. Bartolomei, S. L. Turner, and C. A. Fischer, “Using the Systems Engineering Method to Design a System Engineering Major at the United States Air Force Academy.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.3 Engineering 100 Course Material, HOGSS Statement of Work4 End of course reports for Engr 100, AY 2003 – 2004 and AY 2004 - 20055 Hoit, Marc and Matthew Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention,” University of Florida6 Porter, Richard L., Laura J. Bottomley, Mary Clare Robbins, Sarah A. Rajala, Hugh Fuller, and Walthea V. Yarbrough “Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving – A New Course for 1100 First Year Engineering
. Finally, it is shown that students see a value infinding an overlap between their personal interests and the material they cover in class. Byproviding students with a choice on lab projects it was found that a course can be made to bettercater to students interests than the average class they take in their first year(s) of college.Plans are currently being made to expand upon the results described in this paper. Specifically,the goal of this future work will be to examine the effect of choice on student learning andproject performance.References1 Edwards, R., & Recktenwald, G. (2010). A Guided Inquiry Approach to Teaching Fan Selection. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY
. 4 (2007): 321-334.11. Nokleby, Scott B., and Remon Pop-Iliev. "A Design Challenge-Incorporating Design into the First Year Engineering Curriculum." Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2011).12. Felder, Richard M., G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz. "The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes." Journal of Engineering Education 91, no. 1 (2002): 3-17.13. Lee, Stephen, Martin C. Harrison, Godfrey Pell, and Carol L. Robinson. "Predicting performance of first year engineering students and the importance of assessment tools therein." engineering education 3, no. 1 (2008): 44-51.14. Qualters, Donna M., Thomas C. Sheahan, Emanuel J. Mason, David S. Navick, and
. 45. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.16. Phillips, Betty S. "Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis." Typological Studies in Language. 45 (2001): 123-136.17. Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick, and Jeffrey L. Elman. "Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis." Journal of Memory and Language 57.3 (2007): 348-379.18. Montemurro, Marcelo A. "Beyond the Zipf–Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics." Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 300.3 (2001): 567-578.19. Bellegarda, Jerome R. "Exploiting latent semantic information in statistical language modeling." Proceedings of the IEEE 88.8 (2000): 1279-1296.20. Maynard, Diana, and Sophia Ananiadou. "Trucks: a model
). Recent innovations in undergraduate civil engineering curriculums.Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122:3:123-133.6. Caverly, R., Fulmer, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J., Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R.,Yost, J. (2010). Project-based freshman engineering experience: The core course. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition. Louisville, KY, June.7. ASCE (2009). Report card for America’s infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers. Page 15.1253.16
Lecture,” Hyperion, New York.9. W. Kamkwamba and B. Mealer, 2009, “The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind,” HarperCollins, New York.10. P. Lencioni, 2002, “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.11. P. Lencioni, 2007, “The Three Signs of a Miserable Job: A Fable for Managers (and Their Employees),” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.12. M. Gladwell, 2008, “Outliers: The Story of Success,” Little, Brown and Company, New York.13. P.H. Diamandis and S. Kotler, 2012, “Abundance: The Future is Better Than You Think,” Free Press, NewYork.14. W.G. Bennis and R.J. Thomas, 2002, “Crucibles of Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, Boston.15. B. George, P. Sims, A.N. McLean, and D. Mayer, 2007, “Discovering Your Authentic
read a short description of a concept then immediately write and test codein MATLAB®.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported, in part, through a MathWorks grant from the Curriculum DevelopmentProgram in spring 2013. A portion of the grant supported the purchase of the Adobe Captivatesoftware used to create the videos.Bibliography1. P. Heller, R. Keith, and S. Anderson, “Teaching Problem Solving Through Cooperative Grouping. Part 1: Group Versus Individual Problem Solving,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 627-636 (1992).2. D. R. Woods, A. N. Hrymak, R. R. Marshall, P. E. Wood, C. M. Crowe, T. W. Hoffman, J. D. Wright, P. A. Taylor, K. A. Woodhouse, and C. G. K. Bouchard, "Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program," ASEE J
Industrial Engineering at thelarge private university in South America partially supported this exploratory study.Bibliography1. Allen, D., et al. (2008). “Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report.” Grant X3-83235101- 0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.2. Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Mihelcic, J., and Vanasupa, L. (2008). “Civil and environmental engineering education (CEEE) transformational change: Tools and strategies for sustainability integration and assessment in engineering education.” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.3. Koehn, E., Patel, D., and Khonde, S. (2009). “Introduction of sustainability to civil and
the students in this study would be relatively constant overtime as well. It would be useful to examine the GPAs of these students in light of the research todate to see if this trend is observed. In addition, one might expect that, in the future, if theseindicators change with time, it could be indicative of substantial changes in the K-12 curriculumand/or some other contributing factor(s) that the students experience prior to enrolment in first-year engineering. This longitudinal study may also provide a foundation for assessing the successor failure of initiatives that are being undertaken or those that may be proposed in the future toimprove the success and retention of first-year engineering students at our institution
/conferences).8. Rowe, C., Mahadevan-Jansen, A. “Module-based Freshmen engineering course Development.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (http://asee.org/conferences).9. Hein, G. L., Kemppainen, A. J., Amato-Henderson, S. L. "First-Year Engineering Students and Ethical Analysis", ASEE Annual Conference. www.asee.org. Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.10. Kemppainen, A. J., Jeason, N., Hein, G. L. "Modifying a Pumping System in a First-Year Engineering Design Project", ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division. www.edgd.asee.org. Houghton, MI, October 3-6, 2010.11. “Wind Power: Impacts and Issues” http://www.umass.edu/windenergy/publications/published
of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 6. Price, R. and Cordova-Wentling, R.M. (2009), Human Behavior Skills and Emotional Intelligence in Engineering, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA. 7. Sellinger, C. (2003), Stuff you don’t learn in engineering school. IEEE Spectrum, 40, 49-52. 8. Shuman, Larry J., Besterfield-Sacre, Mary, & McGourty, Jack (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?. Journal of Engineering Education. 9. Shiba, S., Graham, A., & Walden D. (1993). A New American TQM. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press. 10. Tallon, T. &
comparable issues adjusting to the requirements of college and the conceptis definitely scalable to larger class sizes.Intrinsic motivation seemed not to be an issue with this group of students based on the highpercentage who took the quizzes. However, this study will be repeated in the spring semester2011 with a low-stakes version of the quizzes to determine whether larger gains can be madewith required quizzing.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by a grant from the Center for Teaching and Learning at Boise StateUniversity. Page 22.1625.9References1. Wilcox, P., S. Winn, and M. Fyvie-Gauld. (2005). "‘It was nothing to do with the university
Facilities 2000, 14 (2), 67-70. 8. Luth, G. P. Chronology and Context of the Hyatt Regency Collapse. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2000, 14 (2), 51-61. 9. Moncarz, P. D.; Taylor, R. K. Engineering Process Failure – Hyatt Walkway Collapse. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2000, 14 (2), 46-50.10. Pfatteicher, S. K. A. The Hyatt Horror:” Failure and Responsibility in American Engineering. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2000, 14 (2), 62-66.11. Rendon-Herrero, O. Including Failure Case Studies in Civil Engineering Courses. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 1993, 7 (3), 181-185
University. 1991; 66: 201-208.2. Alkhasawneh R, Hobson R. Summer transition program: A model for impacting first-year retention rates forunderrepresented groups. American Society for Engineering Education. 2009; AC 2009-926.3. Bernold LE, Spurlin JE, Anson CM. Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure inengineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007; 96(3): 263-274.4. Conley DT. Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education. 2008; 2008(144): 3-13.5. Evenback S, Hansen MJ, Williams GA. The influence of a summer bridge program on college transition. StudentLearning Outcomes, Academic Performance, and Retention. 48th Annual Forum of the Association for
program.References1.) Hirsch, P., and McKenna, A. “Using Reflection to Promote Teamwork in Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, 2008, 377-385.2.) Hirsch, P., Shwom, B., and McKenna, A. “Teaching and Assessing Teamwork: Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement.” Proceedings, Association for Business Communication, October 2003.3.) Carr, S., McKenna, A., Colgate, J.E., and Olson, G.B. “IDEA: Formalizing the Foundation for Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (671-678), 2006.4.) Lencioni, P. “Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Field Guide for Leaders, Managers, and Facilitators.” Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA. 2005.5
. “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Page 24.1121.12 Environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, Winter 2000.6. S. Zappe, R. Lieicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, and H. Woo Lee. “ ‘Flipping’ the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.7. R. Talbert. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2012.8. L.W. Anderson, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning
over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.Hattie, J. (2009). The black box of tertiary assessment: An impending revolution. Tertiary Assessment & Higher Page 23.1364.14 Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice & Research, Ako Aotearoa, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 259Á275.iClicker. (n.d.). I>clicker Classroom Response System. Retrieved January 3, 2013, from http://www.iclicker.com/Jordan, S., & Mitchell, T. (2009). e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 371
Physics course designed to assist student s with the transition to post-secondary education. He is a Co-Director of the NYS STEP Program, IMPETUS which provides economically disadvantaged students the opportunity to pursue their interest in math and science though educational summer camps, workshops, school-year tutoring and mentoring programs. He has helped provide numerous students and teachers with the opportunity to integrate STEM disciplines using real-world problem solving strategies through teacher/coach training institutes and contest coordination. He is the Adirondack Regional Science Olympiad Coordinator.Robert Prout Jaspersohn, Clarkson University Robert Jaspersohn is a PhD candidate in Physics at Clarkson
, Annual Conference,2006.7. Fortenberry, N., Sullivan, J., Jordan, P., and Knight, D., “Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction,” Page 24.882.17Science, Vol. 317, 2007.8.French, J., Leiffer, P., “The Genesis of Transformation: A First Course in Engineering with a focus on Retentionand Developing Professionalism” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering EducationConference& Exposition, Annual Conference, 2012.9. Bradley, W., and Bradley, S., “Increasing Retention by Incorporating Time Management and Study Skills into aFreshman Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
Publications.[20] Jadva, V., Hines, M., & Golombok, S. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sexdifferences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39(6), 1261–1273.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z.
for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation,” Euro. J. Engr. Educ., vol. 33, n. 5-6, pp. 573-585, 2008.[2] D. Bennett, R. Kapoor, K. Rajinder, and N. Maynard, “First year engineering students: Perceptions of engineers and engineering work amongst domestic and international students,” Intl. J. First-Year in Higher Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp.89-105, March 2015[3] A.R. Bielefeldt and N.E. Canney, “Humanitarian Aspirations of Engineering Students: Differences between Disciplines and Institutions,” J. Humanitarian Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8-17, 2016[4] M. Cavalli, L. Stanlake, and S. Tolbert, “Investigation of Retention and Perceptions among Freshman Engineering Students
Engineering Education, 95(1), 39-47. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00876.x 5. Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie‐ Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: the role of social support in the first‐ year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707-722. 6. Smith, R. (2011). Learning Community Transitions in the First Year: A Case Study of Academic and Social Network Change. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 23(2), 13-31. 7. Garland, L. & Kolkmeyer K. (2011). A Culture of Conversation: Faculty Talk as Meaningful Assessment of Learning Communities. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38(3), 231
activities an assessment method is, the lesslikely the tendency for students to find it to be annoying or useless, and hence more useful theassessment tool.Acknowledgements:This work has been supported through the Mathematics, Science and Technology Partnershipproject; funded by the National Science Foundation, award number EHR0314910.Bibliography/References:1 Bandura, A. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, pp. 71-81. NewYork: Academic Press (1994)2 Furnham, A., T. Chamorro-Premuzic, and F. MacDougall, Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 14, pp. 49–66(2003).3 Allen, D.E., B.J. Duch, and S.E. Groh, “The power of problem-based learning in teaching introductory sciencecourses”, New Directions
://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html Accessed 30 Jan 2009.6. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. http://www.asce.org/exceed Accessed 11 Mar 2009. Page 14.537.17 Appendix 1 Course Outline Prior to Summer of 2006Lsn Class topic Deliverable(s)1 Introduction to engineering profession Undergraduate information sheet, e-mail addresses1L Laboratory: introduction to computer laboratory2 Course outline; laboratory notebooks; laboratory report example2L Continuation of computer laboratory3 Engineering ethics; discuss
). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).14. Citations1. The Information Technology Association of America, Innovation and a Competitive U.S. Economy: TheCase for Doubling the Number of STEM Graduates(http://www.itaa.org/workforce/docs/Innovationwhitepaper.pdf). 2005.2. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation. 2006.3. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation, table 3-2. 2006.4. Seymour, E.; Hewitt, N. M., Talking about leaving : why
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. 2008-2009 ABET Criteria for Engineering Accreditation; http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008-09%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-04-07.pdf 2. National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020.” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004. www.nap.edu 3. Litzinger, Thomas; Wise, John; Lee, Sangha; Simpson, Timothy; Joshi, Sanjay. 2001. Assessing Readiness for Lifelong Learning. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference. pp. 2211-2219 4. Nelson, S. 2001. Impact of Technology on Individuals and Society: A critical thinking and lifelong learning class for
problem does this design solve, who benefits, what human need is met,what improvement can be made? Examples of these assignments and exercises are listed below: Page 11.157.6a. Like/Dislike this Design – This assignment is given on one of the first days of class. Theinstructions are:“Find an engineered product that you like or dislike to show to the class (unless the product istoo large to bring, then it should be easily described, or bring a picture). Review the feature(s) ofits design that you like or dislike. Briefly describe on paper this design feature and why it is sodesirable or so undesirable. Draw a sketch of an improved product. Hand
. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8:255- 284.[16 Isaacs, B. (2001). Mystery of the missing women engineers: A Solution. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 127(2):85-91.[17] Tuan, H., Vhin, C., and Shich, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 639-654.[18] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Instrument: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.[19] APPLES (Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey), created by the CAEE (Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education) project and available
Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp, 319-345 2. Lichtenstein, G. , McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D. and Puma, J, “Comparing the Undergraduate Experience of Engineers to All Other Majors: Significant Differences are Programmatic.” Journal of Engineering Education, 99: 305-317, October 2010. 3. Felder and R. Brent, “Why Students Fail Tests: 1. Ineffective Studying.” Chem. Engr. Education, 50(2), 151-152 (Spring 2016). 4. Newcomb and Bagwell, “Collaborative Learning in an Introduction to Psychological Science Laboratory: Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Teach to Learn.” Teaching of Psychology, April 1997, Vol. 24(2), pp. 88-95. 5. V. Tinto, “Taking Retention Seriously: Rethinking the