Preferences and/or interests (n = 9) STEM Family members (n = 4) Career path (n = 3) 8 Information before College preparation course (n = 3) coming to college Confidence in choosing a major (n = 2) Short videos regarding important topics and resources in college (n = 1)Results and Discussion(1) Challenges/StrugglesWhen students were asked to identify personal challenges and struggles they faced in the firsthalf of the fall semester, students discussed academic, personal, and
excited about their future careers and being in theengineering department” (Louis). A second SEL reflected that “I think continuing this work ofsupporting students and increasing awareness of resources/ gender and financial inequality andbuilding a welcoming community will be crucial” (Anna).It was also clear from interviews and journal entries that student mentors took the job and theirroles in the space seriously. These shared sentiments resulted in the SELs developing strongrelationships with each other as they considered themselves a “team.” As one SEL says “myfellow SEL members are great people I can work with, and I feel like I can speak my thoughtsand do my job without any environmental setbacks.” (Louis) They supported one another in
hindrance to Ella’s engineering identity development.Referring back to our pathway from Figure 1, The first step is that these three students come tothis school with an already well-established engineering interest in making. Looking at thesestudents’ beliefs of what an engineer does, we can make the claim that these students chooseengineering because they already like to do what they think engineers do for a career. Anne,Bob, and Projector Man all believe that in essence, engineers are problem solvers. When askedinterest prompts in the interviews such as, “Tell me about why you pursued engineeringcoursework this semester,” and, “What do you like about your engineering class this semester,”all three of their answers tie back to the problem solving
in first-yearstudents [24]. The improvement observed in this case in the first year could lead to an overallimprovement in the student’s engineering identity throughout their undergraduate career. Figure 2: Median scores for pre and post-service-learning project (n=77). Error bars represent quartiles, and asterisks (*) indicate significance (p<0.05).Engineering Identity Pre, Post Service-Learning Project, and Post first semester sophomore yearThere was a significant change in the construct of recognition (p=0.003) over the three timepoints throughout the study (Figure 3). Post hoc analysis indicated a significant differencebetween Pre and Post 1 time points (p=0.009), again indicating there was an improvement inrecognition of
Agarwal, University of Cincinnati Jutshi Agarwal is a Doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati P.K. Imbrie is the Head and Professor of the Department of Engineering & Computing Education and a Professor in the Department of
. Development includesintroduction to the fields of engineering and engineering technology, career planning, developmentof a community of learners, critical thinking, problem solving skills for lifelong learning, and ethicaland professional behavior. (CPP College of Engineering "First Year Experience" 2017)ABET Student Outcomes:(3) Communicate Effectively(2) an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental,and economic factors(4) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in
collaboration and engagement, each lecture now contains at least two active learning interventions. These are typically performed in small local groups using collaboration tools including shared google docs, accessed via links on LMS and QR codes. In this way, students could join in and participate from any device. Example: Create a Google Jamboard to Describe one Engineering Discipline: Students explore various engineering disciplines in groups of 5 students, typically from different engineering majors. Through this activity, students learn about each other’s engineering disciplines, while researching important aspects of engineering projects and careers. On the jamboards, students can use text boxes, pictures, or any other visual
Paper ID #40298Work in Progress: A Case Study on Large-Course First-Year EngineeringDesign ProjectsDr. Mark Jeunnette, University of Auckland Dr. Jeunnette is the Director of Engineering Design at the University of Auckland. His early career included engineering work in the automotive industry, engineering education, design consulting, and international development before completing his PhD in remote sensing for small-plot agriculture. His interests include engineering design education, aerial remote sensing for agriculture and the environment, image processing, and international development.Enrique del Rey Castillo
respond to nine different motivational factors and rankthe top three they considered when deciding on what career to pursue. The interest factor wasranked first by the majority of the students, and was present in the top three for the highestpercentage of students. Another J. B. Speed School of Engineering study [18], focusedexclusively on the effects of interest in engineering on first-year retention, found that out of thetop three factors influencing students’ decisions to study engineering (i.e., interest inengineering, job availability, and good pay), interest in engineering was the only constructspecified as a reason students drop-out of the school of engineering. In addition, first-year J. B.Speed School of Engineering students were
engineering as a career field andthe term project. They are shown examples of successful bio-inspired designs and encouraged tobrainstorm potential solutions/designs independently before being assigned teams. An instructorfrom the library also visits during this week to show searching capabilities through ourinstitutional library. The week concludes with 7-10 minute presentations where the students arechallenged to prove that they have identified a problem and that their bio-inspiration cangenerate a potential solution.Week 2Prototype design and experimentation. During this week, students are educated on the differentvariable types (control, independent, and dependent) and different research study design types.During class time, students are
average in additive manufacturing and three-dimensionalmodeling at the start of the semester than those with STEM AP courses. Nevertheless, this gapremained statistically insignificant throughout the semester (as denoted by * in Table 7). Onehypothesis for this observation is that curriculums without STEM AP courses available had morehands-on experiential learning opportunities available, thus increasing the student’s overallcomfort via a hands-on learning approach. Another hypothesis could be that schools without APcourses may communicate career options differently than those schools with AP courses and thusstudents at these schools feel more compelled to explore hands-on opportunities. A more detailedunderstanding of the student’s secondary
need for academicsuccess in the engineering curriculum.With nation-wide graduation rates for engineering still holding steady around 50%, engineeringeducators and advisors are seeking ways to improve student retention and graduation. Studieshave identified several factors that drive students to leave engineering including classroomclimate, self-confidence/self-efficacy, academic preparedness, career interests, race and gender,and academic success (i.e., grades and conceptual knowledge,) [1].Math has long been considered the major academic “hurdle” in engineering study. In a previousstudy, we explored the pass and graduation rates of our freshman engineering cohort based onmath courses [2]. But, other challenging core requirements in science
at survey results, demographic data, and standardized test scores. Thisis important as finding a way to identify at-risk students at the beginning of the semester, such thatthey can be pointed towards resources that will improve their chances of academic success beforethey begin to encounter issues and other academic setbacks will ultimately lead to more successfulengineering students, graduates, and productive careers. We therefore succeed in finding attributesthat identify which students need more attention from professors and academic advisors.References [1] K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, N. D. Finkelstein, S. J. Pollock, A. Miyake, G. L. Cohen, and T. A. Ito, “Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical
classes that are less hands-on or field activity-based. Deeper peer relationshipssupport the development of social and interpersonal skills that are important during theeducational experience when selecting a major [20] and later in professional careers [21]. Thenumber of students that agreed or strongly agreed they knew their classmates well increased 17percentage points to 67% upon completion of FERL, and the number that disagreed dropped by12 percentage points to 7%. Due to the mandatory activities outside of class, it is expected thatmilitary institution students may know each other better than students elsewhere, however thedrastic change in three weeks is noteworthy. Students indicated that the strengthened peerrelationships provided the
Eleanor Ita, The Ohio State University Dr. Meagan Ita is a Research Scientist at Arvinas working to develop disease modifying therapies for neu- rodegenerative diseases. Her career passion is to develop novel biotechnologies and therapeutics to better understand human physiology with the goal of equitably extending healthspan, ideally at the intersection of healthcare and STEM education. Meagan has experience as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Engineering Education from The Ohio State University (OSU), earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and an M.S. and B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from The Ohio State University.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is
of sociopoliticalenvironments, and providing resources for action [19]. 2We scaffold our training according to the years of experience that UGTAs have in our program(Figure 1). In the summer of their first year, UGTAs learn foundational concepts related toGIDBEA; in the second year, power and privilege; and in the third year, strategies for engagingGIDBEA in their future careers. Training ahead of the spring semester offers time for conceptreinforcement and reflection on the fall. By scaffolding the training over the UGTAs’ three-yeartenure in the program, we seek to sustain engagement as TAs put their knowledge to practice ininteractions with
of communication difficultieswithin various types of groups and develop targeted interventions to facilitate better teamdialogue. Since the data originated from first-year engineering courses, one plausible solutionwould be to start the intervention in high school. Additionally, longitudinal studies may providedeeper insights into how team experiences evolve throughout a student's academic career andhow early interventions can have long-term benefits. Lastly, examining the intersectionality ofstudents' identities and experiences will enhance our understanding of the multidimensionalnature of team dynamics. Such research could be useful for Tandem so that it can be tailored tothe unique strengths and preferences of individual
students at the University. Assanah’s research focuses on synthesizing hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury.Dr. Kristina Wagstrom, University of Connecticut Dr. Kristina Wagstrom is an associate Professor in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut in Storrs, CT. She specializes in applying chemical engineering principles to study atmospheric chemistry and air pollution with an emphasis on human and ecosystem health impacts. She is also interested in studying the impact of different educational approaches in engineering with a focus on experiential learning and career readiness.Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of
[1]. Today, manyfirst-year students typically have little hands-on experience related to engineering [2]. Manyhave never used common tools before and do not know how common devices, such as carengines, actually work. Stephen Belkoff, an engineering professor at Johns Hopkins, noted thelack of practical skills for incoming freshmen, “These are all A students, and it took two days tobuild a shelf from Home Depot and get it @$$-backwards” [3]. While they are generally verycomputer savvy, incoming freshmen have little experience with engineered equipment. Studentsdo get experience with equipment in a variety of labs and in their capstone projects during thecourse of their college careers, but neither of these may be with actual equipment used
. Ofstudents who take ENGR 151, approximately 77 percent go on to take EECS 280. Like ENGR101, ENGR 151 covers both MATLAB and C++.EECS 183. Students in many other schools and colleges (i.e. other than the College ofEngineering) at the University of Michigan – Ann Arbor may take EECS 183 (“ElementaryProgramming Concepts”). While many students choose to take EECS 183 relatively early in theirundergraduate career, this is not required. EECS 183 is offered in both the Fall and Winter terms.Of students who take EECS 183, approximately 48 percent go on to take EECS 280. EECS 183covers programming in C++ with a small amount of Python at the end of the semester.TRANSFER. Students may take EECS 280 directly if they have transfer credit for a
field after moving to engineering or computing majors. Those faculty advisors couldsee program scholars not only during advising seasons but also in classrooms and otherdepartment professional activities, creating a closer student-faculty relationship and easy accessto program scholar information to follow up. In addition, since faculty advisors also work in theengineering or engineering education field, they can mentor program scholars’ engineeringidentity and career development by sharing their professional experience and connections.Currently, all students in the college are advised by the advisors in the Advising Center. Thischange requires all advisors to be well-versed in this unique student success and scholarshipprogram and fails to
replace all five of those courses with a single common introductory class. And as acommon course, one of the goals is to provide incoming students with information and experiencesto help them choose their major or at least confirm that they want to continue in their selectedmajor. At present, this goal is carried out in two ways. First, six class meetings are devoted to themajors; each major has one dedicated class period with each section: the Major Day. Typically, aMajor Day involves an overview of the major through a review of the curriculum and a discussionof career options. Then, the bulk of the time is spent in a hands-on design activity that illustratesaspects of the major (for example, building prosthetic hands to do a task in biomedical
that does not have a tangible product as an outcome or answer, and sometimes struggleto relate concepts that, while important, are more theoretical to their intended majors and careers[1]. In the authors’ experiences, foundational engineering courses that cover non-technical skillssuch as problem solving, teamwork, communication, recognition of holistic issues, and otherimportant transferable skills are especially prone to this challenge of engaging students whocome into the discipline expecting engineering to look more like the more concrete math orscience courses they are familiar with from their prior studies. Community engagement projects,also commonly referred to as service-learning projects, are one way that instructors facingsimilar
. 3, pp. 319-326, 2002, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00709.x.[59] A. I. Schäfer and B. S. Richards, "From concept to commercialisation: student learning in a sustainable engineering innovation project," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 143-165, 2007/05/01 2007, doi: 10.1080/03043790601118689.[60] C. J. Creed, E. M. Suuberg, and G. P. Crawford, "Engineering Entrepreneurship: An Example of A Paradigm Shift in Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 185-195, 2002, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00691.x.[61] A. Carbone, G. M. Rayner, J. Ye, and Y. Durandet, "Connecting curricula content with career context: the value of
, Environmental Engineering, Computer Engineering Project 3: Students design, build, and analyze a Mars Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, rover system that can navigate variable terrain. Computer EngineeringAnd while some of these disciplines benefit from the fact they are a bit more contextuallyindependent, such as mechanical engineering, the instructional team felt that some disciplinessuch as bioengineering, chemical engineering, biomedical engineering, and industrialengineering, could use more coverage. This would be in hopes to show a more diverse image ofengineering as a career choice.New project designsAlternative design options for project one and two have been
engineering students at TAMUK take an introductory engineering course entitled“Engineering as a Career” (GEEN 1201). Departments within the College of Engineering eachoffer their own section of the GEEN 1201 course specifically designed for their students. As partof an ongoing NSF project, the GEEN 1201 courses for four departments (CNEN, EECS, MIEN,and CAEN) have been augmented to include collaborative hands-on design projects. Theremainder of this section describes the design projects that were used in each of the updatedGEEN 1201 courses during the fall 2022 semester. Descriptions of the design projects used inprevious semesters can be found in [4, 5].Chemical and Natural Gas Engineering: There were four hands-on design projects offered tostudent
. 11[6] AIChE. "Spreadsheet related resources as part of the AIChE Academy." https://www.aiche.org/academy/search/spreadsheet (accessed July, 2020).[7] K. Stratvert. "Kevin Stratvert Master Technology YouTube channel." https://www.youtube.com/@KevinStratvert (accessed January, 2023).[8] L. Gharani. "Leila Gharani Advance Your Career YouTube Channel." https://www.youtube.com/@LeilaGharani (accessed January, 2023).[9] M. D. Miller, Minds Online: Teaching Effectively with Technology. Harvard University Press, 2014.[10] A. Singh, V. Bhadauria, A. Jain, and A. Gurung, "Role of gender, self-efficacy, anxiety and testing formats in learning spreadsheets," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 3
regional campuses, nor are they reported to the central campus. The objective of the first-year engineering curriculum is to provide an opportunity for students to explore engineering disciplines so that students can make informed decisions about their careers. So, these two courses achieve the goal of training these students for their second year of the degree program.5. Role of Administration: It was noted earlier that the regional campuses get limited funding to run the campus businesses. However, there is a process of submitting a budget to the central campus. Engineering coordinators submit the budget each year to the fiscal office. The purchases made for the lab supplies and equipment have to go through the university
programming for itsown sake [6]. However, it must be kept in mind that these are first-year students, not practicingcomputing professionals, so appropriate assignments and accommodations are needed. Forappropriateness, the posed problem should be one that is within the spectrum of a typicalteenager’s life experiences and thus relatable; for accommodating, the assignment should bedelivered in a way that makes problem solving using technical skills acquired in CS1 the primaryfocus. Collectively, these various aspects help to motivate students through the perceivedrelevance of the assignment to career goals and societal needs [7].2. Course SettingProgramming 1, the CS1 course at Ohio Northern University (ONU), is a four-credit hour C++programming course
scientific research abilities, which are critical for their respective future careers.Engineering education is no exception to this academic requirement [1]. The employability ofengineering students today depends on more than just using their technical abilities; in order toeven secure part-time employment and progress in their careers, they also require complementaryprofessional abilities or soft skills [2], [3], [4]. These professional skills include the capacity forinitiative, teamwork, communication, planning and organization, and commercial acumen [5], [6],[7]. Professionals believe that communication skills are one of the most important skills requiredfor employability [8].Writing and more specifically academic writing and communication is an