opportunities for outreach or did not find a right match with theorganizations that provided such opportunities; (2) outreach was considered insignificantcompared to their coursework. There was a general attitude that outreach was not “technicalenough” for engineers and the benefits of community service were not apparent enough tostudents; (3) it was hard to train mentors that were capable of teaching science and engineeringconcepts to a younger audience.We believe that community service builds strong, empathetic leaders. With this in mind, wetackled this design problem like engineers would and specified the user needs of students likeourselves, our k-12 mentees, and the university—our primary stakeholders. After manybrainstorming sessions, we
. Page 24.493.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Camp: a residential experience designed to build academic capital in pre-college studentsAbstractEngineering Camp is a one-week on-campus residential program that exposes pre-college (post7th -11th grade) students to engineering disciplines through introductory seminars,demonstrations, laboratory experiments, and design challenges. The program improves students‟awareness of the breadth of engineering and emphasizes the benefit of developing skills inSTEM. The camp is offered in grade-based parallel sessions geared to the audience, and camperscan return in subsequent summers. Importantly, Camp provides a
following term.Page 13.510.13To help support the ongoing partnership between fellows and teachers, the College seeksongoing funding from a variety of sources, including various corporate and private foundationsand the NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) Program. Managed byNSF's Division of Graduate Education (DGE), GK-12 provides funding to graduate students inscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines to acquire additionalskills that will broadly prepare them for professional and scientific careers in the 21st century.NSF developed the GK-12 program recognizing that, in addition to being competent researchers,STEM graduate students must be able to communicate science and research to a variety
masculinity ideology had higherodds of engineering aspirations. On the other hand, both boys and girls who haveinternalized more conventional femininity ideology regarding objectification of thefemale body were less likely to report engineering aspirations. Although this findingfluctuated in significance as we moved through the model building, the direction iscontrary to previous analyses completed with the first wave of study15. This discrepancypoints to the need for additional investigation; with our upcoming third and final wave ofdata collection we will be able to test for developmental changes in gender ideology thatcould explain differences using longitudinal methods21 which would increase the powerto detect associations. It may also be that as
Educational Experiences with Ways of Knowing Engineering (AWAKEN): How People Learn” project. She is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Engineering Professional Development and Wendt Commons: Teaching and Learning Services. Her area of research is engineering education including assessment of student learning. She taught technical communication courses to undergraduate engineering students and currently consults with faculty and teaching assistants. She earned her Ph.D. in educational administration at UW-Madison.Mitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the
Recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in STEM education continues tobe a national challenge. Accordingly, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required awardrecipients within the NSF’s Division of Engineering Education to create pipeline opportunitiesfor underrepresented students to enter university STEM programs. Outreach through EngineeringResearch Centers (ERCs) is one such effort. This paper describes a mixed methods researchendeavor that addresses this engineering challenge and one engineering research center’sresponse to recruiting underrepresented groups into biomedical engineering using two broadlydefined pipeline efforts: (1) teachers in K-12 via a Research Experience for Teachers programand (2) undergraduate students via
project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Liz developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and undergraduate engineering and education teams as well as a popu- lar Family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Current projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching and program consulting for K-8 integrated STEM using engineering schools in several states and serving as a Professional Development partner for the Engineering is Elementary program. She is also a Co-PI on two NSF DR-K-12 grants focused on practice and research in K-8 engineering education and the chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee on K-12
Paper ID #11774Impacts of a Neural Engineering Summer Research Experience on High SchoolStudents (Evaluation)Kristen M Clapper Bergsman, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Pre-College Education Manager at the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington. She is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington. Previously, Kristen worked as an educational consultant offering support in curriculum development and production. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and
Paper ID #12561Tensions in the Productivity in Design Task Tinkering - FundamentalMs. Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park Gina Quan is a doctoral candidate in Physics Education Research at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. She graduated in 2012 with a B.A. in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests include understanding community and identity formation, unpacking students’ re- lationships to design, and cultivating institutional change. Ms. Quan is also a founding member of the Access Network, a research-practice community dedicated to fostering supportive
-assessment. The implications of these two studies are that gradesand test scores in math and science must be better explained to students. This strategy iscompletely within educators’ power to implement once they are aware of the need.7. Re-evaluate Group Work PracticesWhile group work has often been encouraged as an exercise to build teamwork andcommunication skills, recent research indicates that there may be subtle, unintendedconsequences which may be cause to reconsider the way group work is approached in theclassroom.One study on interpersonal communication with a focus on gender and engineers versus non-engineers found that “engineering males were more likely than other groups to draw negativeconclusions about speakers who engaged in self
extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, and pre-service and in service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and Project Direc- tor of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and undergraduate engineering and education teams, as well as a popular family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching, and program consulting for multiple elementary en- gineering schools in several states, serving as a regional professional development partner for the Museum of Science, Boston’s
Paper ID #11491Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program: Findingson student behavior (RTP, Strand 3)Todd France, University of Colorado, Boulder Todd France is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is part of the Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education Program and helps teach and develop curriculum at a high school STEM academy. His research focuses on pre-engineering education and project-based learning. Page 26.1266.1 c American Society for
something to Design idea å gather info å alternative solutions 6 do with the idea, then design, then å best solution å design and implement. build, test repeat?DYF Teacher Institute Participants Likely to Incorporate More Engineering CurriculumTwo of the DYF teaching institute objectives revolve around creating a community of teachers Page 14.705.13interested in using engineering approaches: • Develop awareness of existing engineering secondary school curriculum, K-12 engineering education research (see www.teachengineering.com). • Develop a community of teachers interested in pursuing
a senior Manufacturing Systems Engineering course.29Although not measured, the authors mention several benefits for undergraduate studentsparticipating in the program, including the development of project management experience,experience with fabrication and prototyping, and proposal writing. The course also served as ameans of building connections between the university and the high school, and as a means ofrecruiting students for the engineering program at the university. The university also planned todevelop a freshman level introduction to robotics course that would be made available to highschool students through an agreement between the two institutions.In addition to mentoring FIRST Robotics Competition teams at local high schools
Engineering Plus, as well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the University’s CU Teach Engineering program. Additionally, she manages and mentors graduate and undergraduate engineering fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s NSF-funded TEAMS initiative, is faculty advisor for the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library. Dr. Zarske’s primary research interests are on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Ms. Madison J. Gallipo, University of Colorado Boulder Madison Gallipo is an
) Funding for the GC DELI project was provided by artificial heart valve, one of the a NSF Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM biomedical engineering hands‐on projects developed for the workshop. (TUES) grant and the high school adaptation of the curriculum is funded by the Intel Foundation.CHiMES (Community Helpers in Math, Engineering and Science) for EPICS High is a programdesigned to connect industry mentors with high school engineering students engaged incommunity
messaging (or lack of it); in others, theyare given significant, almost negligent autonomy in making post-secondary education and careerchoices, because no one is expecting them to be a primary breadwinner anyway.They just may not be that into engineering and science, and with females, engagement is moreeffective and lasting if they are interested31. Finally, regardless of abilities, spatial or otherwise,or interest, engineering careers seem to be more negatively perceived with respect to work-lifebalance and community, and the benefits may not be perceived valuable enough to overcome thenegatives2.Removing female de-motivators for STEM fieldsMadison Avenue will probably never change their gender-focused marketing approach because itsells, but
, like science festivals, robotics competitions, and fairs that encourage young people to create, build, and invent - to be makers of things.”Working with middle school science teachers, education advocates, community partnersinterested in STEM, and university STEM student organizations, an intervention, Girl’s Day Out,was developed by Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific (SSC Pacific or SPAWARSystems Center Pacific) in San Diego, California – one of the research, development, andscience/engineering support arms of the U.S. Navy. The intervention was created to inspire andencourage middle school girls to pursue STEM subjects in high school as a possible pathway to aSTEM career, and to inform parents of the opportunities
. Page 11.1128.10‚ Interestingly, we have seen some students take HSI, then ESP, declare electrical or computer engineering, and then help teach both courses as student assistants.‚ Two students attending ESP had previously attended HSI. They asked for permission to work a different, challenging laboratory project rather than the laboratory exercises they had previously completed in HSI. There assignment was to build a 24 hour clock using information provided in laboratory 7 as a guide. With no assistance from the instructor they were able to successfully complete the design task.‚ Paul Crips, a middle school educator, attended Thinking and Doing Mathematics workshop and then adapted some of the coursework for his use in
school that has educated students since 1988 in aresidential setting. In 2013, Accelerate, South Carolina’s Engineering Launchpad, began in apilot phase, offering blended online coursework with instruction delivered using live video-conferencing technology to exceptional students from across the state. Conceived as a means todraw future engineering talent from across the state, Accelerate was created to attract andprepare the next generation of creative, articulate, and agile engineers. An integrated set ofcollege and honors courses that delivers superior science, engineering, and mathematicsinstruction along with valuable communication skills through dedicated English coursesdistinguishes Accelerate from other engineering courses offered in
advice of Schunn, modeling the engineering design cycle forchildren is an essential component for their true understanding of the concepts of engineering.5All TEAMS Club activities follow a pattern for design-based student engagement: identify theproblem, brainstorm ideas, design solutions, build a prototype device, test the device, reflect,redesign/improve the device. The value of engineering design being practiced by the volunteersand modeled for the elementary students leaves a lasting impression on both groups in terms ofengineering interest and problem-solving development.14,15This research aimed to discover the impact of the University of Colorado Boulder’s afterschoolK-12 engineering education initiative through exploring the following
AC 2012-3989: PK-12 COUNSELORS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, ANDBEHAVIORS RELATED TO GENDER AND STEMMs. Meagan C. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineer turned engineering education enthusiast, Meagan Ross is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. She received a B.S. in computer science from Texas Woman’s University and a M.S. in electrical engineering from Texas Tech University. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, she worked as a microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) engineer for Texas Instruments. Ross is currently a K-12 STEM consultant, curriculum developer, professional development