eye, see how they fit within that picture. For thosewho felt that they fit the engineering mold, an uncanny confidence came through when theywould define what engineering is and how they saw themselves in engineering. The opposite wasfound for those who did not fit the mold or believed themselves not to. “Um, the reason why I wanna become an engineer, um, just basically be able to use creativity towards exploration where I can actually feel like I'm actually using my mind and my creativity. Not just sitting down, doing office work being a robot, you know, I just wanna basically be part of the future. Just like, uh, Okay. I'll just say, just my personal thing. Um, I just feel like it's part of the future where
belongingness in early careerelectrical and computer engineering students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no.3,pp. 165-172, 2019.[23] R Core Team, “R: A language and environment for statistical computing,” Vienna, Austria:R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022. https://www.R-project.org/. APPENDIXTable A.1: Survey items used to measure engineering/computing identity (adapted from [12])Q16. The following questions use the term "engineer" to refer to all majors in Miami's College ofEngineering and Computing, including computer science. Please keep your major in mind whenanswering the questions. (Response categories: Strongly disagree (1); Somewhat disagree (2);Neither agree nor disagree (3
Paper ID #40978Introducing the Engineering Design Process to First-Year Students with aProject Focused on Offshore Wind EnergyProf. Gordon Stewart, Roger Williams University Dr. Gordon M. Stewart, holding a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, has a background in engineering education and renewable energy research. Currently serving as a Visiting Assistant Professor at Roger Williams University in Bristol, Rhode Island, his teaching spans various engineering courses and disciplines and includes mentoring engineering senior design teams. Dr. Stewart’s research focuses on offshore
during pre-college visits and on the university website. It was a stated outcome of theprevious versions of the course and became firmly entrenched in the minds of faculty andstudents [2], [3]. The coordinators deliberately left out opportunities for students to exploredifferent engineering disciplines in the redesign. The previous version of the course had becomedisjointed with a variety of topics (including the disciplinary explorations) that eroded theunifying purpose in the eyes of students. Therefore the redesign focused exclusively on the fouracademic outcomes stated previously and omitted topics that were not directly relevant to theseoutcomes. The coordinators were aware of the tension from the beginning and observed thefollowing after
Paper ID #38349Work in Progress: Insight into the strengths and personality types ofthose involved in a first-year engineering programDr. Melissa M. Simonik, State University of New York, Binghamton Melissa received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Union College (Schenectady, NY) in 2014 and her M.Eng. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) in 2015. Melissa started at Binghamton University in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering doctoral student. She served as a teaching assistant (TA) for Watson Capstone Projects for two years. She continued as a TA for the Engi- neering Design Division in
statistician who can present statistical results in lay language. She is also a storyteller through data visualization. She earned her PhD in Educational Research and Evaluation from Ohio University. During her PhD, she served as a Graduate Associate in the Statistics and Research Lab, which allowed her to practice consulting with students on their doctoral dissertations in the field of Education, especially in research design and statistical analyses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining Timely Positive Interventions Utilized by First-Year Students to Improve their Course Grades in Science and Engineering Kim, S., Forney, A., Cappelli, C., Doezema, L. A., Morales, V. C., and
such as mechanical andcivil engineering [1]. The tools of the engineer in students’ minds are often closer to a hammer ora wrench rather than a test tube or beaker, and thus their conception of engineering is oftenlimited at best [1]. This can get further complicated by the lack of interdisciplinarity exemplifiedin the engineering classroom. When engineering instruction is scaled at the university level, thereis the potential to lose interdisciplinarity as well as too much emphasis on limited topics relevantto the field of engineering [2]. When this happens, the curriculum may revert to limiting thecurriculum to the most popular images of engineering, fields such as mechanical, civil, andcomputer engineering [1].The goal of this work is to
Paper ID #37285A systematic review of pedagogical tools, learning goals, andparticipation strategies for high-achieving engineering and STEM studentsDr. Joseph A. Lyon, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Joseph A. Lyon is a lecturer in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. He received a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, an M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a B.S. in Bioengineering. His research has focused on the use of models and modeling, programming, and computational thinking within undergraduate contexts.Dr. Jacqueline Callihan Linnes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Jacqueline
of usinggenerative AI for learning upon arriving at an engineering school. Therefore, when designinglearning experiences with generative AI for undergraduate engineering students, especially intheir first year, we need to be mindful of the gap that can exist between the perceptions held fromtheir K-12 education and those that engineering communities hold.Tinkering as a creative and improvisational approach to design problems has been studied asvaluable for learning engineering [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. It supports active and playfulexploration and constructing knowledge of materials and tools. Learning environments designedwith tinkering allow young people to have control over tools [18] and explore new paths and newpossibilities
Paper ID #41069Student-Generated Infographics and Videos for Learning about ProfessionalObligations and the Impact of Engineering on SocietyLawrence R. Chen, McGill University Lawrence R. Chen received a BEng in electrical engineering and mathematics from McGill University and an MASc and PhD in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Toronto. He is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at McGill University and is the Academic Lead and Faculty Scholar of the Enhancing Learning and Teaching in Engineering (ELATE) initiative in the Faculty of Engineering. His research interests
. The studyreveals that these first-year instructors' deep understanding of subject-specific contentsignificantly influences their pedagogical approaches. The dynamic interplay between personalPCK and classroom context emerges as a crucial factor, with these instructors tailoring theirpractices to align with both their teaching styles and student needs. Moreover, these instructors'beliefs and prior experiences act as filters or amplifiers for their classroom practices. Thisresearch provides valuable insights for current and future first-year engineering instructors,guiding them on leveraging content expertise, balancing personal PCK with classroom dynamics,and being mindful of the beliefs shaping instructional practices. As engineering
Paper ID #42461Designing Good Practices for Recruitment, Admissions, and Program Structureof Engineering Outreach Programs to Increase Access for Marginalized andNon-Traditional Higher Education StudentsDr. Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University Dr. Sonia Travaglini specializes in the intersection of engineering and learning, and is an educator passionate about new technologies and collaboration. Sonia also enjoys supporting engineering outreach with local community colleges and schools.Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received
Paper ID #38810Work in Progress: Cultivating Reflective Engineers: Does providing areflective ePortfolio experience in a first-year design course leadstudents to be more reflective in later courses?Dr. Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University Rebecca Thomas is the inaugural director for the Pathways Program at Bucknell University, where she oversees the rollout of Bucknell’s E-Portfolio initiative. She is also an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering since 2018 and currently instructs the first-year course for ECE majors. She holds a B.S. and M.Eng. in Electrical Engineering from
Paper ID #39389”I haven’t really made those connections that maybe most would theirfirst year”: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic and studentsocial capital among 3 Cohorts of first-year engineering majors.Dr. Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Hill is an applied sociologist, evaluator, and researcher whose primary scholarship is in gender, STEM and broadening participation in K-22 education and in professorate.Dr. Lance C. P´erez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Lance C. P´erez is the Omar H. Heins Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln where he
application of math and science, we mustprepare engineering students to carry out their work with these responsibilities in mind. One wayto do so is implementation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) which cultivates the significanceof curiosity, making connections, and creating value. An EM promotes information gathering,inter-topic connection making, and constant valuation of an engineer’s product or service and theways in which it supports society. While an EM appears business venture-centered at firstglance, its support and application in the engineering classroom has been growing due to itsrelevance to the role engineers play today [8], [9]. For example, corporations have been callingon higher institutions to graduate more global engineers that
engineering majors and others persistthrough completing the degree [3].Numerous studies have proved the link between a strong sense of engineering identity andsuccess in the field [4]. This ties directly into retention rates as students who see their ownvalidity in engineering disciplines are more likely to stay in undergraduate engineering programs[9]. With this in mind, some universities have tried to increase retention rates by creating spacesfor students to do what we’ve termed, “make.” Dougherty’s [5] universally accepted definitionof “making” encompasses traditional trades like woodworking, sewing, and soldering with moremodern activities including coding, 3D-printing, and laser cutting [6]. Our definition of“making” is similar, but
Paper ID #38507Work in Progress: Knowing Our First-year Students, Meeting Them WhereThey Are, and Supporting Them for SuccessDr. Kathleen A Harper, Case Western Reserve University Kathleen A. Harper is the assistant director of the Roger E. Susi First-year Engineering Experience at Case Western Reserve University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from CWRU and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University.Dr. Kurt R. Rhoads, Case Western Reserve University Kurt R. Rhoads, Ph.D., P.E. is the faculty director of the Roger E. Susi First-Year Engineering Experience
(KEEN) for contributing to this work.One way that educators have eased the infusion of aspects of entrepreneurship education intoundergraduate engineering curriculum is through Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML). Forthis work, we use KEEN’s approach that focuses on attributes of the “Entrepreneurial Mindset”(EM) [3]. Broadly speaking, we define EM as a collection of mental habits that empower one toquestion, adapt, and make positive change that engineers possess and leverage in theirprofessional work. This mindset is applicable for engineers broadly, not only in the context ofentrepreneurial ventures and starting new companies.The increased integration of EM has pushed universities to evaluate its impact. While othershave developed holistic
first-year engineering coursesmight also provide new pathways for transforming curricula aimed at educating the 21st-centuryengineer [14].Mental Health and Wellbeing (MHW) has been attributed to student success in higher education.While engineering undergraduates and their faculty agree on the need for improveddissemination of information, students desire a broader scope, including information relating tocourses and hands-on experiences [15]. Mindfulness training can support the development ofintrapersonal and interpersonal competencies that transfer directly into supporting students'engineering education experience as well as their personal lives [16].Inclusion and a sense of belonging matter as well. Creating learning communities for
Paper ID #42092GIFTS: Improved Team Skill Development through a Semester-Long TeamworkReportDr. Melissa M. Simonik, State University of New York at Binghamton Melissa received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Union College (Schenectady, NY) in 2014 and her M.Eng. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) in 2015. Melissa started at Binghamton University in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering doctoral student. She served as a teaching assistant (TA) for Watson Capstone Projects for two years. She continued as a TA for the Engineering Design Division in 2017 where she taught both Introduction to
these areas, creating a challenging environment particularly forunderrepresented engineering students. To combat this issue, a video and activities weredeveloped to emphasize teamwork and inclusion. The video was created by two students whohad taken the course in the previous year. It presented background information, mindful teachingabout inclusion, some discussion of the students’ personal experiences in the course, and anintroduction to the activities. The three activities that were developed were (1) a communicationgame, which allowed students to practice clear and respectful communication, (2) a teamworkand collaboration game, which aimed to show that each member of a team had somethingvaluable to contribute, and (3) a reflection and
design thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and communication skills (visual,written, and oral) that are necessary for success in engineering and computer science disciplines.The Common Threads: Course ThemesThe design of an introductory engineering course – broadly defined as a course thatencompasses multiple majors, acclimates new students to a university learning environment, andintroduces them to the broader field of engineering –has been explored at many institutions. Suchcourses have been designed with specific outcomes in mind, such as improving student skills inengineering problem solving and teamwork [1], integrating real-world engineering challengesinto the curriculum [2], and community building [3][4]. In many cases, multiple
Paper ID #37248Exploring Transformative Learning from a Summer Bridge ProgramMs. Sukeerti Shandliya, University of Cincinnati Sukeerti Shandliya is a doctoral student in Engineering and Computing Education and a GRA in the De- partment of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. Her research interests include engineering workforce development, DEI in STEM, experiential learning, development of global competencies and cultural competencies in higher education and the workforce. She has completed her bachelor’s in Electronics and Communications Engineering from Banasthali University, India
Paper ID #42689Ill-Structured Design Challenges in First-Year CoursesMadalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoProf. Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico Dr. Anjali Mulchandani is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of New Mexico. She leads the Environmental Resource Sustainability group, which studies themes related to environmental and water resources engineering, atmospheric water harvesting, waste-to-energy technologies, and environmental remediation. Her work integrates and highlights science communication and community needs-based
Paper ID #42204Engagement in Practice: The Development of Skills and Competencies throughCommunity Outreach ActivitiesProf. Rodrigo Cutri, Maua Institute of Techonology Cutri holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from Maua Institute of Technology (2001), MSc (2004) ˜ Paulo. He is currently Titular Professor and Ph.D. (2007) in Electrical Engineering - University of SA£o of Maua Institute of Technology, Professor of theDr. Hector Alexandre Chaves Gil, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Physical Chemistry PhD by Universidade of S˜ao Paulo - USP, MSc degree and
Paper ID #37951The Grand Challenges Scholars Program Research Experience: A GreatOpportunity to Cultivate Belonging in a Community of PracticeDr. Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Olgha B. Qaqish, Ph.D. is an engineering educator and researcher, who has experience working with students at all levels in science, math, engineering, and technology (STEM). Dr. Qaqish is an author of a mathematics textbook: Algebra Essentials.Chloe Grace Hincher, North Carolina State University Chloe Hincher is an undergraduate pursuing a B.S. in Biomedical and Health Sciences Engineering con- centrating in
Paper ID #37368Reading participation and assessment of spreadsheet skills acrossmultiple cohorts when using an interactive textbookSamantha YanoskoGrant ValentineProf. Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. From 2005 to 2015, he served on the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines. In 2018, he served as an Erskine Fellow at the Uni
sense of belonging at the engineering college and provides a platformwhere students can communicate their identity, or express themselves as engineers, to a body oflike-minded peers.Next, receiving mentorship is thought to help keep students engaged with their community andpushes them to realize best practices for success. In this interaction, it is believed that first yearstudents begin to form a stronger sense of being an engineering or STEM major, and this identityis co-constructed with their mentor. Then, the transition to becoming a mentor in theirsophomore year acts like a promotion where these students provide help rather than receive it.This transition is thought to also help mentors maintain best practices because they are facedwith
Conceptions of Modeling and Modeling Uses in Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 2014.[3] J. B. Ärlebäck and H. M. Doerr, “Students’ interpretations and reasoning about phenomena with negative rates of change throughout a model development sequence,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 187–200, Apr. 2018.[4] M. D. Lammi and C. D. Denson, “Modeling as an Engineering Habit of Mind and Practice,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017.[5] “573 Small Panel Air Circulator”. Vornado. https://www.vornado.com/shop/circulators- fans/small/573-compact-circulator (accessed Feb. 19, 2023).[6] Rosenthal. J. “Comparative Tests on Pressure Drop of HVAC
Paper ID #41613GIFTS: Incorporating Bio-Inspiration into First-Year DesignDr. Danielle Grimes, Cornell CollegeDr. Niloofar Kamran, Cornell College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 GIFTS - Incorporating Bio-Inspiration into First Year DesignIntroductionThe purpose of our first-year engineering course is to introduce students to the ABET sevenstudent outcomes: 1) an ability to solve problems (utilizing computer-aided design) 2) an abilityto apply engineering design 3) an ability to communicate effectively 4) an ability to applyprofessional ethics 5) an ability to work effectively in teams 6) an ability