rate of69.4%. Through meticulous data analysis using SPSS, it was observed notable increases in meanscores for Ideation, Interest, Help Seeking, and Unnamed factors, reflecting positive shifts instudents' entrepreneurial mindset. Significant improvements in factors such as Ideation, Interest,and Help Seeking highlight the efficacy of our course in nurturing the multifaceted skills essentialfor success in engineering and entrepreneurial endeavors. Our findings indicate modest statisticallysignificant improvements in Ideation and overall total scores from pre- to post-tests, validating theeffectiveness of this pedagogical approach. Lessons learned from this study will inform futureiterations of the course, ensuring continued refinement to better
such a way that this alignmenttermed their academic identities has a certain impact on their efforts and achievements. Thestudy [8] reveals that the college experience for individual students is influenced by theirperceptions of interpersonal interactions and norms, which a reflective of the college culture andthus play a pivotal role in shaping student performance, engagement, and persistence, surpassingpredictions solely based on socioeconomic status or academic preparedness indicators.The fundamental concept of Engineering Stress Culture (ESC) originates from the uniquedemands and challenges inherent in the culture of engineering education which equates learningwith suffering and shared hardship identity, as emphasized in one of the six
the habitat. Finally, the smaller groups integrated theircomponents and collaborated to maximize the energy efficiency and performance of the Solar-powered Habitat.The assessments of this project were designed for each level of teamwork: 1) Studentshighlighted their contributions through an Engineering Portfolio. 2) Smaller groups reflected ontheir design and building process by submitting weekly engineering logs and a semester-endposter. Finally, 3) Each group habitat (comprising 5~6 groups) presented its energy-efficienthabitat design in the first-year design expo at the end of the semester. The ongoing datacollection of this effort on project-based, multidisciplinary, multilevel teamwork proved how thisproject design effectively cultivated
high rates of universitydropout and the determination of its main causes and solutions [1]. Dropout affects significantlyboth personally and socially. Deficient education for dropouts can be reflected in a significantdecline in their future economic and social well-being [2]. Furthermore, a shortage of skilledworkers can undermine a country's productivity [2]. Currently, universities have high dropoutrates that are evidenced in the data officially presented by official institutions. According to theUnited Nations Organization, dropout exceeds 40% in Latin American countries such asColombia and Ecuador, and even 50% and 54% in Costa Rica and Brazil respectively [3]. Theserates worsen significantly when emphasis is placed only on STEM careers
project-based learning can enhance confidence and refine a skill setdirected towards engineering fields. Feinaur’s integration of innovation and entrepreneurshipinto first-year engineering courses focused on product-based innovation projects to develop acurriculum for students [5]. Students were successful in applying the techniques that theylearned.Assessing engineering design through projects has proven to increase first-year engineeringstudents’ self-efficacy [6]. This study included an in-class team design task supplemented byindividual reflections. The exam on the other hand was an individual written assessment. Resultsconcluded that the design task increased levels of self-efficacy more than the exam.Conclusions about whether a student
-cognitive theory, Zimmerman [14]established a cyclical framework of self-regulation that is divided into three phases: 1)forethought phase (processes promoting a learning mindset by involving one’s beliefs, attitudes,and processes before any academic task), 2) performance control phase (intentionally 2participating in learning activities specific to a personal strategic plan and augmenting learningby utilizing self-control and self-observation processes), and 3) self-reflection phase (evaluatingpersonal performance against goals, learning outcomes, or self-standards and modifying futurelearning strategies). The cyclical nature of this model posits
Manage, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 280–304, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0149206310386227.[10] K. L. Meyers, S. E. Silliman, N. L. Gedde, and M. W. Ohland, “A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01053.x.[11] P. J. Collier, “Why peer mentoring is an effective approach for promoting college student success,” Metrop Univ, vol. 28, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.18060/21539.[12] J. M. Kiyama and S. G. Luca, “Structured opportunities: Exploring the social and academic benefits for peer mentors in retention programs,” J Coll Stud Ret, vol. 15, pp. 489–514, 2014.[13] R. Ghosh and T. G. Reio, “Career
management (n = 8),transitioning to college (n = 5), and commuting (n = 3). Time management, especially coupledwith transitioning, was a main issue in the beginning of the semester. Specifically, studentsstruggled with balancing responsibilities in their lives (e.g., spreading out assignments andreadings instead of waiting until the last minute, study life versus work life, exercise, sleep andwaking up schedule). Being commuters affected academic performance and health. Due to a longcommute, sometimes students came to classes late, missing critical class information. Thisimpacted their understanding of the subject matter, and it was reflected in their low grades.Similarly, after a long commute back home, they only had limited hours of sleep. This
. Relative to the EDP, EM is anewer addition to the FYEP curriculum, so we posit that an EM-to-EDP connection may indicatethat students are beginning to see an EM as integral to the design process. Although we hesitateto draw strong conclusions given our sample size, future work should explore how studentsconceptualize the relationship between moving through the EDP and doing so with an EM astheir guide.On the other hand, Exploration was the least applied code across datasets. Our finding thatstudents mentioned Exploration the least may indicate an area where the design projectcurriculum can be improved. For example, we could have students reflect on how externalexperiences, resources, and/or other courses may relate to their projects, or we could
college is to only admit high achieving, financially secure, andemotionally (e.g., college adaptive) ready students. However, our country deserves better thanthat and our economy demands more engineers, not less. Additionally, all three of theseprograms could be easily adopted at other institutions.A side benefit of the programs was student increased confidence and the development ofleadership skills for both existing and new freshmen students. While leadership was not directlyassessed, strong anecdotal evidence reflected students engaging in leadership activities (e.g.,officers in student organizations). This benefit will be better assessed in the future to determineits impact.As engineering educators, we must continue to evolve and find ways to
Mean St. Dev Mean St. Dev Non-Traditionally Underrepresented Students 3.510 0.426 29.30 3.797 Traditionally Underrepresented Students 3.236** 0.717 28.20 5.448 PMP-Eligible Students 3.161** 0.813 28.02 5.255 PMP Participants 3.343 0.546 28.46 5.782Significance reflects results of an independent samples t-test between non-TU students and TU studentsubpopulations. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p < .01, *** p < .005.Since RQ2 seeks to understand the relationship between participation in the PMP and studentacademic
round of interviews was scheduled to take place in the spring of 2020. Due to theCOVID-19 pandemic, and the abrupt switch to online learning in March of 2020, data collectionfor the first cohort was delayed until mid-summer. We also needed to update IRB protocols toinclude remote interviews as well as update the interview protocol to ask about any positive andnegative experiences the students had due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, weinterviewed cohort 2 (AY 2020-2021) in the spring of 2021. We then interviewed students fromcohort 1 (AY 2019-2020) in the fall of 2021. Although these students were entering their thirdyear of college (typically junior level), we used the same protocol and asked them to reflect ontheir first year. Finally
self-advocacy processes. A brief reflective assignment that asks allstudents to consider personal assets and challenges that they are facing in their collegiatejourneys might be beneficial. The FYED course already introduces students to social styles, andthis information is often used in teaming. The instructional team could consider whether thisexercise could be modified to introduce other diversity characteristics and specifically addressneurodivergence and potentially mental health issues. The faculty development series forinstructors could also introduce topics related to ND and encourage faculty to integrate UDLprinciples.AppendixSurvey items to measure teamwork experiences during the semester (response options): Rate your experience on