Hawkins is a Graduate Teaching Assistance in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. A PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering, he received both his B.S. and M. Eng. from the University of Louisville in the same field. His research interests include power electronics and controls, as well as engineering education for first-year students.Ms. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a STEM Education Curriculum and Instruction PhD Candidate and Graduate Research As- sistant at the University of Louisville. Research interests include: interdisciplinary faculty development, first-year engineering student retention, STEM teacher education, and collaborative, team
, but are very difficult to quantify.1. Introduction Page 26.1221.2The Partnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science(PRIMES) is a University of Louisville cross-college collaboration aimed at reducing attritionamong our STEM majors. This project unites faculty from the College of Arts & Sciences, theJ.B. Speed School of Engineering, and the College of Education and Human Development intackling identified hurdles that contribute to poor retention (and thus low graduation rates) in ourrespective undergraduate STEM programs. PRIMES’ goals are quite simple: 1. Increase by 25% the number of Bachelor’s degrees
opportunities during all four academicyears4. Our goal is to expose students to their future role as global engineers where they will berequired apply technology to balance impacts associated with the three pillars of sustainability—economic, environmental, and societal—to create safe and sustainable designs.As our first graduating class became seniors, we recognized that we could improve on thestudents’ ability to discover and understand their identity as the Engineer of 2020. Consequently,we became aware of the need to revamp the introduction to engineering course. While the initialcourse focused on developing strong analytical skills, creativity, communication, strong sense ofprofessionalism, and versatility—all skills of the Engineer of 20201—the
their academic majors. This isparticularly important to increase retention among under represented minorities (URM) andensure diversity among the population of students.Figure 1: Retention data for all new freshmen that start their mathematics coursework with Math1825. Term/semester 12 retention rate for these students is under 10%. The decision to admit tothe engineering major is nominally made near Term 7.The COE at MSU has developed two programs that address impediments faced by students fromeconomically disadvantaged areas. Students from low socio-economic areas are recruited by theDiversity Programs Office (DPO) to take part in a summer bridge experience that includesacademic pre-classes and social network building. The capacity of the
identities and life experiences as well as engage in dialogueabout “societal issues such as politics, racism, religion, and culture that are often flashpoints forpolarization and social conflict” [3]. This process typically focuses on goals of advancingcompassion, empathy, cross-cultural understanding, advocacy, social justice, and social change.Research has shown that intergroup dialogue in the higher education context can have significantand positive impacts on student development, increasing student motivation, learning, andacademic achievement [1] - [2], [5]. Through engagement in intergroup dialogue, studentsbecome more self-aware in their own social identities, and build knowledge about other socialidentity groups. By developing this knowledge
discipline-specific groups. The next component was integrating the use of community building strategies in the SI Leaders’ lesson plans. Leaders create their lesson plans the week before conducting sessions and submit them to their graduate supervisor or SI Coordinator for feedback and revision. The lesson plan template for fall 2020 was edited to include a section where the SI Leaders were required to detail and describe the community-building strategy they chose to use that week. As each session had the same cohort of students, the SI Leaders were able to conduct activities that went beyond the superficial icebreaker and develop a cohesive community within each cohort. We determined that limiting the number of students to 12 per
research interests include retention, mathematics and materials science teaching and learning, first-year programs, accreditation, and faculty development.Prof. Kevin Pitts, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education, Professor of PhysicsDr. Michelle Ferrez, University of California, San Diego Michelle is currently the Director of the IDEA Engineering Student Center at UC San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering (Inclusion-Diversity-Excellence-Achievement). Dr. Ferrez has twenty three years of experience on diversity in STEM access, retention, and success programs in higher education (4 year and community colleges), K-12 and graduate student pipeline programs, and the role of four
importantly, the FEP staff works closely with theCollege of Arts and Sciences to implement block scheduling for the Fall Semester. In the blockscheduling system, each FEP student is assigned to a block consisting of approximately 22students. All students in a given block have identical class schedules (except for electives).The Freshman Engineering Student Services ProgramThe FESSP provides proactive support to FEP students through summer orientation, academicskills and personal wellness workshops, academic advising, peer mentoring, supplementalinstruction and tutoring, an academic living-learning community, and extracurricular activities. Page
retention and progression through STEM pathways. This research team found itself, like many other institutions and instructors, at thecrossroads of online learning environments, social and educational inequities and historicallydifficult course content, with all the difficulties and opportunities that these components afford.This unique course taught online for the first time, with a depth and breadth of programmingcontent, can be challenging for all students but can especially halt underrepresented studentsprogress through their engineering coursework and ultimately prevent them from achievingsuccess in engineering. In an already challenging semester -- a pandemic which causeduniversity closure and completely online instruction -- our
Education, Schooling, & Society and Computing & Digital Technologies Departments. In addition, he is a faculty fellow of the Institute for Educational Initiatives and Notre Dame Initiative for Global Development. In both his research and his teaching, Alex works to advance his mission: to fight for and create the conditions necessary for the liberation of learning and the alleviation of unnecessary anxiety and harm in education, for both students and faculty. Alex envisions his role as that of a learning experience architect, pioneering more inclusive and authentic assessment through technology. His current research focuses on applied learning research, design, and evaluation, including learning analytics, flexi
for SWE, and on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library. Her primary re- search interests are on student identity, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Ms. Janet L Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder Janet serves as the Associate Director of K-12 Engineering Education for the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Involved since 2000, she collaborates on the College’s ambitious K-12 engineering initiatives, including their capacity-building and school partner- ship programs. She coordinates the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s NSF-funded TEAMS Program (Tomorrow’s Engineers. . . creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) which
findings from the culminating third year of a three-yearNSF-funded project to improve introductory engineering courses at two universities carried outby the interdisciplinary team.Engineering InstructionThe field of engineering education has changed from its 19 th-century emphasis on industrialskills to the post-World War II focus on scientific and mathematics skills to a shift in the 1970sand 1980s that centered on such skills as critical thinking, communications, and team work. 16Recent industry reports indicate that engineering graduates are lacking in the areas of creativethinking and design, communication, and other professional skills.9 Graduates have been foundto be weak in their understanding of certain engineering processes and to lack
Paper ID #17981Impact of Various Pedagogies on Design Confidence, Motivation, and Anxietyof First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. James Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He pre- viously completed his graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, where he con- ducted research in both the School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Engineering Education. Prior to Purdue, he completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical En- gineering. He currently teaches first-year
and educate future engineers1,2. Of specificconcern is the ability and capacity of four-year institutions to educate and supply this demand2.In an effort to meet the rising demands for engineers, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL), in partnership with the state’s six community colleges, sought to increase the number ofcommunity college transfer students entering into the College of Engineering (COE). This effort,leveraged through a National Science Foundation Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics Talent Expansion Program grant (STEP), developed and institutionalized aneffective pathway for community college students to complete select freshman and sophomoreengineering courses that transfer to the university’s COE. However
and subsequentPhysics II course and corequisite Calculus I grades. The findings provide information that can beused by other institutions of similar size and scope to examine the structure of their first yearcourses in engineering, initiate university policies, and develop interventions to support math,physics, and overall graduation success.IntroductionThe first year coursework, similar in most engineering curriculums, involves a series ofintroductory engineering design, graphical communication, and programming courses. Inaddition students are required to complete Calculus I and Physics I as a prerequisite to CalculusII and Physics II which are themselves prerequisites to advanced engineering science courses(i.e., statics, dynamics, fluid
. Dowling and J. Zhou, "The Power of an Idea: The International Impacts of theGrand Challenges for Engineering," Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 4-7, 2016.[3] National Academy of Engineering, "NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering," vol. 2016,2008.[4] D. Kilgore, B. Sattler and J. Turns, "From fragmentation to continuity: engineering studentsmaking sense of experience through the development of a professional portfolio," Studies inHigher Education, vol. 38, pp. 807-826, 2013.[5] M. Eliot and J. Turns, "Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professionalidentity development for engineering undergraduates," J Eng Educ, vol. 100, pp. 630, 2011.[6] J. Turns, B. Sattler and D. Kilgore, "Disciplinary knowledge, identity, and navigation
. A member of the Grand Portage Band of the Lake Superior Chippewa Jordan obtained both his Masters of Community & Regional Planning and Bachelors of Media Arts from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque where he lives with his wife and three daughters.Mr. Nicolai Loner, University of New Mexico c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Asset-based design projects in a freshman level courseAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes how we identified diverse student assets and redesigneda first year course to develop professional engineering identity. Despite many efforts to diversifyengineering, first-generation college attendees, non-traditional students, and students
UC Berkeley and has been a faculty in the mechanical Engineer- ing Department at Texas A&M University. He is one of the curriculum coordinators for the freshman engineering program of the Dwight Look COllege of Engineering at Texas A&M University,Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Jeffrey E. Froyd is the Director of Faculty Climate and Development at Texas A&M University. He served as Project Director for the Foundation Coalition, an NSF Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized their undergraduate engineering curricula, and extensively shared their results with the engineering education community. He co-created the
student identities is crucial for engineering classrooms. TheCommittee on the Guide to Recruiting and Advancing Women Scientists and Engineers inAcademia presented a report which states that the first-year programs are critical for retention ofminorities in engineering classrooms and that building strong engineering identity through thefirst-year courses can help facilitate inclusion of minorities [5]. Pedagogically too, inter-disciplinary-design and problem-based learning environments such as the one afforded in thisremedial spatial visualization course have been shown to facilitate identity development andidentity retention amongst individuals in the engineering classrooms [3, 6]. Recognizing therelevance and significance of identity formation
) design and b) control dimensions of first-year engineering education References[1] R. M. Marra, B. Palmer and T. A. Litzinger, "The effects of a first‐year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the Perry scheme," J Eng Educ, vol. 89, (1), pp. 39-45, 2000.[2] F. Ö Karataş, G. M. Bodner and S. Unal, "First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, (1), pp. 1-22, 2016.[3] M. J. A. Brey, M. D. Mizzy and R. Goldberg, "A maker-in-residence program to build a community of makers," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[4] *E
practice: Learning, meaning, and identity,” New York Cambridge, 1998.[21] M. Cox, “Introduction to faculty learning communities,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2004, no. 97, pp. 5–23, 2004.[22] L. Richlin and M. D. Cox, “Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty learning communities,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2004, no. 97, pp. 127–135, 2004.[23] M. Borrego and C. Henderson, “Increasing the use of evidence‐based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 220–252, 2014.[24] M. J. Miller et al., “Pursuing and adjusting to engineering majors: A qualitative analysis,” J. Career Assess., vol. 23, no. 1, pp
AC 2009-864: CONNECTOR FACULTY: A FRIENDLY FACE FOR EARLYENGINEERING STUDENTSDaina Briedis, Michigan State University Dr. DAINA BRIEDIS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of
aids to enhanced student learning.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Reeping, University of Michigan
likelihood to accomplish a task.Physiological states that are experienced by an individual during an activity such as emotions orstress also have been shown to impact one’s self-efficacy [15].In an effort to relate the self-efficacy aspect of cognitive career theory to engineering students’ andengineers’ perceptions of important skills and abilities Winters et al. [9] conducted a longitudinalstudy. This research study questioned engineering students about their perceived importance ofvarious abilities such as math, science, and business. The individuals were surveyed throughouttheir undergraduate education and then again four years post-graduation. The researchersdetermined that as students’ progress through their undergraduate engineering education
instruction program9, and high intensity collaborative learning based onthe Treisman model10. Student professional organizations have been employed to conductoutreach, build community and act as a recruiting and retention hub 11-14. Studies to define bestpractices have been conducted15-16 and the question of commitment to an engineering majorbefore enrolling has been investigated17. The first-generation college students population hasbeen given additional scrutiny for encouragement to study engineering as colleges anduniversities have attempted to draw in engineering students through the community or juniorcolleges 18-20. More recently, community colleges and baccalaureate institutions havecollaborated to deliberately design practices and coursework
Paper ID #18212An Active Learning Environment to Improve First-Year Mechanical Engi-neering Retention Rates and Software SkillsBenjamin B. Wheatley, Colarado State University Benjamin Brandt Wheatley was awarded a B.Sc. degree in Engineering from Trinity College (Hartford, CT, USA) in 2011. He spent one year in industry at a biomedical device company before returning to graduate school. He is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA). His engineering education areas of interest include cultural competency, active learning approaches as they
university?”The large southwestern university engineering leadership team chose to address the need forchange using a deliberate “re-building strategy” [1]. This choice involved invoking “a processoriented approach to the remaking of a curriculum…, involving external stakeholders. Thisapplies sound systems engineering principles to the engineering curriculum itself” [1].“The re-building strategy…is a fundamental change of academic view linking academia withsocietal context and needs…by emphasizing a shared set of values, identity and commitment. Itis about educating engineers who will become change agents after graduation, with anunderstanding of stakeholder needs and the wider societal impact of engineered systems withinthe innovation process’ [1
(two courses) and student motivation across multiple years.Motivation is a foundational aspect of a students’ academic development. Students who areintrinsically motivated naturally lean toward academic achievement [4]. This means that studentswill seek their short or long-term educational goals, depending on each student’s definition ofacademic achievement. Students can also be motivated extrinsically through the use of rewardsor praise [5]. Either way, understanding motivation can be useful to students and instructorsalike. There is little work comparing which types of FYE courses and instruction modes are themost motivating to their students [6-8]. Many engineering programs have implemented the FYEprogram in different ways. One way to
engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering
prepare undergraduate students forengineering practice and advanced study in graduate school, it is necessary to build knowledge inthese areas throughout the engineering curriculum, starting from the first year. However, in atypical civil or mechanical undergraduate engineering curriculum, students are not exposed tobasic stress analysis and force-deformation concepts until the second semester of the sophomoreyear. In addition, experimental techniques and finite element modeling are mostly covered in thejunior and senior years. Interestingly, the fundamental concepts central to much of this coursework are understood much earlier in the students’ education. That is, students understand fromobservation and common experience the meaning of concepts