-structured problem;students define the problem and identify the skills necessary for its solution; students build theirknowledge base both independently and cooperatively, and repeat the cycle until they havearrived at an acceptable solution. In both engineering design and other PBL processes, solutionsare non-unique and context-specific. And in both contexts, having students begin with the socio-technical concept of technology helps foster a more durable and culturally astute set ofconsiderations when those students perform the iterative process. We see this as corroboratingDym et al.’s labeling of PBL as the “most-favored” pedagogical model for teaching engineeringdesign, citing its potential for positive impact on retention rates, student
Page 22.1104.12Society, S. Jasanoff, et al., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.4. Wisnioski, Matthew. "'Liberal education has failed': Reading like an engineer in 1960s America." Technology andCulture 50 (4), 2009, pp. 753-782.5, Azarin, Samira, Nicola Ferrier, Stephen M. Kennedy, Daniel Klingenberg, Kristyn Masters, Katherine D.McMahon, Jeffrey Russell and Susan C. Hagness. "Work in Progress: A First-Year introduction-to-engineeringcourse on society's engineering grand challenges." 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008,Saratoga Springs, NY.6. Aronowitz, Scott. "Duke and NC State Launch Joint Program to Stimulate K-12 STEM interest" CampusTechnology. March 55, 2010. Available at: http://campustechnology.com
college students,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 75, pp. 249- 284, May/June 2004.[2] E. Warburton, R. Bugarin, and A. Nunez, “Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and post- secondary success of first-generation students,” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. NCES Report 2001-153, 2001.[3] S. Spencer, C. Steele, and D. Quinn, “Stereotype threat and women's math performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4-28, Jan. 1999.[4] N. Fitzallen and R. Natalie, “Outcomes for Engineering Students Delivering a STEM Education and Outreach Programme,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 632–643, Nov. 2017.[5] R. Tillinghast
day” for this question.” Respondents who chose something other than “almost every day” for thisresponse were coded as having failed the attention filter.7 The project is supported by funding from the National Science Foundation: “Collaborative Research: A Study ofInteractional, Organizational and Professional Mechanisms of Disadvantage in the Underrepresented andMarginalized STEM Workforce” (#HRD 1535385, 1665117). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.A question in both the ASEE-DIS and SIS surveys asked respondents whether they had any ofthe following (they could mark all that apply): “vison
/. 1019. Somerville, M.H., Goldberg, D. E., Kerns, S. E. & Korte, R. (2010, October). A war of words: Using sticky language to effect change in engineering education. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE: T3B-1-T38-2.20. Turley, J. (1981, August). Mobilization manpower: A credible force or an empty promise? Military Review, 2012.21. U.S. Continental Army Command. (1973, April 5). CONARC soft skills training conference. Proceedings of a conference conducted at the Air Defense School, 12-13 December 1972.22. Wang, X., Bendle, N.T., Mai, F. & Cotte, J. (2015). The Journal of Consumer Research at 40: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 5-18.23. Whitmore, P.C. (1972, December). What are soft
continuum of rhetorical awareness,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 242–263, 2008.3. N. Artemeva, “Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers,” in Genre in a Changing World, C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo, Eds. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse, 2009.4. R. Bercich, S. Summers, P. Cornwell, and J. Mayhew, “Technical Communication Across the ME Curriculum at Rose-Hulman,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June.5. J. Meyer and R. Land, Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge, 2012.6. H. Estrem, “Threshold concepts and student learning outcomes,” in Naming what we know
Ambassadors Network: Progress in Year 3 on Creating a National Network of Ambassadors. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference (New Orleans: American Society of Engineering Education).11. Steve Blank and Bob Dorf (20120. The Start-Up Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company (K & S Ranch Inc.), pp. 53-188.12. Nancy Duarte (2008). Slide:ology. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.13. Garr Reynolds (2008). Presentation Zen. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.14. Steven Kosslyn (2007). Clear and to the Point: 8 Psychology Principles for Compelling PowerPoint Presentations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.15. Richard E. Mayer (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge.16. National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the
] [reference redacted for anonymity][6] "Twitter MAU Worldwide," stastica.com, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/. [Accessed24 January 2018].[7] Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, & Cornelius Puschmann, “Twitterand Society: An Introduction,” Peter Lang, New York, 2014, 29-41.[8] L. Moran, "Twitter Reveals 2017's Most Popular Tweets, and Donald Trump's Ego MayShatter," 2018. [Online]. Available: (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/twitter-2017-tweets-of-year-trump-obama_us_5a268bf1e4b0f9f0203f2369. [Accessed 21 January 2017].
Conference. June 2015. 10. Bilimoria, D. and A. Stewart. (2009). “‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: The Academic Climate for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Faculty in Science and Engineering.” NSWA Journal. 21 (2): 85-103.11. Patridge, E. V, R. Barthelemy, and S. R. Rankin. (2014). “Factors Impacting the Academic Climate for LGBTQ STEM Faculty.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 20(1):75-98.12. Cech, E. A. (2013). “The Veiling of Queerness: Depoliticization and the Experiences of LGBT Engineers.” Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) National Conference. June 2013.13. Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. (2004) A Decade of System Justification Theory
. Shawn S. Jordan, Odesma Onika Dalrymple, Nielsen L. Pereira, and Yacob Astatke, “Design Swapping as a Method to Improve Design Documentation”, American Society for Engineering Education, AC 2012- 4045 15. William R. Graff, Paul R. Leiffer, Matthew G. Green, and Joel Koblich, “Thirty Years of Rube Goldberg Projects: a Student-Driven Learning Laboratory for Innovation”, American Society for Engineering Education, AC 2011-792
fun to attend a PK style presentation than a traditional one.Student’s commentsThe survey included a section with open-ended questions. This section was optional for thestudents. Here are some of the comments: 1. Please write any issues encountered using the PechaKucha style. ⋅ “No issues, just more preparation.” ⋅ “The biggest issue was trying to decide what info was most important to put in the presentation.” ⋅ “Keeping time with the 20 s slides.” ⋅ “I don’t believe PK style works well for groups.” ⋅ “I thought PK was really cool.” 2. Was it helpful for you? How? ⋅ “Yes. It really forces you to really know the material since you have no bullets, just images. It made me
contemplative activities into the Page 22.1582.7course, a socio-cultural theory offered by Cole and Engstrom22 shall be used as the theoreticalframework for the study. Vygotsky conceived socio-cultural theory23 in the early 1920’s. Itemphasizes the central role of social relationships and culturally constructed artifacts inorganizing thinking. It attempts to theorize and provide methodological tools for investigatinghigher cognitive processes by which social, cultural and historical factors shape humanfunctioning. Cole and Engstrom’s model provides several dimensions along which one can studythe classroom as an activity system. They identify factors
. Krishnamurthi, M. Enhancing Student-Teacher Interaction in Internet-Based Courses. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 5. Paterson, K. Student Perceptions of Internet-Based Learning Tools in Environmental Engineering Page 22.642.9 Education. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 295-304, July 1999.6. Starrett, S. A Beginner’s Approach to Teaching with the Internet. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. Wallace, D., Mutooni, P. A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom
. Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula,courses, and support systems,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 325-328.3. Russell, J. S., & Stouffer, W. B. (2005). Survey of national civil engineering curriculum. Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131, 118-128.4. Sack, R., Bras, R. L., Daniel, D. E., & Hendrickson, C. (1999). Reinventing civil engineering education.ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, session 13d3.5. Jensen, J. N. (2003). A case study approach to engineering courses. ASEE Conference Proceedings, session 2653.6. Schlosser, P., Parke, M., & Merrill, J. (2008). Decision-making in the design
. She is the PI of an NSF S-STEM grant and helps to direct the un- dergraduate research program at SAU. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Ilheus, Bahia, Brazil every-other-year.Prof. Hank Yochum, Sweet Briar College Hank Yochum is the Director of the Margaret Jones Wyllie ’45 Engineering Program and Professor of Physics and Engineering at Sweet Briar College. Sweet Briar is one of two women’s colleges in the United States with an ABET accredited engineering degree. He earned his BS in Physics from the College of Charleston and PhD in Physics from Wake Forest University. Prior to joining Sweet Briar, he was a Member of Technical Staff at OFS Specialty Photonics in the Optical Amplifier
Multidisciplinary, Client-Based Pedagogy.” Journal ofTechnical Communication, Volume 2, Issue 1 (2001): 129-48.5. Ford, J.D. and L.A. Riley. “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula,Courses, and Support Systems.” Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 92, Issue 4 (October 2003): 325-28.6. Anderson, J.L., S. Chenoweth, R. DeVasher, R. House, J. Livingston, M. Minster, C. Taylor, A. Watt, and J.M.Williams. “Communicating Sustainability: Sustainability and Communication in the Engineering, Science, andTechnical Communication Classrooms7. Berndt, A. “Exploring Sociotechnical Contexts in a Global Engineering Course.” IEEE InternationalProfessional Communication Conference 2013.8. Berndt, A. and C. Paterson. “Complementing
. As the people who will fill theranks of engineering workers (and managers) in the future, our best hope for underminingexisting cultural structures of inequality such as depoliticization is to not socialize our studentsinto them in the first place.References1. Cech, Erin A. and Tom J. Waidzunas. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering: The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students.” Engineering Studies 3(1): 1-24.2. Faulkner, Wendy. 2000. "Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering." Social Studies of Science 30:759-92.3. McIlwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.4
in the next section.Table 2: This table shows the activities throughout the module and the week they occur within a15 week semester. Lectures show the week they occur and assignments include the week they areassigned and due. It also describes the learning outcomes for each activity. Activities are listed inchronological order. Learning Outcome(s) (in parentheses are the associated Activity Week Occurred ABET Student Outcomes) Personal and - Describe and reflect on current state and desired future Professional Assign: Week 1 states as a person, student, and professional. (SO7) Interests & Due: Week 2
theirorganizations, Ibarra 12 used the term “provisional selves” to talk about the experimental phasesof identity formation as one adjusts to new expectations and sometimes even new organizationalcultures. He witnessed several forms of experimentation that advancing professionals use,including imitation, efforts to remain true to one’s self and ideals, and use of internal andexternal feedback mechanisms to evaluate their developing “provisional selves.” Ibarra definedthese strategies as “the degree of congruence between what one feels and what onecommunicate[s] in public behavior about one’s character or competence”12 (p.778). With itsfocus on personal-professional identity alignment, this autoethnography employs the secondform of experimentation, “true-to
what type of intervention(s) you would recommend.Our preliminary findings indicate a strong grounding in collaboration for all teams andindividuals; strong evidence of empathy among some (but not all) teams and individuals; andvarying degrees of learning that integrates the humanities and engineering. We summarize ourfindings below.Collaboration: All teams and individuals appeared to be engaged. Individuals seemed to haveroughly equal contributions in terms of time on task and specific contributions. All teamsdemonstrated appropriate teamwork. People listened to each other, responded to each otherappropriately, and seemed to value others’ contributions. There was little or no domination byany single person or pair of persons, no
ordered to follow stacking guidelines established by the engineeringdepartment.However, despite their detailed efforts to shape how forklift operators use the warehouse andforklift technology to maximize efficiency and profit, Supply Chain Management Company hadbeen experiencing problems with how the operators build the pallets. At one meeting, theengineering leadership debuted a new voice activated software program that would give verbalcommands to the forklift operator as s/he completed tasks. This was particularly designed tosolve the problems of pallet composition. As one engineer explained, simply providing operatorswith a list of products to be placed on each pallet had left them with too much control, and theoperators had begun to assemble
. Informal language: contractions (I’ve), wording (a lot) or starting a sentence with and or butThe language of engineering writing is more formal than other types of writing such as fiction. For thatreason, using contractions or beginning a sentence with a conjunction is too informal for most engineeringdocuments.References1. R. House, A. Watt, and J. Williams (2007, June), “Assessing The Impact of Pen Based Computing on Students’ Peer Review Strategies Using the Peer Review Comment Inventory,” 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2052.2. C. Nicometo, K. Anderson, T. Nathans-Kelly, S. Courter, and T. McGlamery (2010, June), “More Than Just Engineers―How Engineers Define and Value Communication
delivery reflect a slightly higher mean, the difference isstatistically insignificant. After some discussion, we arrived at some possible reasons why thisoccurred.Design presentations have been in place in ECE since 1978, when it was first implemented insenior design. In the mid 1990’s the practice was integrated into sophomore and senior design.Because the practice has been in place in all three courses for almost 20 years, it has becomeinstitutionalized as a disciplinary genre in oral communication. Student familiarity with theexpectations of the presentation—the team approach and the prescribed time limit of 20minutes—may explain the minimal difference between project and control students’performances. In addition, when we examine all of the
an Ecology of Knowledge: On Discipline, Context, and History,”No Other Gods. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.[14] S. Star (ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.[15] A. Akera, Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers, and Computers during theRise of the U.S. Cold War Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.[16] J. Hagen, An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press,1992.[17] A. Slaton and A. Pawley, “The Power and Politics of Engineering Education ResearchDesign: Saving the ‘Small N’,” Engineering Studies, 10:2-3, 133-157, 2018.[18] T. Boellstorff, B. Nardi, C. Pearce, T.L. Taylor
creative response, encouragingfaculty and administrators to focus on experiences of students, staff, and others in moreprecarious positions in the academy. Convening both virtually and in person to document,process, and share both our analysis and our feelings, in the hopes of building relationship,networks, and a stronger movement toward engineering that embraces diversity, inclusion,justice, and liberation.References[1] S. Quiles-Ramos, E. K. Foster, D. M. Riley, and J. Karlin, (2019, June), InfrastructureSinkholes: The Pretense of Operating Gender Neutral Organizations Erodes EngineeringEducation Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.https://peer.asee.org/32964[2] L. M. Frehill, (2011). Moving beyond