Engineering Education, 2025 Validating a Data-Driven Approach to Scheduling Office HoursAbstractIn this complete evidence-based practice paper, we will present our analysis of student use ofoffice hours in a large introductory computer programming course and how we have used thisdata to best staff office hours for this large course in a way that is accessible and beneficial to ourstudents.For students beginning their foray into the wider world of engineering, hands-on programmingexperience is invaluable to developing an intuition for technical problem solving. As such,ensuring that resources like office hours are as accessible to the student population of a first-yearprogramming course as possible is imperative, especially in larger courses
Paper ID #48142Critical Thinking (Mis)conceptions of First-Year Engineering StudentsMr. Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University Lance White is a Lecturer for Frist-Year Engineering in Engineering and Academic Student Affairs at Texas A&M University. He is also a Ph.D. candidate at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a thrust in Engineering Education. He has worked as a graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station and remains a collaborator. His M.S. is in Nuclear Engineering with a focus in
-long academic student success intervention program.This comparative quantitative study will compare their overall cumulative GPAs withengineering students who did not participate in the program. The program's participants attendthe same institution, majoring in computer science, computer engineering, electrical engineering,mechanical engineering, bioengineering, or industrial and systems engineering. Results from thispreliminary study will prompt conversations regarding best practices and interventions that mayaid in student success for mid-range engineering students and will provide direction regardingfuture more comprehensive studies regarding this intervention program.Introduction and Literature Review OverviewThis is a works in progress
Paper ID #47640The Power of Movement: Exploring Gestures as Tools for Engineering StudentsConceptualizing StatisticsMr. Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Junior Anthony Bennett is a Graduate Research Assistant and Lynn Fellow at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. He is pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and Engineering (ESE). His research focus is the ’Impact of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies on Learning’. He worked for over a decade in higher education and held multiple positions of responsibilities
discusses the importance of teamwork in undergraduate education. As Teamwork is acritical skill that employers seek in new graduates, especially within STEM fields wherecollaboration is often essential. College students, particularly in STEM programs, are required towork in teams early on, allowing them to develop these skills and become competent teamplayers before entering the workforce. For computer science students, who often work in group-based learning environments, teamwork plays a vital role in fostering not only technical skillsbut also interpersonal and intercultural competencies. The main objective of this research is toexplore the relationship between three key variables: teamwork regulation, effectiveness, andtheir impact on the
, anxiety, and mental health issues have been linked to lower academicperformance [13], [19]. Consequently, various interventions have been implemented to supportthe development of metacognition, time management, and wellbeing among first-year students. Structured academic programs like first-year seminars promote metacognitivedevelopment by encouraging students to reflect on their learning strategies and adjust themaccordingly [20]. Moreover, Cunningham and colleagues [21] demonstrated that incorporatingreflective exercises into engineering curricula improved students’ ability to self-regulate andadapt their learning strategies. Additionally, a community of practice was also proposed by [17]to develop a space for researchers focused on
. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) framework encourages K–12 educators to integrate engineering concepts alongside scientific practices by incorporatingmodel development, problem-based investigations, and iterative design processes [1, 4, 5]. Atleast 41 states have adopted engineering knowledge and skills into their educational standards.While Carr et al. [2] provided a baseline for engineering's inclusion in K–12 standards, theimplementation and impact on student learning remain underexplored. The degree to whichinstructional approaches are consistently applied across different school systems is unknown, asengineering integration varies widely between districts and states.Without such established baseline experiences, institutions
’ effectiveness in introducing thetopics. Additionally, validated instruments were used to measure the impact on students’ sense ofbelonging and identity in bioengineering. Finally, self-reflection allowed for an examination ofthe learning process.IntroductionThis Complete Evidence Based Practice paper describes how hands-on experiential learning canbe utilized in an introductory engineering course to teach complex topics and introduce practicesthat help students feel a sense of identity and belonging to the field. Bioengineering is amultidisciplinary field of students and researchers with diverse backgrounds, academicexperiences, and skills. Because the field encompasses so many concepts, techniques, andapplications from other engineering disciplines as