Paper ID #21854A Strategic Plan to Improve Engineering Student Success: Development, Im-plementation, and OutcomesDr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education.Dr. Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University Matthew Stimpson is the Director of Assessment in the Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs at NC
Angeles. She earned her BS in metallurgy and materials science from Columbia University, and her MS and PhD in materials science and engineering from Stanford University. She previously served as faculty, chair and Associate Dean at San Jose State University’s College of Engineering. Dr. Allen believes in a collaborative, student-centered approach to research, education and academic administration and leadership. She currently serves on the ASEE Engineering Deans Council Executive Board, the ABET Academic Affairs Council, and chairs the ABET Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion.Eva Schiorring, Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Eva Schiorring has almost two decades of experience in research
students are comfortable exploring the STEMdisciplines, COMPASS places undecided, non-STEM students into one of two tracks during thefirst-semester in college where they complete a Career Planning: STEM Explorations or STEMSeminar course. In addition to the Career Planning and STEM Seminar courses, students alsoenroll in cohort math courses throughout the first year, are assigned a STEM program advisor,have the opportunity to live in block housing, receive an upper-division STEM peer mentor,interact in a designated STEM Center with program peers and STEM graduate tutors andparticipate in an early undergraduate research experience.This paper discusses COMPASS’ infrastructure, the evidence based practices implemented toachieve its objectives, the
courses. Followingthe first round of exams, students select the course in which they wish to improve theirperformance most significantly and then complete both an exam wrapper survey and learningstrategies survey to evaluate their preparatory behaviors, conceptual understanding, andperformance on the exam. Each student develops an action plan for improvement based on theirresults and begins implementation immediately. Following the second exam, students completean exam wrapper survey followed by a learning journal, in which students evaluate and reflect ontheir adherence to and effectiveness of their action plan and performance on the second exam.We propose that engagement with this exam wrapper activity in the context of the EntangledLearning
little evidence of planning. Several strategies are used bystudents for all problems, but some are unique to specific types of problems. These findingsdemonstrate the usefulness of post-hoc audio reflection in engineering education research tobetter assess and address students’ metacognition and problem solving strategies.IntroductionThis work-in-progress paper identifies metacognitive activities and problem solving strategiesutilized by first-year engineering students to solve different types of problems. Our researchquestion is: What problem solving strategies and metacognitive activities are revealed bystudents’ post-hoc audio reflections on their solutions to three different types of engineeringproblems (story, open-ended, exercise)? Post
, there were only significant differences in course grades between thosewho entered with 1-20 credits and those who entered with more than 20 credits (p=0.046).Among students entering with zero pre-college credits, females had higher course grades thanmales (F=8.38, p=0.005). No differences were observed between genders for those entering with1-20 credits (F=1.29, p=0.26) or those with more than 20 credits (F=0.22, p=0.64).Previous use of SI and study methodsWe also examine whether prior use of SI and other study methods, including attending officehours and studying in groups, in high school correlated with planned SI use for students’ firstsemester in college and subsequent academic outcomes. Our previous research has shown thatfirst semester
Paper ID #22582Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year CoursesJordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. learning sciences student and lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering De- partments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design Based Research
. Participants employed multiple self-generated hands-on methods toestimate the volume of trash collected by molding the bags of trash into cylindrical, rectangular,and ellipsoid shapes to simplify the estimation of their volume. They then combined theirunderstanding of geometry and algebra with critical thinking to design their own methods forestimating the volume of the various types of trash collected.Participants also explored how to develop a business/financial plan for the operation of arecycling business in their community for the fictional purpose of submitting a proposal to thetribal government. The plan used profit and cost equations to analyze the trash data. Lessoncontent emphasized algebra and ratios, while instructional methods emphasized
Education, 2017Evaluating the Success of Peer Led Student Interventions in a Freshman Year Experience ProgramAbstractThis paper is a Work in Progress and will discuss the process and assessment of a structured peermentor intervention plan implemented in a Freshman Year Experience (FYE) program at NewMexico State University, a Hispanic serving institution. The FYE program was implemented inFall 2014 as an attempt to increase retention. After the first year of implementation, retentionsrates from freshman to sophomore rose by 14.6%.The FYE program has several different components, including a hands-on introductory course,peer mentoring and tutoring, exposure to the engineering disciplines on campus, and othersuccess initiatives. In Fall
the week, and will be quizzed on boththe lectures and the reading assignments.The two credit course, Design Practicum, is a hands-on design course with lectures and labs thatwill introduce students to relevant topics in engineering including: problem solving, team design,innovation, information technology, engineering, ethics in engineering, community engagementand social responsibility. This course will require partial departmental financial support, thus notall departments are currently committed to participating due to budget concerns. Just over halfof our engineering college is currently planning to participate, with approximately 600 studentsexpected to enroll this coming year. (Fall 2016/Spring 2016) This course is modeled after
is also used in group advising sessions. The goal of group advising is to communicate the basic information students need to start prepare their study plans. Social Constructivism is an advising approach that is based on the concept that learners build (or construct) knowledge based on what they already know or believe. In a Social Constructivist approach to advising, the adviser takes time to understand what a student already knows, or believes, about their educational experience, and helps the student build on that knowledge. In this approach, the student can seek out knowledge from multiple sources, and verify what he thinks he knows with his adviser. Each of these advising approaches is used within Northwestern
various aspects of their academic and personal life to before and during the pandemic.Questions ranging from current schoolwork, to future plans and well-being are addressed. Thisinformation may inform both long-term and immediate changes that universities and instructorsmay be able to take to improve student learning outcomes and experiences within engineeringprograms.Methods An initial online survey was sent to 383 students among eight different sections of a first-year engineering course that was being conducted in a 100% remote learning environment duringthe Fall 2020 semester. The online questionnaire included a total of 10 COVID-related questions,each on a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire asks questions related to student
-learning communities for engineeringundergraduates at Virginia Tech. These living-learning communities were created to providesocial and academic support for first-year female and male engineering students. Combined,these learning communities now support over 600 students, the majority of whom are enrolled intheir first-year of college. This also includes a large support team of upperclassmen students (i.e.,sophomores, juniors, and seniors) who serve as mentors and committee members.PurposeThe work presented here is part of a multi-year plan to impact every student involved in either ofthe living-learning communities. In this paper, we describe the work to date, which includes ourcollaboration with faculty in the field of sociology to develop the
what they wanted to happen on their first round of exams, (2) a traditional examwrapper activity recounting their preparatory behaviors and learning strategies and the results oftheir exams, and (3) a reflection on what was learned from the experience, and (4) a plan forimprovement for each of their STEM courses. This process is repeated following the secondround of exams.One modification of the exam wrapper between its first and second implementation was theintroduction of the after-action review terminology. In order to emphasize the students’professional development as engineers, the experience with exam wrappers was framed as afour-stage after-action review. After-action reviews are used to debrief the process andperformance on a training
,this program is engineering discipline specific, open only to incoming students enrolled in thefall semester, and it is closely tied to the first engineering course offered at the university. Bootcamps at University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) and University of Washington (UW)are similar, but they focus on Math and Writing or Science and Math respectively [15], [16],which means that students will not necessarily meet others in their major.All incoming freshmen engineering students are encouraged to apply to E-FIT, which is designedto suit students of all ability levels. Currently, there is space for 132 students (approximately20% of incoming engineering students) to participate, but the program plans to be available to allincoming
Admission Compact The GMU-NOVA Dual Admission Compact for Mechanical Engineering is designed tooutline a pathway from a successful completion of the Associate of Science (A.S.) degree inEngineering to the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree in Mechanical Engineering. Dualadmission status consists of non-degree status at GMU for students who are full-time degreeseeking students at NOVA. Access into the Compact is established using the followingeligibility requirements: 1. Plan to earn an Associate of Science (A.S.) degree from NOVA Community College 2. Plan to pursue the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree in GMU School of Engineering within one year of completing the A.S. degree 3. Have earned 18 or fewer transferable college credits
high school experiences that have not prepared themwith social capital or with academic experiences conducive to success as self-directed learners atthe collegiate level [10]. Metacognition refers to reflective processes by which learners becomeaware of and control their thinking [11], [12]. To become self-directed learners, students mustdevelop the capability to assess what is asked of them by tasks, evaluate their knowledge andability relative to the task, plan an approach using an appropriate strategy, and monitor theirprogress while making adjustments as needed [13]. Thus developing metacognitive ability iscrucial for academic success. This paper will present the context for the learning strategiescourse, describe recent changes, and
the format that these efforts will take. Birdwell et al. [8]recently described efforts encompassing Academic Advising and Student Affairs working togetherto improve first-year experiences of engineering students, by creating and implementing a seminarcourse for first-year engineering students. They concluded that although challenges incommunication and planning between the two offices remain, particularly in training PeerAdvisers, their first-year engineering seminar course helping students in their first two quarters atthe university, help students to form social bonds and learn valuable skills to aid their learning. As of 2017, degrees awarded by the well over 300 schools with ABET-accredited bachelor'sdegrees programs in engineering
component is to prepare the Scholars for successful acquisition of an internship and eventually a full-time position. It also provides the Scholars with an opportunity to begin establishing a network, understand the components of a high- quality resume and online professional profile, and evaluate internship opportunities. By participating in this activity prior to entering college, the Scholars are expected to be able to start planning a career path during their first year. A total of three one-hour sessions are scheduled during the two-week program, and are facilitated by professional staff from the university career center. 3.2. WorkshopsThe SBP programming includes a variety of informational and
Grainger College of Engineering. Sara performs undergrad- uate research in soft robotics and engineering education funded by the IDEA Institute at UIUC. Sara is interested in pursuing a career in Engineering Education as well as furthering her education upon gradu- ating.Mrs. Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ilalee Harrison James is the Associate Director of The Hoeft Technology & Management Program. She serves as a lecturer in addition to leading the strategic plan for the program’s co-curricular outcomes. She is a first-generation college graduate who is passionate about improving career outcomes for underrepre- sented students in STEAM.Prof. Holly M. Golecki, University of
learningefforts have enhanced or detracted from students’ engineering education as a whole incomparison to their non-service learning peers, and if the practices and outcomes of thesesections create new trajectories and plans for students, specifically whether it enhances futureinvolvement in community outreach efforts.IntroductionNortheastern University is a top fifty university [1] located adjacent to the Roxburyneighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts. Thanks to exponential growth and development overthe last decade, Northeastern has become a landmark within the community. For decades, it hasbeen shaped by its urban backdrop and has recently taken innovative steps to use its status in thecommunity to provide an impactful outreach program. The backbone of
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). Her research interests include traffic flow modeling, statistical methods for transportation data analysis, and sustainable transportation planning. Her work has been published in several peer-reviewed journal publications and conference papers, and presented at numerous academic conferences. Dr. Reina has also served as an advisor of undergraduate research and applied projects such as those conducted by the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and awardees of the Dwight David Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship. American c Society
. Thereflective comprehensive report challenges students to evaluate themselves against a benchmarkstudent—referred to as a "world-class" engineering student—based on the following objectives:1. Goal setting a. Setting your goal(s) i.e., major, time to graduation, GPA b. Strengthening and clarifying your commitment to your goal(s) c. Setting up a ‘Road Map’ – a plan to guide you over the next years to graduation d. Understanding the essence of engineering2. Community building a. Building relationships, and making effective use of your peers (help-seeking) b. Participating in co-curricular activities3. Academic development a. Navigating the university system, resources, and academic advising b
minutes on Mondays,Wednesdays, and Fridays. We collected data from 20 students over the first two years of ourengineering program: 15 students in the first year and 5 students the following year. Our sampleconsists of 4 female and 16 male students.Table 1. Intervention Plan. Day Activity Description 1 Pre-intervention measurements Students complete the first 12 questions of the Vandenberg MRT and create 3-view sketches of pipefittings. 2 Plexiglass activity Students create 3-view sketches of pipefittings and work in small groups to trace object edges for front, top, side-view on plexiglass. 3 Building
tracking instruments to evaluate how conativeunderstanding impacts persistence and diversity in engineering. We will work with the college totrack students’ persistence, but in the meantime we will estimate students’ intent to remain inengineering majors through reflective essays and surveys. Students will be provided multiple-choice responses for each survey question. The responses have not yet been collected. Thesurvey questions related to conation include: 1. Have your experiences in ECE 102 changed your plans to stay in this major? a. [If Yes] How have your experiences changed your plans to stay in your major? 2. Have your experiences with conation changed your plans to stay in this major? a. [If Yes] How have your
and Creative ThinkingAbstract:This work in progress study describes a strategic university initiative (TH!NK) that is aimed atimproving critical and creative thinking throughout the undergraduate curricula. The TH!NKinitiative is part of the North Carolina State University's five year Quality Enhancement Plan(QEP). This initiative is designed to train faculty to utilize strategies that cultivate students’ criticaland creative thinking in the classroom. TH!NK provides a comprehensive framework forimplementing strategies that support higher-order thinking skills through faculty training,mentoring, and formal assessment of student learning outcomes. In TH!NK courses, students areintroduced to and given opportunities to evaluate their own work
theirrespective disciplines. In addition, FESP provides interactions with engineering societies andjunior/senior level teaching assistance to enhance early experiences and to encourage students tobe self-directed in their educational planning process and overall academic success.The ENGR194 course was designed as a complementary 1-credit course to FESP and was offeredin the Fall of 2018 for the first time. Enrollment in this class was allowed for all students in theCollege of Engineering. The students who took this course had the opportunity to interact withprofessionals of different disciplines and cultural backgrounds and attend seminars and symposiaon subjects including engineering identity, undergraduate research, time and stress management,and
’ confidence in chemistry, engineering andcomputer skills increased as a result of the course. The most significant increases were observedin engineering skills because initial confidence levels in this area were low. A majority ofstudents reported increased interest in STEM fields and 100% of students (during the 2018cohort) reported that increasing their confidence in science, math and engineering contributed tothis intensified interest. This program evaluation reviews the program’s objectives, format,teaching tools, student feedback and plans for future programming and assessment.IntroductionThe need for STEM-educated workers is long-standing and well-established [1, 2]. The USgovernment has responded by encouraging the development of a STEM
peer evaluations, and leading teamwork training sessions. She is currently conducting research on team learning processes in engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Dr. Tom O’Neill, University of Calgary Tom is a Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology and leading expert in the areas of team dy- namics, virtual teams, conflict management
work is part of a larger study exploring the experiences of rural engineering students. Inaddition to investigating the motivations behind rural students’ decisions to pursue engineering,the study explored the formation of engineering identity and barriers rural students face whileentering an engineering community of practice [20]. A sample of the questions developed tospecifically probe the research question of this paper is as follows: • Why did you choose to attend college? • Why did you choose this university? • Why did you choose an engineering major? • What motivates you? • After graduation, do you plan to return to your rural community? Why or why not?Data AnalysisInterviews were recorded and transcribed by a