engineeringeducation. However, students often engage with these languages in two distinct ways: some usethem primarily for numerical analysis and linear algebra, while others leverage them as full-fledged programming languages [1]. The former group tends to write scripts for specific problem-solving, whereas students with prior coding experience develop functions and broadercomputational solutions. 1Students proficient in programming quickly recognize the advantages of structured problem-solving, allowing them to tackle complex engineering challenges more effectively than those whoview MATLAB solely as a mathematical tool. Programming is fundamentally about
programs not only offer beneficial opportunities for students,but for the instructors who facilitate them. These programs vary in duration and destinations,allowing them to be adapted to specific courses or offer unique opportunities [1]. Recent studieshave shown that understanding instructors’ motivation and goals is vital for advancing study-abroad programs [2]. Similarly, according to [3], faculty must be globally competent to engageeffectively in the classroom. Various methods and frameworks have been studied in thesecircumstances [4], [5]. Research suggests that instructors that lead study abroad programsacquire new cultural learning, travel skills, pedagogical growth, and professional development[2]. International education programs are
abroad programs to provide more structured opportunities forexperiential learning, critical reflection, and actionable skill development. Emphasizing theapplication of ICC in engineering-specific contexts can better prepare students to navigatediverse teams and design solutions that address the needs of varied communities. These findingshighlight the potential for structured study abroad programs to equip engineering students withthe intercultural skills necessary for success in an increasingly globalized workforce, whereculturally sensitive problem-solving is crucial for addressing complex challenges.Keywords: Study abroad, engineering, STEM, reflection, intercultural competence 1. Background1.1 Intercultural Competence (ICC) in Higher
, Dr. Quan has a keen interest in employing active learning strategies and inductive teaching methodologies. His educational mission centers around enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills and self-learning abilities.Jing Wang ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Understanding Epistemic Beliefs of Chinese Students to Bridge the CulturalGaps in Teaching and LearningXinfeng Quan1, a), Jing Wang2, b), Xuan Li3, c), Xi He3, d), Chenhui Zhang4, e)1 Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China2 Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China3 School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China4 Independent
global crises(such as a pandemic or violent conflicts), financial limitations, or the need for more sustainablemethods of globally connecting.2. Background and MotivationGlobal Engineering Competency (GEC) has been defined as the attributes uniquely or especiallyrelevant for cross-national/cultural requirements in the engineering practice [1]. The globalnature of the engineering profession has led to a demand from industry for the development ofGEC in future generations of engineers [1] - [6]. Thus the development of GEC is an importantpart of the formation of engineers [7]. Our study acknowledges that GEC manifests bothinternally and externally in engineers. Internal manifestations center on the engineer’sperspective and worldview (mindset
other’scontexts developed not only technical skills but also valuable global competencies. This study isframed within the Transformative Learning Theory and considers the Washington Accord’s 11Graduate Attribute Profiles, including non-engineering competencies.1. BackgroundMezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory (TLT) (Mezirow, 2003) defined transformativelearning as the process whereby adult learners critically examine their beliefs, values, andassumptions in light of acquiring new knowledge and begin a process of personal and socialchange called reframing in “perspective” (Kumi–Yeboah & James, 2014). He also suggests thatgreater cultural or ethnic divergence fosters the development of global competencies. Problem-based Learning (PBL) is a very
promotion of sustainable economic development through strategicinnovation.Keywords: capability, index, transforming, engineering, education, semiconductor, chip.IntroductionIn the contemporary world, there is still a gap in economic development between different regions, whichis largely due to economies’ capacities to develop highly complex goods and services that allow them tocompete within global value chains [1], [2]. According to Hidalgo and Hausmann [3], one of the keyelements to achieving this productive complexity is Know-How, defined as the practical and theoreticalknowledge necessary to create and make complex goods and services available to the masses. Know-Howrefers not only to technical knowledge but also to the ability of an
the students’ major-specific educational requirements. Theglobalization/trade module is incorporated into an engineering economics course. Mechanical,civil, and electrical engineering students take the course – generally in their 3rd and 4th years. Thestudent body is almost entirely traditional-aged college students (18–22 year-olds) from theUnited States with little to no professional work experience. In general, their worldview is stillsomewhat limited, so specific attention to global engineering is necessary.I was inspired to develop this project by the modern classic “The World is Flat” by Thomas LFriedman [1]. After its publication, Friedman’s work generated much interest in engineeringeducation, inspiring entire conference sessions [2-4
State University. His research interests lie in exploring undergraduate and pre-college engineering student opportunities and experiences. ¨Mr. Michael M. Malschutzky, Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, University of Applied Sciences, Germany Michael M. Malsch¨utzky is a Research Associate at the Centre for Teaching Development and Innovation (ZIEL) as well as Affiliate Faculty at the Department of Management Sciences at Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, University of Applied Sciences (H-BRS), Germany. He received his Diplom-Ingenieur (FH) in Mechanical Engineering from H-BRS in 2005. After working as Test & Validation Engineer (TIER-1) and Program Management Engineer (OEM) in the automotive industry, he
enjoyable and productive collaborations and interactions withtheir international colleagues. In keeping with research on intercultural competency, the programwas designed to build intercultural awareness and skills, forge international personal andprofessional connections, and encourage thinking about the global energy landscape—with aspecial focus on Brazil and the U.S,Twenty-three graduate students (12 from the U.S. and 11 from Brazil) completed all GIGELprogram requirements in Summer 2022. The design of the program included: 1. asynchronouslearning of online modules on Brightspace (an online learning platform); 2. five LIVE Zoomsessions, and 3. readings and assignments on Country Navigator (an online intercultural learningprogram).We built the
equivalent course offered atthe U.S. campus as a baseline. Despite differences in education systems and culturalbackgrounds, results showed successful course deployment in China, with an average of 94% ofthe students achieving the expected learning outcomes. Project-based experiential learningcourses show great promise to impact students internationally.IntroductionAcademic programs designed to support increased collaboration with institutions abroad areproposed to assist in helping with advancing global education. These programs are designed indifferent formats, including faculty-led collaborations, institutional partnerships, branchcampuses, etc. [1, 2, 3, 4]. Among aforementioned formats, institutional partnerships are acollaborative effort
workshop were: 1) to introduce PI and POGIL-Like to engineering and science educators in India, specifically to University faculty members,2) help them identify sections of courses they teach at their Universities that could be taughtusing PI and POGIL-Like, and 3) assist them in developing classroom materials for bothpedagogies in their respective disciplines, that they could take back with them and implement intheir courses. There were a total of 22 participants in the workshop, who were faculty membersbelonging to various disciplines ranging from Computer Science to Metallurgical Engineering.We surveyed our participants before and after the workshop to gauge their initial understandingof active learning techniques (Pre-survey) and their comfort
virtual exchanges inbroadening access to internationalization opportunities among undergraduate and graduatestudents while fostering critical thinking, cross-cultural communication, and the ability to workcollaboratively across borders to address global challenges.1. INTRODUCTION The recent COVID-19 pandemic shed light on the important role that biomedical engineersplay in safeguarding the future of our planet. In fact, many of the challenges our world faces todayare global in nature and require global cooperation. As stated by Dr. John Anderson, President ofthe National Academy of Engineering, engineers play a major role in addressing the dominantglobal problems of our age [1]. The 2022 Biennial Report to the U.S. Congress on
narratives that undermine students’ potential and hinder their academicsuccess. This work-in-progress systematic literature review (SLR) examines how CulturallyRelevant Pedagogy (CRP) can empower international engineering students by addressing thesechallenges, challenging deficit perspectives, and promoting inclusivity. The review aims toanswer two primary questions: (1) How does CRP support and empower international students inengineering education? and (2) What gaps remain in the current literature regarding CRP’simplementation and impact? Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, an initial search identified1,002 records, which were systematically narrowed to 37 relevant studies focused on CRP ininternational higher education contexts. Qualitative
, sustainable materials, and resilientinfrastructure. Recognizing the importance of fostering SL among engineering students tobuilding a sustainable future, this study aims to: (1) measure the current level of sustainabilityknowledge among undergraduate and graduate engineering students at a higher educationinstitution in Colombia, and (2) compare these scores against benchmarks at the university,national, and global levels.This comparative analysis will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of currentsustainability education efforts and inform future curriculum development. Furthermore, thisresearch will contribute to a broader understanding of how engineering education can be betteraligned with the urgent need for sustainable solutions. A
promoting innovative practices that define the future of higher education in theregion.Keywords: Thematic, Engineering, Education, Trends, ConferencesIntroductionEducation is an essential pillar of social progress as it drives economic development and fosterssocial equity. It has been widely demonstrated that high-quality higher education fosters thedevelopment of critical and well-informed citizens who are capable of making sound decisionsand contributing significantly to the creation of a better society. In this context, the increasingcomplexity of new high-tech solutions and innovations is generating a demand from employersfor new ways of thinking and skill sets [1]. In addition to the above, and considering the potentialchanges in technology
(SDGs) [1]. Yet traditional engineering education often prioritizestechnical rigor over creative problem-solving, leaving graduates underprepared for open-ended,real-world challenges [2,3]. Studies reveal a troubling trend: senior engineering students generatefewer innovative solutions than first-year peers, signaling a decline in creative capacity as educationprogresses [4,5]. Industry leaders increasingly stress that engineers must complement technicalskills with creative agility to address unstructured problems [6].Creativity is particularly pertinent to engineering design and problem-solving as it enablesengineers to rethink problems, question assumptions, and explore unconventional solutions. Inengineering, creative thinking goes beyond
hosting global design workshops. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 One Week in Cape Town Clinics: Reflections from an Undergraduate Engineering Experiential Learning TripBackgroundLow-resource, Global Engineering Design Experiences for Engineers: Undergraduateengineering curriculums in the United States aim to equip graduates with a variety of technicaland nontechnical skills. These often include an awareness of global issues and an ability todefine and design within project-specific constraints. Often, the regimented curriculum of anengineering degree does not include the flexibility to include these as a degree requirement [1].In the case of global engineering education, its
sustainability into engineeringeducation. A new course is recommended to prepare engineering students for the globalized field,covering cultural, ethical, and practical aspects of global engineering.IntroductionGlobal education serves as a formidable catalyst in shaping the trajectory of a sustainable futurefor our planet. This report meticulously examines the multifaceted ways in which global educationinitiatives play an instrumental role in cultivating environmental consciousness, instilling socialresponsibility, and fostering cultural awareness. The narrative underscores the harmoniousintersections between these initiatives and two foundational frameworks: The United NationsSustainable Development Goals (SDGs – Appendix 1) and the Grand Challenges
University of Porto to deepen his expertise in innovative and resilient structures. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Co-Designing Humanitarian Service-Learning Activities: Lessons from Semi-Rural Amazon Communities David Coronado1, Miguel Andrés Guerra2*1 Graduate Researcher, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Programa de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2 Associate Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Programa de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador
Paper ID #46180Cultivating Global Leadership in Engineering: Insights from a Gateway CourseDr. Patrick Tunno, Dr. Patrick Tunno is the Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse global initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international students to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad programs
, university, Hyperledger Fabric, educationIntroductionDigitization was the major driver of this change. It also affects universities in their role as teaching andresearch organizations. Universities are using new technologies to change their processes. For example,they are developing simulated learning environments through virtual reality, 360° video archives, andmassive open online courses (MOOCs) that support students' ability to learn independently of time andplace [1], [2]. Universities also play an important role in the official recognition of these activities,achievements of students and teachers, and issuance of official documents and their evolution in thedigital age.The advancement of technology has brought about a transformation in various
workforce development strategies andfindings can be shared and leveraged. Collaborative inquiry is a process in which individualscome together to identify common challenges, analyze relevant data, and develop potentialinterventions for testing. Each workshop focused on a discussion of two themes: 1) broadeningaccess and participation in engineering pathways and 2) experiential learning in engineeringeducation. Each workshop was advertised broadly to all engineering faculty, student supportstaff, engineering administrators, and centers for teaching and learning. A total of 20 individualscame to the workshop at UCL, which was held in June 2024, and 19 individuals came to theworkshop at Cornell, which was held in August 2024. Each workshop was guided
accreditation requirements for major engineering designexperience. The paper will also share data from the surveys of students and faculty mentors fromboth countries and recommendations for such collaboration in the future.IntroductionIn recent years, international collaborations in engineering education have become increasinglycommon, as they offer opportunities for cross-cultural exchange and global problem-solving.Several studies have emphasized the significance of such collaborations, highlighting the benefitsof diverse perspectives in tackling complex engineering challenges [1]. These partnerships oftenpromote cultural competency, teamwork across borders, and a broader understanding of globalengineering practices [1]. However, they are also
, and Bahrain have achieved significant milestones over thepast three decades by investing in infrastructure and STEM education, attracting manypetrochemical companies to seek joint ventures in these places [1]. Attracting the cominggeneration to pursue academic education in engineering and science has been one of the primarypillars of the "Vision 2030" in these countries, and the responsible government offices havesignificantly invested in building state-of-the-art facilities to attract Western academicinstitutions to seek joint ventures by establishing branch campuses in these countries ([2]-[6]).One of the smaller monarchies in the Persian Gulf, became one of the early adopters of thiseducation philosophy by establishing an academic entity
course participants return home, theinstructors adapted by continuing the course online. This transition allowed Nicewonger to gaininsights into how the participatory methods used in the course evolved in response to thelearning constraints imposed by the pandemic. Several debriefing meetings facilitated broaderdiscussions between Nicewonger and Hagy and Östlund about engineering and design education,as well as curricular challenges of teaching participatory design practices remotely.Consequently, Hagy and Östlund contributed valuable pedagogical reflections and curricularcontext based on their experiences as educators in the program being analyzed in this paper.Theoretically, this paper is inspired by ontological debates about design [1], [2
Structure, Student Experience, Academic/Faculty Roles, Cultural norms, Engineeringglobalization.Introduction and ContextEngineering provides solutions crucial to human well-being and societal growth. Despiteremarkable advancements, engineers continuously learn from past failures, emphasizing the needfor education that extends beyond technical expertise. The Hatfield rail crash in 2000 exemplifiesthe devastating consequences of engineering management and execution errors [1]. Similarly, the2019 Keystone Dam incident highlights the importance of a broader understanding ofenvironmental factors in engineering decisions [2].As Vyas [3] stated, engineering disasters often result from a complex interplay of design flaws,underestimations, and insufficient
local events or weather thatare beyond one’s control. Risk mitigation requires feasible and practical action plans in unexpectedsituations, and trip leaders will communicate the expectations and common risk factors to the students sothat they will behave responsibly.As NAFSA summarized in [1], risks may arise to impact a participant’s physical or mental health,personal or financial safety, privacy, security, as well as interactions among participants and/or with theirfamilies remotely during the trip. Adapting to the local culture and lifestyle is vital of an effective actionplan, instead of demanding that the same solution that would have worked in the home country shouldwork in the host country. In general, risks do not outweigh the benefits
in the United States is expected to yield benefits to society, justifying theinvestment of public funds. Finkelstein et al. [1] describe this as a “unique American tradition[of] service and engagement with the greater society.” The scholarship of engagement in Boyer’smodel [2] aligns with this mission. Community engagement can take a variety of forms,including integration into classroom teaching (e.g., service-learning), mentoring co-curricularactivities (e.g., learning through service), outreach (often into K-12 schools and via publicinformation), and research. Community engaged research (CER) is defined as “the collaborativegeneration, refinement, conservation, and exchange of reciprocally beneficial and societallyrelevant knowledge that
for Student Leaders in Academic MakerspacesAbstractThis practice paper discusses the design, implementation, and outcomes of an overseas team-building program organized by the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing (HKU Innovation Wing) at theUniversity of Hong Kong. Established in December 2020, the center has actively supported Student-Initiated Interest Groups (SIGs) focused on technology exploration and development amongundergraduate students [1]. In the 2023-2024 academic year, the center had expanded toaccommodate 22 active SIGs with over 300 student participants, fostering an interdisciplinary,project-based, hands-on learning culture within the University of Hong Kong.Despite the growth of SIGs, several issues have surfaced. Primarily, silos