), from three different introductory courses: 1. A hands-on section focused on naval architecture, involving physically building a vehicle, and framed as a competition (students S1 and S2) 2. A hands-on section, focused on food science and chemical engineering (student S3) 3. A research-based section with no hands-on component, focused on biomedical engineering and materials (students S4 and S5)Data Analysis: Codebook DevelopmentFirst, the transcripts were coded by two researchers using open coding, in which key themeswere identified. Next, the transcripts were coded by the whole research team, at which pointsome codes were expanded or reworked. After this, the research team realized that the codes fellinto three categories, each
completed three co-ops at early stage biopharmaceutical companies. She will be entering a Ph.D. program in Fall of 2021.Ms. Amanda Dee, Northeastern University Amanda Dee is a second-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in bioengi- neering and minoring in mathematics and music. This is her first year with the Connections Chemistry Review program. In the past, she has been a first-year tutor for the College of Engineering and is currently a CRLA Level 1 tutor for the Northeastern Peer Tutoring Program. She is also passionate about research and is currently developing tools for engineering and evaluating transgenic root cultures. Outside of aca- demics, she is an avid musician and performs with
(GELC) at Clemson University. The paper begins with a discussion of the rationalefor an engineering math curriculum followed by an explanation of Clemson’s approach, a reportof preliminary results, and recommendations for interested practitioners and instructors.Additional details about the GELC program are available in previous papers [8], [9].The first-year engineering math curriculum at Clemson was implemented to explain to studentswhy basic math knowledge is relevant to engineering. While the expectations of engineeringstudents within university programs and professional industry require them to learn courseconcepts, connect their learning to real-world contexts, and build a knowledge base easilytransferable across disciplines [1], [2], the
. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa and Tau Beta Pi and is a licensed engineer in the states of Maine and Pennsylvania. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Implementing Life Cycle Assessment Module in Introduction to Engineering in Different ModalitiesIntroductionWith increasing global and societal needs, introducing concepts of sustainability and life cyclethinking have become imperative across all engineering disciplines. The theme of sustainabilityis an integral part of the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges [1].Consideration of environmental factors in engineering design is a part of the student outcomesrequired by
years, universities are looking toimprove their retention and completion rates and the first two years of study are playing a big rolein these two parameters. In addition, the average number of new enrollments in undergraduate EEprograms is flat or increased slowly nationwide, while the same number for the other programsincreased [1]. On the other hand, many of the EE employers are looking only for highly skilledworkers or the students with a graduate degree. Getting graduate degree will result in more yearsof study to get hired in Electrical Engineering.The previous course plan in the EE program at California State University San Marcos was startingwith math, science, and general study courses. Then the plan proceeds into basic circuit theory
Science offered by my department is taken by a variety ofstudents bringing a variety of backgrounds and exhibiting a variety of aptitudes and interests.Myriad challenges accompany the goal of turning out college students well prepared to continuetheir university education. A classic novel, chosen for a computing-related theme, provides notonly a rich literary experience but also practice in concentrated reading and a platform for variousexercises on aspects of computing. As far as this author can tell, scholarly work on theincorporation of literature into computing courses is lacking. Endeavors to integrate humanitiesinto computing (and other technology) fall into categories such as understanding technologythrough science fiction [1], design for
students.The authors would like to present the paper as a poster.IntroductionSimple harmonic motion (SHM) follows logically from linear motion and circular motion. Howeverfundamental it may be to engineering students, SHM is one of the more demanding topics andoften misunderstood. Researchers found that passive instruction by talented teachers imparted littleconceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics [1]. Good physical insight can lead to a deeperunderstanding of displacement and oscillation, which is a pervasive phenomenon in STEM. Eachcourse module has two parts: a) three virtual lecture classes with PowerPoint presentation ontrigonometry, wave motion and MATLAB coding and b) a hands-on lab exercise using a mass-spring system and the phone app
challenges of the virtual/in personlabs. Student's feedback was collected to reflect their overall lab experience in this special time.1. Introduction and BackgroundLabs are a vital component to learn engineering disciplines, since hands-on labs reinforce thetheory that the students learned in lecture. With the development of modern technology,universities are changing from face-to-face education to remote web-based learning. However, itis a challenge to bring hands-on labs online due to the complexity of the labs, which includevarious equipment, materials, and resources. Setting up a web‐system for e‐education requires asignificant amount of time, as well as the necessity of having a computer and other resources.Especially due to COVID-19, most
modern technology andits use in engineering. This approach ties with ABET student outcome (1) and is based on recallingfacts and basic concepts according to Blooms taxonomy. The data shows that nearly 80% of theincoming freshmen did comprehend the MATLAB basics and met the expectations of performingwell.MATLAB programming was first introduced two years ago in the Fundamentals of Engineeringcourse. We report on this 2-year exercise and include student feedback from the second year.IntroductionA computer programming course is required in most engineering curricula. Typically, such acourse is taught in the freshman or sophomore year and use either Fortran, C or JAVA as itsprogramming language. These programming languages are difficult to use when
computational thinking skills andconcepts more efficiently in an effort to better prepare students for the demands of their futurecareers in the limited time allotted in the curriculum.The primary frameworks used to investigate the ways students learn computational thinkingconcepts is that of information processing and mental model theory. Information process theorytreats the student as processor of information, similar in structure to that of a traditional computersystem6. Students receive information through their senses (receptors), process that informationutilizing either working or long-term memory, and enact changes in their environment througheffectors. This model is represented in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Information
challenge for many engineeringprograms [1]. Most inclusive and equitable learning initiatives are spearheaded by departmentssuch as Diversity and Inclusion and Gender Studies with a focus on broader institutional culture[2-3]. Such efforts, however, grapple with inspiring STEM faculty [4] as STEM classroomsremain relatively neglected. Consequently, STEM students from historically underrepresentedgroups, particularly those with perceived lower social capital, may still experience inequities inthe classroom; inequities that include exclusion from high-profile team roles [5-9].Research shows that first-year, team-based design courses present a unique opportunity toaddress such inequities by providing early cooperative and collaborative learning
Fundamentals (Fundamentals) course was developed in response to aninformal faculty survey to identify curriculum weaknesses, and it is intended to provide a strongfoundation in the civil engineering discipline6. It introduces students to tools and techniques,such as surveying, understanding maps and plan sets, field sampling, and data analysis, asrequired for their civil engineering curriculum as well as throughout their professional career.By incorporating software and surveying skills, the course also provides resume enhancement forfirst-year students seeking summer internships, which can further enhance their engineeringidentity7, 8.The objectives of the course are as follows: 1. Define the profession of Civil Engineering, 2. Develop
, with many of them as first-year freshman students. In this paper, we present preliminary findings of two first-yearenrichment programs in ASSURE-US: the student teacher interaction council (STIC) and thestudent summer research, as well as lessons learned from two years’ implementation of theproject in order to improve the project implementations for future years. 1. Introduction Billions of dollars are allocated every year to fund research, program development, and directservices aimed at increasing the number of women, minorities, and underrepresented populationsentering the STEM major/career pipeline. Nevertheless, disparities in STEM representation ofthe Hispanic community prevail. Hispanics account for 17.4% of the US population, and
Alamos where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground
might suggest that there is a benefit to reforming teams mid-semester in each course to give students additional experiences to apply what they have learned tomore teams. 1. INTRODUCTION Research on improving teamwork skills has been conducted in various disciplines from differentperspectives. Providing teamwork training for trauma resuscitation staff could improve the clinicalcare of trauma patients [1]. Research in plant construction shows that adopting training policies andproviding motivators to the company’s staff help them achieve better performance and to improveteamwork experience [2]. Organizational competitiveness could be enhanced by using a frameworkintegrated and emphasized on teamwork [3
study is informed by the need to address the well-documentedunderrepresentation of low-socioeconomic status (SES) and minoritized students in engineeringand other related careers [1]–[3]. Researchers advanced that, in addition to intellectual andscientific reasons, low-income students are attracted to the major by the potential prospect ofemployment after completing a degree [1], [4]. Financial considerations are critical for low-SESengineering students; this includes considerations of financial aid and differential tuition [5].Programs such as the National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) have beenimplemented to address financial assistance of low-SES students. This study is part of alongitudinal five-year S-STEM project
Succeed: Learning Approaches and Strategies of First-Year Engineering Transfer StudentsAbstractThe Evidence-Based Practice paper describes the learning approaches and strategies used byengineering transfer students in a design-based foundations course. Studying the learningstrategies of engineering transfer students is important because the population of engineeringtransfer students is increasing, and is often more diverse and underserved than the generalpopulation of entering engineering students. This type of student presents a largely untappedsource of engineers to address the current national shortage [1], even though attrition rates oftransfer students from engineering programs is highAlthough a large number of studies
(for engineering context) 8-item, validated instrument focused on longer-term,maintained interest. The methods that follow were developed to explore a multi-subfactordepiction(s) (from literature) of maintained interest, including conceptualizing and analyzingstudent responses. Two associated research questions thusly addressed in this study are: 1) whatis the strongest factor structure for measuring the construct of first-year engineering students’long-term, stable maintained interest in the choice of pursuing an engineering career?; and 2)how strong is the fit of theoretically-grounded structural models of the construct of first-yearengineering students’ maintained interest in engineering careers? Results show significantempirical support in
the lab for offering the physical activities isdesired as soon as it is safe.1. IntroductionDuring the global pandemic of 2020 and its corresponding shutdowns, activity-based courses withlarge enrollment, requiring face-to-face interaction, are not considered safe. Many classes aretransitioned to a virtual environment in an emergency situation, posing a complex challenge forinstructors to ensure their students meet the course learning outcomes. An important aspect of anactivity-based course is hands-on work with guidance from faculty, teaching assistants, and others.Activities, traditionally used throughout our first-year mechanical engineering class at TheUniversity of Texas at Dallas, are physical, conceptual, or based on simulations [1-5
University of Michigan. Her research interests lie in assessing and amending curricula to help students transition from undergraduate to professional practice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Motivating factors that encourage rural students to pursue engineeringIntroductionThis complete research paper describes a qualitative study conducted at a large midwesternuniversity exploring the motivations rural students cite as reasons for pursuing engineering.According to the United States Department of Education, rural communities account for 32% ofpublic elementary and secondary schools, serving 24% of students in the United States [1].27.1% of rural students
, large-enrollment FYE coursesIntroductionEngineering design principles and processes are foundational concepts across the engineeringdisciplines [1]–[7]. From a professional development perspective, open-ended design projects,which are frequently conducted in team-based settings, offer students a scaffolded apprenticeshipwith opportunities to engage in collaborative planning and work akin to that of the workforce.From a pedagogical perspective, they require students to think critically about a wide range ofengineering concepts and to complete a variety of practical tasks related to learning objectives.Team-based learning through design projects provides students with technical and non-technicalmastery experiences
engineering design course can be seen atthe Altoona College of the Pennsylvania State University. Engineering Design and Graphics 100is a three-credit course which introduces students to Computer Aided Design (CAD) skills,engineering design, decision making, and teamwork. This class incorporates mini-projects, teampresentations, lectures, exercises, and case studies. As a final design challenge, students designeda soda can lifter using dc motors, a gear box, and two AAA batteries [1]. Student responses to aquestionnaire show that most of the students enjoyed working on mini-projects and the finaldesign challenge. Suggestions for future offerings of the course include modifications totechnical specifications and providing students with a more rugged
Project-Based Learning: Contrasting Experience between Traditional Face- to-Face Instruction and Virtual Instruction Jaya Dofe1, Sudarshan Kurwadkar2 1 Department of Computer Engineering 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA *Corresponding author: jdofe@fullerton.eduAbstractThe Introduction to engineering (EGGN-100) is a project-based course offered every fall semesterto first-year students with undecided engineering majors at California State University, Fullerton(CSUF). The primary
development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Psychological Cost, Gender, and Retention Among Engineering Students AbstractThere is great interest in developing interventions to improve retention in engineering programsby exploring influential factors at the institutional, curricular, and student levels, especially forunderrepresented minorities. According to expectancy-value theory [1], students’ perceptions oftask-related
the previous year willhighlight opportunities for improving virtual bootcamp delivery for preparing future engineers.I. MotivationThe Math and Engineering bootcamp was established at California State University, Chico (CSUChico) in Summer 2019 [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty decided to continueholding the bootcamp in Summer 2020, but in an exclusively online format for compliance withrequired safety protocols. The paper explains how the bootcamp contributed to the campusgraduation goals, the improvements that were made to the Summer 2019 bootcamp to develop anonline and more inclusive bootcamp, the challenges of delivering an online bootcamp, how weattempted to address the challenges, and how we can improve our experience in the
University of Virginia’s Department of Biomedical Engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Evidence-Based Practice Paper: The Use of Virtual Design Modules in an Introduction to Engineering Course--Impact on Learning Outcomes and Engineering IdentityAbstractThe Introduction to Engineering course is taken by all first-year students in the Engineeringschool of an R1 university. The learning objectives of the course are 1) to introduce students tothe engineering design process; 2) to practice applying the design process to solve problems incollaborative teams; 3) to learn the importance of effective communications; and 4) to feelconfident in their capacity to be
PhysicsTeacher, 30, 141–158 https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1119/1.2343497Lindell, R. S., Pea, E., & Foster T.M. (2007). Are They All Created Equal? A Comparison ofDifferent Concept Inventory Development Methodologies, American Institute of PhysicsConference Proceedings, 883(14), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508680Loch, B., & Lamborn, J. (2016). How to make mathematics relevant to first-year engineeringstudents: Perceptions of students on student-produced resources. International Journal ofMathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(1), 29–44.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1044043Magana, A. J., Falk, M. L., Vieira, C., & Reese, M. J. (2016). A case study of undergraduateengineering students' computational literacy
develop a learningproject that would be beneficial to both preschool and first year engineering students. Thismutually beneficial project allowed the engineering students to learn basic principles of 3Dmodeling, 3D printing, and client centered design. It also taught the preschoolers about floatationand buoyancy, representing data through graphs (Figure 1), and inspiring/encouraging theirinterest in engineering.Figure 1. Preschoolers generated bar graphs by placing their votes (slips of red or yellow paper)above their favorite toysThe 2019 project included a single deliverable item for each 4-person design team: a 3D printedtoy. The project was worth 20 points and included the following four requirements (5 points perrequirement): (1) the toy
California, San Diego in Computer Science Engineering.Mr. Ramakrishna Sai Annaluru, University of Texas at Austin Ramakrishna (Sai) Annaluru is a 3rd Year MS/PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, researching at the intersection of machine learning and signal processing. Sai’s educational background include 1 semester of graduate Teaching Assistant experience for Signals and Systems and Introduction to Computing, 2 semesters of head instructor experience for a 1 credit hour spatial visualization course, and 2 years of undergraduate tutoring experience in introductory electrical engineering and mathematics classes. American
Instruction” in conjunction with overlays of FredRogers’ and Benjamin Bloom’s contributions in the production and delivery of digital lessons.Gagne has created a standard for instruction that provides both a framework for building a solidlesson plan and a foundation for evolving numerous learning theories. Though Gagne is rarelyincluded in constructivist discussions, the melding of Gagne’s vision with constructivist ideologyin a quest to best support digital learners provides an enticing blueprint for the 21st centuryclassroom.Marcy Driscoll’s close association with Gagne provides a seemingly dichotomous message inPsychology of Learning for Instruction [1], yet Dr. Driscoll’s turmoil proved an effectiveincubator for creation of a new learning theory