Texas at El Paso Diane works diligently to support minorities, especially women in STEM and preparing future educators to be STEM strong in knowledge and skills. She is an assistant professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and serves as the director for the University of Texas El Paso’s YES! She Can and STEMShine programs.Victor Manuel Garcia Jr., Victor Garcia is a doctoral student at The University of Texas at El Paso and a research assistant of the Yes She Can program from the College of Education. His research topics are in the areas of characterization and design of pavement materials, civil ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “Work-in-Progress
Delaware. She specializes in the development of mixed methods research designs for educational research.Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre
as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacheMs. Adrie Koehler Doctoral Student, Learning Design & TechnologyMr. Shawn Farrington, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Shawn Farrington is a Senior Lecturer in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He co-coordinates a first-year Design Thinking program and teaches several of his own sections. Shawn is also an Educa- tional Psychology Ph.D. candidate at Purdue. HisElnara Mammadova Elnara is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation program at Purdue University. She is dedicated to her research on fostering inclusivity in the curriculum and ensuring digital
Professor of Process Engineering at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colom- bia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process En- gineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Dr. Jennifer Lyn Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jennifer Benning is an Instructor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech.Dr. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Natalie Van Tyne is an
- tion in computing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding the impacts of extra credit modules on student learning experience in a 100-level Electrical and Computer Engineering CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence-based practice paper investigates students’ perceptions regarding thepresence of two extra credit (EC) modules on parallel computing topics in an introductoryelectrical and computer engineering course. Prior work investigating these EC modules showed ahigh participation rate (48-60%) across and high performance (80-88%) on the end-of-module ECquiz across three semesters [1]. The presence of extra credit has long been a topic of
accreditationto include a deeper focus on social impact, cultural responsibility, and ethical considerations[19]. In addition, many professional societies and organizations have updated their missionstatements and core value statements to focus on promotion of socially just education and action,often with emphasis on improving diversity, creating a more inclusive culture, and increasingequity. For example, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) diversity statementprofesses that SME is “commit[ed] to promoting diversity and inclusion of all within ourcommunity” and “believe[s] that diverse perspectives and talents are essential withinmanufacturing research” [20]. Similarly, the Society of Women Engineers lists “inclusiveenvironment” as one of their
effective at positively influencing longer-term engineering studentretention. While makerspaces have excited considerable interest, much of the research onmakerspace impacts and practices have focused on K-12 and informal educational settings. Littleis known about how a well-designed makerspace-based engineering course can contribute tofirst-year students’ persistence in engineering.The platform for this study is an introductory engineering makerspace course at a Southeastern,public university. The course’s objective is to facilitate the application and integration offundamental engineering skills. Six course features were identified by course instructors aspotential pedagogical features that can activate students’ situational interest: technical
Labs and Air Force Research Labs). Dr. Vijlee has been at the University of Portland since 2014.Molly Hiro, University of Portland ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Improving Writing Instruction, Practice, and Feedback in an Introduction to Engineering CourseIntroductionThis Work in Progress (WIP) project’s motivation was to create stronger engineering writers inthe Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland (UP) and to infuse thecurriculum with a healthy understanding of and respect for good writing as an aspect of asuccessful engineering graduate. UP is fundamentally a liberal arts university with a robust Corecurriculum. Still
Callihan Linnes is the Marta E. Gross Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Director of the College of Engineering Honors Program at Purdue University. Her work advances pa- per microfluidics, molecular biosensors, and human-centered instrumentation design for translation into point-of-care diagnostics for global health and health disparities research. She teaches undergraduate design courses for first year engineering honors and capstone design, graduate level instrumentation mea- surement and point-of-care diagnostics, and human-centered design workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A systematic review of pedagogical
1020,1022,1023) in year 1. Students taking Calculus Iin year 1 graduated at a rate 12.4% higher than those who did not. African American studentshad the lowest graduation rate of all ethnic groups. Thus, math preparedness has a criticalcorrelation of success in graduating with an engineering degree, particularly for diverse andunderserved populations.Newman [4] discussed moving from remediation classes, especially in mathematics, to a co-requisite model of education and highlighted that the assumption that all high school students areprepared for college-level work is incorrect. This especially impacted students interested inSTEM fields. Students being ill prepared students is a national problem [5] which is furtherevidenced by reduced numbers of
- neering Education and Future Professoriate. MiguelAndr´es’s research includes sustainable infrastructure design and planning, smart and resilient cities, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andr´es is in developing and applying contemporary pedagogies for STEM courses, teaching empathy studies in engineering as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently
overarching themes to deepen the participants’ understanding oftheir experience: 1) perception of experience and 2) application of new knowledge. From thosethemes, the six reflection prompts were designed to facilitate higher-order cognitive processes[1]. Each prompt captured an aspect of the associated theme [see Appendix A.]. Fellows wereallowed to select the one that best fits their experience for that week. Prompts can be selected nomore than twice. This flexibility allowed for contextualized growth and personalized meaning-making. Questions varied from self-analysis of daily tasks and recognizing the benefits ofstruggling with a task to highlighting the differences between knowledge garnered in theclassroom versus in the research environment
’ impacts on sense of belonging across genderIntroductionThis complete evidence-based practice paper examines the extent to which targeted curricularand co-curricular activities impact first-year students’ sense of belonging in engineering, andwhether these impacts differ by gender identity. The study used a quasi-experimental, mixedmethods design wherein quantitative and qualitative data were collected from first-year studentparticipants in a grant-funded scholarship program (Scholars – the “treatment” group), withquantitative data also collected from a matched group of first-year students who were notprogram participants (Comparison group). This study was a subset of a larger research projectattached to the
, and as such we are heartened by these findings. Implementing this new first yearprogram was an enormous, complex task. The general results showed that students gainedvaluable skills and a strong sense of belonging in our College. Students’ praise for each other,their instructors, the undergraduate learning assistants, and the graduate teaching assistants wasparticularly satisfying, because it matched our student-centered priorities, and our framingassumptions that the best learning and engineering happens in healthy communities. Weacknowledge that there is still much work to continuously improve and adapt our program tomeet the diverse needs of our students, and we are committed to this effort.References:[1] D. Morrell. “Design Of An
mechatronicintegration is necessary to ensure engineering students can compete in the workplace of thefourth industrial age after graduation. Project-based learning engages students with a learningexperience that is hands-on and genuinely interesting.In addition to the abovementioned skills, it has become crucial for contemporary engineers toacquire a solid background and proficient ability to program computers as these skills are neededin industry and engineering designs [7]. However, it has been reported that learning to programis hard and programmers suffer from a wide range of difficulties and deficits [3], [8], [9]. Thisartifact is manifested by high dropout and failure rates in programming courses [9].In this evidence-based practice paper, we propose a
a semester-long team design project which is divided into three phases – problem definition, conceptual design, and final design. Research projects are led by curiosity to solve real-world problems by understanding user needs, and limitations of the system, prototyping solutions, testing, and assessing the impact of the solution on society. The project is driven by the Engineering Mindset Learning model where students chase their curiosity and pursue their entrepreneurial goals. Weekly laboratory instructions, manuals, and video presentations are made available to the students. Teams are formed depending on the class sizes. Assessments: Weekly graphics assignments, quizzes, and four midterm exams exist. For the project, students are
of Technology, Sweden, in the area of spatial ability and learning in technology education. He is a qualified post-primary teacher of Design and Communication Graphics and Construction Studies.Dr. Niall Seery, Technological University of the Shannon Dr. Niall Seery is also the Director of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG) and is a Guest Professor in Technology Education at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Sweden. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement to Holistically Assess Creativity of Design Solutions: A Comparison of First-year Students and Educators JudgementsAbstract:This Complete Research
Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external eval- uation, and as publication support. Most of his work is on STEM education and advancement projects and completed for Minority-Serving Institutions. He also conducts research regarding higher education focused on the needs and interests of underserved populations and advancing understanding of Minority- Serving Institutions.Dr. Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Alexander graduated with a BS in Engineering Science from Trinity University, a MS in Chemical Engineering from Georgia Tech
dedication to student suc- cess, her innovative approach to program design, and her collaborative spirit, Sahar Mari is a true asset to the field of student support services.Ms. Sara AlBanna, SLB Sara AlBanna is a recent graduate from Texas A&M University at Qatar with a degree in petroleum engi- neering. She currently works as an field engineer at SLB. As a dedicated engineer, she is passionate about creating positive change in the industry. Her diverse undergraduate research projects, ranging from the impacts of migration on education to the development of multilateral wells, reflect her interests in multi- disciplinary pursuits. AlBanna is a multifaceted individual, identifying as an author, artist, and petroleum
Lafayette (COE) Dr. Jacqueline Callihan Linnes is the Marta E. Gross Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Director of the College of Engineering Honors Program at Purdue University. Her work advances pa- per microfluidics, molecular biosensors, and human-centered instrumentation design for translation into point-of-care diagnostics for global health and health disparities research. She teaches undergraduate design courses for first year engineering honors and capstone design, graduate level instrumentation mea- surement and point-of-care diagnostics, and human-centered design workshops to practitioners around the world.Dr. Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Sean Brophy is the
representative quotes that best illustrated the outcome space. In some cases, minoredits to quotes were made to improve clarity for the reader.A necessary step in assuring quality of inductively interpreted data is to assure the raw data isapplicable to interpreted codes [19]. While the researchers were mindful to practice reflexivitythroughout data analysis, member checking took place individually with UMAs. Codes andrelative themes were then discussed with the manager of the makerspace, who was also a UMAprior to graduating and assuming the manager position. As an additional measure of rigor afteradjustments to codes and themes in the preliminary measure of quality assurance, we shared ouranonymous data and findings in a meeting with four experienced
Laboratories. Since 1993 he has been with Bucknell University where he is currently Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His research interests include antenna array system design, signal processing, and medical ultrasound imaging. Dr. Kozick received a 2006 Best Paper Award from the IEEE Signal Processing Society and the Presidential Award for Teaching Excellence from Bucknell University in 1999.Christa Matlack, Bucknell University Christa Matlack serves as a Career Coach in the Center for Career Advancement at Bucknell University where her role is to empower undergraduate students to seek meaningful careers and to guide students through the career development process. In addition, Christa is a co-leader of
asplacing emphasis on problem-solving techniques and the use of mathematics in analyzingtechnical problems. It mentions a variety of topics that are addressed, including graphicalrepresentation of data, estimation, dimensions, units, error estimates, statistics, and teamwork.Additional non-mathematics topics such as engineering ethics and the impact of engineeringsolutions are also addressed during the course. Students wishing to enroll in the EngineeringFundamentals course must have successfully passed one of the following courses: CollegeMathematics for Managerial, Social, and Life Sciences (MATH 1630), Pre-calculus (MATH1730), or Calculus I (MATH 1910). These prerequisite courses are typically taken by first-yearstudents, depending on their
student populations under consideration. Despite this, the PMP represents anoutlet for abundant future research related to best practices in supporting underrepresentedengineering students. The program’s structure allows for a snapshot of student engagementduring their first-year as a program participant, while also providing an opportunity forlongitudinal analysis as students progress through their academic careers. There are likewiseabundant opportunities to explore outcomes associated with being a peer mentor. To pursuequalitative analyses, we would like to conduct focus groups with members of the 2022-23mentee cohort to better understand how the program impacted their first year on campus.Eventually, we would also like to utilize quantitative
, The Pennsylvania State University Justin Lavallee graduated from the Harvard Graduate School of Design in 2010 with a Master in Architec- ture. After working as a researcher studying novel applications for industrial robots in custom manufac- turing processes, he joined the MIT Department of Architecture in 2011 as an instructor and eventually director of the MIT Architecture Shops. He joined the MIT New Engineering Education Transforma- tion as a lead technical instructor in 2019. Throughout his time at MIT he has focused on developing and teaching courses at the intersection of design, technology, and making, while also participating in a number of research projects focusing on new fabrication techniques.Dr
Poster Presentation Practice Final Poster Presentation 4 (Ethics) Reflect on ethical and/ or Poster Presentation File (Potential Impacts Sect.) societal issues as related to your Inclusion and Bias in STEM reflection activity semester project or field of study 5 (Research) Gather and evaluate Project Research & Bibliography Assignment relevant and reliable information Project Problem Statement Assignment and data from a variety of sources Final Poster Presentation 6 (Student Success) Demonstrate Academic Planner Assignment key skills necessary for success in
identified throughthe survey and provide a set of inclusion best practices and learning objectives for inclusivitytraining for undergraduate teaching assistants.Introduction 1Undergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) play an important role in promoting student success.UGTAs promote student engagement, serve as peer mentors, and improve students’ perceptionof a course [1]. In engineering education, involvement of UGTAs in first-year design courses hashad positive outcomes, and the use of undergraduate teaching assistant programs continues togrow [2, 3]. Institutions thus continue to explore on effective strategies for UGTA training. MostUGTA training
strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature,” The Journal of Negro Education, pp. 555-581, 2007.[10] S. Lord et al., “Talking about a revolution: overview of NSF RED projects,” ASEE- American Society for Engineering Education. Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[11] T. R. Forin, S. Farrell, K. Jahan, S. Lezotte, B. Sukumaran, H. Hartman, R. A. Dusseau, T. F. Bruckerhoff and S. K. Bauer, S.K., “Impacts of Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives in a Civil and Environmental Engineering Department” ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, pp. 1-8, 2020.[12] Best Colleges, “United States Air Force Academy,” US News and World Report. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/united-states-air-force
education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Con- trol, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship.Miss Deniz Nikkhah, University of California, IrvineKameryn DenaroDr. Hye Rin Lee, University of Delaware Hye Rin Lee is a NSF postdoctoral fellow at the University of Delaware. She received her Ph.D. at the University of California, Irvine with a concentration in Human Development in Context. Her research interests include motivation, psychological interventions
water resources area. In addition to engineering education, Nazli is also conducting research in stormwater management practices and agricultural drainage water management practices.Dr. Pavan Karra, Minnesota State University, Mankato Pavan Karra is Associate Professor at Trine University where he teaches in the field of Design and Con- trols. He can be reached at pavan.karra@mnsu.edu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Effect of Terminology on Student Performance (Work-In-Progress)AbstractMany instructors know that understanding a few key phrases or terms can make a hugedifference in the outcome of students’ performance in exams. This is especially prominent forfirst