engineeringsolutions, aligned with the SDGs and NAE Grand Challenges, contribute to sustainability. Thereport also underscores the importance of cultivating global citizenship through education, whichUNESCO identifies as crucial for achieving sustainable development goals.Addressing the urgent need for a strategic approach to globalize education without additionalresources, the report emphasizes leveraging creativity and the growing diversity of the studentbody. It details how increased international student enrollment in the U.S. enriches educationalenvironments and supports global citizenship.Furthermore, the report discusses the essential values for future engineers, including empathy,ethics, and cultural awareness, proposing strategies for integrating
the ability to work in or lead diverse teams. Ethical considerations arisingfrom cultural differences, understanding these differences in product design and engineeringtasks, and recognizing the interconnectedness of the global economy are also crucial. It alsoincludes exposure to international supply chain management, intellectual property, liability,business practices, and practical global experience. Finally, it encourages viewing oneself as aglobal citizen and appreciating worldwide challenges.I worried that our students hardly understood globalization or oversimplified it into ‘good’ or‘bad.’ I was sure they generally do not appreciate the profession’s role. Engineering is usingtechnology to solve problems, and engineering students often
, 2014). 1. Engineering Knowledge 2. Problem Analysis 3. Design and Development of Solutions 4. Investigation 5. Tool Usage 6. The Engineer and the World 7. Ethics 8. Individual and Collaborative Teamwork 9. Communication 10. Project Management and Finance 11. Lifelong Learning 5This PBL program is also referring to the global competence as a 21st century imperatives(National Education Association (NEA), 2010) for nurturing mindset of global citizen.It is easily expected that the major learning outcomes of this 3DDA workshop are related toEngineering Knowledge, Problem Analysis, Investigation, and Tool Usage. The question is howand how much extent other attributes could be acquired
curriculum at Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan, through thelens of the Sheffield Graduate Attributes framework—a global model assessing innovationcompetencies across technical, social, and cultural dimensions. Technical attributes focus onapplying theoretical knowledge, social attributes on teamwork and communication, and culturalattributes on ethical responsibility and global problem-solving.Analysis of nine core courses reveals a pronounced emphasis on technical skills, with 78% oflearning outcomes tied to computational tools and structured problem-solving. Courses like“Mechanical Design with CAD” and “Multiphase Systems” exemplify this trend, equippingstudents to execute predefined solutions but offering few opportunities for open-ended, real
technical proficiency; the objective is the implementation of sustainabledesigned solutions [6], [7]. However, community participation is important. The success of theproject is determined by the community’s engagement with the project and availability. There isthe need for a deep understanding of the community, its social and cultural contexts to developtrust and proper communication to achieve the desired collaboration and partnership.Complementary to the community understanding, students and faculty advisors develop aframework with high ethical standards and professionalism, which may not be applied in everycommunity [6], [8], [9]. To provide context, and a sense of purpose and clarity, students andfaculty advisors have to understand economic
transformation and artificial intelligence 3. Enhancing Undergraduate Education and 5. Enabling regional initiatives in entrepreneurship Curriculum Improvement and innovation 4. Ethics and Society in Engineering Education 6. Entrepreneurship and innovation to overcome the 5. Government, Industry, and University economic and financial crisis 6. Management of Engineering Education 7. Equal rights, opportunities and spaces for women in 7. Online and Remote Laboratories Latin America and the Caribbean in the 8. Recruitment and Retention in Engineering professional field 9. Technology for
individualistic norms they associate with the United States. Public infrastructure, particularly the transitsystem, was praised for its accessibility, reliability, and environmental integration, prompting several students to reflect onthe limitations of comparable systems in the U.S. Cultural observations often centered on social restraint, rule adherence,and expectations around personal conduct in public spaces, which challenged students’ assumptions about Germanformality and perceived aloofness.Sustainability emerged as a deeply embedded societal ethic, with students noting that practices such as energyconservation, water purity, recycling, and walkability were not framed as special efforts, but as integral parts of everydaylife. This led many to
. Totackle them, it is essential to incorporate diverse perspectives that reflect themultifaceted nature of the world. Different cultural contexts provide the foundation fortailoring global problems into localized solutions that are both practical and sustainable.Additionally, varied life experiences bring unique insights, enriching the understandingof ethical and social challenges within engineering, thereby fostering morecomprehensive and impactful approaches to problem-solving.Diversity is an absolute necessity for the industry, as it drives innovation, fosterscreativity, and enhances problem-solving by bringing together a wide range ofperspectives and experiences (Direito et al., 2021; Leever, 2020; Jones et al., 2020).Engineering solutions
complex global challenges. ABET [8] has incorporated global competencyinto its student outcomes, encouraging curricula that foster global awareness, cross-culturalcollaboration, and ethical leadership. European initiatives similarly emphasize inclusivity, genderequity, and democratic principles, while programs such as the European Green Deal [9] and theErasmus+ framework [10] actively support sustainability and cross-border collaboration ineducation. Additionally, initiatives like the Grand Challenge Scholars Program [11] andEngineers Without Borders [12] promote experiential learning opportunities, encouragingstudents to address pressing global issues through innovative and community-centered solutions.These efforts collectively highlight a
Paper ID #45818Coming to America and Helping Communities: Stories from Women in AcademiaDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Education Program. She conducts research related to engineering ethics, sustainability, social responsibility, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and a licensed P.E. in Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering
. Instructors must balance the educational objectives of their programs withthe needs of the communities they serve while also considering equity issues when distributingresponsibilities among diverse student design teams. Interestingly, the instructors involved in thisresearch project have long been concerned about the ethical considerations surrounding thesustainability of course projects.In the early 2000s, instructors received external funding to establish a joint course collaborationwith a local university in Kenya. However, once the funding ended, it became impossible tosustain the partnership. In 2020, just before the pandemic began, a new partnership was formedwithout funding in order to explore ways to integrate students from a Kenyan
. Third YearFor their third, and final phase, the VESA team plans to expand on the work they have alreadydone by collecting data on how VESA technologies have assisted the pilot study abroad programs.According to the VESA proposal, the group is going to “prioritize the use of this technology tofacilitate the establishment of lasting, ethical community relationships that will allow our studentsto contribute to community well-being year after year”, as per their third-year proposal. Due to thesuccessful nature of the VESA group in the past, the team hopes this final phase will benefitstudents learning by expanding access to intercultural learning, supporting ethical service learning,allowing faculty to gather media for advertisement purposes, and
, safety,and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.” StudentOutcome 4 requires “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” Attainment ofthese two outcomes were usually included and assessed as part of our ME curriculum in variouscourses. One advantage gained by our students working in the six collaborative capstone projectsis that that they experienced these attributes first hand and are better prepared to enter thepractice of engineering after graduation. Further, these students are prepared to work for multi
knowledge. They serve as stark reminders of the evolvingroles and responsibilities of engineers. Modern engineering demands a multifaceted skillsetencompassing safety protocols, public policy, business acumen, sustainability, and ethics,emphasizing the crucial role of trust placed in engineers by society.Recognizing the dynamic nature of society and the accelerating pace of technological change, theNational Academy of Engineering (NAE) emphasized the need for adaptation in engineeringeducation and practice to effectively address future challenges [4].Looking Abroad While Viewing WithinThis paper examines the engineering education systems in the UK and the US, two globallyrespected frameworks attracting international students and scholars. While
these skills, they have yet tofully adopt or integrate them into their professional practice. In addition, the lack of specific,actionable plans for skill acquisition reflects a gap between awareness and action. While studentsacknowledged the need for continuous improvement in ICC, they did not consistently providedetailed strategies for how they would develop these competencies further. This is particularlyimportant in engineering, where the ability to engage effectively with diverse perspectives isessential for designing solutions that are culturally relevant and ethically sound.Providing students with more guidance on creating actionable development plans could helpbridge this gap and ensure that they are well-prepared to apply ICC skills in
their responses, ensuring ethical data collectionpractices. This study is particularly timely given the increasing global focus on sustainability andthe urgent need to equip future engineers with the necessary knowledge and skills to addresscomplex environmental and social challenges.The instrumentSulitest is a globally accessible online platform designed for the enhancement and evaluation ofSustainability Literacy (SL). Sulitest assesses sustainability knowledge among engineeringstudents at the undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral levels. Prior studies have determined theinstrument’s reliability, yielding a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.79 [13], a value considered acceptablefor demonstrating internal consistency in social research [14]. The
in prominence. funding grants. Accreditation ABET accreditation focuses on defined UK accreditation bodies (e.g., student outcomes, including teamwork, Engineering Council, IET, IChemE) communication, and problem-solving. emphasize evidence-based assessment of Programs must demonstrate continuous learning outcomes covering technical, improvement. practical and professional skills. Professional Skills Communication, leadership, ethics, and Integrated Engineering Program at UCL for Engineers focus entrepreneurship all emphasized across focuses on project
, and representatives from universities, research centers, civilsociety, and the private sector met to formulate a declaration and action plan to build consensus aroundpolicies, projects, and other solutions focused on governance, regulatory, and institutional frameworks forthe safe, trustworthy, and ethical development of AI in the Americas.Using the results of the commissioned foresight study, LACCEI identified its initial area of focus assemiconductor and chip materials, design, and manufacturing, considering it strategic for security andeconomy in the Americas. In 2022, the United States enacted the CHIPS and Science Act [22], with $280billion in funding to support domestic research, manufacturing, and workforce development in this