Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland; Sherry Liao, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Deciding on a Major

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

choice, but that there can be barriers that confound decision making. For example anindividual’s prior experiences and background (culture, gender, genetic endowment, sociostructuralconsiderations, and disability or health status) impact the nature and range of their career possibilitiesconsidered. In theory, SCCT aims to describe the intersection of self-efficacy beliefs, outcomeexpectations, and goals11. Self-efficacy, defined by Bandura, is one’s own belief about one’s ability toachieve a task12. This derives from four primary sources: performance outcomes, vicarious experiences,verbal persuasion, and physiological experiences. Self-efficacy is a task level theory; it is useful in classsettings where students can perceive separate domains

Conference Session

FPD 2: Retention

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Herbert P. Schroeder, University of Alaska Anchorage; Linda P. Lazzell, University of Alaska Anchorage

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

science courses and their mathematics level was at algebra 1 orlower. It would be years before these underprepared undergraduates would be eligible to taketheir first introduction to engineering course. The lack of academic preparation for theseincoming first-year engineering students presented a formidable problem.We searched for a solution where we could connect directly with the K-12 students. It had toresult in the K-12 students being motivated to complete chemistry, physics, and trigonometry inhigh school. It had to develop the self-efficacy required to continue to pursue a challengingSTEM curriculum. At the university, we had to find a way for Alaska Native and AmericanIndian students to survive and then excel. We needed to develop an

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Best Papers

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University; Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University; Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the face of challenges. Beliefs about the nature of intelligence havebeen identified as a key lever across these critical behaviors linked to academic success and life-long learning [3].Beliefs are recognized as powerful sources of behavior and various outcomes, and they are awell-established construct of interest in engineering education research. For example, students’beliefs about their own capabilities, or self-efficacy beliefs are important [4-9], and theycorrelate with retention in educational pursuits [10, 11]. Prior work has shown the importance ofbeliefs held by engineering students about the self (i.e. identity) [12-14] and how those beliefsframe their interactions with others [15]. Theory has been generated that connects

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Maker Spaces in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

students [27]. The principles ofthe competency-belief component of this theory are similar to Shavelson’s self-concept of ability[28] and Bandura’s self-efficacy construct [29]. While by definition, these three concepts aredifferent, they have proven difficult to isolate empirically [30-34] and are usually measured in thesame manner [27]. Competency beliefs are frequently grounded in self-efficacy theory [22], whichfacilitates the connection between positive feedback and better academic achievement [35]. Valuebeliefs, on the other hand, have been studied less often but are by no means less vital. Whilecompetency beliefs focus on a person’s ability to do a task or engage in an activity, value beliefsfocus on an individual’s desire to engage in an

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

”responses related to strategies students realize they were not using effectively.A single researcher scored the responses; thus our study did not have the benefit of a more robustreview of the data or the benefit of inter-rater reliability.Conclusion and Implications for Future ResearchWe propose that a course environment that focuses on increasing metacognitive awarenessthrough self-directed learning in individual and collaborative settings may positively impactstudents’ self-efficacy. As students focus on attaining goals that are important to them, in settingswhere the challenge is not beyond their capability, in a social setting that supports persistence,students’ self-efficacy should be enhanced [16]. This is an area ripe for future

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

-Year EngineeringIt is critical that first-year engineering programs have a plan to assess the objectives and outcomes.Continuous improvement will allow a program to make adjustments along the way to meet theirobjectives and outcomes for students. Recently, Spurzer, Douglas, Folkerts, and Williams (2017)developed an assessment framework for the first-year introduction to engineering courses whichfocuses on student-learning objectives. While this is much needed, there is an opportunity toexpand beyond assessing only student-learning objectives to include student-growth objectives(e.g., motivation, identity, self-efficacy, integration). The term student-growth objective is coinedfrom the ever-expanding research and instruments used to measure

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Bracey, Temple University; Keyanoush Sadeghipour, Temple University; Carnell Baugh, Independent; Shawn Fagan, Temple University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

continued to rise andmost first year engineering students were presenting SAT scores well above the nationalaverage, across gender and ethnicities. In addition, the college used validatedinstruments to assess psychological predisposition, which revealed that 95% of the 1styear students in this study consider themselves to be “gritty” and 86% reported verystrong self-efficacy (belief) in their ability and high school math preparation to studyengineering.However, in contradiction to their above average SAT scores, half of the first yearstudents entering Temple Engineering in Fall 2014 and Fall 2015 tested below Calculus I,only 33% had experienced a high school engineering course or activity, less than 33%had a family member in a STEM field, and only

Conference Session

FPD IX: Research on First-Year Programs and Students, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Patricia A. Tolley, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

institutions are committed to the intellectual and social growth of students; that is, theyare committed to their education and not just retention.Community BuildingThe ability to successfully adjust to the emotional, cognitive, and social challenges of living onone‟s own for the first time, develop new friends and support networks, examine personal valuesand beliefs, explore various career options, and choose/succeed in a major is dependent on robustself-efficacy.24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 Self-efficacy is the belief in one‟s ability to organize andexecute courses of action to achieve specific outcomes.24 The rigor of the engineering curriculumaffects self-efficacy appraisals and students‟ choices about persisting in the major, particularlyfor

Conference Session

FPD6 -- Early Intervention & Retention Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Light, University of Washington; Laura Girardeau, Washington State University; Jennifer Beller, Washington State University; Greg Crouch, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Page 11.1404.9identified psychological processes (self-efficacy, approach/avoidance behavior, and locus ofcontrol) that facilitate a student’s decision to stay in college or leave, many of which arereflected in these essays. Additionally, some differences were noted between the LLC Teniwestudents themselves and appeared to be aligned by their major. Finally, the essays were minedfor information regarding the students’ perceptions of the LLC program and in essence provideda “student evaluation” for the program.Seminar group 1 summary Common student goals for the year included making friends and getting good grades.Many students felt they had benefited from common living arrangements and campus resourcesprovided by the LLC. Other common

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5B: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

into groups. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference. Tempe, AZ, USA.4. Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34.5. Marra, R.M., Rodgers, K.A., Shen, D., Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 27-38.6. Hutchison, M. A., Follman, D. K., Sumpter, M., Bodner, G. M. (2006). Factors influencing the self- efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 39-47.7. Okudan, G.E., Horner, D., Bogue, B., & Devon, D. (2002). An

Conference Session

FPD3 -- Professional Issues for First-Year Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dwight Tolliver, University of Tennessee; Lauren Hines, University of Tennessee; J. Roger Parsons, University of Tennessee-Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

interdisciplinary teams1, 2. As a result, many engineeringprograms now devote a portion of their curriculum to team experiences and buildingcommunication skills. These activities are designed not only to equip students with theinterpersonal skills that they will need in their career, but to build self-efficacy and helpincrease retention3.The Engage program at the University of Tennessee was designed to be an integratedcurriculum that would “continue to teach essential skills, using techniques that improveproblem-solving ability, teach design methodology, and teach teamwork andcommunication skills,”4. The Engage program is a 12 credit hour, two-semester coursethat all first year students are required to take. The program was piloted in the 1997-1998academic

Conference Session

First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint; Ulan Dakeev, University of Michigan, Flint

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Metacognitive Self-regulation Intrinsic Goal Orientation Extrinsic Goal Orientation Task Value Control of Learning Self-efficacy Test Anxiety Time/Study Management Effort Regulation

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Celena Arreola, University of Texas, El Paso; Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso; Crystal Fernandez-Pena, University of Texas, El Paso; Helen Elizabeth Geller, University of Texas, El Paso; Giselle Andrade, STEMGrow; Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas, El Paso; Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas, El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas, El Paso; Melissa Stearns

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Self-Determination, Grade Motivation, and CareerMotivation. Glynn and his associates define student motivation to learn science as the “internalstate that arouses, directs, and sustains student behaviors associated with the learning of science[8].Table 1. Student Scores on the SMQ II-Pre & Post TestsTest Students/Scores Intrinsic Self- Self- Grade Career Overall/Raw Motivation Efficacy Determination Motivation Motivation AggregatePre Total # 114 114 114 114 114 Average Score 14.25 14.23 13.64 16.92 15.35 74.39 (n=114) STEMGrow(n=86) 14.63

Conference Session

Bridge Programs Connecting to First-Year Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rezvan Nazempour; Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago; Peter C. Nelson, University of Illinois, Chicago; Renata A. Revelo, University of Illinois, Chicago; Yeow Siow, University of Illinois, Chicago; Jeremiah Abiade

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Pre-College Engineering Education

]found that college students who were high-achieving usually had access to a summer bridgeprogram prior to entering their first year.In the second area, increasing interest in the major [13], [14], improving student sense of belonging[15], [16], [17], increasing student sense of preparedness [17], [18], increasing student self-efficacy [17], [19], and networking with students [20], [21], [22], and faculty [15], [23] can beconsidered as sub-goals. Finally, recruiting students to the majors [13], [14] and enhancingdiversity in the major [15], [24] are considered sub-goals for the third category.This paper presents a detailed report of a Summer Bridge Program (SBP) as a part of an ongoingNational Science Foundation (NSF)-supported project, which

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Nazanin Naderi, Youngstown State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Barriers to LearningAnalytics Adoption in Higher Education. Lester, J., Klein, C., Rangwala, H. & Johri, A. (Eds.).Learning Analytics in Higher Education: Current Innovations, Future Potential, and PracticalApplications. Routledge, NY, pp. 1-19.Karim, S., & Kandy, M. (2011). Time management skills impact on self-efficacy and academicperformance. Journal of American Science, 7(12), 720-726.Kearns, H., & Gardiner, M. (2007). Is it time well spent? The relationship between timemanagement behaviours, perceived effectiveness and work-related morale and distress in auniversity context. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 235-247.Khatib, A. (2014). Time management and its relation to students' stress, gender and

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Core Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wujie Zhang, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Gina Elizabeth Mazzone, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Anne Alexander, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jill Meyer, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

an understanding of students' chemistry education backgroundas well as their intent of study to be able to analyze the results based on their majors (majors willbe clustered and included in the drop-down list). The questions related to motivation assessmentare selected from the attached reference to mainly focus on the three factors of motivation: self-efficacy (Q4 and 5), active learning strategies (Q6-8), and science learning value (Q9-11). Q11looks particularly at whether the response is major-dependent. The questions with the highestloading of these three factors have been chosen. Moreover, to ensure the survey quality, a reversequestion has also been included (Q5).Voluntary Qualtrics surveys containing an informed consent statement were

Conference Session

FPD5 -- Placement & Early Success

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mwarumba Mwavita, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. There are many activities in collegebesides academics such as sports, parties, and social life in general. These extracurricular(social) activities may come in the way of students’ academic work and jeopardize theirperformance. However, according to research on self-regulated learning, students who exerciseself-regulated learning strategies in the midst of all distractions are more likely to succeed intheir academic endeavors. 13Four items in the instrument assessed classroom engagement. These items dealt with doinghomework, assignment completion prior to class, studying, and taking notes in class.Self-regulated learning was assessed with self-regulated learning subscale from Bandura’sMultidimensional Scales of Perceived Self-Efficacy developed

Conference Session

Mentoring First Year Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rose Marra, University of Missouri; Whitney Edmister, Virginia Tech; Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech; Barbara Bogue, Pennsylvania State University; Chia-Lin Tsai, University of Missouri; Fleur Gooden, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

underrepresentedminorities derive greater benefit from models that involve social and networkinginformation in addition to more mechanistic career development information (e.g.,Learning to negotiate the politics of an organization as well as understanding thesteps to advancement) 11,12,8.Ongoing research on mentoring identifies and investigates a broader range ofmodels. Chesler and Chesler 6, a team comprising sociology and engineeringexpertise, investigate how existing gender roles and dynamics impact the creationof effective mentoring programs. They report that a prevalent model, the HeroicJourney, emphasizes organizational and technical information and guidance butneglect psychosocial issues such as self-efficacy or sense of belonging. This isimportant because

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University; Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Libraries, First-Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Student, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

self-efficacy, sense of belonging, identification and identityintegration. Often, negative experiences are the result of subtle bias or schemas that all studentsbring with them into their teams, and occur despite the employment of best practices in teamformation.This paper presents a summary of a contemporary understanding of this phenomenon aspresented by several individual researchers covering the fields of stereotype threat, engineeringdesign, teamwork, motivation, and race, gender and their intersections. The content of this paperwas generated by collecting the individual responses of each researcher to a set of promptsincluding: • examples of how students can be marginalized in engineering teamwork and what governing

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caitlin Cairncross, University of Portland; Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland; Zulema Naegele, University of Portland; Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

financial pressures). Hutchison, Follman, Sumpter, and Bodner6found that student retention was greatly impacted by students’ self-efficacy, which in turn wasimpacted by factors such as motivation, understanding of material, and social influences(including peers and faculty). Finally, Bernold, Spurlin, and Anson3 found that persistence inengineering is related to both student learning styles and study habits, as well as teachingmethodologies.Adding to the existing body of literature, ASEE’s publication on best practices in engineeringretention1 highlighted the wide range of programs that universities have developed in reaction tothe various issues that affect student persistence. Almost half of the universities profiled in thepublication had some

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Sunday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Chiki, Ohio University; Braden Vale Jay Robinson, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

), 525-548.[4] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R. & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self-efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395.[5] Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Conference Session

FPD 1: The Path to Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

engineering. Participation in pre-college engineering classes has been positivelyassociated with engineering self-efficacy,7 and research on the effects of participation in ProjectLead The Way suggests that students are more likely to pursue STEM degrees and, in limitedcircumstances, may have higher GPAs than students who did not participate in these classes.8K-12 and higher education institutions both need information on the effects of pre-collegeengineering programs on undergraduate engineering students. The persistence and grades ofstudents that have participated in K-12 engineering programs and continued on to study incollege engineering programs are possible measurable outcomes of K-12 engineering educationprograms. The NSF, the Department of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily A. Bovee, Michigan State University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

sense of belongingwith their selected major and college (Good, Rattan, & Dweck, 2012). Indeed, feelings ofbelonging are related to overall well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2000) as well as higher levels ofacademic self-efficacy and motivation (Freeman, Anderman, & Jensen, 2007). It is particularlyconcerning that students who belong to groups that are underrepresented in engineering feel lessconnected with their major, which is also generally related to problems with adjustment to thecollege environment (Dennis, Phinney, & Chuateco, 2005). To address the issues of retention inengineering majors, many colleges and universities have implemented programs to supportstudents in their first year (Purdie & Rosser, 2011). This paper will

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander E. Dillon, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Jonathan D. Stolk, Southern Methodist University; Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

existence and influence of motivation have been studied in numerousenvironments including, notably, academic settings. Strong correlations have been foundbetween a person’s motivational state and short, medium, and long-term outcomes suchas performance, satisfaction, and persistence - three goals central to pedagogicalrefinement and revision. Specifically, research conducted over the past three decadesstrongly suggests that motivations are tightly linked to outcomes such as self-efficacy,critical thinking, creativity, self-regulation, and pro-social behavior2-8 - goals that areidentified as critical to the professional success, and in particular, to the success of STEMgraduates.9-13One useful framework for characterizing the dynamics of motivation

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Retention & Bridge Programs #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Zahrasadat Alavi, California State University, Chico; Kathleen Meehan, California State University, Chico; Kevin Buffardi, California State University, Chico; Webster R. Johnson, California State University, Chico; Joseph Greene, California State University, Chico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

• I am confident with Precalculus • I am confident with Calculus • I enjoy math • I can apply my math skills to computing and engineering projectsThe post-bootcamp survey included these same ratings so we could investigate potential changesin their attitudes. Fourteen (n=14) of the seventeen bootcamp participants (82%) completed bothsurveys and consented to include their data in our formative assessment. We performed aWilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test to compare pre- and post-bootcamp ratings to test the hypothesisthat the bootcamp would improve students’ self-efficacy. Table 1 shows the mean (M) andstandard deviation (sd) for each item’s rating, as well as the p-value of the hypothesis test.Overall, the average

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

pursue undergraduate degrees in STEM fields, and have slightlyhigher undergraduate grade point averages6, while evaluations of FIRST Robotics programs haveshown similar outcomes7,8. One of the few studies exploring the effects of a wide range of pre-college engineering activities measured significantly higher engineering self-efficacy amongstudents who had participated in pre-college engineering classes or had engineering-relatedhobbies9. Overall, relatively little work has been done to broadly understand the effects of pre-college engineering participation on the experiences and success of university engineeringstudents, resulting in limited theory to guide the understanding of this experience.To address these limitations, we developed a

Conference Session

FPD VI: Presenting "All the Best" of the First-year Programs Division

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorelle A. Meadows, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Elizabeth S. Hildinger, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

provide a general overview of student perceptions, the questions on theevaluation fail to address some interesting aspects of student motivation and choice. To addressthis shortcoming, a survey instrument was created and implemented in paper form at the end ofthe Winter 2011 semester in 9 of 11 sections of the course offered that semester, with usableresponses from 420 students (of 499 students enrolled in these sections). Responses wereanonymous and participation was encouraged, but voluntary. The collected data was analyzed inaggregate to determine how students were selecting their section of Engineering 100 and toassess their perceptions of the impact of the specific course they had just completed on theirsense of self-efficacy as an engineer

Conference Session

The Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle D. Gagne, Alfred University; Bethany C. Johnson, Alfred University; Steven M. Pilgrim, Alfred University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. However, point values wereincreased for the second Cohort and the data remained collapsible.Finally, it is possible that the measures used in the present investigation are not actuallypredictive of persistence in an engineering program, and therefore the null result we founddepicts the true state of reality. There are myriad components to self-regulation beyond thesubset chosen for this study. For example, self-efficacy, or the personal belief that one can orcannot accomplish particular tasks in particular domains, has been linked to academic outcomes[16], as have implicit theories regarding the source of one’s intelligence in subsequentimplications for outcomes [17, 18]. Nelson and colleagues incorporated knowledge building andclass goal

Conference Session

Beyond the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Veenstra, Engineering education consultant

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

earned afirst-year GPA less than 2.000. In their conclusions, Zhang et al. stated, “We hypothesize thecausal link that student self-efficacy improves with academic success and self-efficacy lead toimproved retention.”6 In contrast, the Seymour and Hewitt study found no strong relationshipbetween academic performance and retention in STEM programs.7Within engineering, Calculus I is considered a gateway course to success in engineering. Correctplacement into either Pre-Calculus or Calculus I has received substantial research. Because of thecalculus content in the majority of engineering courses, successful completion of Calculus I, witha very good to excellent understanding of the calculus concepts is important for other courses inthe freshman