integrating the makerspace into the existing curriculum are discussed, as well asthe guidelines for the revised class periods and final project.This paper also provides an analysis regarding whether integration of a makerspace into a first-year engineering course positively or negatively impacted first-year students developing: 1) anengineering or maker identity, 2) technical skills, and 3) general engineering skills such ascuriosity, problem solving, and/or teamwork. Students completed pre/post surveys regardingprior makerspace experience, their first-year makerspace experience, engineering identity, andgeneral engineering skills. The survey results of students who participated in the maker-sectionsof the course are compared with survey results of a
collaborationcentered extra-curricular resources can improve the project experience for first-year engineeringstudents.Background and Motivation First-year engineering education and its impact on student retention, culture, andexperience is an important topic to current educators trying to improve university levelengineering education. Persistence in an engineering program is directly related to the first-yearexperience [1]. The first-year curriculum and surrounding environment are essential componentsto providing students with points of both learning and discovery that will ultimately impact theirdecision to stay within their chosen path [1]. Although the engineering path may not be the bestpath for every student, there is a serious concern over
graduation rate is only 50%, withhalf of these students leaving engineering after the first year. Many of these students lack first-hand knowledge of the wonderfully creative and diverse types of work in which engineers areengaged. The idea is to introduce students to a wide variety of practicing engineers who are verypassionate about and fulfilled in their work – giving the students more reasons why they shouldstick it out early on in the engineering major when the time commitment to their studies issignificant and the first year curriculum is less engineering courses and more math, chemistry,physics and general education courses. As an additional note, we also simultaneously instituted acollege-wide mentoring program in which all of our beginning
programmingexperience, a variable which was explored in our study. The ability to increase performance ingroups across all prior programming experiences, especially groups with low prior programmingexperiences is an important step to increasing the graduation rate of underrepresented groupswithin computing majors.Online modality of teachingThe coronavirus pandemic that hit the globe in 2020, required all our first year engineeringcourses in our school to be offered online. Prior to the fall 2020 semester, none of our first yearcourses had online offerings, and none of the instructors teaching first year engineering courseshad any experience with online teaching, or incorporating active learning components into thecourse curriculum. This added another dimension
Engineering from Wright State University, in Day- ton, Ohio. Her experience with teaching first-year engineering students has led to research interests in curriculum development, student empowerment and the development of holistic engineers through the collaboration with engineering stakeholders.Prof. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is an Assistant Professor and the director of the Multiphase Microfluidics Laboratory at Kansas State University. She received her PhD from Columbia University and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the George Washington University. Her research aims to acquire new fundamental understanding of phase-change processes. She is passionate about research
five of the NAE’s 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering and integrates project-based learning and information literacy strategies into an application experience that challengesthe students’ worldviews and perception of engineering.Chandler-Gilbert Community College (CGCC) is one of ten colleges in the Maricopa CountyCommunity College District (MCCCD) and has a student annualized headcount of 14,630,drawing students primarily from east valley communities in the Phoenix area. According to theMaricopa Trends Report (2016), 72% of CGCC student body is part-time credit seeking, and81% of the student population is 24 years of age and under. Females constitute 53% of totalstudent population and males at 47% of the total student population. American
Complement an Integrated Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, UK. August 2002, 2002.[13] Richardson, J.; Dantzler, J., "Effect of a freshman engineering program on retention and academic performance," in Frontiers in Education, 2002.[14] C. Pomalaza-Ráez and B. H. Groff, “Retention 101: Where robots go… students follow,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2003.[15] A. Saterbak, M. Embree and M. Oden, "Client-based projects in freshman design," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.[16] IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM
- orating with other faculty members in the classroom and is invested in research, classes and assignments that provide overlap and continuity within the engineering curriculum and engineering pipeline. Nick is also a mentor for the REU program at Olin which studies the educational experiences of undergraduate engineers.Ms. Lauren Van Beek, University of St. Thomas Lauren Van Beek is an undergraduate studying Mechanical Engineering at the University of St. Thomas.Laura Ann Lilienkamp, Smith College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Identity Development through Self-Directed Learning in the First SemesterAbstractThis research paper investigates
Paper ID #26333Intended and Unintended Consequences of Rapidly Expanding an Engineer-ing Mathematics Intervention for Incoming First-Year StudentsDr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of
design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31208Prof. Didem Ozevin P.E., University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Ozevin is an associate professor of the Department of Civil and Materials Engineering. Dr. Ozevin received her Ph.D. from Lehigh University in 2005. She worked as a research scientist at Physical Acous- tics Corporation till 2010. Her research is integrating structural design and damage assessment methods, and real time process and damage detection.Prof. Jeremiah T Abiade, University of Illinois at Chicago Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Laboratory for Oxide
ranged from improvingstudy habits to learning technical skills that would not only help them successfully complete thepilot bridge camp, but also provide academic skills that would potentially help them to be moresuccessful in an undergraduate program. Participants also learned life skills to prepare them forprofessional careers. The learning experiences integrated math and technology into hands-onengineering and science projects over three months in 2-3 week intervals. After the completionof each face-to-face session, participants had the needed tools, skills, and information toaccomplish each related independent project. The independent projects engaged the participantsthroughout the summer, built skills and self-confidence in each successive
finish thefreshmen year with the same core set of courses completed and with ample opportunity to makesocial connections. Although the larger goal of integrating general science, math andcommunication proved unrealistic at this time, the core ME curriculum was integrated. Finally,to achieve the objectives related to teamwork, project management and professionalresponsibility, the faculty decided to include a long-term service-learning design projectspanning the first year. For this project, students would work in teams to address the needs of anexternal client. Many similar models exist in the literature. For example, the ROXIE9 program atVirginia Tech engages a cohort of freshmen in the design process through a large number ofservice projects
andcomplex problems,” can be achieved through educational practices, such as first-year seminars,learning communities, E-Portfolios, service learning courses, internships and capstone projects(7). Barriers that exist for integrative learning in higher education today often point to afragmented undergraduate curriculum (collections of independent classes in general education,specialized study, and electives) and the organization of knowledge into distinct and separatecolleges and departments, “even though scholarship, learning, and life have no such artificialboundaries” (p. 16) (7). Learning communities, capstone experiences, and service learningprojects can transcend these barriers by organizing around interdisciplinary themes, linkingcross
several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone Design courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Pil Kang, University of New Mexico Sung ”Pil” Kang is an assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. His academic interests include change management, change model validation, and mindset evolution. He may be reached at pilkang
backgrounds. From these goals and commitments, programs such asthe RISE first year seminar were developed.The RISE first year seminar started as PRiSE, Promoting Retention in Science and Engineering,in the 2013 academic year. Students joined PRiSE to build community, receive mentorship,tutoring, and academic advising as well as be supported by the Center for STEM Diversity.Since its inception, PRiSE has transformed into RISE, the program it is today. During thistransformation, RISE has grown into an official Registrar approved two-semester seminar coursewith a curriculum focused on building a cohort of students who can support one another as theybuild their sense of belonging, self-efficacy and academic expertise. In creating andimplementing this
One Machine”, 3D Printing Industry, available at http://3dprintingindustry.com/crowd-funding-2/ (accessed September 24, 2014).21. Fidan, I., Patton, K. (2004), “Enhancement of Design and Manufacturing Curriculum through Rapid Prototyping Practices”, Proceedings of IMECE04 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 13-20, 2004, Anaheim, California USA.22. Flynn, E.P. (2011) “From Design to Prototype –Manufacturing STEM Integration in the Classroom and Laboratory”, 1st IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), April 2, 2011, Ewing, NJ, pp. 3B1- 3B423. Flynn, E.P. (2012) “Design to Manufacture –Integrating STEM Principles for Advanced Manufacturing Education”, 2nd IEEE Integrated STEM
encouraging to see so many students in Differential Calculus who are visiting the Center.Based upon the limited amount of data available to us at this time we conclude that the programhas been successful. At the end of this year we plan to correlate Study Center visits with gradesin pre-requisite courses and persistence in engineering.Further StepsWe have initiated a number of additional programs to help students from underpreparedbackgrounds succeed in engineering. Amongst these initiatives are opportunities for students toparticipate in events at our engineering school, a voluntary bridge course (no course credit) tohelp students transition from Differential Calculus to Integral Calculus, an optional 4-day courseon programming internet-connected
Engineering Education, 1998. 87(4): p. 469-480.12. Parsons, J.R., et al., The engage program: Implementing and assessing a new first year experience at the University of Tennessee. Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. 91(4): p. 441-446.13. Al ‐ Holou, N., et al., First-Year Integrated Curricula: Design Alternatives and Examples*. Journal of Engineering Education, 1999. 88(4): p. 435-448.14. Torres, W.J., A. Saterbak, and M.E. Beier, Long-Term Impact of an Elective, First-Year Engineering Design Course, in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Jazzed about Engineering Education. 2016: New Orleans.15. Carlson, E., H. Lee, and K. Schroll, Identifying attributes of high quality special education teachers
Paper ID #23690Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to PromoteEngineering SuccessDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the
qualitative interviews withunderrepresented minority engineering students. These allowed us to explore their classroombelonging experiences and showed that classroom belonging is a familiar concept and a functionof two separate sources of belonging: academic belonging and social belonging. Academic self-efficacy, curriculum content motivation and an ability to share academic struggles with otherswere important contributors to academic belonging. Social similarity, successful teamexperiences and a general sense of caring were also considered helpful to building socialbelonging in the classroom. Implications and ideas to build engineering classroom belongingfrom this research are discussed.Key Concepts: social belonging, engineering identity
the first-year engineering curriculum. It will be a repository ofopinions on diverse learning environments, as authored by first-year engineering students.Specifically, an online questionnaire asks students – anonymously – about their pre-conceivedassumptions as they entered first-year engineering at Northeastern University. These questionsattempt to uncover what first-year students had thought about with respect to what they thoughttheir professor would be like, what they would look like, how diverse their classroom would be,etc. This data is collected in addition to non-specific demographic information, which is used tobroadly connect common misconceptions to background at a future date.BackgroundDiversity levels in STEM have been and are
similar to pre-pandemic semesters and have far fewer U (unsatisfactory) grades than inSpring 2020 when the whole campus went online midway.IntroductionTeam-teaching has a long history when many educators had attempted integration acrossdifferent disciplines [9], curriculum [4] [14], and even country borders [12]. Besides traditionallecturing, projects [1]-[3],[5][6], and service-learning [8] could also be used in team-teaching.Despite the challenges in implementation, team teaching provided a wide array of benefits, evenfor faculty mentoring [13] and team-building [11]. Communication [10] and faculty help hadbeen deemed important ever since the remote-working technology was emerging [7].Traditional team-teaching may involve multiple instructors
, planning, and implementing design solutions. Theauthors found that students who participated in the creative lab demonstrated a higher confidencein continuing in engineering coursework than those who did not. As the study states, “Creativityis an important attribute for engineers practicing their profession in a global society” [12].Although students struggled with the open-ended nature of the design problems, they enjoyed thecourse and saw the value in the addition to their curriculum. Illustrating the importance of incorporating real-world engineering design problems, Odehet al. write, “Nowadays, engineering education needs to meet the requirements and needs ofbusiness and industry. This can be achieved by collaborating with the local
Paper ID #22582Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year CoursesJordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. learning sciences student and lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering De- partments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design Based Research
replacement for Chalk based teaching, each interactive way to learn with internet and PowerPoint presentation, posting coursework materials and communicating with the instructor) 5. In your student perspective, provide other suggestions to improve the teaching (technologically) that might enhance the future students’ learning process.Appendix – B: Final Examination 1. What is academic integrity? Provide an example that you have held in this semester as a part of academic integrity. 2. Have you registered for Spring 2019 semester? YES | NO If YES, how many credit hours did you register? Who helped you in advising in selecting your courses and in guiding the registration process? If NO, state the cause and how
Paper ID #26713Work in Progress: First-Year Engineering College Students: Value Createdfrom Participating in a Living/Learning CommunityDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D., is an Clinical Associate Professor at Boise State University, Idaho. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Ms. Kim M. B. Tucker, Boise State University Kim Tucker is currently completing her Doctoral Degree in Curriculum and Instruction and works as the Coordinator of Residential Learning for in the Living
encourage greater engagement for all students.More effort and attention should be placed in future onboarding efforts to highlight theimportance of active engineering engagement and the benefits of seeking support from peers,engineering faculty, and staff.References[1] C. Clark, “Diversity initiatives in higher education: Intergroup dialogue as pedagogy acrossthe curriculum,” Multicultural Education, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 51, 2005.[2] A. B. Dessel and N. Rodenborg, “An evaluation of intergroup dialogue pedagogy:Addressing segregation and developing cultural competency,” Journal of Social WorkEducation, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 222-239, 2017.[3] A. Dessel, M. Rogge, and S. Garlington, “Using intergroup dialogue to promote social justiceand change,” Social
after students have beenoffered admission to the College of Engineering. Recruitment largely targets students whoparticipate in programs that bring students to campus, including the IDEA Engineering StudentCenter Overnight Program, which overlaps significantly with the desired student population forRedshirt. The marketing plan for recruiting Redshirt scholars also includes distributing flyers atUCSD’s Triton Day for admitted students, an email campaign specifically targeting potentialRedshirt students, and phone calls from UCSD engineering students. The Redshirt program alsoworked with UCSD’s Summer Success Program to integrate the Redshirt application intoUCSD’s “Common Application” for all summer programs, since all Redshirt students
Paper ID #18609Work in Progress: Increasing Interest in STEM and Improving Retention forAt-Risk Students - A Two-Year StudyDr. Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield Melissa Danforth is an Associate Professor and the Chair of the Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at CSUB. Dr. Danforth is the PI for a NSF Federal Cyber Service grant (NSF-DUE1241636) to create models for information assurance education and outreach. Dr. Danforth is the Project Director for a U.S. Department of Education grant (P031S100081) to create engineering pathways for students in the CSUB service
engineering degree, with the ultimate goal of broadening participation among those who attend engineering college. Sullivan was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Dr. Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder Derek Reamon is the Co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program (ITLP) and the Gen- eral Engineering Plus (GE+) degree program, and a Senior Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. As ITLP co-director, he coordinates 19-22 sections of First-year Engineering Projects, a course that has a proven benefit on retention within engineering and is also a nationally recognized model for