- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 3: Identity & Belonging
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lizandra C. Godwin, University of New Mexico
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
& Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 181–200, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1648269.[13] N. Choe, M. Borrego, L. Martins, A. Patrick, and C. C. Seepersad, “A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 27502. doi: 10.18260/1-2--27502.[14] C. J. Faber, R. L. Kajfez, D. M. Lee, L. C. Benson, M. S. Kennedy, and E. G. Creamer, “A grounded theory model of the dynamics of undergraduate engineering students’ researcher identity and epistemic thinking,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 529–560, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/tea.21736.[15] L. Fleming, K. Smith, D. Williams, and L. Bliss, “Engineering
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 3: Identity & Belonging
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Libby Flanagan, Clemson University; Madison Pollock, Clemson University ; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Karen A. High, Clemson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
. After each lesson and after thelesson series, students completed a written reflection on what they had learned, totaling to fivereflections over the semester. Their responses will be explored with a thematic qualitativeanalysis to answer the research questions above. The lessons continue to be adapted to thiscontext and are being taught to all sections of the course this semester. A rollout to all incomingfirst-year engineering students is planned for the Fall of 2023, so this analysis is ongoing, and allconclusions drawn so far are from Fall of 2022 and are denoted as a WIP.Definition of EmpathyDuring a pilot study in the Fall of 2022, 59 first-year students in the honors sections of“Introduction to Engineering” at a large R1 university
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 9: Identity & Belonging 1
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Anna Newsome Holcomb, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lakshmi Raju
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
on social capital theory, belongingness, and engineeringrole identity. These theories shaped our data collection and analysis procedures.Social capital describes the resources that are cultivated or made available through socialnetworks. Following other scholarship in engineering education research on social capital [15]we focus on social capital at the individual level [16]. Each student brings with them a socialnetwork to their undergraduate studies, although the extent to which that network is equipped tosupport them through their engineering studies might be variable [17]. Lin distinguishes betweenthe availability, accessibility, and activation of resources in a social network [17]. The goal of theECE Discovery Studio peer leadership
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 2: Advising & Mentoring
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kelyn Rola, Southern Methodist University; Caitlin Anderson, Southern Methodist University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
, “Putting diversity in perspective: A critical cultural historical context for representation in engineering,” Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28776.[3] M. Newsome, “Colleges now produce fewer Black graduates in math and engineering,” The Hechinger Report, Apr. 12, 2021. http://hechingerreport.org/even-as-colleges-pledge-to- improve-share-of-engineering-graduates-who-are-black-declines/ (accessed Feb. 15, 2023).[4] S. A. Elkins, J. M. Braxton, and G. W. James, “Tinto’s separation stage and its influence on first-semester college student persistence,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 251–68, 2000.[5] K. M. Whitcomb and C. Singh, “Underrepresented minority students receive lower grades and have higher rates of attrition
- Conference Session
- First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 3: Evaluation & Assessment
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Marko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, eGrove Education; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
classesAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we report on peer oral exams, a cross between oral examsand peer assessment, as implemented in a high-enrollment undergraduate computerprogramming course for engineers. The idea was to leverage the educational andimplementational advantages of both evidence-based approaches simultaneously. Oral exams,for instance, have been argued to promote conceptual understanding, self-reflection,communication competency, and professional identity formation in students – but theirdeployment in large classes is resource-demanding and nontrivial, stifling their broader adoption.Peer assessment, on the other hand, is highly scalable and affords students many potentialeducational benefits of its own, including the