productassembly efficiency.Overview of Manufacturing Engineering Technology (MET) program at MSUMany Manufacturing Engineering Technology (MET) curricula include both product design andmanufacturing processes courses. These courses typically focus on different product realizationprocesses and manufacturing process analysis, which often involve a lot of design andmanufacturing issues and theoretical concepts. At Minnesota State University (MSU), Mankatomany design and manufacturing projects attempt to provide the students opportunities to practicetheir design for assembly knowledge and build their own product assembly. In recent years,about 30 students in our program involve our DFA project every year. All of the students aregiven foundational DFA
originalideas and analytical skills for the solution of concrete problems in the areas of manufacturingsystems, programming, logistics and others. As an attractive educational tool, roboticscontributes to the increase in students’ interest for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM) concepts.Through this Course, Curriculum and Lab Improvement (CCLI) grant project sponsored by theNational Science Foundation an updated Industrial Robotics and Automated Manufacturing(IRAM) Laboratory will be developed at Morgan State University. The IRAM Laboratory willprovide an improvement in the current facility and combine the integration of additional courseswith a hands-on laboratory approach into the Industrial engineering undergraduate curriculum.These
Department of Political Science and Public Administration at the University of Southern Indiana. Dr. Hallock Morris is currently the editor of the Indiana Journal of Political Science and is a member of the Executive Council of the Indiana Political Science Association. Her research interests include environmental policy, political behavior, women and politics, and pop culture and politics. Most recently, her research on the politics of hypoxia has appears in Politics and Policy and Social Science Quarterly. Page 15.88.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010A SERVICE LEARNING PROJECT: AN
enrollment in STEM areas has beendeclining; this is particularly true for minority and Appalachian students. This project workedwith two batches of twenty students each. Each batch was organized into four teams of fivestudents. All students were first provided instruction in logic circuits and ladder logic. Ladderlogic circuits for four tasks were created; a) simulation of automatic garage door, b) simulationof four way traffic light, 3) controlling a light via a physical switch, and 4) physical control offive lights. The five lights mimicked traffic lights (red, yellow, yellow left, green, and green left)at an intersection. The students were asked to control the timing sequence of the lights. Uponcompletion of the eight hour lecture/laboratory
. An excellent source ofreal life examples can be found at the Winter Simulation Conference1. The papers presented overthe past 10 years of the Winter Simulation Conference were analyzed for such examples to beused in courses such as Systems Modeling or Modeling and Simulation Languages.In addition, the projects described in each paper were analyzed for characteristics that would beuseful for use as potential student projects. These projects could also be used as the basis forengineering and technology students to become involved in health care DES research.One of the first characteristics analyzed was the ranking of the DES software products beingused. Figure 1 shows that across all sectors, business, healthcare, and government, Arena
engineering based on systems theory.We now discuss each of these meanings.1. INCOSE: According to INCOSE (International Council on Systems Engineering),13 “Systems Engineering is an interdisciplinary approach and a means to enable the realization of successful systems. It focuses on defining customer needs and required functionality early in the development cycle, documenting requirements, then proceeding with design synthesis and system validation while considering the complete problem.” Practitioners of system engineering in this meaning focus on one-time, large projects with a definite start and end, where a new system is to be designed and created to meet customer needs. Practitioners focus on industries such as information
courseshave become a common component of many undergraduate engineering programs. Severalstudies have examined the effectiveness of various types of introductory courses. Hoit et al.showed that the conversion of a lecture-based multidisciplinary introductory course to a Page 15.697.2laboratory-based course that engaged students in “hand-on” activities for each undergraduateengineering discipline resulted in significant improvements to retention in engineering1. Asimilar attempt to implement active learning through a freshman year course that focused on aninterdisciplinary design project was attempted by Courter et al. with no evidence of
additionaltopic for the Senior Design Project Class required to meet ABET criteria for accreditedengineering programs. It also suggests the sustainability categories that may best fit the FEtopics. Table 1. Mapping Core Engineering Topics to Sustainability ConceptsCore Engineering FE Exam Topic Relevant Sustainability CategoriesMathematics 1. Complex Systems & System DynamicsEngineering Probability and Statistics 1. Complex Systems & System DynamicsChemistry 2. Natural World Basics, 4. Chemicals and Materials 11. Chemicals & Materials for SustainabilityComputers
system constraints.In recent years, faculty at a number of universities have used hands-on approaches for teachinglean principles, particularly physical simulations, to give students an opportunity to practiceapplication and to engage them in actively learning lean topics1,5,8. In these activities, studentstypically simulate a process that is poorly structured and performs badly, then use specific leantactics to improve performance, often in multiple improvement rounds. Such simulations areeffective in providing opportunities for practice and decision-making, but are more controlled interms of content and time than projects done at company sites, for example2. When leansimulations are used, students’ abilities to apply lean ideas have improved
evaluating the achievement of learning outcomes prior tostudent graduation. Direct measures are those that assess achievement by observation ofperformance rather than by soliciting opinion about the achievement of a particular outcome. Astandardized exam is a good direct measure. Others might include a third party evaluation ofstudent projects or a manager’s assessment of work done on co-op/internship. A standardizedexam may be the most tempting for busy faculty trying to assess their program because it isfairly easy to administer, the results are naturally quantifiable, and the program can more or lessguarantee a consistent rate of response. Such an exam, however, should be evaluated using apsychometric evaluation to study reliability, validity
to better fathom the students’ levels of understanding of theconcepts.The satisfactory evaluation results and feedback from the students were encouraging to furtherenhance the learning of engineering statics and mechanics concepts by improving the design andcontent of the interface. Adding other parameters and more complex statics problems to theexisting interface can be done as a future project. The interface could be tested on a largersample of engineering students who are taking the relevant courses and who are more motivatedto participate in the study. Another possible relevant research project that can be conducted inthis field is comparing the effectiveness of the multimodal lab to physical labs in engineeringcourses. Indeed, labs in
Besides principles of good practice in multi-media design16,17, a number of importantcriteria were considered in the development of the review modules. Specifically,≠ Where appropriate, modules should consider a variety of learning styles≠ Review modules should primarily be focused at knowledge (Foundational) level on the Steps for Better Thinking model (see Figure 2).≠ Review modules should be relatively short and should provide opportunities for exploration of applications related to the topic.≠ Embedded online interactive exercises should be self-correcting.≠ Navigation through review modules should be student-controlled.≠ All materials developed should be suitable for incorporation with a classroom project or as a stand-alone review