. Through the lunch, students became acquainted with their discipline-specific facultymentors. These faculty mentors consist of one representative from each engineering disciplinewho eventually would become the SSP students’ academic advisors and have regular check-inswith their students. The lunches offered a casual, non-threatening environment to help buildconnections between students and their mentors. Faculty mentors utilized the lunches to provideshort Q&A sessions with the group describing their discipline along with academic andprofessional opportunities.Throughout the year, social events were planned to provide students with an opportunity to relaxand connect with each other and the grant team. A winter quarter kick-off party was held
, Australian Journal of Psychology, 73:1, 87-102, DOI:10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409[4] Maithreyi Gopalan. “Students’ Sense of Belonging Matters: Evidence from Three Studies”.https://www.google.com/url?q=https://tll.mit.edu/sense-of-belonging-matters/&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1707428553250036&usg=AOvVaw00y7fOXuEVLb49q3Cg-2MA[5] Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/Environment Fit: Developmentally AppropriateClassrooms for Early Adolescence. In R. E. Ames, & Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on Motivationin Education, 3, 139-186. New York: Academic Press.[6] Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532
mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.[5] Larkin-Hein, T. (2001, June), Enhancing Understanding Through On-Line Discussions Paperpresented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. https://peer.asee.org/9222.[6] Tahmina, Q. (2018, June), Assessing the Impact of Peer Mentoring on Performance in aFundamentals of Engineering Course Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/29829[7] J. J. Park, M. Park, K. Jackson, and G. Vanhoy, “Remote engineering education under covid-19 pandemic environment.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in HigherEducation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 160–166, 2020.[8] M. Adnan and K. Anwar, “Online
. Hartleroad, “Comparison of the Academic Achievement of First-Year Female Honors Program and Non-Honors Program Engineering Students,” Journal of the National Collegiate Honors, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcjournal[27] X. Gong, M. E. Cardella, and Q. Lei, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING HONORS PROGRAMS BETWEEN US AND CHINA,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[28] D. I. Miller and D. F. Halpern, “Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates?,” Learn Individ Differ, vol. 26, pp. 141–152, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012.[29] S. Y. Yoon and E. L. Mann, “Exploring the Spatial Ability of Undergraduate Students: Association
. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.overdrive.com/search?q=7C5DB81D-CB21- 44B7-8335-5DC66EC6BD6B[8] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, “A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being: A model of empathy in engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 123–148, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20159.[9] N. W. Sochacka, D. A. Delaine, T. Shepard, and J. Walther, “Empathy instruction through the propagation paradigm: A synthesis of developer and adopter accounts,” Adv. Eng. Educ., p. 29, 2021.[10] J. E. Froyd, C. Henderson, R. S. Cole, D. Friedrichsen, R. Khatri, and C. Stanford, “From dissemination to propagation: A new paradigm for education
-kilmann conflict mode," vol. 1, no. 11, 2008.[22] O. S. L. Strategies. Available: https://opensourceleadership.com/documents/DO%20Definitions.pdf[23] D. Jacobson and N. J. I. J. o. Q. M. Mustafa, "Social identity map: A reflexivity tool for practicing explicit positionality in critical qualitative research," vol. 18, p. 1609406919870075, 2019. 13
. Medin, C. D. Lee, and M. Bang, “Point of View Affects How Science Is Done,” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/point-of-view-affects-how-science-is-done/ (accessed Feb. 13, 2023).[4] S. C. Hill, “When I Learned the Value of Diversity for Innovation,” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-i-learned-the-value-of-diversity-for-innova tion/ (accessed Feb. 13, 2023).[5] C. Cole et al., “What Factors Impact Psychological Safety in Engineering Student Teams? A Mixed-Method Longitudinal Investigation,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 144, no. 12, p. 122302, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1115/1.4055434.[6] A. Edmondson, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams,” Adm. Sci. Q
Supervision & Curriculum Development, 2005.[5] E. J. Hansen, Idea-Based Learning: A Course Design Process to Promote Conceptual Understanding, Illustrated edition. Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing, 2011.[6] K. Bain, What the Best College Teachers Do, 1st edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2004.[7] N. Graff, “‘An Effective and Agonizing Way to Learn’: Backwards Design and New Teachers’ Preparation for Planning Curriculum,” Teach. Educ. Q., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 151–168, 2011.[8] A. Childre, J. R. Sands, and S. T. Pope, “Backward Design: Targeting Depth of Understanding for All Learners,” Teach. Except. Child., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 6–14, May 2009, doi: 10.1177/004005990904100501.[9] J. C
," Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001.[23] S. Park y S. Holloway, “Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Education: An Examination of the Interplay among School Factors, Parental Role Construction, and Family Income,” School Community Journal, vol. 28, n.o 1, pp. 9-36, 2018, Available in: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184925.[24] D. J. Wilson-Ihejirika, Q. Liu, J. Meihui Li, M. Nisar, y J. Lin, “Engineering Pathways from High School to Workplace: A Review of the Literature,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland
City 8 3 5 4.13 0.83 Tech.p. I would recommend this workshop to other students interested in understanding what 8 3 5 4.50 0.76 majoring in engineering would be like at City Tech. q. I would recommend this workshop to other students interested in understanding what the 8 3 5 4.25 0.89 different engineering majors are like at City Tech. r. I am confident that I can identify the engineering 8 3 5 4.25 0.71 major that best fits my desired
, 2024. Date. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=ED610707&id=ED610707[20] I. Fomunung, C. Silver, and M. Porter, “Increasing the success rates of engineering students after transferring into four year colleges from community colleges: It’s much more than dollars” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, Aug., 2022. https://peer.asee.org/42050[21] M. McGinnis and R. Welch, “Capstones with an industrial model,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 2010. https://peer.asee.org/16899[22] C.E. King, “Industry engagement versus faculty mentorship in engineering senior capstone design courses,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE