listing my available ingredients. I see how valuable it can be and I want to proactively incorporate it into my learning and career. I am very grateful to this course because this mindset shift towards AI might well change my life.”Similar to what many other students wrote in the responses, this student thought that generativeAI was harmful to learning because it would only provide a venue for plagiarism. However,these students now hold a different perspective after the course. For example, the student fromthe previous quote became proactive in using generative AI to support learning and even supporttheir daily life. Another student said that because this course “provided a space to experimentand test its limitations in addition to
information from a variety of sources, including AI ● Professional development: Opportunities to meet with career center and other on-campus resources were provided during Expos; Headshots for LinkedIn or similar were provided at no cost to the student Outcome 4: Employ the NSPE Common course material, activities, and assignments were utilized for code of ethics to examine ethical ABET accreditation including case study examples, live-action simulation case studies and extrapolate [9], and final assessment of a hypothetical ethics scenario related to principles
. (2019). Developing tolerance for ambiguity anduncertainty by interdisciplinary intensive courses. In V.N. Balázs, M. Murphy, H-M. Järvinen &A. Kálmán (Eds.), Complexity is the new normality. SEFI 47th Annual Conference,Proceedings. (pp. 936-943) Budabest.15. Yadav, A., Alexander, V., & Mehta, S. (2019). Case-based instruction in undergraduateengineering: Does student confidence predict learning? International Journal of EngineeringEducation, 35(1), 25-34.16. Rohde, J., Musselman, L., Benedict, B., Verdín, D., Godwin, A., Kirn, A., ... & Potvin, G.(2019). Design experiences, engineering identity, and belongingness in early career electrical andcomputer engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 165-17217. Allen, K
Paper ID #37455Evaluating Students’ Entrepreneurial Mindset Attributes in First-YearDesign ProjectsNicholas H. CheongDr. Meagan Eleanor Ita, The Ohio State University Dr. Meagan Ita is a Research Scientist at Arvinas working to develop disease modifying therapies for neu- rodegenerative diseases. Her career passion is to develop novel biotechnologies and therapeutics to better understand human physiology with the goal of equitably extending healthspan, ideally at the intersection of healthcare and STEM education. Meagan has experience as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Engineering Education from The Ohio State University (OSU
– extremely)Post survey items to measure engineering self-efficacy (response options strongly disagree – strongly agree): I will be able to achieve most of the engineering-related goals that I have set for myself When facing difficult tasks within engineering, I am certain that I will accomplish them I believe I can succeed at most any engineering-related endeavor to which I set my mind I am confident that I can perform effectively on many engineering-related tasksPost survey items to measure commitment to engineering (response options): I have no doubt that I will graduate with a degree in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree) It is my intention to pursue a career in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree