Paper ID #46658Investigating design canvases impact on student performanceAshley Hockstok, Ohio Northern UniversityDr. Abigail Clark, Ohio Northern University Abigail Clark is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from The Ohio State University. She also holds degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Ohio State and Ohio Northern University. Prior to her time at OSU, she worked at Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education, informal engineering education, and identity
from the PMs during the 2024 year foundthis improvement helped participants to further engage and participate in research meetings.Summary of Good Practices for Engineering Outreach Program EvaluationAs part of the evaluation of the AACRE program during each years’ iteration of the program, thefollowing evaluation good practices were found to help generate rich feedback on the program,both from participants and stakeholders, and proved useful in finding program improvements:Pre-program need-finding and norm setting: ● Implement a survey designed to understand the interests, goals, and needs of the program participants to help inform program content as they on-board - these are also used to evaluate the outcomes and impact of the
Education: The Impact of Complementary Field Activities on Student EngagementAbstractThis Complete Research paper details the design and implementation of the Complementary FieldActivities (CFAs) as an educational framework for engineering first year students that promotessustainability and student engagement, while providing personalization and exploration.Sustainability is a critical global challenge, and shaping future engineers to integrate sustainable practicesis essential for addressing this issue. However, students often face an overwhelming array of educationalopportunities, leading to information overload that can hinder their ability to engage meaningfully withhigh-impact experiences. In an environment where students are constantly
students could use if they chose to pursue a career in VR design. Outside of the classroom, Deniz enjoys going on hikes, playing video games, and spending time on the beach.Yuhui Wang, University of California, Santa Cruz Samantha (Yuhui) Wang is a third-year Physics undergraduate at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her personal academic interest in optics drew her to UCSC’s Social and Emotional Technologies VR lab for research in her first year on campus and she has worked to expand students’ access to Virtual Reality at the university ever since. She believes technology is a tool to support a community and VR, being a new and emerging field, has a lot of potential applications that students can build upon
embedded electromechanical systems. He has also led numerous student teams in grant-funded projects to design such systems for automation and sensing tasks.Dr. Christina R Scherrer, Kennesaw State University Christina Scherrer is a professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the Senior Associate Dean of the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering at Kennesaw State University. Her research interests are in the application of operations research and economic decision analysis to public health, as well as in engineering education. Her research has been funded by NIH, NSF and the CDC. She has advised and published with more than two dozen undergraduate researchers and is committed to development of the STEM
multitude of roles as he continually seeks to savor the joys of teaching and learning from faculty, staff, and students. Crimm earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and is also a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Georgia having been recognized by this GSPE organization in 2019 as the overall ”Engineer of the Year” among the several highly competitive categories such as Education, Private Practice, Industry, Government, etc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-in-Progress: Seeking How to Best Enhance Engineering RPG Rates in a Post-Covid World: from alternative grading techniques to blended
programs and universityoffices dedicated to expose students to research opportunities and support their involvement inthese experiences [24]. Most notably, the Meyerhoff Scholars Program at the University ofMaryland Baltimore County prepares undergraduate students for graduate school throughresearch opportunities, mentoring, and community building programs [25]. This program alonehas produced hundreds of students who chose to pursue advanced degrees in a STEM graduateprogram [25], [26].While undergraduate research is an effective intervention and prepares students for a range offuture opportunities (not just graduate school), many students do not pursue researchopportunities until their junior or senior years. As a result, its impact on the
Paper ID #46631Novice versus Experienced Near-Peer Mentors’ Facilitation of a Discussionwith a Student Avatar Facing Logistical Challenges on a Design TeamPamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has
rigors of STEM education, especially mathematics. He is also involved in various engineering education ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #46731initiatives focusing on the integration of novel technologies into the engineering classroom, and excellencein instruction. His additional research interests include water, and wastewater treatment, stormwatermanagement and pollution control, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025WIP: Evaluating the impact of a cross-disciplinary introductory first
uncertainty quantification to address a diverse set of problems, including reliable aircraft design and AI-assisted discovery of novel materials. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Research as Teaching: On Student Mindset and Voice in a Sustained Collaborative AutoEthnography on Mathematical ModelingAbstractIn this complete research paper, we advocate for a methodology with unique researchaffordances that also serve student mindset development. Mindset is an important element ofstudent development; in particular, metacognition helps students learn more effectively and is akey component of lifelong learning. Theory on reflective practice suggests that key elements ofmetacognition are best
. Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver Dr. Mike Jacobson received his B.S. in Mathematics from the State University of New York @ Stony Brook in 1975. He completed his MS and PhD. In Mathematics at Emory University in 1977 and 1980, respectively. Dr. Jacobson’s mathematics specialization is Graph Theory and Combinatorics. He also has been actively involved in training pre-service and in-service teachers. He joined CU Denver in 2003 as Professor and Chair, after spending 23 years at the University of Louisville as Assistant, Associate and Professor, Chair, as well as Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies. Dr. Jacobson has published over 150 journal, conference, and technical papers. He has been a recipient
, sustainability, and diversity, equity and inclusion.Mrs. Sally Sue Richmond, Penn State Great Valley Sally Sue Richmond is a Lecturer in Information Science at the School of Graduate Professional Studies, Penn State Great Valley. Richmond has a B.A. in Art and an M.S. in Information Science from The Pennsylvania State University. She has 20+ years industry experience in IT. Her research interests are problem-solving, team processes, and mentoring. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Student Mentors and the Engineering Design Process Experience for First Year StudentsIntroductionIn this Work in Progress, we describe the mentoring program
First- Year RetentionAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper focuses on the impact an introductory, makerspacecourse has on engineering student retention. The course, titled Engineering Methods, Tools, &Practice II (ENGR 111), is a requisite for all J.B. Speed School of Engineering first-yearengineering students, features integration and application of institutionally-identifiedfundamental engineering topics (first introduced and practiced in prerequisite EngineeringMethods, Tools, & Practice I), and takes place in a 15,000 square foot facility located on theUniversity of Louisville’s campus. ENGR 111 was inaugurated in the Spring 2017 semester, andprimary course iterations have occurred during
which mayinclude not only other engineers, including those from other engineering disciplines, but alsothose from other functional areas such as marketing, sales, manufacturing, and procurement.While it is not usually feasible to simulate this in a freshman design class, students can beintroduced to the complexity of real engineering problems.Another aspect of ill-structured projects is that the design process is usually both creative anditerative. Designers make their best efforts on the first concept, but if the problem is sufficientlychallenging, they will often find that improvements can and should be made. The number ofiterations is impacted by the time and money available, how fast modifications can be made, andhow close the initial
ABET outcomes selected by the engineering department forthis course. The revised class was piloted in the Fall semester of 2023. For the BS in Engineering, ABET has 7 outcomes which must be achieved to attain orretain accreditation. [7] The program must have documented student outcomes that support theprogram educational objectives. [8,9] Attainment of these outcomes prepares graduates to enterthe professional practice of engineering. For Robert Morris University, the Introduction toEngineering ENGR1010 course is designated to assess outcomes 3, 4a, 4b and 7. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. (a) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering
anincreased interest in calculus, and the course received an overall excellence rating of4.8/5. Written feedback highlights the effectiveness of integrating programming andreal-world applications, making calculus a more intuitive and empowering tool forengineering problem-solving. While direct comparisons with traditional calculuscourses are not yet available, ROB 201 is designed to condense three semesters ofcalculus into a single semester, emphasizing practical applications that preparestudents for elective coursework in Numerical Methods, Optimization, and FeedbackControl.1 Motivation for Reform and Engineering Education Perspective: Why Calculus Needed a Complete Overhaul in 2024The calculus curriculum taught at most universities today
has more than 6 years of professional experience as a practicing engineer, primarily focused on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants. His research interests center on the scholarship of teaching and learning, collaborating with engineering faculty across disciplines to help assess and enhance their teaching practices.Cassie Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Cassie Wallwey is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests center on student-centered and inclusive learning practices and principles including student engagement in learning, feedback and assessment, self-regulation of learning, and
prompt reflection and integration of sociotechnical perspectivesinto every step of the design work students engage in, which requires students to keep thebroader impacts of their work in mind both in the course and beyond the classroom inprofessional practice. To properly understand the development and implementation of the CEQs,background on the course will first be provided.Course HistoryIn 2019, administrators at a large public mid-Atlantic university began a study of their FYEprogram to evaluate whether it was providing students with the skills and knowledge that wouldbe most useful to them in their professional careers. To do so, a survey was sent to engineeringfaculty, university alumni, and employers who had hired university graduates in
, especially undergraduate peer-TAs.Dr. Jutshi Agarwal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Jutshi Agarwal is a Research Scientist at the Department of Engineering Education, University at Buffalo. She received her doctoral degree in Engineering and Computing Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s and Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering. Her primary research areas of interest is in preparing future engineering faculty or teaching professional development of engineering graduate students. She also works in the areas of teaming in engineering classrooms and creating instructional tools for engineering in various contexts and educational settings. She has expertise
who made this programpossible.References [1] J. R. Sablan, “The challenge of summer bridge programs,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1035–1050, 2014. [2] W. C. Lee, C. Brozina, C. T. Amelink, and B. D. Jones, “Motivating incoming engineering students with diverse backgrounds: Assessing a summer bridge program’s impact on academic motivation,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, 2017. [3] L. Lenaburg, O. Aguirre, F. Goodchild, and J.-U. Kuhn, “Expanding pathways: A summer bridge program for community college STEM students,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 153–168, 2012. [4] A. Suzuki, A. Amrein-Beardsley, and N. Perry, “A
Mechanical, Electrical and Computer, Civil and Environmental, EngineeringTechnology, and General Engineering. These programs all share a common core of first yearthrough senior level coursework.Existing First-Year ExperienceThe need for a robust first year program to support first time in college (FTIC) engineeringstudents is well established. Much research has been done in this space over the past twodecades. LeTourneau’s awakening happened around 2009 when school leaders took a hard lookat 6-year graduation rates and calculated a 5-year average of just 42%. An NSF Step grantentitled FIRE, First Year Initiatives for Retention Enhancement, was received beginning in 2010with the goal of raising the 6-year graduation rates to 65% (Neimi et al., 2011
, students (1) designed a data-driven approach to learn about carbon dioxideemissions and (2) planned for the quantitative analysis of decarbonization strategies. The firstpart involved students collecting data from different carbon dioxide sources with an Arduinosensor. Then, they used the data to practice data visualization and analyze the impact of thoseemissions on the environment. The second part involved students estimating the impact thatspecific decarbonization strategies could have in NM. For example, if a student chose thestrategy of switching to all electric vehicles in NM, they would estimate how much carbondioxide could be reduced if that strategy is fully implemented in 2050. Additionally, theyestimated how the strategy might change if
identify the most effectivestrategies for early engineering education.This systematic review will aid educators and curriculum designers by synthesizing existingstudies and providing actionable recommendations for integrating microcontrollers andmicroelectronics into early engineering programs. Froyd et al. (2015) note that systematicreviews translate research insights into practical applications, enhancing curriculum design andinstructional strategies. Anwar et al. (2019) further stress the importance of adherence to SLRguidelines, such as PRISMA, to maintain rigor and credibility. However, several studies lack thislevel of detail, limiting their utility in guiding pedagogical practices. This literature reviewconsolidates the best practices and
graduate level courses). Our university is much the same, with one graduate-level course(Advanced Computer Security) and one upper-division undergraduate-level class related toCybersecurity (Introduction to Computer Security) that is restricted to Engineering majors andhas a sequential string of three prerequisite courses. While there may be more classes on thehorizon, all of these are spearheaded by a single faculty member in response to the growingdemand for cybersecurity professionals.Intro to Hacking Competitions is a 3-unit (9 work-hours per week) course that satisfies a GeneralEducation requirement and is supported by the First Year Design program hosted by our Schoolof Engineering. This program brings professional engineering practice to
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Systems Engineering Approach to Metacognition in a Final Synthesis ProjectAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper examines the implementation of a final synthesisproject within a success skills course for first-year engineering students enrolled in GeneralEngineering Learning Community at Clemson University designed to support students with lowcalculus readiness. The program’s goal is to enhance retention and foster academic andprofessional success by providing holistic support, including a co-enrollment in a professionalskills and learning strategies course. The course focuses on cultivating key habits in students,encompassing professional behaviors
retained. This study addresses the creation,development and implementation of two pilot First Year Seminar (FYS) courses offered college-wide for engineering and computer science students in the 2024 fall and 2025 spring semestersas a high impact practice for student success.Results are promising. Student focus groups, faculty focus groups, pre- and post-course surveysand mid-course progress surveys were conducted to provide insight into student developmentand design effectiveness. Institutional Research at Wright State University produced initialquantitative assessment comparisons during the 2025 spring semester on DFW rates (percentageof students earning a ‘D’ or an ‘F’ or withdrawing compared to the total enrollment), persistence,significance
with students on what future careers in their majors of interest could be. It was also suggested that FYS instructors collaborate with graduating students involved in their capstone design projects, creating an opportunity to introduce first-year students to the scope and impact of culminating team design work. 3. Feedback for Continuous Improvement: Instructors were interested in collecting feedback directly from students around their experiencing using the modules. A pre/post module assessment could be considered to track the impact of content delivery and retention. It was recommended to share this feedback within the FYS Community of Practice and broadly across the COE to benefit a wider community
´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and a Courtesy Affiliate Professor at Universidad EAFIT. He holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. With over 10 years of experience teaching undergraduate and graduate courses, Juan also has more than 6 years of professional experience as a practicing engineer, primarily focused on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants. His research interests center on the scholarship of teaching and learning, collaborating with engineering faculty across disciplines to help assess and
compete for prizes andrecognition such as for innovative design, fabrication achievements and best presentation. Thecompetition event is a high energy celebratory experience open to the public (Fig. 1).Figure 1. An MAE 3 Undergraduate Tutor (left) with students (right) and their robotat the course-wide final robot competition.Through a process of continuous improvement, the popular course has maintained a mixedreputation among students as “being a lot of work!” and as a valuable high impact learningexperience. Students often share with instructors that the course experience provided a solidfoundation in essential hands-on engineering skills and prepared them for advanced coursework,engineering clubs, capstone design and technical careers. The
minority student success." in J.Appl. Res. High. Educ Vol 14.2, pp. 660-678, 2021.[7] B. Bradford, M. Beier and F. Oswald, “A meta-analysis of university STEM summer bridgeprogram effectiveness,” CBE Life Science Education, vol. 20, no. 2, April 2021.[8] K. Kendricks, A. Arment, K. Nudunuri, C. Lowell, “Aligning best practices in studentsuccess and career preparedness: an exploratory study to establish pathways to stem careers forundergraduate minority students,” in J. Res. Technol. Careers., vol. 3, no. 1, January 2019.[9] L. Cancado, J. R. Reisel, and C. M. Walker, “Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program inEngineering on Student Retention and Graduation”, in Journal of STEM Education: Innovationsand Research, vol. 19, no. 2, Jun. 2018.[10] J. R