, services, and overall environment in which we live. As consumers, we seekimproved and reliable services. We want innovative, environmentally neutral, andsustainable products. We expect a reliable and safe infrastructure to continue our dailyliving standard. Engineers are needed to keep us at the living standard that we enjoy andexpect.As we enter into the 21st Century, the demand for more engineers in the United States isincreasing. According to projections from the U.S. Department of Labor, “engineeringoccupations will add 178,300 jobs in the 2008-2018 period at a growth of 10.3% [1].”The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects that the number
Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research
assessed, each with the sameinstructor, to determine if learning environment affects the above four traits over the course of asingle semester. One section emphasized in-class advising, with the instructor serving as theacademic advisor to each student in the class. The other section, which served as the controlgroup, spent equivalent time in group project meetings. Both sections of the course engaged inintensive design-build activities for the duration of the semester. Psychometric assessments ofthe constructs were delivered twice – once at the beginning and once at the end of the semester.We found that the learning environment with integrated advising yielded lesser improvementsthan the control environment that placed greater emphasis on team
Tougaw4 provide a survey of the common philosophies behind currentIntroduction to Engineering classes at other institutions. Although the MSU class is closelyaligned with the category that they identify as providing the basic survival skills for collegestudents, the MSU course also covers engineering specific topics as well. A conscious decisionwas made not to develop a project-oriented course (e.g., Elzey1; Lo, Lohani and Griffin7) due tothe significant investment of faculty resources for such a course. Typically students in thesetypes of courses have been admitted into engineering and the goal of such courses is to developtheir design skills and pique their interest in engineering. The faculty have a vested interest inputting the required
with their score could loosely be considered a formative assessment, as thestudents would have minimal feedback regarding their performance (the score), though researchis mixed regarding the effectiveness of this practice11, 12. However, to truly improve and supportstudent learning, incorporating specific feedback with information that lets them know why theiranswer is correct or incorrect is an essential part of formative pedagogy6, 9, 11.ObjectivesThis research project investigates implementing formative no-stakes (optional) quizzing and low-stakes (required) quizzing within Blackboard in a freshman level Construction Managementcourse and evaluates: (1) whether the quizzing helps students to better prepare for medium- andhigh-stakes exams
AC 2011-913: UNDERGRADUATE ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE FOR FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH A SUMMER BRIDGE PRO-GRAMJacqueline Q. Hodge, Texas A&M University Jacqueline Hodge is a native of Giddings, Texas and currently the Project Manager for the Engineering Student Services & Academic Programs Office (ESSAP) at Texas A&M University (TAMU). In her cur- rent position, Jacqueline is responsible for Retention and Enrichment Programs for engineering students. Jacqueline graduated from TAMU with a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. While obtaining her degree, Jacqueline was involved with several community service activities such as the Boys & Girls Club of Bryan, Help One Student To
, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning and As- sistant Professor of Engineering Education & Educational Technology at Purdue University. After study- ing philosophy, religious studies and information science at three universities in Germany, he received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. (2004) in Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, USA. NSF, SSHRC, FQRSC, and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on the intersection between learning, engineering, the social sciences, and technology, particularly sus- tainability, designing open-ended problem/project-based learning
survey14,conducted over 35 institutions, revealed that eleven institutions offered, or will offer in thenext year, a first-year program, of which at least 75% of the courses were taught byacademics from within Engineering. All of the first-year programs surveyed include anintroduction to the engineering profession and engineering life-cycle and/or an EngineeringDesign course, with some excellent examples of active and project based learning based onreal-life engineering problems.The longest-lived of these integrated, common first-year programs is that offered by theUniversity of Auckland (hereafter named U of A), taught entirely in-house since 1996. Thispaper charts the evolution of that program from its first incarnations in 1996
; they are simply asked to fabricate a working machine, but the fabricationchallenge involves cutting thin sheet metal and soldering, and getting a machine to work is anon-trivial task. The midterm of the course ends with a steam car derby. The second project ismore open ended. Teams are supplied with Arduino programmable controller kits with servosand sensors (www.arduino.cc) and asked to devise an interesting project. Projects are judged onfunctionality, originality, and possible usage in the market.The details of the iCommunity structure will be discussed in more detail in a moment, but a keydistinction to make at this juncture is that ENG100++ is a course and iCommunity is anextracurricular activity. In thinking about engineering student
Ed.D., West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. While her doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching in STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions
-controlled Unit Operations experiments, and incorporating Design throughout the Chemical Engineering curricu- lum. She currently works as a freelance Engineering Education Consultant and Chemical Engineer. She is the Project Manager for NSF grant #1623105, IUSE/PFE:RED: FACETS: Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transforming Society, for which she is advising and coordinating assessment.Dr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From
CE-EC courses during theirfirst two years of study without going beyond credit or personal limits.In order to ensure students are receiving a benefit from CE-EC courses, no matter what point intheir academic career they take the courses (it will be highly encouraged to take these courses inthe first two years), we will be offering different options that will appeal to different years. Firstis a Foundations of Engineering (FE) Exam preparation course students will be able to utilize tosatisfy one CE-EC credit. This gives extra support on the back end of degree attainment. Aspecial projects course where students work on American Society of Civil Engineering andAmerican Institute of Steel Construction challenge projects (Concrete Canoe / Steel