introduction of the Next Generation Science Standards. Although reports onthe results of most RET programs appear to be positive in terms of teacher satisfaction, gainingresearch skills and improved content knowledge about engineering, few programs have reportedon the use of any systematic process to guide teachers in the development of their instructionalmodules or lesson plans, and most programs appear to lack follow-up and\or reports ofclassroom implementation from the lessons.Our University has completed one three-year RET program in the area of pharmaceuticalengineering and has begun a second. Each participating teacher has been able to enrich his or herown knowledge-base as a STEM education professional as an active member of a research
Paper ID #14160Transportation System Based Summer Academy for Teachers (RTP, Strand4)Dr. Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Shashi Nambisan is a Professor of Civil Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UT). Since 1989, he has led efforts on more than 165 research, education, and outreach projects that have addressed local, statewide, regional and national issues in transportation and infrastructure systems management related to policy, planning, operations, safety, and risk analysis. He has authored or co-authored more than 125 peer reviewed journal and conference publications. Along
-making does take place during engineering designexperiences in culturally and linguistically diverse urban classrooms, and we present two studentgroup case studies to support that argument. We discuss implications of this work for elementaryengineering instructional design, pedagogy, and educational research.IntroductionIn its Framework for K-12 Science Education, the National Research Council writes, “Engineers,too, make decisions based on evidence that a given design will work; they rarely rely on trial anderror” (NRC, 2012, p. 62). For engineers to plan feasible solutions and revise solutions they havealready tested, they need to engage in reflective decision-making that takes into accountinformation about design options. This intentional
Apple. Active in promoting public understanding of science and engineering for over 35 years, he was the lead Editor of the popular book Family Science (1999) and a Co-Author of the recently published Family Engineering: An Activity & Event Planning Guide (2011). DHA provides the STEM education and science center fields with Research & Evaluation, Strategic Planning, and Materials Development and Implementation services. David Heil is a sought after national and international presenter on STEM education, is a past Director of Informal Science Education for the National Science Teachers Association, and served 2 years on the ASEE K-12 & Pre-College Division Board of Directors.Mr. Derek W Rector, Diamax
are elementary or middle schoolscience or STEM teachers, and the content areas for the units were either earth science orphysical science. The teachers in this study represented eight different schools within two urbandistricts with high diversity in the Midwestern region of the U.S. Teacher grade levels rangedfrom 4th grade to 7th grade.Data Sources & Analysis. The data used for this study consisted of written curriculardocuments generated by the teachers for the four units. These documents included lesson plans,worksheets, rubrics, and other supplemental artifacts such as PowerPoint slides and readings.Content analysis methods were used to examine the documents. This analytical method wasselected because it is a systematic way of
, homes, and businesses, unless the students can create a diversion plan to keep the water out ofsensitive areas and routed around the town. Students are able to dig trenches and make mounds within thesimulation. During class, students take their first attempts at saving Rivertown, testing ideas andredesigning their diversion plan within the computational model. After becoming familiar with the scenario,and brainstorming ideas, students complete the project at home. They must create a diversion plan, makethe digs and mounds, raise the river to the appropriate flooding level, and see how well their diversion planworked. They must then go back and do a redesign, attempting to keep the sensitive parts of Rivertowncompletely dry, using the fewest
ideas Select a solution Build the device Test and evaluate the device Present/share your device 4. ReflectionFor resources that include the lesson plans with instructor notes and student secret agent packetscontact:Katheryn KennedyStevens Institute of Technology, CIESE, Castle Point on Hudson,Hoboken, New Jersey 07030 Katheryn.Kennedy@stevens.edu Page 26.1359.2
competitions. Some students enter the course with a portfolio in hand. The teacherserves as resource and mentor, as the students present weekly plans and progress for a grade.This year a third course is being piloted called Engineering Technology. Designed primarily for9th grade students, the course focuses on engineering design, project management and hands ontechnical skills, which allows them to advance to the Intro to Engineering course with a richerpreparation. Evaluation will include the effectiveness of the course, the program’s impact on thestudents, and an assessment of the student work.IntroductionThe quest to design a new engineering program, deciding where to start, establishing the runningthemes for a whole new course, or set of courses
. Page 26.1459.5 Table 3. Statistical analysis comparing current cohort’s current (pre) and intended (post) frequency of STEM classroom practices Question Survey N Mean Std. Dev. P-value How often do you use (or plan to use) Pre 20 3.80 1.322 0.673 teacher-led lectures or discussion Post 16 3.63 1.088 How often do you use (or plan to use) Pre 20 2.00 0.918 0.033* student-led class discussions or Post 16 2.81 1.276 presentations How often do you have (or plan to Pre 20 4.25 0.911 0.865 have) students
Generation Science Standards1 (NGSS) and an all-out push by President Obama andthe Department of Education seek to reform science education by introducing engineeringcontent and practices into Kindergarten through 12th-grade instruction. Science teachers acrossthe grades are tasked with including engineering in their science curricula creating the need forresearch on NGSS execution and roadblocks. This qualitative study stemmed from anexperienced high school physics teacher’s unexpected change in co-planned engineeringinstruction during a math and science enrichment camp. In an attempt to understand Evan’s*actions, this study examined the origins of and tensions within Evan’s engineering educationepistemology (EEE). My main research questions were
engineering curricula -Test engineering curricula -Use the Explore-Create-Share model to structure -Familiarize with engineering/design software curriculum planning -Share best practices in STEM education -Recieve support from teacher mentorsteachers with the opportunity to learn about engineering concepts informed by classroom andindustry practices, test curriculum materials, collaborate with industry and education experts,familiarize with engineering and product development software, and share best practices inSTEM education. The second phase is the Authoring Phase. This phase focuses on training
engaging in serious reflection on how to use the knowledge of student misconceptions inphysics was needed to guide transformation of the content in planning for instruction18. Baumertet al.19 attempted to answer questions such as: what kind of subject matter knowledge do teachersneed to be well prepared for their instructional tasks and to what degree does their mastery of thecontent influence their instructional repertoire? In agreement with other studies, a positive effectof teacher PCK on students’ learning gains mediated by the provision of cognitive activation andindividual learning support was shown19. Another important tentative conclusion drawn fromthat study was that teacher education programs that compromise on subject matter training do
and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu. Page 26.1040.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Investigating the Impact of an Outreach Activity on High School Students’ Attitudes toward STEM DisciplinesIntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is a growing interest inthe United States. A recent five-year strategic plan published by the National ScienceTechnology Council’s Committee on STEM Education clearly outlines STEM education as anational priority, defining STEM jobs as “the jobs of the future” 1. The
event, werecritical to its design and implementation. A one-credit, pass/fail course withapproximately 40 students from a wide variety of majors focused on the design andconstruction of the musical instruments. Students in this class were also required todevelop lesson plans for the small group sessions. Students in a senior-level ElectricalEngineering audio technology course developed, together with the faculty member, aseries of demonstrations for the museum-like portion of the event.There is currently a growing interest in K-12 programs that integrate STEM educationwith the Arts, commonly known by the acronym STEAM.1, 2, 6, 9, 10 Even as the nationadvocates for advances in K-12 STEM education to spur greater employment andeconomic
the teachers’ education is important for teaching structure andcontent. Bjurulf also mentions that classroom and group size affects the choice of content. Allteachers in the Bjurulf study performed design and make tasks, but it was found that the taskswere handled in very different ways and that reflection for a deeper understanding by thestudents was lacking in some cases.Blomdahl13 shows that teachers’ lack of knowledge about pupils’ preconceptions can causeproblems in planning and implementation classroom activities. Not knowing the pastexperiences of students has been found to be an uncertainty factor.Mattson14 discusses how teachers, student teachers, and pupils view technology. Her workshows that teachers need subject competence to give
Classrooms (Curriculum Exchange)AuthorsNicholas Stambach, Graduate Student Manager, nstambac@mines.eduBarbara Moskal, Director, bmoskal@mines.eduProgram Websitehttp://trefny.mines.edu/Program SummaryThe lesson plan that is proposed for presentation here wascreated as part of a larger, kindergarten through twelfth grade(K-12) outreach program. A unique feature of this program is theinclusion of all grade-levels, K-12, within a given district.Additionally, this program is modeled after a National ScienceFoundation GK-12 program, which was originally funded overten years ago. The lesson presented here targets grades 5 through8. Teachers who participate in this program attend a two-weeksummer workshop which is taught by
projectbooklet. Page 26.727.7Figure 4 Engineering Activity RubricCATEGORY 4 3 2 1 ScoreConstruction Project plan and Project plan is neat Project plan is not Project plan andManagement: structure is neat and and orderly, but the neat and orderly, but structure are notDesign orderly. structure is not. the structure is. neat and orderly.Construction Building is complete Building is Building is Building isManagement: and per architectural
engineering design process and that theworkshops empowered them and their students to tackle projects previously perceived asbeyond their skill level. Insufficient preparation for troubleshooting hardware andsoftware issues was listed as the greatest barrier to fully realizing the technology’spotential in the classroom. Also highlighted was a lack of resources for development ofmeaningful lesson plans using this nascent technology.IntroductionDuring the summers of 2013 and 2014 four workshops were held for high school scienceand technology teachers. The workshop participants built and commissioned their ownRepRap 3D printers in order to take them back to their schools to use in classrooms.Workshops were intended to provide the tools and basic
heating to create a design plan and develop a materials budget for their passive solar house. (NGSS 4- PS3-4, 3-5-ETS1-2; CCSS 4.MD.A.3, 4.MD.A.2, SL.4.1)• Make a Prototype: Teams use their design plans to build their models. (NGSS 4-PS3-4; CCSS SL.4.1)• Test the Prototype: Teams conduct fair tests to determine if their models meet the criteria of the problem. Students calculate the total open area on each side of the house and roof. Teams prepare and present their findings. The class then compares their designs to determine the relationship between the team designs that were most successful and the features of those designs. (NGSS 4-PS3-4, 3-5-ETS1-3; CCSS SL.4.1)• Reflect and Redesign: Teams
-based public discussion and inform publicpolicy.1The SRN model incorporates public stakeholders into the research throughout the project forresearch activities, rather than peripherally for broader impacts goals. Hence, the tasks ofeducation, outreach and outcomes assessment assume a larger role than in some NSF projectsand are envisioned to work closely with researchers to foster relationships with stakeholders thatbenefit both research and broader impacts goals.Outreach in STEM fieldsThe National Science Foundation emphasizes education and outreach activities in its science andengineering awards through its required broader impacts section in all submitted researchproposals. Funded researchers are required to make a plan for sharing results
the three-time National Championship SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team and is a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Den Braven joined SCGSSM in early 2014 as the director of the GSSM residential engineering program and Accelerate, the new virtual engineering program for gifted high-school students in the state.Dr. Elaine R. Parshall, SC Governors School of Science and Mathematics Elaine R. Parshall is the Academic Coordinator for Accelerate, a blended online high-school engineering program offered to students grades 10-12 around the state. Her current responsibilities include course integration, planning summer camps and Saturday experiences, working with faculty, and general trouble- shooting for this new program. Formerly, she
major with a high level of one-on-one advising. However, a high degree of flexibility also contributes. In the LSE program,iterative revision and recreation of an individualized curriculum and career plan are understoodas signs of success rather than failure or deviation. Students are encouraged to understand anddesign their major as a “whole-person technical degree” that does not require them to pass, toassimilate, to compartmentalize, or to conform to stereotypes. We suggest that this holisticflexibility may disrupt barriers such as impostor syndrome by positioning the student not asimpostor but as designer and creator – even when enrolled in technical courses in which thesex/gender ratio is skewed male. Lessons learned from “liberal studies
problem solving and design exercises. Students also learn about teamwork and leadership through group activities. • Future Engineers. This eight-‐day program has been structured exclusively for high performing students in grades 10 and 11 and is intended to promote engineering as discipline of choice as those students begin thinking about plans for university studies. In addition to hands-‐on engineering design activities and team projects, including computer aided design and 3D printing, participants are introduced to engineering disciplines along with advanced math and sciences, and
does not intervene duringthe assembly process. Another practical example of an adjustment made occurs in the lectureconcerning computer programming. The various computer programming concepts includingvariables, functions, and structures are presented as an analogy to parts of speech like nouns,verbs, and punctuation. The analogy grounds the computer programming concepts into adiscipline (language arts) that high school students have more familiarity. The instructormaterials were also revised to provide more background information concerning the lessons andmore detailed lesson plans. A daily lesson plan was developed for the high school versionincluding a minute-to-minute timeline of the day. A significant difference in a high school course
change, disruptive/transformative innovation, development studies, strategic planning, and public policy. Mahmoud has authored/co-authored 50+ peer-reviewed published papers in well-reputed international conferences and journals, in addition to 25+ institutional/curricular frameworks and internal reports. Mahmoud has attained a number of research funding grants from the UK, Malaysia, and Qatar, and won a number of awards and scholarships during his studies and professional career. After finishing his Doctorate, Mahmoud worked as a researcher at Loughborough University, UK. In Fall 2011, he moved to Qatar University (QU), Qatar, as a faculty member with the Dean’s Office, College of Engineering. In Fall 2012, Mahmoud
in the hopes of making better use of my credentials. Teaching was the natural choice as I am passionate about providing rigorous science instruction to high Page 26.731.1 school students. I currently am in my third year of teaching at Cleveland High School in Seattle, WA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Exploring Neural Engineering with a Teacher-Authored Science Curriculum (Curriculum Exchange)Contact Information—Pre-college Education Manager, Kristen Bergsman, bergsman@uw.eduWebsite: www.csne-erc.org/content/lesson-plans
theemphasis from a discipline-based focus to crosscutting concepts that connect many disciplines.These crosscutting concepts, such as systems and system models, promote a deeperunderstanding of science and engineering concepts. Traditional education programs often do notprepare teachers to build these connections between science and engineering concepts. Theobjective of this study was to determine if formal interactions with engineering students tofacilitate afterschool science clubs would provide a means for pre-service teachers to learn howto make these connections in their instructional practices.In this study, undergraduate elementary education and biological systems engineering studentsworked together to plan and facilitate afterschool science
available across the state of Utah in the 2014 FallSemester. Again, data was collected from these courses and used to improve it in the nextphase.2.4 Summary of the Research HistoryThe TICE grant has provided the state of Utah the opportunity to reach the Governor HerbertEducational Plan, ‘On Pace to 66% by 2020’2. The objectives of this research helps fulfill thefirst three steps of the PACE plan: 1. Reach young students. 2. Provide STEM related curriculum to small rural schools (providing access to all students). 3. Help students complete a degree by receiving concurrent high school and college credit.On a much larger scale, the contribution of this research could not only help preserve theexisting engineering and technology
technology, followed bymath, and then science. No respondents indicated the highest level of interest in engineering.Many school systems and states include “math” and “science”. Most elementary school teachersdo not have engineering training6 so often when teachers hear “engineering” they think thesubject involves more than they are capable of teaching and is therefore out of their comfort zoneand abilities. As noted in the conclusions, efforts will be made by the planning to committee toaddress this perception.Approximately half of the teachers were interested in pursuing a Math or Science endorsement ifthere were local opportunities. The percentage of teachers willing to pursue professionalopportunities increases to 58% when a stipend was
STEM • Treasure Hunt • Design your own • Sort materials by • Testing materials • Create toy Integration modeling activity “standard” physical properties • Planning organizers Activities • Describe objects in • Initial design • Test terms of these • Redesign properties Lesson 1 – This lesson