Paper ID #33350Crafting a Virtual Studio: Some Models and ImplementationsDr. Zachary Riggins del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Zachary del Rosario is a visiting assistant professor of engineering at Olin College. His goal is to help scientists and engineers reason under uncertainty. Zach uses a toolkit from data science and uncertainty quantification to address a diverse set of problems, including reliable aircraft design and AI-assisted dis- covery of novel materials.Riya Aggarwal, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Riya is junior at the Olin College of Engineering studying Engineering with a
] National Research Council, "How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition," National Academies Press, 2006.[5] T. Martin, S. D. Rivale and K. R. Diller, "Comparison of student learning in challenge-based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering," Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1312-1323, 2007.[6] D. L. Schwartz, S. Brophy, X. Lin and J. D. Bransford, "Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 39-59, 1999.[7] PER Group, University of Minnesota, Online Archive of Context-rich Problems, October 2012. Available: https://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research
will help them as they progress into upper level-engineering classes.However, many students initially resist the provided steps for problem solving. At the beginningof the semester, students complain that the strategy is lengthy and 22% of students do not see thebenefit, while 19% of students said that the method helped them avoid making mistakes [14]. Atthe end of the semester, 52% of students reported that the method got easier with time, while thenumber of students who said it helped them avoid mistakes or find mistakes increased to 22% and30%, respectively [14]. Our intervention was designed with two things in mind; 1) If we reinforcedthe problem-solving strategy in more classes, it would help them catch their mistakes in PHY160and 2) if
mathematics,” Washington, DC: Office of the President, 2012.[8] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[9] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–225, 1995, doi: 10.1177/0146167295213003.[10] J. L. Meece, A. Wigfield, and J. S. Eccles, “Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, p. 60, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60.[11] T. Perez, J. G
boyfriend was [also an] engineer. And I spent a lot of time with them just 'cause they were really close friends of mine. So I felt like you're spending a lot of time with them also like interested me in engineering because I remember why I went, and this was not really little. I went to stay with my cousin and her boyfriend at his college, Purdue. And he was just showing me all this stuff he was working on and it was really interesting. And I remember I was like nine and he described to me, natural selection and it blew my mind. I was blown away. He also explained to me the very basic derivatives. And I was like, "This is so cool." But, even though I didn't know, like really understand it, it just, it was
self-directed learning. Since 2017, Abigail has been the graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their development of self-regulation and time management skills, effective learning strategies, and positive habits of mind. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Implementing an Engineering Math Curriculum Sequence: Preliminary Results and Lessons LearnedThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper details an engineering math curriculumsequence for first-year engineering students belonging to the General Engineering LearningCommunity
Paper ID #33853WIP: Enhancing Freshman Seminars With Themes: An ArchitecturalEngineering ApproachDr. Ryan Solnosky P.E., Pennsylvania State University Ryan Solnosky is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky has taught courses for Architec- tural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshman in Engineering. He received his integrated Bachelor of Architectural Engineering/Master of Architectural Engineering (BAE/MAE), and PhD. de- grees in architectural engineering from The Pennsylvania State University. Dr
theobjective of enabling others to successfully implement the design project in their course.Since its founding, Dunwoody College of Technology has prided itself on ensuring studentslearn in an environment that mirrors industry as closely as possible. With this history in mind, weguide interdisciplinary groups of students consisting of electrical, mechanical, and softwareengineering majors through the engineering design process. The project objective is to research,design, build, calibrate, and test a balance or scale with a digital readout made from simplecomponents. Successful completion requires elements of each engineering discipline representedin the course. The course itself, Introduction to Engineering, is laid out in a manner thatincrementally
aspercentages of the entire study sample, of the participants from four-year institutions, and of theparticipants from two-year institutions.LimitationsThis study is limited by the size of the sample and its time frame, as well as by the institutionalspace and participants’ frame of mind when completing the survey as a homework assignment.These limitations could be mitigated by the collection and analysis of additional data from asimilar cohort of transfer students, or with data from a cohort of entering engineering students.Responses could also be limited in depth by a lack of effort due to demands from the rest of aparticipant’s workload, or by an overall tendency to write little more than one sentence perresponse. The use of a survey often
Paper ID #32797Types of Models Identified by First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach Kelsey Rodgers is an assistant professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. She teaches a MATLAB programming course to mostly first-year engineering students. She primarily investigates how students develop mathematical models and simulations and ef- fective feedback. She graduated from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University with a doctorate in engineering education. She previous conducted research in Purdue
Paper ID #33975Understanding Remote Student Motivation in Hybrid and Remote Engineer-ingLab ModesDr. Rui Li, New York University Dr. Li is a visiting industry assistant professor at Tandon School of Engineering, New York University. He earned his master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 2009 from the Imperial College of London and his doctoral degree in 2020 from the University of Georgia’s College of Engineering, where his research involved using smartphones, wireless sensors, and 3D printing to create low-cost MRI/CT compatible sur- gical devices. His current research interests are student motivation, active learning
apowerful tool allowing us to solve important engineering questions such as how electrical chargeis stored in a capacitor, strain energy of a deformed material, or how to compute moments ofinertia for non-standard shapes.One instructor has a lesson on “how to integrate a potato” which is entertaining, enlightening,and memorable as it is something the students can visualize and relate to their everyday lives.This visual representation is beneficial to students to help keep the big picture in mind as they gothrough the various mathematical derivations and proofs to unlock these powerful tools. Theapplications are motivation to keep pressing on in their math and science studies.Part of this connection with the mathematical world is made through use of
students noted the importance of collaboration, connecting collaboration to a successfullearning environment and for their future as an engineer. Some student quotes in this areaincluded "I think that the concepts we were taught in the growth mindset are good for making mea better person and teammate, which is important in the collaborative environment ofengineering.” and "At a macro level, I understand now the power of teams, collaboration, andfeedback in creating a successful learning environment."Overall, these reflection results illustrate that having assignments related to teamwork keeps theteamwork topic on students’ minds as they progress through their coursework. Althoughteamwork was not specifically requested as a target of this
Paper ID #34699Self-Efficacy, Mathematical Mindset, and Self-Direction in First-YearEngineering StudentsDr. Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University Dr. Cavalli is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Associate Dean in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. His technical research interests include materials behavior and solid mechanics. His educational interests include distance education and first-year student success. He has previously served as the Chair of the Materials Division of ASEE.Ms. Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University Anetra Grice is has served as the STEP Program Director for
entitled Introduction to Engineering at the University of NewHaven were surveyed in this study. Students take this course either in the fall or spring of theirfirst year depending on their math placement. The course is project-based and students areexposed to three small projects related to different engineering disciplines and one large termproject that spans over half of the semester. In fall 2019, the three sections of the course weremodified to incorporate use of the makerspace more consciously into the final project. This wasdone with two objectives in mind: (1) to improve the first-year retention of engineering students;and (2) to engage the Gen Z students more with the learning and give them broader experiences.As part of their first
are struggling. Feedback canbe solicited from both the teams as well as individual team members; this ensures not only thatprogress is made with their projects, but that each student is contributing effectively as part of theirteam. A structure featuring a preliminary and final design review would align with similaroccurrences in coursework and in industry.It is also recognized that a virtual project of this type could potentially be utilized not only forshort-term programs similar to Summer Bridge, but also for traditional K-12 and undergraduatecourses. With this in mind, a goal has been set to collect more data specifically related to theknowledge acquired from the project, including knowledge of the engineering design process andother
Paper ID #33866”Mapping” the Landscape of First-Year Engineering Students’Conceptualizations of Ethical Decision MakingJoshua Bourne Reed, Rowan University Josh Reed is an engineering masters student at Rowan University working for the Experiential Engineering Education department. He has graduated with a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering from Rowan University. Josh is very passionate about education as well as the social issues in both the engineering and education systems. He hopes to further his understanding in both of these fields.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant
Paper ID #33237Introducing Simple Harmonic Motion – A Teaching Module in a First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Christopher Horne, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Since 2011, Dr. Horne has been a Lecturer at NC AandT State University and East Carolina University. He currently teaches freshman a course in problem solving using MATLAB. He combines twenty years’ experience in management and engineering with a passion to help students learn STEM-related material. He is a licensed professional engineer and holds masters and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University and North Carolina AandT State
Paper ID #33249Traditional Lecture Format vs. Active Teaching Format in an OnlineFreshman Engineering CourseDr. Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Nina Telang is an associate professor of instruction in the ECE department at UT Austin. She has taught a variety of courses in the ECE department at the freshman, sophomore and junior undergraduate levels that include 4 required (core) courses, and 2 elective (tech-area) courses. Her repertoire of courses is from a range of areas such as circuit theory, digital logic design, solid state devices, computing sys- tems, and embedded systems. Her teaching style
Paper ID #33450Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic RetentionApproach in a First-Year Engineering CourseMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates the Supplemental Instruction program. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007, her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012 and her M.A. in STEM Education from The University of Texas at Austin in 2019. Additionally, she has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology
," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508-555, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20347.[5] T. Augsburg, "Becoming Transdisciplinary: The Emergence of the Transdisciplinary Individual," World Futures: Transdisciplinarity, vol. 70, no. 3-4, pp. 233-247, 2014, doi: 10.1080/02604027.2014.934639.[6] S. Derry and G. Fischer, "Toward a Model and Theory for Transdisciplinary Graduate Education," presented at the 2005 AERA Annual Meeting, Symposium, “Sociotechnical Design for Lifelong Learning: A Crucial Role for Graduate Education”, Montreal, Canada, April, 2005.[7] S. L. T. McGregor, "Transdisciplinary Pedagogy in Higher Education: Transdisciplinary Learning, Learning Cycles, and Habits of Mind
there was less live attendance in online SI sessions, and somestudents expressed negative feelings about attending SI online [14]. Keeping these pastexperiences with online SI in mind, we explored the effectiveness of our online SI offerings.Study contextFirst-year engineering students entering Northeastern University in September 2020 encountereda profound change in instructional strategy compared to previous years in which all classes wereoffered in-person: during the Fall 2020 semester classes were offered under a hybrid learningmodel in which a limited number of students could attend each class meeting in-person and theremainder would attend only remotely, based in part on student preferences. This study focusedon assessing consequences of
readiness, and itsultimate goal is increasing retention in this population [1], [2]. In addition to cohorting studentsin STEM courses, the GELC program requires students to co-enroll in a learning strategiescourse. The course is designed to develop self-regulatory, academic, and social-psychologicalcompetence for students through its three primary units: Habits of Professionals, Habits ofLearning, and Habits of Mind. An overarching goal of the course is to support students inbecoming successful STEM students and future engineering professionals. While the course is inits fourth iteration, the Fall 2020 semester marks the first use of the LASSI within the learningstrategies course. Our approach went beyond using the LASSI as a measure of
, mentioned gains from the modules and theopportunities to choose their own path through the course. These gains are expressed in terms ofachieving a deeper understanding of engineering and aligning choices to personal values andinterests. Both groups seem to gain a broad perspective of the different areas and dimensions ofengineering, as well as an understanding of the different Immersed Program opportunitiesavailable in the college. This broad perspective appears to support students who feel certainabout their interest by inspiring them to explore beyond their initial ideas and ‘remainopen-minded.’ The students who mention feeling uncertain, find in the array of modules areas ofengineering that appeal to their interests, skills and values, gaining
Paper ID #34240Learning a Second Language and Learning a Programming Language: AnExplorationMs. Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati I am a PhD candidate in Engineering Education with a research focus on professional development for future faculty. Currently, I am the Lead Graduate Teaching Assistant for the first year engineering design course with an enrollment of 1300 students across all engineering majors.Dr. Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati Gregory Bucks joined the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati in 2012. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #34266Students’ Concerns and What They Look Forward to: A Comparison ofCOVID-19 Versus Pre-COVID-19Dr. Nora Honken, University of Cincinnati Nora is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at The University of Cincin- nati. She holds a PhD in Educational Leadership and Organizational Development for the University of Louisville, a MS in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University and a BS in Industrial Engineer- ing from Virginia Tech. She also has extensive industrial experience.Angela Boronyak, University of Cincinnati Dr. Angela Boronyak joined the University of Cincinnati in
Paper ID #33521Team-Teaching a Project-Based First-Year Seminar in PandemicDr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. Her research interests include engineering education, swarm robotics, statistical signal processing, and swarm intelligence.Dr. Hugh Jack P. Eng. P.E., Western Carolina University Dr. Jack holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and a Master’s and Ph.D. in Mechanical En- gineering from the University of Western Ontario. He is currently a Distinguished Professor and Director of the School of