Assistant Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. She received her M.S. in Counselor Education, Student Affairs Administration from Radford University and M.S. in Career and Technical Education and B.S. in Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise both from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. Page 11.887.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Lessons Learned: Implementing a Large-Scale Peer Mentoring ProgramAbstractBeginning in 1992 with the creation of the
, W., Watford, B. (2009). Implementing a Peer Led Model in a Large Scale PeerMentoring Program.[5] Watford, B., Clater, C., Kampe, J., Edmister, W. (2006). Lessons Learned: Implementing aLarge-Scale Peer Mentoring Program. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. Retreived 25 September fromhttp://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=2138. Page 15.528.9
Paper ID #27366Facilitating a Student-Led, Large-Scale Engineering Bridge Camp: TwelveYears of Tips from the TrenchesAdrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has 20 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University as the Assistant Director of Student Programs and Outreach in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education. Her current responsibilities include managing a large peer mentoring program, fa- cilitating all aspects of a first year student bridge camp, assisting faculty members with outreach activities and grant proposals, and working with other
in the same residence hall community, it is hoped that an academicallysupportive peer group will enhance the overall experience.Such integration does not come easily. A coordinated plan has been developed to join the Page 14.749.3Cornerstone Experience and the Residential Experience to address the challenges encountered bythe development and implementation teams. These issues include facility location andcomposition including design and construction, gender balancing in a residence hall withpredominantly engineering degree program students, segregating engineering students or mixingwith other majors on single residence hall floors, development
of precedent materials, and experienced instructional designers’ beliefs about design character. These studies have highlighted the importance of cross-disciplinary skills and student engagement in large-scale, real-world projects. Dr. Exter currently leads an effort to evaluate a new multidisciplinary degree program which provides both liberal arts and technical content through competency-based experiential learning.Iryna Ashby, Purdue University Iryna Ashby is a Ph.D student in the Learning Design and Technology Program at Purdue University with the research interests focused on program evaluation. She is also part of the program evaluation team for the Purdue Polytechnic Institute – a new initiate at Purdue
that native studentsalready know and that resident freshmen living together learn quickly, but they are new andunfamiliar to the more isolated transfer students until someone takes the time to explain. In thefall 2006 offering of EngE2984, we also recognized and seized the opportunity we had to buildcommunity among new transfer students, and that, in itself, made a considerable difference. Oneof the key things involved in community building was a peer mentoring program for transferstudents, the Network for Engineering Transfer Students (NETS), which was established in fall2005 through funding from an NSF STEP grant (STEP: STEM Talent Expansion Program,where STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math).Peer-Mentoring (NETS) and EngE2984
academic spaces (e.g., project and computer laboratories) ● serves as the first point of contact for inquiries regarding the academic programThe co-curricular director: ● coordinates with the housing department to secure residential space for participants ● plans and implements co-curricular programming ● manages a staff of tutors and resident mentors (termed Peer Leaders) ● serves as the first point of contact for inquiries regarding the residential program and co- curricular activitiesFour additional staff members provide advising, instructional, and programmatic support on afull-time or part-time basis. In support of the professional staff, a number of graduate studentsserve as teaching assistants (TAs) for the courses
Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the design of new learning experiences. His experience in technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new
, and in synergy with large-scale developments in the MSU College of Engineering.The two most salient developments that the EEES program articulates with are (a) a program toredefine the first year engineering experience and (b) a large scale program to expand our currentresidency program in undergraduate engineering to encompass most first year engineeringstudents. An important focus in both efforts is on community building for early engineeringstudents. These programs and the synergy with EEES will be described later in this paper.The four EEES components are: • a program of Supplemental Instruction for the key core courses taken by early engineering students. For local reasons, we call this subprogram “peer assisted learning
, the list and definitions of professional skills varies widely, as does howthese skills are learned. Some methods focus on direct learning, via workshops, skill-buildingclasses, mentoring or direct required practice. Other methods are more indirect, such as rolemodeling, practice as part of project and assignments or from the indirect lessons of theUnwritten Syllabus itself.The engineer of 2020 has a set of guiding strategies that may be of help in forming teachingtechniques. The set of strategies is: Engage in a comprehensive effort Consider the linkages Focus on levers for change Pursue student-centered education Develop a research base Communicate, communicate, communicateWhile some of these do not apply
engineering hasbeen reworked and implemented at LeTourneau University. This new course, required for all first year engineering students, is intended to increaseretention in the engineering program by providing “iY Generation” students with a realistic viewof what “real” engineers do and what is expected of engineering students. The course attempts toengage this new type of first semester engineering student with engineering flavored in-classactivities and labs (e.g. wind generator design with wind tunnel testing) to provide a balance tothe non-engineering core courses (Calculus, Chemistry, English) that fill the first year of theengineering curriculum. Lesson modules lay the foundations for success in engineering education by