, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Mt Sinai J Med, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 610–623, 2012. 3) J. Sablan, “The Challenge of Summer Bridge Programs,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1035–1050, 2014. 4) T. T. Ishitani, “Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 861–885, 2006. 5) S. M. Ostrove, J. M., Long, “Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 363–389, 2007. 6) S. P. Ackermann, “The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low transfer students,” Community /Junior Coll. Q. Res. Pract., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 211– 224, 1991
, Kentucky (pp. 73-84), 2014.[21] C. Gattis, B. Hill, A. Lachowsky, “A successful engineering peer mentoring program,” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 2007.[22] Q. Tahmina, “Does Peer Mentoring Help Students be Successful in an Introductory Engineering Course?,” ASEE Conference Proceeding, 2019.[23] P. A. Vesilind, “Mentoring Engineering Students: Turning Pebbles into Diamonds*,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 407–411, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00620.x.
Questions Pre-Q Prior to this course, I had participated in an online blog (Y/N). Using Likert Scale, Q1 I enjoy online blogging as a component of this class. Q2 Blogging is an effective way to communicate with the rest of the class. Q3 Blogging enhances my desire to communicate with my peers. I share more information on the blog posts than I would have in an in-class Q4 discussion
Industrial Engineering at thelarge private university in South America partially supported this exploratory study.Bibliography1. Allen, D., et al. (2008). “Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report.” Grant X3-83235101- 0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.2. Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Mihelcic, J., and Vanasupa, L. (2008). “Civil and environmental engineering education (CEEE) transformational change: Tools and strategies for sustainability integration and assessment in engineering education.” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.3. Koehn, E., Patel, D., and Khonde, S. (2009). “Introduction of sustainability to civil and
. 100, No. 4. (2011): 760-777.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” J. Engineering Education. Vol. 98, No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and Shuman, L. “Predicting STEM Degree Outcomes Based on Eighth Grade Data and Standardized Test Scores.” J. Engineering Education. Vol. 99, No. 3. (2010): 209- 223.4. Burtner, J. Critical-to-Quality Factors Associated with Engineering Student Persistence: The Influence of Freshman Attitudes. Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/ISEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F2E-1 (2004). Available online at http://fie-conference.org
the site layout and test submission system.It is the only module completed during a scheduled orientation period and is designed to alleviateprocedural anxieties and allow students to meet the instructors and other facilitators. Figure 2: Home page for example student currently on Unit 6.Specifically, units tests can be completed anywhere and proctors grade them online typicallywithin 24 hours of submission. Units 1-3 familiarize the student with the compiler, declaringvariables and interacting with the user via a terminal window. Unit 4 is a comprehensive sectiontest (S1) taken in person during the scheduled office hours. This helps ensure the course iscompleted in good faith. Students must pass a Q&A interview session
). Page 25.1167.8References [1] Orwin, E.J. and Bennett, R. J. “Trials and Tribulations of a Freshman Design Course.” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 16-19, 2002. [2] Comolli, N., Kelly, W, and Wu, Q. “The Artificial Kidney: Investigating Current Dialysis Methods as a Freshman Design Project.” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010. [3] Dong, J. and Warter-Perez, N. “Collaborative Project-Based Learning to Enhance Freshman Design Experience in Digital Engineering.” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009. [4] Shaw, D. and Tanyel, M. “Lessons
Really Gained? ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 22-25: Saratoga Springs, NY.Lichtenstein, G., H. Loshbaugh, and B. Claar (2009). An Engineering Major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergrad eng. Major. Journal of Engineering Education 98(3): 227-234.Lindberg-Sanda, A. and T. Olsson. (2008). Sustainable assessment?: Critical features of the assessment process in a modularised engineering programme. International Journal of Educational Research. 47(3): 165-174.Loui, M.C., Robbins, B.A., Johnson, E.C., & Venkatesan, N. (2008). ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 22-25: Saratoga Springs, NY.Malik, Q., M. Koehler, P Mishra (2009
PreparationSAT Q 0.001 0.001 0.001 -0.002SAT V 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000AP credits 0.019*** 0.022*** 0.024*** 0.005Applied activitiesworked on a car engine -0.314* -0.400* -0.425* -0.347built circuit 0.380* 0.331* 0.287 0.266installed software 0.325* 0.371* 0.396* 0.377*installed hardware 0.324** 0.286* 0.233 0.317*repaired small appliance 0.217 0.215 0.149 0.164Aspirations: year aftergraduationengineering grad school 0.799
Science Teaching 36, 28–35 (2007).43. Lundy-Wagner, V., Veenstra, C. P., Orr, M. K. & Ohland, M. W. Gaining access or losing ground? Economically disadvantaged students in undergraduate engineering, 1993-2004. (in progress).44. Godfrey, E. & Parker, L. Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 99, 5–22 (2010).45. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. (Westview Press, 1997).46. Xie, Y. & Shauman, K. A. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. (Harvard University Press, 2005).47. Long, R. A. Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development. (2010). at 48. Patton, M. Q
. Page 24.882.6Table 1. Select questions from Fall 2013FIG Student Survey [%SA/A = percentage of students who either agreed orstrongly agreed; %N = neutral; %D/SD = percentage of students who either disagreed or strongly disagreed;%NoAn = no answer] Avg* STDEV %SA/A %N %D/SD %NoAn Q# Question FIGs have helped me develop valuable connections with 7 students in my own major. 3.73 0.97 61% 25% 13% 2% My peer advisor (PA) has been a source of positive support 11 this semester. 4.35 0.70 86% 13% 0% 2% My faculty mentor
as the unit tests for aspecific function passing without error). To provide the flexibility to allow each student todemonstrate their learning in the way best suited to them, the grading category (quizzes,assignments, Projects 1 and 2, and Project 3) in which the student scored highest was double-weighted in the final grade (i.e., 40% of the final grade instead of 20%).5. Space. Class meetings and office hours were held exclusively on Zoom. Information regardingthe class was distributed among several platforms: GitHub for the content and rubrics forassignments, worksheets, and projects; Canvas for grades, announcements, anddiscussions/Q&A; and a course website for readings and project descriptions. While meeting onZoom worked overall
entire class in a large lecture hall with each presenter havingapproximately one minute of Q&A after their presentation. Students are graded by the instructorof record, the course graduate teaching assistant, and the undergraduate mentors assigned to theclass. Grading is based on oral and visual presentation, and student understanding of technicalcontent. Furthermore, a classroom response system (clickers or a streamlined Google form) isused by the class members to provide additional feedback to the presenter. Peer feedbackcontributed a very small portion (~5%) of the student’s presentation grade.The articles selected by the study population over a nine-year period were analyzed. The authorsindependently assigned each presented article to
D: Student infographic examples - Example infographic posters from fall and winterquarters. The infographic with the most votes among their peers in each section for the fallquarter is reflected below in Figures D1-D3. The winter quarter top vote earners are shown inFigures D4-D5. Figure D1: Infographic on Peer Learning from Monday section (Team D), F2016Figure D2: Infographic on Reading from Wednesday section (Team Q), F2016Figure D3: Infographic on Questioning from Friday section (Team II), F2016Figure D4: Infographic on Questioning from Tuesday section (Team 9), W2017Figure D5: Infographic on Questioning from Thursday section (Team 18), W2017Appendix E: Peer and instructor assessment of infographic examplesThe infographic rubric
customer statements and Q & A’s. The project is broken into subsystems thatare addressed one at a time though iterations are needed throughout the design, as the designchanges in one subsystem would likely affect other design choices that had been made prior.Custom web-based simulators were provided to students to help them with modeling and designdecision making. The final deliverables of this project include a few visual/physicalrepresentations of various aspects of the design and a design report.Research MethodThis research effort aims to understand how first year students’ understanding of the designprocess changes before, during, and after engaging in the class activities in this course. Datacollected are the visual representations of
, G. (2001). A promising prospect for minority retention:Students becoming peer mentors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 375-383.[26] Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate womenin engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, BLAH, 369-375.[27] Sandvall, E., & Calder, D., & Harper, M., & Jackson, Z. B., & Baker, B. J. (2017,August), Peer Mentoring in the First-Year Engineering Experience Paper presented at 2017FYEE Conference, Daytona Beach, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/29428[28] Tahmina, Q. (2018, June), Assessing the Impact of Peer Mentoring on Performance in aFundamentals of Engineering Course Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition
their STEM majors. Introduction to Engineering Fields: The purpose of this component is to introduce the Scholars to different types of engineering including bioengineering, chemical engineering, industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, civil and materials engineering, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science - as disciplines and as major programs offered at University of Illinois at Chicago. It intends to familiarize the Scholars with career options, path to graduation, research areas (undergraduate and postgraduate), and future outlook. Each of these sessions is typically a 30- to 45-minute presentation followed by a lively Q&A
mark next to the SIX MOST IMPORTANT. a. Abstracting b. Brainstorming c. Building d. Communicating e. Decomposing f. Evaluating g. Generating alternatives h. Goal setting i. Identifying constraints j. Imaging k. Iterating l. Making decisions m. Making trade-offs n. Modeling o. Planning p. Prototyping q. Seeking information r. Sketching Synthesizing s. Testing t. Understanding the problem u. Visualizing v. I prefer not to answer24. What did you struggle with the most on your project?25. What did you enjoy the most about your project (what shouldn’t change)?26. What tools and resources would you have wanted
environment,” Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 2000, 30-43.2. Bishop, J. L., M.A. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013).3. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, M. Litzkow, “Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-based Streaming video Software,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, 267-274.4. Talbert, R. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. Kecskemety, K. M., B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. Stickel, M., S. Hari, Q
, student had an option to take as muchtime as they needed. Some of the projects were also presented in class for peer review andcritique. Faculty were available to provide feedback at any stage of the project completion. Theinstructors held Q&A sessions about badges throughout the semester as needed by students.Assignments completed as part of a badge were evaluated by two or more faculty membersand/or teaching assistants involved in a particular learning experience, using a detailed rubricthat was also available to learners. These evaluators would provide detailed feedback on eachassignment and may require from students to revise and resubmit without penalty as many timesas needed until the competency was attained. Students could not get
Society of Engineering Education, 20124. Anderson, L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Illinois, 2001.5. Bland, L. “Applying Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-Long Learning,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.6. Redekopp, M.W. and Ragusa, G. “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2013.7. Stickel, M., Hari, S., and Liu, Q. “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self
challenging team scenario of engineering students attempting to worktogether. During this activity, the actors and actresses manifest common difficulties onengineering teams, including gender dynamics, miscommunications, misunderstandings, andother frustrations that emerge from teamwork. Afterwards, the facilitator leads a discussion withthe students, including a Q&A session between students and the actors and actresses in character.The interactive theater sketch ends with an invitation for the audience to brainstorm strategies toimprove interactions within teams. The actors/actresses then re-enact their scenario, butincorporate the suggested strategies to improve their synergy. Findings suggest that theinteractive theater sketch can help
provided them in the online videos. In addition,there was time for live student presentation and group discussions with a Q & A on thepresentations. Groups would meet not only on their own out of class to complete a courseassignment, but additionally in-class to apply the concepts they learned in the online modules.For example, groups would spend time on plan reading exercises and the instructor was able tospend time providing feedback to each group.4.3 Data gathering and analysis. Data was gathered through a reflective journal kept by theinstructor and a survey administered quarter into the semester and towards the end (AppendixA). 4.3.a Instructor notes: Given the new approach to teaching the instructor kept weeklynotes about the
., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 95–113, 2011.[29] E. A. Plant, J. S. Hyde, D. Keltner, and P. G. Devine, “The Gender Stereotyping of Emotions,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 24, pp. 81–92, 2000.[30] J. H. Pleck, F. L. Sonenstein, and L. C. Ku, “Masculinity ideology and its correlates,” Gend. Psychol. Read., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 308–326, 1993.[31] B. Markway, “How to crack the code of men’s feelings,” Psychology Today, 2014. .[32] A. J. Franklin and N. Boyd-Franklin, “Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males,” Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2000.[33] J. C. Wade, “Masculinity ideology, male reference group identity dependence, and African American
Engineering (Fundamental).” Proceedings of 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017. Paper ID #18604.[17] Hughes, Q. & R. Sehab. “What They Say Matters: Parental Impact on Pre-College Academic Identity of Successful African American Engineering Students.” Proceedings of 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010, AC 2010-1227[18] Y. Strammis, “Sibling Influences on Decision to Study at University.” Ph.D dissertation, Dept. Psychology., University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2017.[19] L.C. Steelman, & B. Powell, “The Social and Academic Consequences of Birth Order: Real, Artificial or Both,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol
). Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study. J. Engineering Education, 101(1), pp. 6–27.4. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. J. Engineering Education, 98(4), pp. 361–376.5. Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H.L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T. & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. J. Engineering Education, 99(4), pp. Page 23.669.13 371–395.6. Jones, B.D., Paretti, M.C., Hein, S.F
, 39thAnnual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, pp. 1-6.20. Malik, Q., Mishra, P. and Shanblatt, M., (2008). Identifying Learning Barriers for Non-major EngineeringStudents in Electrical Engineering Courses, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE North Central Section Conference. Page 24.48.15 AppendixMusic-to-Light Modulator Project Bill of Materials total Part Supplier Part # Cost/unit Cost Light modulator kit Carl's Electronics CK1200
research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program entitled “Focus OnRetention in Cohorts of Engineering Students” (FORCES).References1. Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L. and Herrin, G.D. “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.” Advances in Engineering Education. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2009): 1-33.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 98 No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Lenning, O.T., Ebbers, L. H. “The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the
focuseson one school, identified here as Eastern Technical University (ETU). This analysis is restrictedto ETU’s first-year mechanical engineering curriculum, which typically involves students takingMechanics (ETU Physics), Calculus (ETU Math), Introduction to Manufacturing (ETUEngineering), and/or Introduction to CAD (ETU Design). Each course includes threecomponents: lecture, recitation, and laboratory. ETU’s curriculum generally identifies lectures asthe main venue through which content knowledge is imparted, while the recitation sessions areprimarily used as an opportunity to engage with the material through Q&A experiences andparticipation in group-work exercises. The laboratories serve as vehicles for specific skilldevelopment and attempt