safety, and sustainable infrastructure.Mr. Edward Stephen Char Jr., Villanova University BS EE Villanova University 1996 MS EE Villanova University 1998Dr. John Komlos, Villanova University Page 26.27.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ✁✂✄☎ ✁✂✆✄✝☎ ✁✂✞✟✂✠☎✠✡ ☛✠ ☞ ✌✄✂✍☎✎✡✏✑☞✝☎✒ ✓☛✄✝✡✏✔☎☞✄ ✕✠✖☛✠☎☎✄☛✠✖ ✗✘✙✚✛✜✚✢✣✚✤ ✥✦✚✛✦✜✚✧ ★✢✩ ✪✫✫✚✫✫✬✚✢✭✮✯✰✱✲✳✴✱✵✶✷✷✸✹✺✻✸ ✼✹✶✻✽✾✿✶❀❁ ✽❂❃✸✾❄✽❅ ✺✹ ✸ ✹✽❆ ❇✾✺❈✽❉❀❊❃✸✿✽❅ ✸❇❇✾✺✸❉❋ ●✺✾ ❀❋✽ ✾✽❍■✶✾✽❅ ●✶✾✿❀❊❁✽✸✾ ✽✹❏✶✹✽✽✾✶✹❏❑▲▼❑◆❖❑◗❑ ❖ ❘❙❙❚❯ ❱❲❖❳ ❑❨ ❩❖◆❳❱❬❭❑❪◆ ❑▲▼❑◆❖❑◗❑ ❨❪❳ ◆❑▼❫◆❱❑❴ ❖ ❱❲❑ ❘❙❵❙ ❛❜❝❝ ❛❞❪❡ ❢❫❩❑◆❑◗❑❣❤✐❥❦❦❧♠♥♦♣q rs❦ t
taken) Participant demographic information (Gender, Race / Ethnicity) Select from lists Q: What interested you about this summer program? Open-ended comment Q: What do you expect to learn and experience in this summer program? Open-ended comment Q: How do you expect this program to help your academic career? Open-ended comment Q: Rate your agreement with the following statements: 5-point Likert scale (strongly I am interested in the field that I am studying. agree = 5, agree = 4, neutral I am interested in a career in STEM. = 3, disagree = 2, strongly I am confident that I am prepared
- content/uploads/2012/01/EUR-ACE_Framework-Standards_2008-11-0511.pdf.(13) Passow, H. J. J. Eng. Educ. 2012, 101, 95. Page 26.1177.10(14) Brett, J.; Behfar, K.; Kern, M. C. In The Essential Guide to Leadership; Harvard Business Review, 2009; pp. 85–97.(15) Halverson, C. In Effective Multicultural Teams: Theory and Practice; Halverson, C. B.; Tirmizi, S. A., Eds.; Springer, 2008; pp. 81–110.(16) Pelled, L. H.; Eisenhardt, K. M.; Xin, K. R. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44, 1.(17) Watson, W. E. Acad. Manag. J. 1993, 36, 590.(18) Horwitz, S. K. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2005, 4, 219.(19) Manning, M. L.; Lucking, R. Clear
ScienceFoundation.AppendixFigure 2 shows the plots for the comparison groups. The histograms and Q-Q plots show that thedistribution of the cumulative GPA does not follow the Normal distribution. The results of thenormality tests presented in Table 9 also confirm that. Table 9. P-value of Normality test methods for cumulative GPA for C-Groups Jarque Shapiro- Anderson- Kolmogorov- Groups/ Method Bera (J-B) Wilk (S-W) Darling (A-D) Smirnov (K-S) Not 1&2 6.338e-13 4.612e-06 2.986e-06 0.08832 PELL-Eligible 3 <2.2e-16 <2.2e-16 <2.2e-16 1.048e-07 1&2 2.174e-07 7.481e-05
to design examples andexercises that meet the specific needs of each classroom. In order to better understand thedifferences between classrooms, students from two different classrooms (named“Classroom 1” and “Classroom 2”) were submitted to the same following question duringan electrochemistry lesson:Consider the following overall reaction for a battery: 2 Ag+ + Sn → 2 Ag + Sn2+What is the reaction quotient (Q) for this redox process?a) [Sn2+].[Ag]2/[Ag+]2.[Sn] b) [Sn2+]/2[Ag+]c) [Sn2+]/[Ag+]2 d) [Ag+]2/[Sn2+]The correct answer to the question above is letter c): Q = [Ag+]2/[Sn2+].Although it seems to be a very easy question, is was possible to
evaluated by the authors. Session 1 Session 2 Presentation Q&A Presentation Q&A 0.4286 0.9333 0.7241 0.5926 no input 4 8 10 12 -1 8 0 2 0 0 4 2 4 11 1 23 29 23 16 Observation: 1. The value of 0.4286 indicates the results could have been better but was still a worthwhile effort. Recall the value could go negative. Note there 23 out of 39 students indicated the
% ofstudents attended regularly. The rate of D’s, F’s, Q drops and withdraws (DFWQ rates) for SIstudents was 2.8% in fall 2020, compared to a 9.1% DFWQ rate for SI students in fall 2019. SIstudents who had less programming experience (potentially through systemic educationalinequities) than their advantaged counterparts, also had statistically significant higher courseGPAs when compared to non-SI students who had the same prior experience. The teamdetermined several emerging themes from the survey and interview responses, such as aburgeoning sense of community, comfort with peers over time, accountability and structure, andan awareness of SI session activities as diverse and different than other learning experiences. Wehypothesize these all had strong
? *Q#T - Traditional instruction mode; Q#V - Virtual instruction mode Figure 1. Survey Results © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021There was no overwhelming consensus since only 50% of participants appreciated the overallcourse design and project alignments. Of all the projects, most students enjoyed working on thewind turbine project in mechanical engineering. Table 1. Understanding of Major Questions 2019 2020 Before Now Before Now
scheduling and associated modifications asneeded. The acceptance letter also included anticipated benefits and commitments, such as: Participating in STRIDE sessions held once a week Reflecting once a month through an electronic journal guided by instructors Attending meetings for a professional group of your choice recommended by instructors Receiving training on peer mentoring for future STRIDE cohorts Demonstrating the use of recommended study methods weekly, for example, through display of out-of-class notes and Q&A with instructor on notes and weekly schedule.It was also explicitly highlighted that there was no cost to students to participate in the program,and contact
technical symposium on Computer scienceeducation. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 402-406, 2008.[4] S. Lee, S. Kastner, and R. Walker. “Mending the Gap, Growing the Pipeline: Increasing Female Representationin Computing,” in Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Gainsville, FL, 2015.[5] G. Skelton, Q. Pang, W. Zheng, and H.R. Shih. “Using robotics for teaching critical thinking, problems solvingand self-regulated learning for freshmen engineering students,” in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.[6] T. S. Hall and P. W. Munger. “Integrating robotics into first-year experience courses,” in Proceedings of 2011American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section Annual Meeting
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
handling and coping skills. The informal gathering took place in fun places in campus, the bowling arena and pooltablezone, where food, drinks, and opportunity drawings were gifted to the students. The workshopsfor on-campus resources, time management and financial planning took place in differentmonths, at least one month appart, at different hours of the day, in the same large classroom withround tables, and consisted of oral presentations, roundtable discussions, printed brochuresoffered to the students, food, drinks and opprtunity drawings. The forum with faculty andindustry professionals took place in a medium sized classroom and consists of a panel discussionfollowed by Q&A. b) Undergraduate Research Experiences To increase the
. J. Couns. Psychol. 2012, 59 (3), 424.(9) Jimenez-useche, I.; Hoffmann, S. R.; Ohland, M. W. In 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference; Roanoke, VA, 2015; pp 1–6.(10) Layton, R. A.; Loughry, M. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Ricco, G. D. Adv. Eng. Educ. 2010, 2 (1), 1.(11) Ohland, M. W.; Loughry, M. L.; Woehr, D. J.; Bullard, L. G.; Finelli, C. J.; Layton, R. A.; Pomeranz, H. R.; Schmucker, D. G. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2012, 11 (4), 609.(12) Oberg, K. Pract. Anthropol. 1960, July-Augus, 177.(13) Liu, O. L. ETS Research Report Series 14-15. 2014, 14 (15), 1.(14) Ockey, G. J.; Koyama, D.; Setoguchi, E.; Sun, A. Lang. Test. 2014, 32 (1), 39.(15) Brooks, L.; Swain, M. Lang. Assess. Q. 2014, 11 (4
., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 468–487, 2019.[15] R. R. Fowler and M. P. Su, “Gendered Risks of Team-Based Learning: A Model of Inequitable Task Allocation in Project-Based Learning,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 312–318, 2018.[16] L. Q. Prendergast, “Retention, success, and satisfaction of engineering students based on the first-year experience.” Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick, 2013.[17] L. A. Meadows and D. Sekaquaptewa, “The effect of skewed gender composition on student participation in undergraduate engineering project teams,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[18] S. Ingram and A. Parker, “Gender and modes of collaboration in an engineering classroom: A
strategies for retaining engineering, engineering andtechnology and computer science students. Retrieved from ASEE websitehttps://www.asee.org/search?q=going+the+distanceDuckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passionfor long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.Duckworth, A.L., & Seligman, M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting academic performance inadolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.Hughes, B., Garibay, J. C., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, M. K. (2013). Examining the tracks that causederailment: institutional contexts and engineering degree attainments. AERALent, R W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying
Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 29.9. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361.10. Doolen, T., & Long, M. (2007). Identification of retention levers using a survey of engineering freshman attitudes at oregon state university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 721-734. doi:10.1080/0304379070152078411. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.12. Strobel, J., & Pan, R
, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Mt Sinai J Med, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 610–623, 2012. 3) J. Sablan, “The Challenge of Summer Bridge Programs,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1035–1050, 2014. 4) T. T. Ishitani, “Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 861–885, 2006. 5) S. M. Ostrove, J. M., Long, “Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 363–389, 2007. 6) S. P. Ackermann, “The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low transfer students,” Community /Junior Coll. Q. Res. Pract., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 211– 224, 1991
D: Student infographic examples - Example infographic posters from fall and winterquarters. The infographic with the most votes among their peers in each section for the fallquarter is reflected below in Figures D1-D3. The winter quarter top vote earners are shown inFigures D4-D5. Figure D1: Infographic on Peer Learning from Monday section (Team D), F2016Figure D2: Infographic on Reading from Wednesday section (Team Q), F2016Figure D3: Infographic on Questioning from Friday section (Team II), F2016Figure D4: Infographic on Questioning from Tuesday section (Team 9), W2017Figure D5: Infographic on Questioning from Thursday section (Team 18), W2017Appendix E: Peer and instructor assessment of infographic examplesThe infographic rubric
their STEM majors. Introduction to Engineering Fields: The purpose of this component is to introduce the Scholars to different types of engineering including bioengineering, chemical engineering, industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, civil and materials engineering, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science - as disciplines and as major programs offered at University of Illinois at Chicago. It intends to familiarize the Scholars with career options, path to graduation, research areas (undergraduate and postgraduate), and future outlook. Each of these sessions is typically a 30- to 45-minute presentation followed by a lively Q&A
environment,” Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 2000, 30-43.2. Bishop, J. L., M.A. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013).3. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, M. Litzkow, “Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-based Streaming video Software,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, 267-274.4. Talbert, R. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. Kecskemety, K. M., B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. Stickel, M., S. Hari, Q
challenging team scenario of engineering students attempting to worktogether. During this activity, the actors and actresses manifest common difficulties onengineering teams, including gender dynamics, miscommunications, misunderstandings, andother frustrations that emerge from teamwork. Afterwards, the facilitator leads a discussion withthe students, including a Q&A session between students and the actors and actresses in character.The interactive theater sketch ends with an invitation for the audience to brainstorm strategies toimprove interactions within teams. The actors/actresses then re-enact their scenario, butincorporate the suggested strategies to improve their synergy. Findings suggest that theinteractive theater sketch can help
., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 95–113, 2011.[29] E. A. Plant, J. S. Hyde, D. Keltner, and P. G. Devine, “The Gender Stereotyping of Emotions,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 24, pp. 81–92, 2000.[30] J. H. Pleck, F. L. Sonenstein, and L. C. Ku, “Masculinity ideology and its correlates,” Gend. Psychol. Read., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 308–326, 1993.[31] B. Markway, “How to crack the code of men’s feelings,” Psychology Today, 2014. .[32] A. J. Franklin and N. Boyd-Franklin, “Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males,” Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2000.[33] J. C. Wade, “Masculinity ideology, male reference group identity dependence, and African American
Engineering (Fundamental).” Proceedings of 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017. Paper ID #18604.[17] Hughes, Q. & R. Sehab. “What They Say Matters: Parental Impact on Pre-College Academic Identity of Successful African American Engineering Students.” Proceedings of 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010, AC 2010-1227[18] Y. Strammis, “Sibling Influences on Decision to Study at University.” Ph.D dissertation, Dept. Psychology., University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2017.[19] L.C. Steelman, & B. Powell, “The Social and Academic Consequences of Birth Order: Real, Artificial or Both,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol
a larger change from Survey 1 to Survey 2 than from Survey 2 to Survey 3. Thethree highest changes were seen in developing a prototype for a design challenge (Q8), settingdesign criteria (Q5), and using an iterative process to complete the design challenge (Q10).Table 3. Engineering design process results. Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Difference Q Step P value Average Average Average btw 1 & 3 Identifying a design problem from 1 3.40 4.30 4.20 0.80 <0.005 the community Incorporating