Geisinger jhgraham1@geisinger.edu Troy Schwab Bucknell University trschwab7@gmail.comAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes a study on race, gender, and self-bias in first yearengineering student’s team peer evaluations. Our institution runs a first year introduction toengineering course with approximately 200 students that uses team projects over the span of thesemester. Each project has 2-5 students per team and incorporates peer and self evaluations intoeach student’s individual project grades. The researchers began this study to observe how racial,gender, and self-bias
Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into the engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engineering.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an
an engineering educa- tion researcher and practitioner who draws on decades of experience in engineering and higher education. Her expertise includes: project management, program assessment, university-industry partnerships, grant writing, and student development in the co-curricular learning environment with a special focus on re- cruiting, supporting, and graduating students from groups historically underrepresented in engineering. Since 2014, Dr. Ogilvie’s research has focused on engineering transfer students and their experiences at both sending and receiving institutions through an NSF funded multi-institutional study based in Texas (EEC-1428502). Dr. Ogilvie holds multiple degrees in engineering and public
betterperformance (10%) on equivalent final examination problems than the LabVIEW students. Asecond result showed that both groups of students performed equally in MATLAB programmingexercises – their ‘second’ programming language. A third result compared the programmingbeliefs of the pilot and control groups with the instructors’ beliefs. The beliefs survey wasadministered at the beginning and end of the quarter. The pilot group of students exhibited ashift to more expert-like beliefs. This paper provides details about the processes and problemsused in this investigation. The work described here began in early 2007 and was completed in2008. This project was funded by the National Instruments Foundation.IntroductionOhio State’s First-Year Engineering
Paper ID #19038Exploring Engineering Identity in a Common Introduction to EngineeringCourse to Improve RetentionDr. Michele Yatchmeneff, University of Alaska Anchorage Michele Yatchmeneff is Unangax (Aleut) who grew up living a traditional subsistence lifestyle in rural villages along Alaska’s Aleutian chain. She earned a BS in Civil Engineering in 2005 and an MS in Engineering Management in 2009 at University of Alaska Anchorage. After earning her BS she began working in Alaska’s construction and engineering industry, specializing in water and sewer projects in remote villages across the state. She also worked as the
luncheon was scheduled to alignwith the annual Project Day events in which the graduating seniors set up and present theircapstone projects. These capstone projects are industry sponsored and multi-disciplinary. First-year students were able to interact with the seniors, to ask questions about the program, and tosee the types of projects and real world applications that students in the engineering programwere involved with.During the welcome luncheon the seating for the meal was organized by the sections of theIntroduction to Engineering Design I course, the first of the engineering courses that the studentswill be taking. The faculty member who will be instructing the course is placed at the table withstudents enrolled in their class so that they
curricula. He is currently conducting research on an NSF project led by Dr. Stephen Krause, focused on the factors that promote persistence and success for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the
Education Department, Purdue University Syafiah Johari is currently a senior in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. She did research under supervision of Dr. Monica Cox (Associate Professor) and Nikitha Sambamurthy (Graduate Stu- dent) in Engineering Education Department for the 11-week Summer Undergraduate Research Fellow- ship (SURF) program in summer 2014. Her research interests include heat and mass transfer, energy and environment. She was the recipient of Mechanical Engineering Scholarship Award of Purdue University in 2013 in recognition of her outstanding achievement in academic and co-curricular activities and Best Engineering Design Award for the excellent class design project in spring 2013
research on team learning processes in engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Ms. Genevieve Hoffart, University of Calgary Genevieve is completing her honours degree under the supervision of Dr. Thomas O’Neill at the Uni- versity of Calgary looking at the influence processes in teams. She has been working with the Schulich School of Engineering for
Aeronautical University (ERAU),in Daytona Beach, FL has linked three fundamental engineering courses to provide students witha STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) small-learning-community (SLC).The same set of students is registered concurrently for the matching Physics I, Calculus I andProgramming for Engineers courses.Table 1 presents the topics taught in each of the STEM SLC courses. The STEM-SLC facultyfocused on creating mini-projects for their courses that would leverage the common topics, theseare the bold faced topics. For detailed results and an in depth-review of examples of thedeveloped mini-projects please refer to the previously published ASEE conference paper4. Table 1: Description of Calculus I, Physics I
the same general math and science courses as part ofthe engineering requirements, thus working in teams forces collaboration and often friendshipsthat carry over into other engineering courses. In addition to providing a collaborativeengineering design environment, we strive to introduce our first year engineering students in ourIntroduction to Engineering design course to cutting-edge resources and technology to preparethem for a successful engineering career.Introduction to Engineering Design CourseOur Introduction to Engineering Design course offers first year engineering students from allengineering disciplines a chance to work together on design projects, and participate in lecturescovering design topics that span multiple disciplines of
upperclassmen role model that the first-year students can associatewith engineering. On average, each mentor has three to seven mentees. The Eco-Carorganization has sponsored workdays, where new members get paired with older members tocomplete projects. The workdays have encouraged mentor to mentee relationships, whichinvolve teaching new members various skills. They have set up an organized system of sub-leads, where a sub-lead of a specific aspect of the car would serve as a mentor to a group ofmentees. This gives the mentees a consistent person to go to if they ever need help with Eco-Carprojects or projects outside of the organization, such as schoolwork. They plan to set upadditional activities, not directly related to the car, but for various
, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection (such as how to use CATME Team-Maker to form inclusive and diversified teams). In ad- dition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. One feature ongoing project utilizes natural language processing technique to map students’ written peer-to-peer comments with their perceived numerical rat- ings. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at CATME research group.Mr. Chuhan ZhouDr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and the Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue
mechanical engineering majorsmixed. The course met twice a week during the 15 week semester, a 50 minute “lecture” and a160 minute laboratory session. The purpose of the course was three-fold: (a) help students makea good transition to college; (b) introduce students to engineering; and (c) prepare students forthe engineering curriculum by teaching them a number of basic skills.The online aspects of the course are delivered using PathFinder, a website developed at theuniversity. The course chapters are given in the PathFinder Plan Tab shown in Figure 1.Semester projects are used to reinforce course topics. Students work on the project during the labperiod. Projects are chosen by each instructor. Figure 1: PathFinder
disciplines, as well as to teach themhow to use particular tools, employ some data techniques, and write technically.8 Content that iscommon between the two tracks include engineering graphics (both by hand and with a softwarepackage), MATLAB, design, and engineering ethics. They also address an array of professionalskills, including teamwork and oral reporting. The major additional content area for the honorsstudents is computer programming in C and C++. Further, with the additional contact time, thehonors students are able to engage in a more challenging and substantial design project.9 The honorsprogram reserves ten weeks at the end of the program almost exclusively for this project, while thestandard track integrates their design project with
AC 2011-2844: INFLUENCING THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS OF UNDER-GRADUATE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH A LIV-ING LEARNING COMMUNITYJacqueline Q. Hodge, Texas A&M University Jacqueline Hodge is a native of Giddings, Texas and currently the Project Manager for the Engineering Student Services & Academic Programs Office (ESSAP) at Texas A&M University (TAMU). In her cur- rent position, Jacqueline is responsible for Retention and Enrichment Programs for engineering students. Jacqueline graduated from TAMU with a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. While obtaining her degree, Jacqueline was involved with several community service activities such as the Boys & Girls Club of Bryan, Help
they would with traditional techniques.” Bowen 13 describes an introductory class incomputing that is focused on MATLAB as a replacement for FORTRAN. As Bowen observes,“Inclusion of computer programming early in the curricula has been seen by the CivilEngineering faculty as a way of improving the students' skills in logical reasoning, application oftechnical knowledge, and quantitative problem solving.” The students “write MATLABprograms as an integral part of a structural design project where groups of students competeagainst one another to produce a truss-style balsa wood bridge having the highest profit.Throughout the semester a series of homework assignments require students to write MATLABprograms that calculate separate bridge
) education. Afterpilot classes were developed, in 1998 the FC curriculum was implemented college-wide. In2003, the university adopted a track system with the FYE foundational courses separated intothree tracks: Track A (aerospace, agricultural, biomedical, civil, industrial, mechanical, andnuclear engineering), Track B (computer and electrical engineering), and Track C (chemical andpetroleum engineering). Track A was primarily project-based and used Mindstorms, Legos,magnetic balls, and beams to build structures. Track B focused on circuit design and computerprogramming. Only Track C maintained the FC curriculum until 2013. The target population ofthis study is first-time-in-college (FTIC) chemical or petroleum engineering students who startedin
designed as part of larger project that aims to increase the percentage ofminorities and women that work in sustainable chemical and bioenergy technologies. The projectalso included the design of two college-level classes. This summer bridge course, EST 11,piloted portions of one of these 4-credit courses designed for students at Bronx CommunityCollege. EST 11 was funded through both the College Now program and NSF ATE Project#1601636 - Chemical and BioEnergy Technology for Sustainability (CBETS).Curricular DesignThe program focused on introducing high school students to the fields of Chemistry, ChemicalEngineering and Energy Technology while improving their computer skills, math skills, andpreparing them for college life. The goal was to increase
. In addition to his administrative roles, he has guided several research and industrial related projects. He has been involved in receiving over $7 M funding from various industrial and government sources and has been the principle author of numerous papers in national/international journals and publications. He is a fellow of the ASME and an evaluator for the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) as well as member of several national and international organizations. He is also the recipient of Temple University exceptional research award. His current research interests are in the areas of dental materials (NIH), Bioengineering (Various sources), and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems.Carnell Baugh
year engineering course. For thequantitative portion of the study, all participants (control and experimental) were asked tocomplete a pre and post survey, which consisted of the Motivated Strategies of LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ) and several demographic questions. The MSLQ was used to categorizestudents as low, medium, and high self-regulated learners. Participant grades in the first yearengineering course were also collected to look at the performance of the control andexperimental groups. The quantitative data will be used to determine if the FYS 101 course had asignificant impact on the SRL skills and performance of the experimental group when comparedto the control group. Data collection for this project is on-going and results will be
simulations lessen theslow response time of traditional grading.Introductory level classes are described by Koenig[7], that help develop and reinforce basicreasoning skills that are critical in carrying out projects, designs, and experiments later on inSTEM coursework. These classroom exercises are designed so that they scale up in difficulty.Hixon[4] calls this a “spiral curriculum,” and appears to be very useful with engineering designprojects.Our FYE plan is based in part on implementing these experiential learning methods inconjunction with the retention strategies developed by the ECSEL coalition, Kalonji &Gretchen[6]. The FYE is only the first year of a complete four year plan for increasing studentretention. The FYE transitions in the
AC 2011-2916: GENDER SCHEMAS, PRIVILEGE, MICRO-MESSAGING,AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION: PRACTICAL LESSONS FROM THE-ORYYevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. Her research interests lie at the intersection of project-based learning and gender studies with specific emphasis on the curricula and pedagogies implemented in the first-year engineering programs.Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is an Associate Professor of Materials Science at Olin College, where she has been in- volved in the development and evolution of the engineering curriculum since she joined the
the VaNTH NSF ERC forBioengineering Educational Technologies. The CBI instruction was developed and implementedin the areas of reverse engineering, statics, dynamics, energy (including renewable energy), andforward engineering. Additionally, the paper describes the initial impact of the CBI curriculumon the students, including initial assessment results, and the impact on the faculty and the course.A controlled experiment was performed with a control group following a more traditionallaboratory setup. From the initial positive results obtained in this project, it is argued that theVaNTH principles are effective in motivating and engaging freshman engineering students inmechanical and civil engineering majors and that the CBI materials and
30 differentstudents’ responses, an acceptable percentage agreement was reached between independentresearchers coding the data. Resulting frequencies of the various model types identified bystudents are presented along with representative student responses to provide insight intostudents’ understanding of models in STEM. This study is part of a larger project to understandthe impact of modeling interventions on students’ awareness of models and their ability to buildand apply models.IntroductionEngineering requires the use of many types of models to understand, evaluate, and makepredictions about systems [1, 2]. Models can be developed using various types of tools and formany different purposes [3]. Although there are many types of models
assessingoutcomes and understanding the factors that affect student success. This section brings forthsome of the ideas discussed at the workshops in these areas.Engineering DesignOne important trend common to many first-year programs involves the introduction of open-ended engineering problems to first-year students. Experiential learning allows teams ofstudents to work collaboratively on projects to meet established design objectives. Through on-going critiques, discussion within teams and feedback from the instructor, students develop theirown solutions to design problems. These projects teach students how to apply basic math andscience principles to a practical problem, to integrate concepts from other courses, and tounderstand the engineering
]. Nelson[19] uses the Analytics Lifecycle to break down the activities that generally occur in this process,activities that we hoped the students in this study would engage. Those activities or practicesinclude: problem framing, understanding and exploring or data sensemaking, developing ananalytic model, and interpreting, explaining, and activating results. Within this process, theactivities are further broken down into the tasks of define, identify, explore, analyze, present, andoperationalize. In the class project, students engaged in all these tasks except operationalize,which would require managing the implementation of the solution over some time. For thepresent study, we focus our analysis on the process of question design from the task
isaccomplished to complete the group task. It is crucial for team members to realize that all phasesmay be necessary ones, but to work through the first three as quickly as possible to reach theperforming phase.Several studies have examined collaborative assignments in the classroom. The contributions byShuman et al., Dym et al., Felder and Brent, Smith et al., and Barrick et al. have provided a Page 26.1240.2summary of how to instruct students using collaborative projects.3,4,5,6,7,8 Many times instructorsuse teams in an academic environment without much thought on how the development of teamsin their course influences the students’ abilities to learn
longitudinal view of student success in the CoRe Experience program and to identifyfactors that both attract students to the program and enhance their persistence in our college.CoRe Experience StructureThe first‐year engineering course, EGR 100, Introduction to Engineering Design, a team-baseddesign project course, was piloted in Spring, 2008, offered full‐scale in Fall, 2008, and has beenoffered each semester since. This course is required of all incoming engineering students. EGR102, Introduction to Engineering Modeling, an engineering problem-solving and computationcourse, follows in sequence and is required of all engineering majors other than computerscience and computer engineering. Students in those two majors instead take CSE 231
. Theyconcluded that soft skills can be taught, albeit not through traditional lecture means and a degreeof mentoring is recommended in the workplace, if possible. They tended to see the skillsenhanced through experiential project work. Similarly, Parker and Anderson10 at the Universityof Wisconsin deleted specific lectures on time management and teamwork skills in favor ofhaving students do appropriate project work to learn these same skills in a trial introduction tocivil and environmental engineering course. Vasko, et al11 concluded that once a projectexperience was concluded, soft skills such as life-long learning could be adequately assessed bystudent survey techniques. Tallon and Budny12 took a different approach in adding specificpublic speaking