hardware—typically acamera—and software—typically control code or other image processing operations—thatinterprets information from an image to inform decisions in many different applications [1].These applications include—but are not limited to—manufacturing processes, control ofautonomous vehicles, and medical imaging. With the advent of self-driving vehicles and othersimilar technologies, students are becoming increasingly familiar with consumer uses formachine vision. In turn, the application of machine vision in various engineering disciplines isbecoming increasingly apparent to student; thus, the perceived utility of creating a machinevision system in a project-based learning environment may be motivating to students [2].Previous work
Paper ID #41583Early Design Sprint Impact on Engineering Identity and EntrepreneurialMindset in the First YearDr. Kathleen Bieryla, University of Portland Kathleen Bieryla is an associate professor of biomedical and mechanical engineering in the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland.Dr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of Portland Shaghayegh (Sherry) Abbasi received her B.S. in electrical engineering from Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, Iran. She continued her education in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department of the University of Washington where she received her M.S. in 2007 in
education- ally based research projects with an emphasis on statistical analyses and big data. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Use of Transfer Student Capital in Engineering and STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review1. Introduction This complete research paper presents a systematic literature review that synthesizes theuse of Laanan’s theory of transfer student capital in postsecondary vertical college transfers,specifically focusing on use in engineering and Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) education [1]. The motivation for this research stems from a need to betterunderstand the theory of transfer student capital, which
. Natasha Mallette is a licensed professional engineer with expertise in engineering education focusing on effective curricular design, inclusive teamwork, and social justice. She has over 6 years of work experience as a design, process and research engineer in nuclear energy, renewable technologies, and various manufacturing facilities. In 2020, she received the OSU Breaking Barriers in Education Award, which recognizes high impact in teaching, mentoring, and advancing gender equity in higher education. She is fluent in the fields of energy, chemical processes, and engineering design and is currently the Director of Engineering+, the College of Engineering’s first year experience program
-367, 2000.[6] L. Hausmann, J. Schofield and R. Woods, "Sense of Belonging as a Predictor of Intentions to Persist among African American and White First-Year College Students," Research in Higher Education, pp. 803-839, 2007.[7] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[8] E. Tate and M. Linn, "How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5/6, pp. 483-493, 2005.[9] L. Nadelson, I. Villanueva, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, K. Youmans, S. Lanci and C. Lenhart, "Knowledge in the making: what engineering students are learning in the makerspaces.," in ASEE
& Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. is research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology used in the classroom.Mr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nick Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at
] or local high schools [17].Ambitious institutions have developed assistive technologies [18], constructed low-costgreenhouses [19], and designed affordable (sustainable, aesthetically-pleasing, functional)housing [20]. One program created learning communities: cohorts of students that attended thesame classes, lived in the same dormitories, and participated in the same service-learningactivities [21]. By practicing engineering outside of the classroom -- by solving problems forreal people -- students learn to weight constraints, evaluate feasibility, develop specifications,and prototype solutions which are very practical. Also, there are few other educationalexperiences which foster such a deep sense of purpose and such a high degree of
-year instructors could apply more specific instructions orintervention to ensure student projects are completed on time.References[1] A. C. Edmondson and I. M. Nembhard, "Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits," Journal of product innovation management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123- 138, 2009.[2] R. R. Reilly, G. S. Lynn, and Z. H. Aronson, "The role of personality in new product development team performance," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 39- 58, 2002.[3] N. Sivasubramaniam, S. J. Liebowitz, and C. L. Lackman, "Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta‐analytic review," Journal of Product Innovation
. 50, no. 6, pp. 903–933, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1518/001872008X375009.[14] J. N. Cummings and M. R. Haas, “So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 316–341, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1002/job.777.[15] S. Reeves et al., “A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39,” Med. Teach., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 656–668, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663.[16] J. Long, A. R. Rajabzadeh, and A. MacKenzie, “TEACHING TEAMWORK TO ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SELF- REFLECTION AND ACKNOWLEDGING DIVERSITY IN TEAMS,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.24908
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and a Visiting Professor of Engineering at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colombia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Cassondra Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cassie Wallwey, PhD is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include studying effective
Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 122–147. 1982.[15] P. McClure and A. Rodriguez, Factors related to advanced course-taking patterns, persistence in science technology engineering and mathematics, and the role of out-of- school time programs: A literature review, New York, NY: The Coalition for Science After School.2007.[16] J. Ma, Pender, M.; Welch, M., (2016). Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. The College Board.[17] CSO – STEM Exploration Experience for Kids (SEEK). 2022. Vanderbilt University. [Online] Available https://vupace.vanderbilt.edu/public/category/programStream.do?method=load&sele ctedProgramAreaId=1317740&selectedProgramStreamId
Paper ID #41539Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Students in a First-Year Engineering DesignCourse: Identity, Self-Efficacy, and ExperiencesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and the Director for the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program houses both an undergraduate IDE degree accredited under the ABET EAC General criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Dr. Bielefeldt conducts research on engineering ethics
Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging students in the STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Catalyzing Sociotechnical Thinking
Paper ID #43414Work in Progress: A Novel Two-Semester Course Sequence that IntegratesEngineering Design, Sociotechnical Skills, Career Development, and AcademicAdvisingDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that examine social and ethical aspects of technology and engineering practice.Dr. Keith Andrew Williams, University of Virginia Born in Georgia, USA; moved shortly thereafter to Jordan and then to southern Africa, including Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Botswana, and South Africa, attending local/native
how thecomfort levels towards additive manufacturing and three-dimensional modeling changed initiallythrough only a group project and then secondly through both a group and individual project.Previous WorkIn the context of academic settings, makerspaces serve as shared learning hubs that providestudents with open access to technology and tools for hands-on making, prompting creativecollaboration, and innovative exploration [4, 5]. Making these opportunities in a single locationwidely accessible to an academically diverse campus is crucial to the development of engineers.Thus, the arrival of academic makerspaces on college campuses indicates an importantadvancement in the field of engineering design education [2]. Through their use
contexts is in generating the correct prompt, to assure that the technology willrespond as expected by the teacher. Prompt engineering can be described as a combination of AI,linguistics, and UX [18]. One of the possible frameworks to craft efficient prompts is CLEAR, a5 components model depicted in Table 1, that stands for Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive,and Reflective [19].Table 1. CLEAR framework for prompt engineering Model Component Description C Concise Prompts must be short and have clarity on what they state L Logical Prompts must be structured and coherent E Explicit Prompts must clearly specify inputs and outputs A Adaptive
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education focuses oneducating future generations to be successful in their professions. A decline in STEMproficiency has been reported in America, leading to significant regression from its position asa global leader in math and science. Debbie Myers, general manager of DiscoveryCommunications in STEM Diversity Symposium concluded: "International comparisons placethe U.S. in the middle of the pack globally." For the United States to achieve a competitiveadvantage, there is a need to encourage young people to develop a passion for learning andspecifically encourage minorities and females to pursue STEM careers [1]. Another report named "Rising above the Gathering Storm" indicated that the U.S. is
expertise extends to facilitating workshops and training sessions, catering to the needs of both staff and students within Purdue University.Dr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He was formerly a Research Tutor at OCMS, Oxford, and formerly a Research Fellow at the Oxford Centre for
Paper ID #44393Work in Progress: Teaching Engineering Students to Self-Transform: Parallelismsbetween Product Innovation and Student Career Path PlanningDr. Noe Vargas Hernandez, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Noe Vargas Hernandez researches creativity and innovation in engineering design. He studies ideation methods, journaling, smartpens, and other methods and technology to aid designers improve their creativity levels. He also applies his research to the desDr. Javier Ortega, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Javier A. Ortega is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the
and a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. His research interests include geotechnical engineering, column-supported embankments, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Developing a Foundational Engineering Course to Improve Students’ Sense of Belonging and Increase DiversityAbstractThis work in progress paper addresses the national imperative to promote involvement inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields across all ethnicities, races,genders, and economic backgrounds. The United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) developeda Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategic Plan in 2021, which includes an objective
Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, (3), pp. 280-301, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2001253[3] F. S. Carracedo et al, “Competency Maps: an Effective Model to Integrate Professional Competencies Across a STEM Curriculum,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 27, (5), pp. 448-468, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9735-3[4] D. L. Linvill, M. Tallapragada and N. B. Kaye, “Training Future Engineers to Become Better Communicators: The Effects of Engineering-specific Communication Courses on Student Attitudes and Identity,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] S. C. Petersen et al, “Mini-Review - Teaching Writing in the Undergraduate
college engineering technology programs [29]. Perhapsthe most ambitious, mature, and successful effort at contextualized math instruction forengineering can be found in the Wright State Engineering Mathematics model, which introducescore calculus concepts in the context of engineering applications in an introductory course taughtby engineering faculty before the students complete their formal mathematics courses [30] [31].This approach has been extended to an earlier preparatory course focused on algebra conceptsthat has also shown promising results in terms of degree attainment by students who wereinitially underprepared [32] and has been adapted by several other engineering colleges [33][34], including versions focused on precalculus-level
aCharrette construction design method to develop a multiple stakeholders-focused course. Duringthe next months we will analyze the overall dropout numbers since the workshop course wasimplemented and the 10 previous years, including the feedback of last-year students whoparticipated in the workshop their first semester.Background/FrameworkFor several years, there has been a lot of research focused on how to increase and maintain thenumber of graduates from higher education studies in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM). One of the main reasons for this is because graduates of this field help acountry to stay competitive, improve the global economy through greater innovation andtechnology, create jobs and improve [10], [12], [13
construction in STEM learning spaces.Dr. Ethan E. Danahy, Tufts University Dr. Ethan Danahy is a Research Associate Professor at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) with secondary appointment in the Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging students in the STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative
Paper ID #42461Designing Good Practices for Recruitment, Admissions, and Program Structureof Engineering Outreach Programs to Increase Access for Marginalized andNon-Traditional Higher Education StudentsDr. Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University Dr. Sonia Travaglini specializes in the intersection of engineering and learning, and is an educator passionate about new technologies and collaboration. Sonia also enjoys supporting engineering outreach with local community colleges and schools.Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received
Ruengvirayudh, P.AbstractThis Complete Research paper will address the timely interventions the first-year science andengineering students used at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) to reverse their initialstruggles, measured by an early alert and/or midterm deficiency, to improved course grades.First-year undergraduate students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) disciplines face many challenges, including (1) transition and adjustment from highschool to college, (2) time management skills with academic, personal, and socialresponsibilities, and (3) addressing different levels of preparation for their STEM classes. Toaddress the struggles that the students face, the First-Year Advising Committee (FYAC) at LMUconducted a
engineering education focusing on effective curricular design, inclusive teamwork, and social justice. She is the Director of Engineering+, the College of Engineering’s first year program at Oregon State University. Engineering+ [link webpage] combines three foundational engineering courses, co-curricular opportunities, career and industry development skills to enhance the success of our first year and transfer students. In addition to her 10 years in higher education, she has over 6 years of work experience as a design, process and research engineer in nuclear energy, renewable technologies, and various manufacturing facilities. In 2020, she received the OSU Breaking Barriers in Education Award, which recognizes high
andtechnical knowledge. For example, student outcomes specified by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) include the following [4], [5]: generating engineering solutions that meet specified needs and with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, communicating effectively to different audiences, recognizing ethical and professional responsibilities when faced with engineering situations and resolving any dilemmas while accounting for the impact of solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts, and functioning effectively in a multi-disciplinary team.A
solicitation of the College of Engineering in 2020 and a three-yearredesign was undertaken and completed in Fall 2023 with its third iteration.This paper assesses how the redesign achieved the initial goals and how its delivery reflects thedesired characteristics. Four course outcomes were adopted: 1) Develop creative solutions byapplying engineering design, math, science, and data analysis, 2) Construct an effectiveprototype or model using technology and tools, 3) Demonstrate improved power skills(communication, teamwork, information literacy, professionalism), and 4) Employ NSPE Codeof Ethics to examine case studies and extrapolate for other situations. In terms of the courseoutcomes, this paper describes how students self-assessed their achievement
. is research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology used in the classroom. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessing Various Pedagogical Features of Remote Versus In-Person Iterations of a First- Year Engineering Makerspace CourseAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper is a follow-up to an ASEE 2022 conference proceeding thatwas focused on the challenges in development, in addition to resulting student perceptions upondelivery, of a remote iteration (Spring 2021, due to the COVID-19 pandemic) of a conventionallyhands-on, active learning-based makerspace course; of