Conference Session

FPD 5: Transitions and Student Success, Part I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carolyn Skurla, Baylor University; Steven R. Eisenbarth, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

surveyquestions are provided below. These results were selected because they show interestingdifferences and similarities between the transfer and non-transfer students. Also, these resultsshow the views of all the students of the SAS scholarship program.In Figure 1, a clear difference is shown in the timing of when students decided to major inengineering or computer science. The transfer students were split across all responses, while thenon-transfer students mostly chose to major in the last two years of high school. These resultsmay give insight on how to improve recruitment of transfer students.Figure 1: Decision to major in engineering or computer science. Q 14. When did you decide to major in engineering or Tranfers computer

Conference Session

FPD 9: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part III: Research, Sustainability, and Professionalism

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shelley Lorimer, Grant MacEwan University; Jeffrey A. Davis, Grant MacEwan University; Olivia Tronchin, University of Alberta

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

FPD10 - Freshman Engineering Introduction to Design

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Silas Bernardoni, University of Wisconsin- Madison; Amit Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin - Madison; John Murphy, University of Wisconsin- Madison; Sandra Courter, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Advanced Engineering Study, 1993.[4] M. Tribus, "TQM in Education: The Theory and How to Put It to Work," 1993.[5] D. Seymour, On Q causing quality in higher education. Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1993.[6] D. Seymour, Once upon a campus lessons for improving quality and productivity in higher education. Phoenix: Oryx Press, 1995.[7] S. Courter, "A Grounded Theory of the Positive Attributes of a TQM Curriculum Innovation: A Multi-Case Study of a Cross-Disciplinary Course in Engineering." vol. PhD: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1996.[8] S. D. Bernardoni, "Implementing a Kaizen strategy in an Introduction to Engineering Design course to achieve continuous improvement," in IIE regional Conference University of

Conference Session

FPD6 -- Early Intervention & Retention Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Froyd; Xiafeng Li, Texas A&M University; Arun Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; William Bassichis, Texas A&M University; Jacque Hodge, Texas A&M University; Donald Maxwell, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University - Engineering Education; Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University; Kyle Patrick Vealey, West Chester University of Pennsylvania; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

interest in civic engagement.Results and DiscussionThe data for each question and their classification is given in Table 5 including average valuesfor the pre- and post- test, standard deviations (shown using σ-PRE for pre-test data and σ-POSTfor post-test data), and the results from the analysis. SS means statistically significant with arrowindicating a statistically significant increase or decrease while HIGH means an average responseof 4 or higher on both the pre-test data and the post-test data. The survey questions are given inTable 6. The questions are also given in Table 6 in their post- test forms.Table 5: Summary of results for each question along with analysis Q# PRE σ-PRE POST σ-POST P(T<=t), α = 0.05, N = 376 1 4.452

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Wednesday Cornucopia (Educational Research)

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline C. McNeil, University of Louisville; Erin Lynn Gerber, University of Louisville; Gerold Willing, University of Louisville; Mary Elizabeth Mills, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Daniels; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs

a larger change from Survey 1 to Survey 2 than from Survey 2 to Survey 3. Thethree highest changes were seen in developing a prototype for a design challenge (Q8), settingdesign criteria (Q5), and using an iterative process to complete the design challenge (Q10).Table 3. Engineering design process results. Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Difference Q Step P value Average Average Average btw 1 & 3 Identifying a design problem from 1 3.40 4.30 4.20 0.80 <0.005 the community Incorporating

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Student Perceptions and Perspectives

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joanne Kay Beckwith, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. A. Demiranda, “Pre-Collegiate Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 604–623, 2011.[12] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010.[13] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, “Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 310–321, 1996.[14] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, “Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span.,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 557–68, 2013.[15] N. A. Fouad and M. C. Santana, “SCCT and Underrepresented

Conference Session

FPD6 -- Early Intervention & Retention Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Foor, University of Oklahoma; Susan Walden, University of Oklahoma; Tyler Combrink, University of Oklahoma; Lindsey McClure, University of Oklahoma; Deborah Trytten, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

ofVocational Behavior 2005, 67, 87-101.19. Bauer, K. W.; Liang, Q., The Effects of Personality and Precollege Characteristics on First-Year Acitivitiesand Academic Performance. Journal of College Student Development 2003, 44, (3), 277-290.20. Rhoads, T. R.; Murphy, T. J.; Trytten, D. A. In A Study of Gender Parity: Department Culture from theStudents' Perspective, Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005; Indianapolis, IN,2005.21. Lancaster, S. M.; Walden, S. E.; Trytten, D. A.; Murphy, T. J. In The Contribution of Office-Hours-TypeInteractions to Female Student Satisfaction with the Educational Experience in Engineering, Proceedings ofAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and

Conference Session

FPD 2: Retention

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Herbert P. Schroeder, University of Alaska Anchorage; Linda P. Lazzell, University of Alaska Anchorage

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Professionals from the community come to meet the students, make presentations, and explain jobs and opportunities available in engineering and science fields. ANSEP students make presentations on their research projects and internships so that others can see the array of career options. These meetings are an opportunity for us to see the students each week and to identify and mitigate problems before they jeopardize a student’s academic Page 23.63.10 success. We work to keep these sessions very informal and relaxed. We share pizza, bar-   b-q, and traditional Native

Conference Session

Service Learning and Societal Issues in the First Year

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University; Jed Marquart, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

in eacharea: 1. How well does the pitch/poster articulate a specific problem or unmet need and identify the customer/potential customer? 2. How unique and viable is the proposed solution in addressing the identified need? How well researched is the idea for the profit or non-profit business activity? 3. How effectively and passionately does the presenter articulate the problem, solution and call to action? 4. How effective or accomplished are the speaker’s skills? How well designed and presented is the poster? How well is the Q/A handled?At the competition, posters were displayed for judging during a two hour period. Each team

Conference Session

Assessment and Curriculum Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Godfrey, University of Auckland; Rosalind Archer, University of Auckland; Paul Denny, University of Auckland; Margaret Hyland, University of Auckland; Chris Smaill, University of Auckland; Karl Stol, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 4: The Best of the All: FPD Best Papers

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; David Reeping, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs