school after decision to go to school hearing the graduate presentation school (Yes) SLCC 54 11 37 6 21% (F only) SLCC 87 28 42 17 32% (S only) SLCC 14 4 6 4 28% only Chemical Engineering (F,S) SLCC and 163 64 51 48 39% UoU (F,S,J,Sr)Table 1: Categories of and number of students surveyed and the results for each categoryKey: (F
convincing research gap in the introductory sections of the documents. Table 3shows the themes designated as Broader Impacts. These were determined by the NSF definitionof Broader Impacts, which was included in the Introduction, as well as open coding from theactivities that the participant described as contributing to the broader impact.Table 3: Broader Impacts Themes, Definitions, and Participant Examples Evaluation Criteria: Broader Impacts Theme Definition Example(s)K-12 Education Mention of outreach to “As I did as an undergrad during Engineering for Kids, I willand Outreach school-aged children, expose basic aspects of my
? What specific topics or information do you hope will be covered as part of the professional development activities during this summer research experience?The focus of the post-experience survey was to assess academic and developmental outcomesassociated with program participation, as well as students’ experiences. Many of the questionsfrom the pre-experience survey were repeated in the post-experience survey, which alloweddirect comparison of individual answers across the 10-week program. The post-survey alsoincluded a set of open ended questions: What part(s) of the summer program did you find most valuable or helpful? What part(s) of the summer program did you find least valuable or helpful? Please share any
crossed a threshold of 2.8 V) triggers ahardware interrupt which starts Clock, while a falling edge (indicating that available powerhas dropped below 2.4 V) triggers a second hardware interrupt to stop Clock. The Powermodule is configured to automatically send the system into LPM3 as soon as the systementers an idle state. This will happen while the system is waiting for the Battery OKhardware interrupt and in between Clock ticks. This idle, low-power state accounts forabout 98.6% of overall runtime. The Semaphore module provides an inter-thread signalingmechanism within the RTOS. In this project, a semaphore is posted every 2,000 Clockticks, or every 2 s. The semaphore unblocks the data collection/transmission loop insidethe main system Task
). Retrieved March 24, 2016, from http://catalog.mtsu.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=19&poid=5815&returnto=2677[2] Graduate Education: The Backbone of American Competitiveness and Innovation. (2007). In Council of Graduate Schools[3] Foroudastan, S. (2014). Engineering Management Creating Strong Partnerships between Future Graduates. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, American Society for Engineering Education, 1-10.[4] Foroudastan, S. (2015). Master of Science in Professional Science 2014-2015 Institutional Effectiveness Achievements Report. Middle Tennessee State University.[5] Foroudastan, S. (2015). Domestic Internationalization Developed Through Collegiate
real-world process orsystem over time." Furthermore, in designing new systems, a simulation experiment would helpdesigners run various scenarios to select the optimal alternative among the others. In some casesit may be possible to study the real system and to modify it to observe any change in the systemoutput(s), for example, examining the impact of increasing the number of automated check-inkiosks on reducing passengers’ waiting time in airports [2]. However, in some other situations, forinstance, in emergency rooms, it is not an appropriate approach to make changes in the system.Simulation courses have been part of the Industrial Engineering curriculum since the 90’s.Simulation courses have been offered in traditional Industrial
Austin BME graduate recruitment efforts.References1. Bell, S. M., Blumstein, J., Brose, K., Carroll, A., Chang, J., Charles, J., ... & Smith, R. (2014). Defining success in graduate school. Molecular biology of the cell, 25(13), 1942-1944.2. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 162.3. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Method or madness? Inside the USNWR college rankings. Working Papers, 42.4. Howell, L. L., Sorenson, C. D., & Jones, M. R. (2014). Are Undergraduate GPA and General GRE Percentiles Valid Predictors of
styles, and academic integrity.To build an effective supervisory relationship, first a workshop on Life as a graduate student isoffered. Students hear from senior graduate students on the challenges, opportunities, andsupport throughout grad studies. Additional topics of discussion include: 1) how to keep a happyand healthy life style, 2) where to get help? and 3) what are the opportunities for leadership orscholarship? The discussions are conducted in round table groups to provide an open format.The second workshop focuses on the supervisory relationship. This workshop is designed toteach students on their responsibilities as graduate students, and to give them a toolkit to build asuccessful relationship with their supervisor(s)/academic
hisor her research abilities. For example, while a student in Category 1’s reliance on authority andconcrete rules might be less sophisticated than a more self-directed, self-assured approachevident in Category 3, learning from experts in the field and developing a familiarity withfoundational knowledge and skills in engineering is a key step in being able to progress as anindependent engineering researcher. Though students’ responses at a particular point in time maybe best represented by one category, it is possible and likely that students’ level of researchprocess sophistication will change over time as a result of their experiences.Though our process for classifying graduate engineering students’ research processsophistication was an
for academics up for promotion. Many professors passalong papers they have been asked to review to their graduate students to give them practice inan activity that will become common in their professional careers.Peer review of oral presentations may be most prevalent in graduate TA training courses forstudents who are not native speakers of English. Van Ginkel et al.’s study of 52 publicationscovering the topic of oral presentations and peer assessment in higher education over a 20-yearperiod included none specifically on the graduate level in engineering.6 It thus appears that thepedagogy has not been widely disseminated to graduate-level engineering courses; work at theUniversidad de Málaga in Spain is a notable exception in the literature
Paper ID #16704Engineering Portfolios: Value, Use, and ExamplesDr. Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University Vincent Wilczynski is the Deputy Dean of the Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science and the James S. Tyler Director of the Yale Center for Engineering Innovation & Design. As the Deputy Dean, he helps plan and implement all academic initiatives at the School. In addition, he manages the School’s teaching and research resources and facilities. As the James S. Tyler Director of the Center for Engineer- ing Innovation & Design he leads the School’s efforts to promote collaboration, creativity, design and
provided for Spring Break for Research came from a grant throughthe Engineering Excellence Fund, a student-led organization in our College of Engineering andApplied Science. This fund is managed by a group of student leaders who receive funding througha portion of student fees. The BOLD Center also contributed funds to support the workshops, food,and other nominal program costs. For future years we have included a line item for the program inour next round of proposed funding through the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation.References[1] Figueroa, T., Hurtado, S. (2013). Underrepresented Racial and/or Ethnic Minority (URM) Graduate Students in STEM Disciplines: A Critical Approach to Understanding Graduate School Experiences and
uses 2 bands, and it applies the reactive handoff approach to each of the two channels independently. The rest of the assumptions are the same as in the notes. Comparing the duplexing (sharing the resources between access point and user terminals) mechanism of 802.11 and 802.22, what is/are the main difference(s)? i. Derive the expression for pm under this scenario. ii. Find the mean SU session time in this case.Laboratory experiments: One of the key assessments of this course were the virtual laboratoryexperiments spread throughout the semester. There were three such experiments based onsimulation of some real life application of the concepts being covered in the course. They weredeveloped using USRP software
effectiveness.Teaching practicum sessions provide TAs with the opportunity to demonstrate their teachingskills via short problem-solving sessions attended by the director for teaching assistantcertification and fellow first-time TAs. A standard evaluation form is used to rate the TA in thefollowing areas: statement of the problem and learning objective(s) discussion of relevant equations or overarching engineering concepts indication of common misconceptions or sticking points questions that are used to assess student understanding clarity and effectiveness of teaching verbal communication: pace, volume, and clarity graphical communication: clear handwriting/organized slides; diagramsAll evaluators are required to
MEASUREMENT # DATA TEAM # MEMBERS # TUBES LENGTH METHOD(S) POINTS REPORTED 1 4 Ruler 1 1 10.5 cm 2 4 Ruler 1 1 9 cm 7 4 Ruler 2 2 3.5 inches 10 4 Ruler 1 4 4 in 11 4 Ruler 1 2 10.2 cm 16 4
has occurred to document such reasonsthere are at least two significant studies that help inform program developers. The first was Scottet al.’s 2004 report30 investigating motivations of students in business, engineering and educationprofessional doctorate programs. More recently Wellington & Sikes31 addressed the sameresearch question. Notably, the latter researchers observed, as did Humphrey & McCarthy32 in1999, that doctoral students “no longer form a homogeneous population” (p.725). Among themotivations were: renewal, personal satisfactions e.g., overcoming challenges, becoming excep-tional, a differentiator from the MBAs, work demands, the flexibility of such programs, i.e., aperceived difference from what some perceived as
). Beyond scholarship: Recognizing the multiple roles of theprofessoriate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.4. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students inHigher Education: A Perilous Passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, Number 3. Jossey-BassHigher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, Publishers, Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1342.5. Bandura, A. (1991). Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior.Neurobiology of Learning, Emotion and Affect, 4, 229-270.6. Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Hagerty, B. M., & Orczyk, C. (1986). A conceptual framework for
student demands as well asleader roles in STEM graduate programs will be fundamental to understanding the specificfactors that foster the academic and professional development of underrepresented graduateSTEM students.Bibliography1. Folt z, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors That Contribute to the Persistence of MinorityStudents in STEM Fields. Planning For Higher Education, 42(4), 46-58.2. Ghosh-Dastidar, U. u., & Liou-Mark, J. j. (2014). Bridging Pathways through research and leadership forunderrepresented students in STEM. Mathematics & Co mputer Education, 48(3), 214-2263. Graham, E. (2013). The Experiences of Minority Doctoral Students at Elite Research Institutions. New DirectionsFor Higher Education, 2013
students in higher education: A perilous passage? Ashe-eric higher education report, volume 28, number 3. Jossey-bass higher and adult education series: ERIC, 2001.9 A. Suzuki, A. Amrein-Beardsley, and N. Perry, "A summer bridge program for underprepared first-year students: Confidence, community, and re-enrollment," Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, vol. 24, pp. 85-106, 2012.10 M. Walpole, H. Simmerman, C. Mack, J. Mills, M. Scales, and D. Albano, "Bridge to success: Insight into summer bridge program students' college transition," Journal of the first-year experience & students in transition, vol. 20, pp. 11-30, 2008.11 C. E. Hmelo-Silver and H. S. Barrows, "Goals and
our society is imperative. Inrecognition of this problem, the objective of this paper is to present the geothermal energy as oneof the clean and sustainable form of renewable energy that uses the heat stored in the Earth as itssource of energy. Its first commercial uses dates back to the early 1800’s and has continued togrow throughout the years. One of its most known and common uses is at a small scale as a heatsource for residences. It can also be used at a much larger scales. There are several questions thatcome up with large scale geothermal energy model. How much energy can be produced? Cangeothermal energy produce enough energy for a whole town, city, or country? What is the initialcost and lifelong cost of geothermal energy? Are there
., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.9 Weimer, D. J., Prieto, L. R., & Meyers, S. A. (2004). To train or not to train: That is the question. In W. Buskist, B. C. Beins, & V. W. Hevern (Eds.), Preparing for the new psychology professoriate: Helping graduate students become competent teachers, (pp. 2-9). Syracuse, NY: Society for the Teaching of Psychology.10 Heppner, M. J. (1994). An empirical investigation of the effects of a teaching practicum on prospective faculty. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 500-507.11 Girves, J.E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. The Journal of Higher
are paying the most attention to are academic integrity issues. The standards for plagiarism or collaboration on an assignment may be different in other countries. We have put a lot of emphasis on needing to educate this influx of international students that academic integrity is very important here.[26]Several studies conducted in the 1990’s pointed to academic dishonesty and cheating being onthe rise, but found that courses in ethics could reduce the students’ propensity to engage inunethical academic or business practices.[21] All of these solutions, which were focused onstudents, would probably not be able to be put in place by a single instructor or in one course, butrather need to be addressed, supported and
approximations of partial derivative, again are not limited to Bernnan and Leake enginemodel simulation. They are universal and must be dealt with whenever deriving linear models orcomparing transients run with the nonlinear and linear simulations. The technique and thesimulation algorithm is very useful in teaching undergraduate and graduate control systemscourses.References1. Norman S. Nise Control Systems Engineering, Sixth Edition, , Wiley publishing Company, Inc., 2011.2. Bernnan, T. C. and Leake, Simplified Simulation Models for Control Studies of Turbojet Engines, Technical Report No. EE-757, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 2007.3. Kuo, B. C., Automatic Control Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 2012.4