andpractical experiences of focusing on setting objectives and accomplishing goals. This habitus-based focus that the professionally-experienced non-traditional students described wastransferred and utilized in their graduate school experience. Abigail feels strongly about herfocus and compares her level of focus to her peers when she claims, I have a focus probably that a lot of students don‟t have. I know why I‟m here. – AbigailEthan specifically discusses his direction of his research, and from his prior experience, knewthat it involved ethics. He states, I didn‟t have it necessarily formed to the level it was when it got bound into a document as a dissertation, but I had an idea of what I wanted to do for my research
Genomics Working with genomic databases 3 Measuring genomic data Visit to on-campus sequencing and flow cytometry facilities 4 Data Carpentry Workshop Basics of using R, a statistical computing language 5 Plant development and basic plant Macro- and micro-dissection of major plant research anatomy species 6 Research Ethics and Field trip to local company Communications 7 Data Mining Finding, downloading, and cleaning data sets 8 Machine Learning Making inferences using data sets 9 Plant Physiology Trip to
knowledge and methods required to evaluate sustainability concepts and systems. • Design, manufacture, and manage processes in an environmentally conducive manner. • Analyze engineering and management problems in their social and environmental context. • Develop economic, environmental, and social sound sustainable decisions. • Evaluate the impact of products, processes, and activities through life cycle assessment. • Develop written communication skills required for this profession. • Demonstrate professional, legal, and ethical responsibility in decision making practicesPLOs clearly enunciate both the technical and the management skills needed to be a leader in anorganization. The objective of
provides enrichment activities geared towardcreating awareness plus developing interest and providing logistical information about graduateschool. For example, workshops include topics on developing research skills, general graduateschool information, the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), research ethics andprofessionalism, and communicating research. Additional workshops are geared towardundergraduate student retention for expanding the pool of potential graduate students. Facultymentor the students in developing graduate school applications their senior year. Students arealso provided tools to help them obtain internships and undergraduate research experiences. AllSIIRE students have financial need, and scholarships are provided through an NSF
the bachelors’ degree [9].In the Ph.D. in Technology Management program, a student is required to take courses from thefollowing areas: General Technology Core (12 credit hours) Major Area of Specialization (18 credit hours) Professional studies (9 credit hours) Research Core (9 credit hours) Foundational Studies at Master’s level (minimum of 17 credit hours) Dissertation Research (18 minimum credit hours)General Technology Core coursework is designed to enhance effective communication,collaboration, and management strategies. Additionally, this coursework serves to fosterextensive understanding of legal and ethical issues associated to technology use which candevelop as a result of federal and governmental
opportunity to collect anonymous stakeholderfeedback (i.e., survey data) and grade data (i.e., deliverable scores and attendance) for thepurpose of studying the impact of this teaching and learning model. Working with the FacultyAdvisor, ethics approvals have been obtained from both the University of Toronto HealthSciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School BoardExternal Research Review Committee (Protocol # 2017-2018-20). To date, data has beenanalyzed for dissemination of findings to relevant communities of practice, including theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (2018), the Biomedical Engineering Society(Education section; 2017-2019), and the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2017
Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scien-tists and Engineers. The survey included 1,440 respondents selected randomly from ninety-ninedepartments of chemistry, civil engineering, microbiology, and sociology in major research uni-versities in the U.S. Students were asked to report their level of agreement with 5 questions. Theresults of the survey suggested that there was room for improvement in doctoral programs, bothacademically and socially. Page 25.599.4In a similar vein as the main objective of this paper Crede and Borrego5 argued that If the U.S.was to remain a globally recognized source of technological and scientific
. These four were that (1) collaborationsshould not be stressful, (2) the time requirements should be reasonably low, (3) all thecollaborators should have clear roles in the project, and (4) all the collaborators should live up totheir commitments. In order to achieve these ideal collaborations, seven factors were identifiedas being most important, namely: (1) compatible interests/passions; (2) shared goals; (3)complimentary skills; (4) compatible personalities; (5) compatible work ethic; (6) a sharedunderstanding of rigor; and (7) a desire to learn from each other (see Figure 3). Common to theseseven factors was the notion of sharing and compatibility. Factors most important for a
AC 2011-242: WRITING CHALLENGES FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSIN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYJoy L Colwell, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Joy L. Colwell, J.D., is an Associate Professor of Organizational Leadership and Supervision and Director of Graduate Studies at Purdue University Calumet. She regularly teaches graduate courses in Leadership and Ethics and the Directed MS Project for the MS in Technology program at PUC.Jana Whittington, Purdue University Calumet Jana Whittington has a Ph.D. in education with a specialization in instructional design and online learn- ing. Additionally Jana has a MA in studio art and humanities, BFA in painting, and AA in graphic design. She has taught a variety of courses for 15+ years
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Career preparation and planning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Intellectual Property Management 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Entrepreneurship 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ethics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
andphysical objects; scientific computation; algorithm development, computer implementation andapplication; documentation; ethics; and professionalism. This course also introduces the various Page 13.237.3engineering majors to aid in major selection. Topics included in the second semester designcourse are: the engineering design cycle; patent application and search; basic projectmanagement; written and oral communications; computer assisted design and analysis; graphicscommunication; and working in a team environment. The second semester digital courseincludes: the engineering design cycle; patent application and search; basic project management
” c) learn to communicate with the public and other scholars regarding knowledge, outcomes, standards, products, ethics and behaviors”3) Demonstrate evidence a) learn to engage in intellectual discourse with others in theof Scholarly Study” discipline b) learn to identify and to acquire specialized knowledge needed for particular applications” c) learn to organize core knowledge, strategies, collegial associations and intellectual processes to solve problems”The faculty and the program administration combine to strategically implement the secondObjective. The Director, the Graduate Committee and
and run classes with aminimum number of students as total enrollment has increased, there are still low enrollmentcourses in some of the focus areas.In order to address some of the enrollment management issues, suggested electives wereapproved by the Graduate Education Committee. The suggested electives designated were thosecourses which were deemed to be good rounding courses for almost every technology area. Thethree suggested electives were Project Management, Leadership and Ethics, and Technologyfrom a Global Perspective. Having three agreed-upon technical electives allows some degree ofenrollment management. Students are told that the suggested electives are suggested and notrequired, and in fact some do include other electives in their
challenges students may experience during the transition to graduate school and getting started in coursework and research activities Communication strategies for working with colleagues from different backgrounds, experiences and disciplines Balancing academic, research and personal responsibilities Research ethics and responsible research practices for the mentor’s discipline4. ConclusionThrough the proposed activities which are grounded in best practices as well as multiple theories,participants will come out of this interactive panel discussion with draft versions of researchgroup charters, plans to enact mentorship contracts, and knowledge gained from other earlycareer faculty through case studies and group
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He conducts research on training and development with a specific focus on professional development, ethics, and coaching.Dr. Michael Wade Keller, University of Tulsa Michael Keller is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at the university of tulsa. His research and teaching interests are in solid mechanics, both experimental and theoretical, and materials science.Rami M. Younis, The University of Tulsa c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Fostering Graduate Student Professionalism Using Developmental Coaching Techniques Fostering Graduate Student Professionalism Using Developmental Coaching TechniquesIntroductionGovernment agencies
qualitativefeedback. When asked about the most impactful elements of the program, four participantsspecifically mentioned active learning, three listed writing objectives and general teaching skills.Less frequently mentioned were teaching experience (2), ethical issues and discipline (2) andtechnology (1).Table 1-Summary of survey results (N=6)As a result of my participation in the Doctoral SD D Neither A SATeaching Program in Engineering, I am prepared to: N=61. Write learning objectives for a course 0% 0% 0% 33% 67%2. Implement active learning into a course 0% 0% 0% 17
industries. This encourages toursto be organized for students to learn what different industries focus on and if they are interestedin that line of work. It is also an opportunity for students that participate in the tours to observeand take note of professional skills and conduct in the workplace.ResultsBefore the student can graduate with an MSPS degree, the student must complete a 250-hourinternship with a business that is related to their field of study. This internship replaces thetraditional thesis requirement. While a thesis teaches the student work ethic and proper researchskills, it lacks providing the student much needed hands-on experience he/she receives from realworld industry exposure.3 Students develop problem-solving skills that can
of the course. Theaddition of more TAs is both a gift and curse because it provides more manpower to pick up theresponsibilities of the course. More personnel also adds a new dynamic, namely, group work.As engineers we encourage group work, due to its obvious benefits6,7. As every undergradengineer learns, working in a group can also be very difficult due to the varying personalities andwork ethics of the group members. These same challenges extend to working in a team of TAs. • Delegate course responsibilities equally emphasizing that each team member reserves an equal share of the work • Assign tasks based on each members strengths
supportive learning environment: ethic of cooperative support between participants, faculty, and administration; strengthened by social gatherings and informal discussions outside the classroom; a trusting environment for students to challenge and consider alternative perspectives, and engage in new learning activities. • Immersion-type experiences for students (and faculty) to work closely and build camaraderie and provide a forum to develop cohort groups, nurtured by an environment of continual interaction (classroom, lunch discussions, intensive team-based projects, external organized activities such as business trips). • Committed students with diverse backgrounds and experiences. Listening to and
Learning Assistance Program at NJIT. She is active, and a former Board Member, in the Hispanic Association for Higher Education (HAHE) and has presented at previous ASEE meetings.Michael Kerley, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Kerley has been a professor at NJIT for the past eleven years. He currently is Coordinator of The Teaching Assistant Instructional Program (primarily for International students), and also teaches Engineering Ethics, Technical Writing, Oral Presentations each semester. Dr. Kerley’s background is in Theatre and Media Education, having his Masters Degree in Theatre Directing from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and his doctorate in
3CIT 594 - Intermediate Graduate Topics: Computer Information Technology 3CIT 599 - Intermediate Independent Study 1-3CSC 507 - Concepts of Programming Languages 3CSC 533 - Computer Networks 3CSC 550 - Database Management Systems 3CSC 582 - Computer Security 3PHI 510 - Ethics in Information Technology 3Advanced Elective Courses CreditsCIT 630 - Advanced Computer Forensics 3CIT 637 - Wireless Networks
experience.Modifications since its inception include an additional one-quarter seminar on advancedteaching techniques which includes information on subjects such as Bloom's taxonomy,ABET, adding practical ethics instruction to engineering courses, and proposal-writingfocused on an REU application, as well as more information in the job search seminar onhow to establish and maintain a successful career and how to continue to identifymentors. Lee, Papautsky, and Purdy have provided a description of the current PFF inEngineering program12. Page 15.532.4In addition, better synchronization with UC's university-wide PFF program has beenachieved. Two significant differences
participants for professional success in the engineering field.Current ProgramOur current program consists of three seminars--Modern Teaching Techniques, AdvancedTeaching Techniques, and the Academic Profession--together with a 10-hour mentored teachingexperience. Participants also have the option of completing additional mentoring hours andearning a PFF certificate from the associated university-level PFF program. Since most of ourPh.D. students do little teaching during their time at UC, the program was designed to providebasic skills for organizing class materials, delivering content, and evaluating students, exposureto active learning techniques, discussion of engineering-related topics such as project and teammanagement, ethics in engineering
, and Global Issues in Sustainability 3 Sustainable Enterprise 3 Urban Engineering 3 TOTAL CAREER TRACK HOURS 12 Table 2: Engineering and Technology Track Course Title - Choose 4 courses Credit Hours Sample of Business courses Strategy and Sustainability 3 Legal, Ethical and Professional Environment of Business 3 Project Management
-subordinate relationships. Underlying this skill set are skills depicted below: Human resources Motivational Page 25.217.9 Conflict management Negotiation Ethics Change management Group dynamics InterpersonalSome of the skills defined as “leadership” may be more appropriately categorized as“management” skills. It is not the intent of this paper to debate or differentiate the definition ofleadership versus management, as others have long since discovered this as an effort in futilitygiven the current and continuing controversy11. It is more important in defining the body ofknowledge for technology
setting and academia settings. A recurring theme included participantswanting to see more rigor in academia to make sure that engineering graduate programs producehigher quality engineering Ph.D.s. What follows is a summary of their recommendations forinstitutions: Provide explicit ethics instruction Enforce high qualifying exam standards Develop a high quality graduate curriculum Emphasize rigor in both oral and written communication Avoid grade inflation at the undergraduate level Have students work on problems with breadth and depth Teach students to solve engineering problemsThese respondents also recommended that the government provide more resources for graduateeducation.DiscussionMany of the
department initiated an independent research propositioncourse for all first year PhD candidates. Student performance in this spring semesterthree unit course was treated as a graduate qualifier exam, and both students and facultyhave been supportive of this requirement, as summarized earlier1. Over the last decade, our first year approach to research education hasbroadened. Peter Kilpatrick added a one unit fall course, Introduction to Research, aprofessional development course including research ethics, presentations, andpublications. While these two courses were satisfying as stand-alone efforts, recentfaculty and graduate student sentiment pushed for an earlier engagement of student withresearch advisor, PhD committee, and research itself
skills with various types of tools and equipment.13 They tendto have better time management skills than younger students14, greater ethical awareness12, and ahigher work ethic and motivation level.12,13They do face certain challenges, though, due to their non-traditional pathways. They may havechallenges in finding the appropriate graduate program, navigating the admission process, andsecuring funding, since they have been out of the university environment and immersed in adifferent environment.2,15 Once these students are admitted, they may find that they need torefresh their knowledge of higher-level mathematics and learn new computer programs.9Furthermore, they may need to deal with personal and family responsibilities that youngerstudents do
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Providing sustainable scientific writing support for graduate engineering students by creating a local scientific learning communityNotesNote that the first two authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Also note that this studyreceived ethics approval from the ethics board of our institution to gather data from ourparticipants from voluntary, anonymous, online surveys.AbstractObjectives: Provide sustainable support to graduate students that are writing scientific texts,while breaking their sense of isolationGraduate students share the results of their scientific research mainly by writing and publishingscientific papers. To
existing knowledge, identifying and accessing appropriate resources and other sources of relevant information and critically analyzing and evaluating one’s own findings and those of others Master application of existing research methodologies, techniques, and technical skills Communicate in a style appropriate to the discipline7The University of Virginia cites the importance of many similar skills for their graduate studentsacross disciplines and to these lists adds the ability to deal with ambiguity, to reach and defendconclusions, ethics and integrity, leadership, seeing a project through from inception tocompletion, being self-motivated, and demonstrating strategic