5-4, 5-5, and 9-2. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data[10] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, Updated July 15, 2019,Accessed January 2020. Available at https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics-UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf[11] M. Wang, J. Eccles, and S. Kenny, “Not Lack of Ability but More Choice Individual and Gender Differences inChoice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Psychological science, 24(5), 770-775,2013.[12] A. Johri, H. Teo, J. Lo, M. Dufour, and A. Schram, “Millennial engineers: Digital media and informationecology of engineering students,” Computers in Human Behavior, 33, pp. 286
, “Professional writing expertise.” In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press, 2006.[4] M. Eodice, A.E. Geller, and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ. Press, 2017.[5] NAE Grand Challenges. www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx. 2008.[6] S. Pearlman and D. Carrillo, The Critical Thinking Initiative. www.thecriticalthinkinginitiative.org (2017).[7] R. Irish and P.E. Weiss, Engineering communication: From Principles to Practice, 2nd ed. Canada: Oxford UP, 2013.Appendix A - Student Survey of Rubric Effectiveness Student Evaluation of Rubrics Survey 2017
/gradhacking-the-mooc[5] Jordan, K. “MOOC completion rates: the data. Katy Jordan, researching education andtechnology”, Online at http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html [Accessed: Jan. 29,2018][6] Porter, S., “To MOOC or not to MOOC : how can online learning help to build the future ofhigher education?" Chandos information professional series, 2015.[7] Coursera, “Top Specializations,” Online athttps://www.coursera.org/featured/top_specializations_locale_en_os_web. [Accessed: Jan. 29,2018].[8] MIT, “MITx MicroMasters,” Online at https://micromasters.mit.edu/. [Accessed: Jan. 29,2018].[9] EdX, “GTx,” Online at https://www.edx.org/school/gtx. [Accessed: Jan. 29, 2018].[10] EdX, “MicroMasters Programs,” Online at https://www.edx.org/micromasters
environment,” Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 2000, 30-43.2. Bishop, J. L., M.A. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013).3. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, M. Litzkow, “Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-based Streaming video Software,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, 267-274.4. Talbert, R. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. Kecskemety, K. M., B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. Stickel, M., S. Hari, Q
programs, 2015-2016. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs- 2015-2016/#objectives 3. Chickering, Arthur W., & Reisser, Linda. (1993). Education and identity (second ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 4. Mooney, Carolyn J. (1991). Professors Feel Conflict between Roles in Teaching and Research, Say Students Are Badly Prepared. Chronicle of Higher Education, v37 n34 pA15-17. 5. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge.6. Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent student to excel. San
, 133(2), 99-106. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(99).[2] Bernold, L. E., Bingham, W. L., McDonald, P. H., & Attia, T. M. (2000). Impact of holistic and learning-oriented teaching on academic success. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 191-199.[3] Honken, N., & Ralston, P. S. (2013). Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look. Journal of STEMEducation: Innovations And Research, 14(2), 29-37.[4] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs," 2014.[5] Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.[6] A. Naimpally, H. Ramachandran and C. Smith, Lifelong Learning for Engineers and
Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Reviews during the 2013-2014 Accreditation Cycle, 27 October 2012, 22 March 2014, .6. Oakes, W., Coyle, E., and Jamieson, L., “EPICS: A Model of Service-Learning in an Engineering Curriculum”. Page 24.1369.12 Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2000.7. Oakes, W. and Thompson, M. “Integration of Service Learning into a Freshman Engineering Course”. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004.8. Duffy, J., Tsang, E. and Lord, S. “Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why and How
Engineering Education Conference& Exposition,Annual Conference, 2005.11. Seymour, E., Hewitt, N.(1997) Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. WestviewPress, Boulder, CO12. Ohland, M., Sheppard, S., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., Layton, R., “Persistance, Engagement, andMigration in Engineering Programs” Mechanical Engineering (2008)13. Eris, Ozgur; Chachra, Debbie; Chen, Helen; Sheppard, Sheri D.; Ludlow, Larry; Rosca, Camelia; Bailey, Tori;and Toye, George, "Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey"(2010). 2010. Paper 3.14. Shuman, L., Delaney, C., Wolfe, H., Scalise, A., and Besterfield-Sacre, M., “Engineering Attrition: StudentCharacteristics and Educational Initiatives
. Page 26.40.15References1. Sheppard, S., and R. Jenison. (1997). Examples of Freshman Design Education. International Journal ofEngineering Education 13(4). 248-61.2. Dally, J.W., and G. Zhang. (1991). Experienced in Offering a Freshman Design Course in Engineering.Proceedings of the Conference on New Approaches to Undergraduate Education. July, 1991. Banff, Canada.3. Frank, M., I. Lavy, and D. Elata. (2003). Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an AcademicEngineering Course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13. 273-88.4. Marra, R.M., B. Palmer, and T.A. Litzinger. (2000). The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course onStudent Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme. Journal of
Society of Engineering Education, 20124. Anderson, L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Illinois, 2001.5. Bland, L. “Applying Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-Long Learning,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.6. Redekopp, M.W. and Ragusa, G. “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2013.7. Stickel, M., Hari, S., and Liu, Q. “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self
studies, Studies in Higher Education, 2012, pp.656-666.9. Schauss, N.A., and Peuker, S. Improving student success and retention rates in engineering: one year after implementation, Proceedings of the 6th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, College Station, Texas, 2014. Page 26.199.15
, pp. 95-118, 2012.[4] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[5] J.E. Froyd, M.W. Ohland, “Integrated engineering curricula,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94 no. 1, pp. 147-164, 2005.[6] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016, ID 14814.[7] K.L. Meyers, M.W. Ohland, A.L. Pawley, S.E. Silliman, K.A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2012.[8] S. Reed, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, D.M. Amos
holistic approach, but reshaped to have a more explicitconnection to the STEM courses and a deeper developmental approach to learning, mastering,and utilizing specific learning strategies.References[1] Aleks.com, 2018. Online. Available: https://www.aleks.com/about_aleks.[2] J. E. Van Dyken, “The Effects of Mathematics Placement on Successful Completion of anEngineering Degree and How One Student Beat the Odds,” Ph.D. dissertation, ClemsonUniversity, Clemson, SC, 2016.[3] S. Grigg and E. A. Stephan. (PREP)ARE: A student-centered approach to provide scaffoldingin a flipped classroom environment. ASEE 2018 in progress[4] P. Treuer and L. Whisler, “Entangled Learning: An Overview,” 2015. Available:http://www.EntangledLearning.org.[5] L. Whisler and P
and technology retention database,”Research News on Graduate Education, 2(2), 2000.[8] E. Seymour, and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave thesciences, Westview Press, CO. 1997.[9] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance inengineering programs,” Journal Engineering Education, 97(1), 27–36, 2008.[10] M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of whyundergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), pp.525-548,2014.[11] R.M. Felder, K.D. Forrest, L. Baker‐Ward, E.J. Dietz, and P.H. Mohr, “A longitudinalstudy of engineering student performance and retention: I. Success and failure in the introductorycourse,” Journal of
spring 2007 semesters is shown in the tablesbelow. The color coding indicates which tutor had responsibility for which subject(s). Thetutors designated "SI" held joint appointments with B2B and with Supplementary Instruction (SI)programs operating in Physics I, Chemistry I, and Calculus II.Table 1 Typical results demonstrating the effectiveness of tutoring supplemented by mentoring for Physics I in the spring semester. Spring 2006 Comparison of Tutored and Other Engineering Students (SI Class) Course: PHYS 2325 Tutored Group Other Group Total
programming assignments showed that the majority of first-yearstudents in programming courses do not meet the expectations of instructors at the end of theirfirst course in computing [2]. Engineering students are no different in this regard. One potentialreason for this discrepancy between the learning outcomes desired by instructors and studentperformance is that the instructional methods used as well as the course content do not matchwell with the learning styles of most engineering students.The idea of learning styles has been around since the early 1980’s [4] and there are manylearning style models and assessments. The most commonly used within engineering is theFelder-Silverman learning styles model [5], with its associated assessment, the Index
farm project? (i.e. did you apply and use project 3.78 4.25 0.3878 management principles?) 3 - Team communication improved between the mousetrap 3.78 4.25 0.3627 car project and the wind farm project. 4 - The Excel tools presented in the course were useful in 4.33 4.5 0.5927 completing the wind farm project. 5 - The delivery of the course content was effective. 4.33 3.67 0.0758 6 - The textbook was useful. 4 2.67 0.0089 7 - The instructor(s) communicated effectively. 4.56
constructive, effective study groups to maximizeeach person’s learning within the study group environment.References Cited:1 Brower, A. M. & Inkelas, K. K. (2010). Living Learning Programs: One High-Impact Educational PracticeWe Now Know a Lot About. Liberal Education, 96 (2).2 Inkelas, K. K., Zeller, W. J., Murphy, R. K., Hummel M. L. (2006) Learning Moves Home. About Campus,10 (6), 10-16.3 Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. InC. L. Schroeder & P. Mable (Eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls (pp. 22-52). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.4 Pike, G. R. (1990). The Effects of Residential Learning Communities and Traditional
AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed
), 17-21. 9. Tuan, H., C., Vhin, S. Shich (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation Page 25.34.15 toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 639-654.10. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Instrument: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1965).11. Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.12. Kruger, C., and Summers, M. (2000). Developing Primary School Children's Understanding of Energy Waste. Research in Science &
late 1990’s. The student enrolments for both the U of A andMacEwan for 1995 and 2010 are provided in Table 1. Currently MacEwan students comprisealmost 10% of the second year engineering students at the U of A.Table 1 - Enrolment statistics for MacEwan and University of Alberta: 1995 & 2010Year MacEwan MacEwan % U of A U of A % Engineering Engineering / Engineering Engineering Institution /Institution Enrolment Enrolment ~25,000
Comprehensive Learning Spaces Evaluation Model Accessed January 10 2011 from http://www.swinburne.edu.au/spl/learningspacesproject/ [12] Woolner, P., Clark, J., Hall, E., Tiplady, L., Thomas, U., and Wall, K. (2009, in press). Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. In Press.[13] Wall K. & Higgins, S. (2006). Facilitating metacognitive talk: a research teaching and learning tool. International Journal of Research and method in Education 29(1) p. 39-53.[14] Pitkethly, A. & Prosser, M. (2001). The First Year Experience Project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 185-191.[15] Pascarella, E.T. &
. Page 22.346.16References1 Roy S. Czernikowski, Margaret B. Bailey, David A. Borkholder, Matthew M. Marshall, Alan H. Nye, and N.Richard Reeve. (2007) RIT’s Engineering Honors Program: Product Innovation in a Global Economy. 37thASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. T2A9-T2A152 William E. Lee III. (2002) Humanities Awareness: A Comparison Between Honors Program and TraditionalUndergraduate Engineering Students. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition.3 Gregory Tonkay, E.Zimmers. (2007) Migration from a Leadership Honors Program to an Engineering LeadershipMinor. American Society for Engineering Education.4 Kathleen A.K. Ossman. (2005) Enhancing the Education of Engineering
, Mike and Bowe, Brian (2011). An International Comparison of Engineering Programs in their Emphases and Professional Skills Development. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.26. Jaeger, B., Whalen, R., Payne, R. and Freeman, S. (2010). Successful Students: Smart or Tough? Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX. Page 23.1240.23 Appendix A Professional Skills Survey Please circle one: Male
Education, Louisville, KY, June 2010.[6] Simmons K, Sample S and Kedrowicz A, “Prioritizing Teamwork: Promoting Process and Product Effectiveness in a Freshman Engineering Design Course,” Paper submitted for presentation at the 117th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY, June 2010.[7] Felder RM and Brent R, The ABCs of Engineering Education: ABET, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, and so on. Proceedings ASEE Conference, 2004, Session 1375. Page 15.789.12 ME 1000 LECTURES Week Day Primary Category Official title (syllabus