University (ECU),freshmen are introduced to engineering topics that include solid modeling, mechanicalengineering, electrical engineering, and design engineering. Robots inherently integrate all thesedisciplines. At ECU, student teams are used in a cohort learning environment to build robots.The robot building project serves as a platform for experiential learning in engineeringdisciplines and also serves to develop problem solving skills, interpersonal skills, and ethics. Arobotics competition is embedded into the introductory class work to increase levels ofparticipation, interest and challenge for the freshmen. During classroom and laboratory exercisesleading up to the competition, students build mobile robots to compete in a treasure-huntinggame
, electricity, management study environment, learning Processes fluid flow, diffusion, resistance, Ethics 2 Professionalism, registered series/parallel resistors engineer, canons, ethical theory Engineering Accounting Problem 2 Techniques, decomposition, Basic 2 Defining a system, open/closed, systems, solving process, constraints, algorithms, concepts intensive/extensive quantities, state/path flow charts quantities, Universal Accounting Equation, conservation, steady stateEngineering Science
paths to the field.Mr. Paul R Hottinger, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Engineering Librarian at Cal Poly Pomona c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The impact of information literacy instruction on the synthesis level of first-year engineering studentsAbstract:This complete evidence-based practice paper examines the impact of intentional informationliteracy instruction has on first-year engineering students. Information literacy (IL) is the abilityto find, evaluate, and use information ethically. Many students are not taught these skills in highschool, and often do not realize their deficiencies until their first year of college when
program becausethe foundations built during the first year are a key to student’s success. There are about fourdifferent pathways for the First Year Experience in Engineering Program at this institution:Standard, Honors, Scholars and Transfers. The Standards Program is the focus of this paper as itthe only pathway offered at the regional campuses. The two courses sequence offered in thisprogram are: Fundamentals of Engineering I and Fundamentals of Engineering II. These courseshave two main components: lectures and hands-on labs. The topics covered in lecture provideskills for problem solving, critical thinking, ethical decision making, teamwork, communicationand presentation. The laboratory experiments provide a broad overview of
, and teamwork skills. Students are also presented the opportunity to improve theirprofessionalism and ethical values through these simulations. In Industrial Engineering (IE)teachings, where a variety of tools are used to design, improve, and manage integrated systems,simulation-based approaches become an important piece in the learning environment.There are a number of publications in literature that analyze the impact of simulation-basedteaching environments. A vast majority supports the experiential learning theory proposed byKolb [2]. In Umble & Umble [3], researchers utilize in-class simulation exercises for supply chainand inventory management principles. These exercises provide opportunities for in-class studentdiscussions that
of research interest are self-regulated learning, motivation, and developing educational tools.Miss Dayoung Kim, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dayoung Kim is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interest includes engineering ethics, curriculum development for socially-responsible engineers, and cultural studies for engineers in a global context. She earned her B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering at Yonsei University, South Korea in 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Students’ Reflection Quality and Effective Team
interpret data An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, 0 0 3 15 19 environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability An ability to function on 0 0 1 14 22 multidisciplinary teams An ability to identify, formulate, and 0 0 4 17 16 solve engineering problems An understanding of professional 0
to focus our study on the items that had morevariability in the responses, so we eliminated these two items and re-ranked the other 5 itemsbelow to study the relationship between students’ personality types and these topics: • Orthographic drawing (Visualization) • Sustainability and ethics • Term Project (Entrepreneurship, creativity, and customer interaction) • Math, physics and mechanics • Communication (Writing and presenting)Dominating Personality Types of Engineering Students Figure 1 shows a comparison of the personality types of University of New Haven first-year students and the ASEE-MBTI data. The data is also displayed in tabular format in Table A.1in Appendix A. The ASEE-MBTI survey includes results from
freshman engineering course, called “Exploring Engineering,” was created in 1992.The primary goals of the course were to introduce the students to engineering, to help them tochoose a major, and to develop basic computer literacy. The course consisted of two largelectures (attended by every student in the class) and one computer lab (in sections of 20 studentseach) every week. Three of the lectures were devoted to each of our four majors: civil,computer, electrical, and mechanical engineering. Other topics of importance to our studentswere interspersed between the lectures. These included study skills, time management, graphing,statistics, ethics, and engineering careers. Engineering alumni frequently spoke about theircareers and provided valuable
Americans, Hispanic Americans and Native Americans continue to beunderrepresented. Reports by the National Science and Technology Council1 and theCommission for Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering andTechnology 2 identify the societal perils of continued disparate representation across engineeringand the STEM fields. Continued underrepresentation has dire implications for the future of thetechnical workforce as the demand for qualified professionals will outpace the available pool ifthe demographics do not change3. The additional human cost for unequal access that ischaracterized by underrepresentation makes the issue compelling and critical for society and theSTEM fields in particular. Thus, beyond the moral and ethical
and the “analyze the discipline” exercises foreach department presentation, my critical thinking skills are: Figure 4. Survey responses to Question 1.Question 2: The goals of this course include improving students’: a) use of tablet pcs; b) critical thinking Page 25.529.7and decision-making skills; c) team building/communication skills; d) understanding ofdiversity/harassment; e) knowledge about engineering professionalism/ethics; f) understanding ofengineering design and practice; g) knowledge of departments/engineering disciplines at SpeedSchool;h) ability to use the software tools Excel, Maple, Matlab
served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an Affiliate in the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She plays a leadership role in Purdue’s first-semester first-year engineering course which serves approximately 1,800 students each year. She is also the Director of the MEDLEE (Mathematics and Engineering Design Learning
professional issues, including teamwork, ethics, communication, and leadership. Specificcourse-related topics, such as spatial analysis or localized topics within a field, also emerged insmall numbers (though some of these issues were themselves tied to students’ success insubsequent courses). A small number of studies focused on comparing teaching approaches toidentify approaches that lead to higher learning gains.Methods: How are we conducting assessments?With respect to the methods used to conduct assessment, surveys dominated the literaturereviewed, with more than half of the papers reporting survey data. Most surveys addressed issuesrelated to student satisfaction and attitude, though many also included self-reported learninggains. In addition
laboratory in topics such as profile of the engineering profession andeducation, systems of units, data presentation and graphing, ethics, and problem solving usingcommon engineering concepts.A description of one of these challenges is presented next to demonstrate the challengedevelopment and implementation process, the developed instructive materials, assessment tools(pre-test and post test), and the preliminary results that were obtained in the implementation ofthe challenges. Similar instruction and assessment tools were developed for each of the otherchallenges in Figure 2. Page 22.471.6 Introduction to ME Objectives M1 M2
peers.As we enter an age when diversity is highly valued, inclusion and equity are becoming commonterms associated with learning and work environments. ABET EAC Student Outcome 5 specifiescreating “a collaborative and inclusive environment” as part of teamwork, and, as such, it isessential we educate our incoming students on these topics and provide support for their socialand emotional development as part of their professional development.The authors present a new model for an engineering orientation for first-year students thatintroduces them to professional codes of conduct and educates students on the importance ofacting professionally and ethically in classrooms, laboratories, makerspaces, and even in thehallways. The orientation also
* *Assessment Automatic grading * * * * Self and peer anonymous grading Table 2. Professional Skills Related Topics Project Dream Lecture Topics and Formats Management Ethics Resume Projects One instructor in person for all sessions Including online portion Teaching Purely online module * * * Each instructor leads their own session * Manual grading
projects.In most engineering programs, the Introduction to engineering courses is offered based on disci-pline-specific contents. Introduction to engineering (EGGN-100) at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF),is offered to first-year and undecided engineering majors every fall semester. Besides theobjectives mentioned earlier, one of the primary goals of this PBL course is to “introduceundecided freshman engineering students to major projects in Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, andComputer Engineering projects so that students can make an informed choice about their major.”The course starts with an active introduction to the engineering profession, different engineeringdisciplines, engineering ethics, team building, and engineering
; Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; and Mechanical Engineering. Whilenot an exhaustive list of undergraduate majors offered by the COE, these four broad cohortsenabled the SBP to cover major areas of interest to participants.Engineering presentations by Texas A&M University-Kingsville faculty addressed introductoryengineering topics such as the design process, importance of math for engineers, use of computerprograms, professional registration and public safety, engineering ethics, and engineering careerpaths. These were distributed throughout the 3-week period. The organizing faculty decided thatworking or retired engineers from the community and alumni from the COE would be invited tospeak individually or as group panelists about
in electrical and computer engineering (ECE) whichwas created to specifically address (1) provide an orientation and early success skills foruniversity life, (2) introduce ethical considerations in engineering, (3) introduce the profession ofengineering, and specifically, electrical engineering (EE) and computer engineering (CpE), and(4) give early technical and hands-on skills required of EE and CpE majors. Students in thecourse have predominantly already selected computer engineering or electrical engineering astheir field of study; however, a number of students enrolled in the first-year course are exploringthe fields of computer and electrical engineering in their search for a major. As the introductorycourse is a prerequisite to later
., an engineerinstilled with the entrepreneurial mindset) places product benefits before design features andleverages technology to fill unmet customer needs”. Skills associated with the entrepreneurialmindset include: effective communication (verbal, written, graphical), teamwork, ethics andethical decision-making, customer awareness, persistence, creativity, innovation, timemanagement, critical thinking, global awareness, self-directed research, life-long learning,learning through failure, tolerance for ambiguity, and estimation3. In order to prepare moreengineering students with such skills, the Kern Family Foundation has established the KernEntrepreneurial Education Network (KEEN), a network of institutions that are committed tochanging
Progress: Privilege and Diversity as Determiners of Engineering Identity and SuccessBackgroundFoundational, first-year engineering courses (sometimes referred to as cornerstone courses)typically cover introductory content in design, ethics, programming, technical drafting, andprototyping/construction, for incoming students who are majoring in a broad assortment ofengineering disciplines. For an increasing number of universities, including the one where theresearch herein takes place, all engineering majors are combined for these introductoryengineering experiences, including a wide variety of majors such as bio, chemical, civil,mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering. This mixing of students leads to great varietyin
, Assistant Superintendent, Merrillville Public Schools, INDr. John Hutton, Assistant Superintendent (Secondary), Valparaiso School Corporation, INMr. Garry DeRossett, Principal of Boone Grove High School, IN12:30 - 2:00 p.m. LunchSpeaker: Michael Littman, Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, PrincetonUniversity “Educating Future Engineers and Citizens about the Grand Tradition in Engineering”2:15 - 3:45 p.m. Session #3: The Place of Humanities in the Engineering CurriculumDr. Gary Downey, Panel Leader, Professor of Science and Technology in Society, Virginia TechDr. Deborah Johnson, Professor of Applied Ethics in Science, Technology, and Society,University of VirginiaDr. Cornelius Delaney, Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the
College offers multidisciplinary programs in the social sciences founded ona model of liberal education and designed to prepare students for law school, graduate study,decision-making roles in public and private enterprise. Students examine how public policyproblems are identified, analyzed, and resolved in the United States and globally.13Residential College in the Arts and HumanitiesThe Residential College in the Arts and Humanities (RCAH) is an interdisciplinary college forundergraduate students interested in the global connections between literature, history, ethics,culture, world languages, the visual and performing arts, and their own civic engagement in thesefields of work and study. Students, faculty, visitors, and staff are able to
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project
% Prefer not to disclose* 1% Directly from high school* 93% After time working / a break* 4% Entry into program Transferred from another school/program* 2% Another route* 1%* values estimated from self-disclosure on optional surveyAll incoming engineering students take APSC 100, an introduction to engineering course in thefirst term. The course covers a broad array of engineering topics including design, decision-making, sustainability, professionalism, and ethics. APSC 100 is the only engineering-specificcourse taken by all first-year engineering students in the first term. As such, it is used as aplatform for
engineers to obtain 21st century skills related to communication, leadership, and cultural, humanities, and ethical sensitivities, Provide opportunities for students to gain in-depth experiences in Challenges areas, as a mechanism to prepare them for engineering careers broadly, and to prepare them to be the future innovators to help solve these challenges. Figure 1: National Academy of Engineering, Engineering Grand ChallengesBelow are details of the implementation of strategic messaging in K-12 programming, theapplication process, and first-year engineering program in support of improving studentperformance metrics:B.1.1 Pre-College Programs: The College of Engineering at University Name has a substantialPK-12
professional behaviour. a. Identify and utilize standards of academic honesty/integrity. b. Indentify how the foundations of engineering ethics impact their experience. 2. Articulate unique, personally relevant examples of how the things they are learning apply to the real world. 3. Demonstrate interpersonal and relationship skills, such as tact, diplomacy, teamwork. 4. Demonstrate logical thought process to break up a complicated problem into simple, resolvable steps or segments. a. Utilize algorithmic/computational thinking/design processes. 5. Apply basic principles, relationships, and mathematical laws to solve problems. 6. Understand the principles of developing a model for a complex system, and
,collecting data from the seminar, rather than a different course in the major, made it less likelythere would be confounds due to differences between instructors across sections. In addition, noother first-year course is mandatory for all first-year engineers (e.g., students with appropriateAdvanced Placement scores do not enroll in Calculus I). Each survey was one of severalassignments that could be completed for credit, and so not every student was required toparticipate. In alignment with the ethical standards required to protect participants in research inpsychology, students were given the option to complete the survey for points toward their grade,but elect to exclude their data from analyses from our research without penalty. Aside from
Paper ID #15220Confidence in Computational Problem-Solving Skills of First-Year Engineer-ing StudentsMs. Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University Mary Fraley is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online/blended learning methods, first-year engineering courses and program development.Ms. Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University Ms. Kemppainen is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals. Her research interests include the improvement of STEM education, ethics, and online/blended learning
are key concepts ofservice-learning”.3 Service-learning in engineering has also been shown to meet AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) objectives.4 Particular student outcomes such as(c), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k) can be mapped to results and tasks in engineering service-learning projects (Table 1).Table 1. ABET Student Outcomes.5(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and