Paper ID #23690Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to PromoteEngineering SuccessDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the
), theCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Control (CENDAC), and the Villanova Center for theAdvancement of Sustainability in Engineering (VCASE). There are a total of 68 full-timefaculty members that teach in the CoEVU, 58 of which are tenured or tenure-track. The CoEVU Page 15.1253.2is committed to an educational program that emphasizes technical excellence and a liberaleducation within the framework of the University's Augustinian and Catholic traditions.Engineering programs throughout the country continue to modify their curriculums in an effortto be more innovative, integrated and inclusive of “real world” hands-on experiences andexamples1-5
, 70% of the students enrolled in Calculus or Pre-Calculus during the first semester wereretained in CEAS, compared to 60% of the Algebra II students. First-time, first-year CEASstudents, particularly those with weak mathematics preparation, continue to be a target group.Analysis of data for the latter portions of the 2008-09 and the whole of the 2009-10 academic Page 22.837.2years is ongoing, and is not entirely included in the results discussed in this paper.Literature cites an intensified curriculum and increasingly difficult coursework among thereasons for the “slumping sophomores” phenomenon, which can contribute to disengagementfrom
for learning and applying the design process. Students apply design tools includingspreadsheets, system analysis, 3D drawing, model building, research, reporting, and customerneeds, all in a team-based active-learning environment. A ZEH is a high-efficiency home that iswell-insulated and air-tight, oriented and designed to utilize passive solar heat, and fitted withhigh efficiency appliances and HVAC systems (heating, ventilating and air-conditioning). Asolar thermal water heating system further reduces the energy use. The remaining use ofelectricity is provided by an integrated solar photovoltaic system and/or an on-site wind turbine.These homes are grid connected and sometimes draw energy from the grid; at other times theyput energy into
Riley, 2003. Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: ALook at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2003, 325-238.3 Hendricks, Robert and Eric Pappas, 1996. Advanced Engineering Communication: An IntegratedWriting and Communication Program for Materials Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, October1996, 343-352,4 Sullivan, Francis and Robert Baren, 1997. Simulating the Workplace in an EngineeringTechnology Course: A Rhetorical Model, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1997 279-284.5 Sharp, Julie et al, 1999. Four Effective Writing Strategies for Engineering Classes, Journal ofEngineering Education , January 1999, 53-576. www.onlineethics.org7
qualitative interviews withunderrepresented minority engineering students. These allowed us to explore their classroombelonging experiences and showed that classroom belonging is a familiar concept and a functionof two separate sources of belonging: academic belonging and social belonging. Academic self-efficacy, curriculum content motivation and an ability to share academic struggles with otherswere important contributors to academic belonging. Social similarity, successful teamexperiences and a general sense of caring were also considered helpful to building socialbelonging in the classroom. Implications and ideas to build engineering classroom belongingfrom this research are discussed.Key Concepts: social belonging, engineering identity
communicating about their work. The challenge for educators has been to integratethis more holistic view of an engineer’s training with the already demanding curricula already inplace. At the University of Michigan all incoming first-year students are required to take acourse, Engineering 100, “Introduction to Engineering,” that integrates many of these skills—design, communication, engineering science and teamwork—in the context of a semester-longproject. This course has several sections each semester, each with a different project focus. Somesections of this course go through a complete design/build/test cycle, while others, such as ours,focus more closely on the design process.Our section, Design: The Next Generation, focuses on the product design
compared with an assessment done in 2002 using the sameinstrument. Impacts of these particular projects on students’ excitement about engineering andmotivation to pursue engineering were measured with a new instrument. A large majority of thestudents report that the projects got them excited about engineering and motivated them tocontinue.IntroductionAs has been documented in many studies1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, persistence of students in engineering relieson a complex set of interrelated issues including demographics, high school preparation, selfefficacy, motivation, commitment, academic performance, satisfaction with curriculum,interaction with faculty, financial difficulties, and others. Of particular interest is that students’expectancy for
the first-year engineering curriculum. It will be a repository ofopinions on diverse learning environments, as authored by first-year engineering students.Specifically, an online questionnaire asks students – anonymously – about their pre-conceivedassumptions as they entered first-year engineering at Northeastern University. These questionsattempt to uncover what first-year students had thought about with respect to what they thoughttheir professor would be like, what they would look like, how diverse their classroom would be,etc. This data is collected in addition to non-specific demographic information, which is used tobroadly connect common misconceptions to background at a future date.BackgroundDiversity levels in STEM have been and are
similar to pre-pandemic semesters and have far fewer U (unsatisfactory) grades than inSpring 2020 when the whole campus went online midway.IntroductionTeam-teaching has a long history when many educators had attempted integration acrossdifferent disciplines [9], curriculum [4] [14], and even country borders [12]. Besides traditionallecturing, projects [1]-[3],[5][6], and service-learning [8] could also be used in team-teaching.Despite the challenges in implementation, team teaching provided a wide array of benefits, evenfor faculty mentoring [13] and team-building [11]. Communication [10] and faculty help hadbeen deemed important ever since the remote-working technology was emerging [7].Traditional team-teaching may involve multiple instructors
, their critical thinking skills. This case study evaluationrubric will need to include such things as the clarity, depth, relevance, logicalness, preciseness,and significance of the answer as well as the importance of each part.5.2 Follow through assessmentCritical thinking cannot be developed in a single course or at a single point in a student’seducational career. Mature critical thinking takes time to develop, it must be practiced, and itmust be practiced in many different domains. Exposure of incoming engineering students tocritical thinking both explicitly through formal definitions and models, and implicitly byexample is the first step towards an integrated approach to strengthening the development of
preparing technical reports and PowerPoint andposter oral presentations. On the last day of the program, students presented their group projects.We report on a 9-year exercise conducted using the WOW project including detailed studentfeedback from the most recent year. 1. IntroductionEngineering design is defined as the communication of a set of rational decisions obtained withcreative problem solving for achieving certain stated objectives within prescribed constraints [1].The role of design in an engineering curriculum is a key factor contributing to its success [1]. 1Engineering design projects provide students with a broad view related to the material presentedin lectures. Through project-based
specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in coun- seling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties in- clude assessment, evaluation and research for the ITL Program’s and BOLD Center’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder
Paper ID #23233Work In Progress: Using Current Crowdfunding Projects as Case Studies toEnhance Students’ Understanding of the Design ProcessDr. Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College Derek Breid is an assistant professor of Engineering Science at Saint Vincent College. His interests in- clude integrating active learning techniques into classic engineering courses, and studying the mechanical behavior of soft materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work In Progress: Using current crowdfunding projects as case studies to enhance students’ understanding of the
AC 2008-2912: THE VALUE OF SCAVENGER HUNTS IN THE LIFE OF AFRESHMANCraig Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He integrates communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical Engineering program. He is editor of the CED Newsbriefs and the MCCE Co-op Courier and has co-authored a textbook - Engineering Your Future. Page 13.1280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Value of Scavenger Hunts in the Life of a FreshmanAbstractStudents
, planning, and implementing design solutions. Theauthors found that students who participated in the creative lab demonstrated a higher confidencein continuing in engineering coursework than those who did not. As the study states, “Creativityis an important attribute for engineers practicing their profession in a global society” [12].Although students struggled with the open-ended nature of the design problems, they enjoyed thecourse and saw the value in the addition to their curriculum. Illustrating the importance of incorporating real-world engineering design problems, Odehet al. write, “Nowadays, engineering education needs to meet the requirements and needs ofbusiness and industry. This can be achieved by collaborating with the local
, introductory materials science, electronic materials, kinetics, and microelectronics processing. She has been involved in a number of innovative curriculum development programs and educational research projects on improving student learning in engineering through the use of active learning and service learning. In 2010, she was awarded the College of Engineering Award for Excellence in Service. In 2007-2008, she was an SJSU Teacher Scholar. In 2002, she was awarded the College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching award.Katherine Casey, SJSU College of Engineering Katherine graduated with a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. in Experimental Psychology from SJSU. She now works in the College of Engineering as Engineering
in Project 2) once a week. Student teams will work on design activities during that time frame. • Projects should require teams to prepare proposals, final written reports and presentations to wide range of audiences. • Influence of having an actual client on students’ motivation and interest level in engineering will be investigated more in detail. Some students commented that they would prefer to interact with the costumer more often. In the future, customer will be invited to more design classes to provide feedback to students.REFERENCES [1] S. Anwar, T. Batzel, and E. Sell, “Integration of Project Based Learning into a Freshman Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings of the 2004 American
Paper ID #30948Developing Metacognition in First Year Students through InteractiveOnline VideosDr. Peter M Ostafichuk P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Peter M. Ostafichuk is a professor of teaching in Mechanical Engineering and the Chair of First Year Engineering at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. He teaches introduction to the engineering profession and practice, and design in mechanical engineering. He has extensive experience in Team-Based Learning (TBL), curriculum development, and teaching innovation.Dr. Susan Nesbit, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Before
, and hy-flex classroom teaching.Dr. Jack Bringardner, New York University Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year
decisions [3]. In theirbook, they mentioned poor teaching by Science, Math and Engineering (SME) faculty,curriculums that are overloaded and fast paced that become overwhelming, inadequate highschool preparation, lack or loss of interest in SME, conceptual difficulties in one or more SMEsubjects, non-SME majors offering better education or more interest, and loss of confidence dueto low grades in early years as contributing factors for attrition.Students’ misconceptions and the inability to solve word problems have been found to be maincontributors for students’ failures in math and engineering courses [4-6]. Without an appropriateremedial intervention, the path of these students in engineering is infeasible.Conclusions and Recommendations:This
they do. Three factors that mayimpact the project tasks that students take on are goal orientation, the roles that the student takeson or are assigned on the team, and the student’s gender. These factors may affect what a studentdoes with their time in a course and consequently can affect their engineering self-efficacy andconfidence.BackgroundHands-on project design-based courses are integrated into engineering curriculum in order togive students an opportunity to apply the knowledge they have learned in a setting that mimics aprofessional engineering workplace. The project-based design course structure also emphasizescommunication, project management, and teamwork, all of which are important skills forengineers to have for successful careers
AC 2012-3555: THE IMPACT OF A HYBRID INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNIN A FIRST-YEAR DESIGN (CORNERSTONE) COURSE ON STUDENTUNDERSTANDING OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESSProf. Susan K. Donohue, University of Virginia Susan Donohue is a lecturer in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She taught ENGR 1620, Introduction to Engineering, in fall 2011. Her research interests include K-20 engineering education with an emphasis on design, development of spatial skills, and identification and remediation of misconcep- tions. Page 25.1305.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
Paper ID #22582Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year CoursesJordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. learning sciences student and lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering De- partments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design Based Research
Partnering with PhysicsAbstractThis work-in-progress paper will describe an effort at curriculum reform for the first yearengineering program at Texas A&M University. A variety of motivations for, and challengesencountered in this effort are discussed, which highlight how educational change often takesplace in tension between educational theory and institutional constraints. Preliminary discussionof results and future plans for assessment are discussed.IntroductionRetention of engineering students continues to be a concern nationally [1]. There are perhapsadditional pressures for improvement in retention at large state institutions, where legislatureskeenly watch metrics such as retention, and where the institutions have a mission to serve
replacement for Chalk based teaching, each interactive way to learn with internet and PowerPoint presentation, posting coursework materials and communicating with the instructor) 5. In your student perspective, provide other suggestions to improve the teaching (technologically) that might enhance the future students’ learning process.Appendix – B: Final Examination 1. What is academic integrity? Provide an example that you have held in this semester as a part of academic integrity. 2. Have you registered for Spring 2019 semester? YES | NO If YES, how many credit hours did you register? Who helped you in advising in selecting your courses and in guiding the registration process? If NO, state the cause and how
Paper ID #26713Work in Progress: First-Year Engineering College Students: Value Createdfrom Participating in a Living/Learning CommunityDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D., is an Clinical Associate Professor at Boise State University, Idaho. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Ms. Kim M. B. Tucker, Boise State University Kim Tucker is currently completing her Doctoral Degree in Curriculum and Instruction and works as the Coordinator of Residential Learning for in the Living
]. This model of education is anexample of a top down level approach in which students start with the definition of the problemin a specific course, then they learn the details and components required to solve the problem. Forthis project, we are using the same problem-based learning model to create an EE program. Itbegins with a concept and system modeling approach, integrating the required courses in the EEprogram, connecting the lower division courses to the real-world applications, and improvingretention. First-generation college students, such as 53% of California State University San MarcosStudents, need to be able to relate their education to the real world. In order to address the factorsthat persistently cause so many students to leave
encourage greater engagement for all students.More effort and attention should be placed in future onboarding efforts to highlight theimportance of active engineering engagement and the benefits of seeking support from peers,engineering faculty, and staff.References[1] C. Clark, “Diversity initiatives in higher education: Intergroup dialogue as pedagogy acrossthe curriculum,” Multicultural Education, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 51, 2005.[2] A. B. Dessel and N. Rodenborg, “An evaluation of intergroup dialogue pedagogy:Addressing segregation and developing cultural competency,” Journal of Social WorkEducation, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 222-239, 2017.[3] A. Dessel, M. Rogge, and S. Garlington, “Using intergroup dialogue to promote social justiceand change,” Social
after students have beenoffered admission to the College of Engineering. Recruitment largely targets students whoparticipate in programs that bring students to campus, including the IDEA Engineering StudentCenter Overnight Program, which overlaps significantly with the desired student population forRedshirt. The marketing plan for recruiting Redshirt scholars also includes distributing flyers atUCSD’s Triton Day for admitted students, an email campaign specifically targeting potentialRedshirt students, and phone calls from UCSD engineering students. The Redshirt program alsoworked with UCSD’s Summer Success Program to integrate the Redshirt application intoUCSD’s “Common Application” for all summer programs, since all Redshirt students