material, test-taking skills, and college survival skills. • Professional Success – career planning and effective presentations. • Engineering Information – career and advisement information and research presentations/laboratory tours. • Engineering Design and Problem Solving – creativity, effective teams, brainstorming, process design, and product design. • Societal Issues of Engineers – ethics, diversity/international issues, environmental issues/sustainability, medicine and bioengineering. • Personal Development – stress management and other wellness issues.This course is a particularly good class to do problem-based, cooperative activitiesbecause it addresses the goal of giving students engineering
forces act on two different generic molecules as they approach each other? Attraction between molecules when they are far apart and repulsion between them as they come closer/Repulsion between molecules when they are far apart and attraction as they come closer/The gravitational force and the molecular repulsion between molecules6. For how long do you think have scientists been formally working on nanotechnology? Last decade/last twenty years/last fifty years/last century/last millennium7. Are you aware of some applications of nanotechnology? Yes/No/Not Sure8. Have you had formal instruction about nanotechnology in high school or college? Yes/No/Not Sure9. Have you ever visited a research laboratory or worked in it
touching key concepts at several points along the spiral in differentcourses, adding depth and sophistication at each pass. Each foundation course also stresses thedevelopment of essential skills, such as problem-solving, oral and written communication,application of the design process, teamwork, project management, computer analysis methods,laboratory investigation, data analysis and model development. Students go on to buildsubstantial depth in some of the foundation areas in disciplinary courses, while other topics maynot be further developed, depending on their chosen discipline.One of the foundation courses taken during the freshman year is EAS107P Introduction toEngineering Project-Based. This introductory engineering course is a hands-on
presentation. Each team member must also complete a peer evaluation forthemselves and each team member, which is part of the students’ grade for the course. If theaverage peer evaluation for an individual student is less than 70%; then their design report gradeis appropriately weighted. Starting in 2007-8 academic year, UMBC began charging a laboratory fee of $40.00 perstudent for this course. Consequently, the design teams are provided materials order forms(along with a list of venders from which they can order their construction materials) and eachteam was required to submitt the materials order form to the instructor. The due date of thematerials order form provided one of the design project milestones of the project whose intent isto ensure
experiences with lower-division students, and they expressed positive feedback aboutinteractions with the classes. All participants agreed to return for the following year’s classes. Thebenefits of practitioner-student interactions are deemed mutual; students learn about the engineeringworkplace, and faculty and practicing engineers can market their research laboratories andcompanies to the next generation of engineers. One company representative responsible for humanresources indicated that although his primary interest was recruiting graduating seniors, speaking tofreshman uniquely enabled him to seed future positive recruitment opportunities and was thuswelcomed.Table 1: Students in MEE Practice I & II were asked to respond to these survey
, remained the same: ≠ introduce sustainability in the context of civil engineering; ≠ present an enthusiastic, “big picture” of civil engineering that would complement the technically intense first year modules; and ≠ act as a catalyst for sustainable thinking in studies beyond first year.The module is a compulsory, 10 credit module - a 10 credit module is expected to require 100hours of student’s time, that being made up of a combination of lectures, seminars, site visits,laboratory sessions and individual review and work on assessed pieces. It has been taken eachyear by an average of 85 full time students and it is a compulsory component of the followingfull time undergraduate degree programs: ≠ MEng Civil Engineering (4 years
University (ECU),freshmen are introduced to engineering topics that include solid modeling, mechanicalengineering, electrical engineering, and design engineering. Robots inherently integrate all thesedisciplines. At ECU, student teams are used in a cohort learning environment to build robots.The robot building project serves as a platform for experiential learning in engineeringdisciplines and also serves to develop problem solving skills, interpersonal skills, and ethics. Arobotics competition is embedded into the introductory class work to increase levels ofparticipation, interest and challenge for the freshmen. During classroom and laboratory exercisesleading up to the competition, students build mobile robots to compete in a treasure-huntinggame
Paper ID #17870Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four-YearLongitudinal Assessment of the DYP ProgramDr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Steffen Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Assistant Professor position in the Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the California State University in San Luis Obispo. He is teaching courses, includ- ing laboratories, in the HVAC concentration and mechanical engineering including first-year courses. Dr. Peuker’s educational research focuses on increasing student retention and success in engineering through
, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/Amelink, C. T., & Meszaros, P. S. (2011). A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 47-62. doi:10.1080/03043797.2010.531695Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Hunter, J. and J. Baygents. (2012). “Grand challenges DELI (Discover, Explore, Learn, Imagine) Project” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference.Jollands, M., Jolly, L., & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based learning as a contributing factor to
- Guided Field Students are divided into 4 cohorts and take tours of 4 Trips to University engineering centers on campus during their regularly 8 Engineering Centers scheduled class period. The instructor attends random 9 locations. These centers include a manufacturing center (mechanical engineering), structures center (civil 10 engineering), paper laboratory (chemical engineering), and steam heat plant (applied mechanical engineering) 11 Power Utility A guest speaker from a power utility speaks about power Engineer
Paper ID #24675Mechanical Engineering Organized Around Mathematical SophisticationDr. Louis J. Everett, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Everett is the MacGuire Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett’s current research is in the areas of Mechatronics, Freshman Programs and Student Engagement. Having multiple years of experience in several National Laboratories and Industries large and small, his teaching brings real world experiences to students. As a former NSF Program Director he works regularly helping faculty develop strong education proposals.Dr
program, students were introduced to aerodynamics design as anexample of applied engineering. They learned the basic formulation of fluid mechanicsequations, which lead to application of continuity and Bernoulli’s equations. Students had anopportunity to verify these equations through hands-on projects and direct measurements in thethermos-fluid laboratory. Also, students were introduced to basic force analysis on aerodynamicvehicles, with an emphasis on lift generation airfoils. They were also given the opportunity touse simulation tools to better understand flow properties and their effect on the aerodynamicloads.Through this session of the SEE program, students were introduced to both theoretical andexperimental topics related to
leading supply chain and operations management journals, and 47 peer reviewed conference proceedings articles in these areas. He has B.S. in ME, and both M.S. and Ph.D. in IE. He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, and a senior member of IIE.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of
, 2008[6] Knight, D.W., Carlson, L.W., Sullivan, J.F., “Integrated Teaching and Learning Program andStaying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course onStudent Retention,” Integrated Teaching and Learning Program and Laboratory,”http://itll.colorado.edu [December 2013]
program becausethe foundations built during the first year are a key to student’s success. There are about fourdifferent pathways for the First Year Experience in Engineering Program at this institution:Standard, Honors, Scholars and Transfers. The Standards Program is the focus of this paper as itthe only pathway offered at the regional campuses. The two courses sequence offered in thisprogram are: Fundamentals of Engineering I and Fundamentals of Engineering II. These courseshave two main components: lectures and hands-on labs. The topics covered in lecture provideskills for problem solving, critical thinking, ethical decision making, teamwork, communicationand presentation. The laboratory experiments provide a broad overview of
degreesoffered, profiles of recent alumni, and hands-on activities related to that major. Next, students wererequired to attend a student panel, an alumni panel, and laboratory tours. In each case, students wererequired to attend these events for only one department (sessions for each department were offered inparallel so that each department met in a separate room), but they could attend additional departmentofferings based on their interests. Finally, students were required to attend 3 events outside of class timethat would contribute to their major discernment. These included but were not limited to events put on byengineering student groups, departments, and the Career Center as well as individual meetings withfaculty, alumni, or upper-class
Professor for the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research
eat at the cafeteria and then return to their studies or bring their food with them. Most studentssimply ate at the cafeteria and then returned to their studies. If students had class, or needed toattend their professor’s office hours or meet with student groups, or utilize laboratory or studiofacilities in their respective colleges, they were able to step out for these engagements and thenreturn. The general idea was to have a central study location that students would study in forthree days straight during the day. They also had vouchers which could be used for lunch. After5:20 pm they could continue their regular evening schedules, which might include studying orcompleting final assignments. This was a mandatory event. On Day 1
have also offered a summer section of this course to newly admittedengineering students who wanted to make a head start in their studies.Summary of Project Results:Mathematics Enrichment SessionsThe performance of students who opted to register for the ES sections are compared to those whochose the non-ES sections. Non-ES sections have either the traditional recitation sessions orcomputer laboratories that use the software Mathematica. Graduate teaching assistants conductboth of these options. The results from the initial implementation of ES are presented in [5].To gauge the effectiveness of the ES approach, the ES group and the non-ES group werecompared relative to two measures: proportion of students who passed Calculus I, that isproportion
information is available; consider convenience factors such as studentavailability and dormitory location ). Importantly, because of the small size of the laboratory 4,10sections from which the teams are formed (capped at 20 students), these competing suggestionscan never all be satisfied. Sometimes women and URM students are isolated on teams eventhough it is not considered best practice.Team AssessmentsAt the end of the seven- to ten-week project, students completed teammate ratings via theComprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) system . (In the middle 11of the project, they completed a similar assessment.) They rated themselves as well as eachteammate on five behaviorally-anchored
sections. Non-ES sections have eitherthe traditional recitation sessions or computer laboratories that use the software Mathematica.Both of these options are conducted by graduate teaching assistants.To gauge the effectiveness of the ES approach, the ES group and the non-ES group werecompared relative to two measures: proportion of students who passed Calculus I, that isproportion who earned letter grades of A, B, or C and proportion of students who earned gradesof A or B. It has been shown in the literature that students who earn grades of at least B inCalculus I tend to perform better in subsequent mathematics and physics courses3. The results ofthe statistical analysis are presented in Table 1, where the p-value corresponds to a one-sided
Paper ID #12106Evaluation of a dual first year student advising programDr. Jess W. Everett, Rowan University Jess W. Everett has worked in four distinct areas: waste management operations research, contaminated site assessment and remediation, education innovation, and sustainable engineering. He has employed a wide variety of techniques, including computer modeling, laboratory experiments, field testing, and surveys. His current research focuses on energy conservation, alternative energy generation, engineering learning communities, and hybrid courses (courses with classroom and on-line aspects).Ms. Maria Perez-Colon, Rowan
, vol. 67, 505-524, 2007.[13] Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Ricco, G. D., “Design and validation of a web-based systemfor assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria”, Advances in Engineering Education, 2 (1), 1-28,2010[14] Abarca, Javier, et al. (2000) “Introductory Engineering Design: A Projects-Based Approach,” Third Edition,Textbook for GEEN 1400: First-Year Engineering Projects and GEEN 3400: Innovation and Invention, IntegratedTeaching and Learning Program and Laboratory, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University ofColorado Boulder. Available online athttp://itll.colorado.edu/index.php/courses_workshops/geen_1400/resources/textbook
Paper ID #11270Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: An Innova-tive Approach for First-Year CoursesDr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Steffen Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Assistant Professor position in the Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the California State University in San Luis Obispo. He is teaching courses, includ- ing laboratories, in the HVAC&R concentration and mechanical engineering including first-year courses. Dr. Peuker’s educational research focuses on increasing student retention and success in engineering through implementation of a
enhancing collaboration between peers andpotentially easing the difficulty of the engineering curriculum for some students. Strategies thathave been found to be effective for learning in engineering classrooms and promoting community-building amongst students include cooperative learning activities, model-eliciting activities,problem-based learning, inquiry-based laboratories, and learning communities.3 The use of studentself-assessment tools can help students to increase self-efficacy and confidence in theirengineering-related abilities.11 Many universities are currently utilizing multi-pronged approachesthat include improvements to mentoring and academic advising, the development of a communityof belonging, and improvements to teaching in the
course were identical with the exception of minor changes to theactual content of the team projects. Specifically, projects for the control group (andcorresponding weighting for course grades) included a sailboat (10%), a racecar (20%), abiomimetic design (20%), and a video game (30%). In contrast, the training group projectsincluded a musical instrument (10%), a structure (10%), bridge (25%), and racecar (40%). Bothcohorts were required to sketch, construct, present and test their designs in the laboratory. Page 26.689.7Adapting the theoretical foundation of CC, we created a simple and clever acronym, SUIT,which was the basis for a 90-minute
includesa 1-credit course devoted to selection of an engineering major. This includes hands-on activitieslead by faculty and industry professionals to learn about each of the engineering disciplinesoffered.At the Private institution, the students are exposed to a basic engineering design process throughmulti-week projects that are not intended to aide in engineering discipline selection. However,students complete a series of homework assignments throughout the semester that aid inselecting their major, understanding engineering career options, and integrating into the Collegeof Engineering.At the Large Land Grant, the students are exposed to a variety of engineering disciplines throughweekly laboratory experiences, but selection of a major is not a
Paper ID #12655Summer Engineering Enrichment Program Results Exceed ExpectationsDr. Robert W. Whalin, Jackson State University Dr. Whalin, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Director, Coastal Hazards Center, Jackson State University. He is Director Emeritus of the Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. He received his PhD in Oceanography from Texas A&M University in 1971 and is a Registered Professional Engineer. Dr. Whalin was Director of Army Research Laboratory (1998-2003; Adelphi, MD), and Technical Director /Director of Waterways Experiment Station (1985-1998; Vicks- burg
Rice University. Saterbak was responsible for developing the laboratory program in Bioengineering. Saterbak introduced problem-based learning in the School of Engineering and more recently launched a successful first-year engineering design course taught in the Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bio- engineering Fundamentals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Outstanding Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and
is the Thomas Walter Distinguished professor of Mechanical Engineering at Auburn Uni- versity. He is the co-founder and director of the NSF-funded Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education (LITEE). LITEE has been recently recognized by the National Academy of Engi- neering as one of the model programs in the country that has successfully infused real world experiences into engineering undergraduate education. He is also the founder and director of the Auburn Engineering Technical Assistance Program (AETAP). Prior to coming to Auburn in 1984, Dr. Raju held faculty posi- tions in several universities in India and visiting positions at the Catholic University of America, Purdue University, and